PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Rick Gurnsey

Publications and source records attributed to Rick Gurnsey.

10 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2005

Effects of local and global factors in the Pinna illusion.

The Pinna illusion (Pinna & Brelstaff, 2000) consists of two concentric rings of micropatterns that appear to counter-rotate when the observer moves towards the stimulus. There have been several reports that the illusion is stronger when the retinal expansion is produced by observer self-motion than when produced on a computer screen without observer self-motion. In fact, we found that the illusion is as strong (or stronger) when the retinal expansion is produced on a computer screen without observer self-motion. In a second series of experiments the strength of the Pinna illusion was inferred from the amount of physical counter-rotation required to null it. The strength of the illusion is relatively unaffected by changes to the global structure of the display but minor changes to the micropatterns comprised in the display can effectively eliminate the illusion. We provide a simple model of optical flow that is in very good agreement with many of the results reported.

Female↗
PubMed2005

Non-monotonic changes in performance with eccentricity modeled by multiple eccentricity-dependent limitations.

Eccentricity-dependent resolution losses are sometimes compensated for in psychophysical experiments by magnifying (scaling) stimuli at each eccentricity. The use of either pre-selected scaling factors or unscaled stimuli sometimes leads to non-monotonic changes in performance as a function of eccentricity. We argue that such non-monotonic changes arise when performance is limited by more than one type of constraint at each eccentricity. Building on current methods developed to investigate peripheral perception [e.g., Watson, A. B. (1987). Estimation of local spatial scale. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 4 (8), 1579-1582; Poirier, F. J. A. M., & Gurnsey, R. (2002). Two eccentricity dependent limitations on subjective contour discrimination. Vision Research, 42, 227-238; Strasburger, H., Rentschler, I., & Harvey Jr., L. O. (1994). Cortical magnification theory fails to predict visual recognition. European Journal of Neuroscience, 6, 1583-1588], we show how measured scaling can deviate from a linear function of eccentricity in a grating acuity task [Thibos, L. N., Still, D. L., & Bradley, A. (1996). Characterization of spatial aliasing and contrast sensitivity in peripheral vision. Vision Research, 36(2), 249-258]. This framework can also explain the central performance drop [Kehrer, L. (1989). Central performance drop on perceptual segregation tasks. Spatial Vision, 4, 45-62] and a case of "reverse scaling" of the integration window in symmetry [Tyler, C. W. (1999). Human symmetry detection exhibits reverse eccentricity scaling. Visual Neuroscience, 16, 919-922]. These cases of non-monotonic performance are shown to be consistent with multiple sources of resolution loss, each of which increases linearly with eccentricity. We conclude that most eccentricity research, including "oddities", can be explained by multiple-scaling theory as extended here, where the receptive field properties of all underlying mechanisms in a task increase in size with eccentricity, but not necessarily at the same rate.

Contrast Sensitivity↗
PubMed2005

Detection of symmetry and anti-symmetry.

To assess the role of second-order channels in symmetry perception we measured the effects of check size, spatial frequency content, eccentricity and grey scale range on the detection of symmetrical and anti-symmetrical patterns. Thresholds for symmetrical stimuli were only moderately affected by these manipulations. Anti-symmetrical stimuli composed of large black and white checks elicited low thresholds. However, anti-symmetry became essentially undetectable at small check sizes. Removing low frequencies from large-check-size, anti-symmetrical stimuli had little effect on thresholds whereas removing high frequencies had a pronounced effect. Moving the stimuli from fixation to 8 degrees eccentricity caused a dramatic increase in thresholds for anti-symmetrical stimuli but not symmetrical stimuli. When the grey scale range was increased anti-symmetry was undetectable at any check size whereas symmetry was easily seen at all. We argue that these results and others in the literature suggest that anti-symmetry is only detected under conditions favourable to selective attention.

Analysis of Variance↗
PubMed2005

Orientation discrimination across the visual field: size estimates near contrast threshold.

Performance in detection and discrimination tasks can often be made equal across the visual field through appropriate stimulus scaling. The parameter E2 is used to characterize the rate at which stimulus dimensions (e.g., size or contrast) must increase in order to achieve foveal levels of performance. We calculated both size and contrast E2 values for orientation discrimination using a spatial scaling procedure that involves measuring combination size and contrast thresholds for stimuli with constant size-to-contrast ratios. E2 values for size scaling were 5.77 degrees and 5.92 degrees. These values are three to four times larger than those recovered previously using similar stimuli at contrasts well above detection threshold (Sally & Gurnsey, 2003). E2 values for contrast scaling were 324.2 degrees and 44.3 degrees, indicating that for large stimuli little contrast scaling (.3% to 2.3% increase) was required in order to equate performance in the fovea and the largest eccentricity (10 degrees). A similar pattern of results was found using a spatial scaling method that involves measuring contrast thresholds for target identification as a function of size across eccentricities. We conclude that the size scaling for orientation discrimination at near-threshold stimulus contrasts is much larger than that required at suprathreshold contrasts. This may arise, at least in part, from contrast-dependent changes in mechanisms that subserve task performance.

Differential Threshold↗
PubMed2004

Backward masking and the central performance drop.

