PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Rita Shane

Publications and source records attributed to Rita Shane.

6 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2003

The impact of dedicated medication nurses on the medication administration error rate: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Concerns about hospital medication safety mount as the pace of new drug releases accelerates. METHODS: We performed a randomized study at 2 hospitals (A and B) to examine whether the medication administration error rate could be decreased by having "dedicated" nurses focus exclusively on administering drugs. "Medication nurses," after receiving a brief review course on safe medication use, were responsible solely for drug delivery for up to 18 patients each. "General nurses," who did not attend the course, provided comprehensive care, including drug delivery, for 6 patients each. A direct observation technique was used to record drug errors, process-variation errors, and total errors. RESULTS: At both hospitals combined, the total error rate was 15.7% for medication nurses and 14.9% for general nurses (P<.84). Comparing hospitals, the total error rate for medication nurses at hospital B was significantly higher than it was at hospital A (19.7% vs 11.2%; P<.04). At hospital A, there was a significantly lower error rate for medication nurses than for general nurses in the surgical units (P<.01) but no significant differences in total errors comparing nurse types in the medical units (P<.77). CONCLUSIONS: This trial suggests that use of dedicated medication nurses does not reduce medication error rates. However, subgroup analysis indicates that medication nurses might be useful in some settings. The differences in findings at the 2 hospitals and their differences in medication-use processes reinforce the concept that medication errors are usually related to systems design issues.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Evaluating the accuracy of technicians and pharmacists in checking unit dose medication cassettes.

The accuracy rates of board-registered pharmacy technicians and pharmacists in checking unit dose medication cassettes in the inpatient setting at two separate institutions were examined. Cedars-Sinai Medical Center and Long Beach Memorial Medical Center, both in Los Angeles county, petitioned the California State Board of Pharmacy to approve a waiver of the California Code of Regulations to conduct an experimental program to compare the accuracy of unit dose medication cassettes checked by pharmacists with that of cassettes checked by trained, certified pharmacy technicians. The study consisted of three parts: assessing pharmacist baseline checking accuracy (Phase I), developing a technician-training program and certifying technicians who completed the didactic and practical training (Phase II), and evaluating the accuracy of certified technicians checking unit dose medication cassettes as a daily function (Phase III). Twenty-nine pharmacists and 41 technicians (3 of whom were pharmacy interns) participated in the study. Of the technicians, all 41 successfully completed the didactic and practical training, 39 successfully completed the audits and became certified checkers, and 2 (including 1 of the interns) did not complete the certification audits because they were reassigned to another work area or had resigned. In Phase II, the observed accuracy rate and its lower confidence limit exceeded the predetermined minimum requirement of 99.8% for a certified checker. The mean accuracy rates for technicians were identical at the two institutions (p = 1.0). The difference in mean accuracy rates between pharmacists (99.52%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 99.44-99.58%) and technicians, (99.89%; 95% CI 99.87-99.90%) was significant (p < 0.0001). Inpatient technicians who had