Kehrer [Spatial Vision 2 (1987) 247] found that texture discrimination performance sometimes peaks in the parafovea rather than at the fovea, and he referred to this phenomenon as the central performance drop (CPD). Kehrer used a backward mask to limit performance and Morikawa [Vision Res. 40 (2000) 3517] argued that in some cases the temporal aspects of the backward mask may be critical to the emergence of the CPD. In one experiment Morikawa showed that the CPD does not emerge when a simultaneous noise-mask (different from the mask used by Kehrer) is used to limit performance. In another experiment Morikawa showed that unmasked texture displays comprising short lines do not elicit the CPD. In both cases, changes in the temporal aspects of the texture displays were accompanied by changes in the spatial structure of the mask or stimulus. For the spatio-temporal theory of the CPD to be sustained one would have to show that noise masks elicit a CPD when used as backward masks and that the short-line textures elicit a CPD when followed by backward masks. Our evidence provides little if any support for either of these predictions. Furthermore, an analysis of a simple filter-rectify-filter model of texture segmentation shows that a greatly attenuated CPD is to be expected when a noise mask is used as a source of spatial noise.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Orientation discrimination across the visual field: matching perceived contrast near threshold.

Performance can often be made equal across the visual field by scaling peripherally presented stimuli according to F=1+E/E2 where E2 is the eccentricity at which stimulus size must double to maintain foveal performance levels. Previous studies suggest that E2 for orientation discrimination is in the range of 1.5 degrees -2 degrees when stimuli are presented at contrasts well above detection threshold. Recent psychophysical and physiological evidence suggests spatial reorganization of receptive fields at near-threshold contrasts. Such contrast-dependent changes in receptive field structure might alter the amount of size scaling necessary to equate task performance across the visual field. To examine this question we measured orientation discrimination thresholds for a range of stimulus sizes and eccentricities (0 degrees -15 degrees ). We used the same procedure previously employed except that stimuli were presented at near-threshold contrasts. We controlled for the effects of perceptual contrast on thresholds through a matching procedure. A standard line of 3 degrees in length presented at fixation was set to 2 just noticeable differences above detection threshold. The perceived contrast of all other stimuli was adjusted by the subject to match this one. Orientation discrimination thresholds were then obtained at these matching contrasts for all stimulus sizes and eccentricities. E2 values of 3.42 degrees and 3.50 degrees were recovered for two subjects; these values were about a factor of two larger than E2 values previously found for this task when stimuli were presented at higher physical contrasts.

Contrast Sensitivity↗
PubMed2003

Orientation discrimination in foveal and extra-foveal vision: effects of stimulus bandwidth and contrast.

The parameter E2 is used in many spatial scaling studies to characterize the rate at which stimulus size must increase with eccentricity to achieve foveal levels of performance in detection and discrimination tasks. We examined whether the E2 for an orientation discrimination task was dependent on the spatial frequency bandwidth of the stimulus used. Two methods were employed. In Experiments 1 and 2 stimuli were presented at a fixed high level of contrast across viewing conditions. In both experiments the E2s recovered for narrowband stimuli were larger than those recovered for broadband stimuli. In Experiment 3 we controlled for the potentially confounding effects of perceptual contrast by measuring orientation thresholds over a range of stimulus contrast levels. Only thresholds which had reached an asymptotic level, such that increases in stimulus contrast led to no further changes to thresholds, were included in the calculation of E2. We observed that E2s recovered in the latter condition were in the range of 1.29 degrees -1.83 degrees and similar for narrowband and broadband stimuli. We conclude that a failure to consider the role of perceptual contrast may result in inflated estimates of E2.

Contrast Sensitivity↗
PubMed2003

Backward masking is not required to elicit the central performance drop.

In some circumstances, texture discrimination performance peaks in the parafovea rather than at the fovea. Kehrer (1987) referred to this phenomenon as the central performance drop (CPD). In most studies showing the CPD, task performance has been limited by a backward mask. Morikawa (2000) has argued that in these studies the backward mask was critical to the emergence of the CPD. In three studies we use textures comprising left and right oblique line segments and limit performance by manipulating the orientation variability within the foreground and background textures. Using this method we demonstrate that significant CPDs emerge whether or not there is a backward mask. We conclude that in past studies of the CPD the backward mask functioned primarily as a source of spatial noise and that its temporal relation to the texture display is not critical to the emergence of the CPD.

Humans↗
PubMed2002

Two eccentricity-dependent limitations on subjective contour discrimination.

Eccentricity-dependent sensitivity losses in spatial discrimination tasks can often be overcome by scaling stimuli at each eccentricity by a factor F=1+E/E(2). However, because there may be more than one eccentricity-dependent limitation at play in a particular task a single scaling function may be insufficient to explain all sensitivity losses as stimuli are moved from foveal to peripheral retinal locations. We propose a method explicitly designed to determine whether a single scaling factor is sufficient to capture all eccentricity-dependent sensitivity losses in a task. The methodology was applied to subjective contour stimuli that varied in aperture size (sigma) and carrier wavelength (omega). For a range of stimulus configurations [2(-0.5)log(sigma/omega)] we measured threshold scale [2(-0.5)log(sigma omega)] and fit data at each eccentricity to rectangular parabolas that expressed sensitivity limitations arising from aperture size and carrier wavelength. Although a single scaling factor (E(2)) explains much of the variability in the data there are systematic sources of variance in the residuals (i.e., deviations of the data from the best fitting functions). Our analysis shows that two scaling factors are required to capture all eccentricity-dependent limitations in the data.

Analysis of Variance↗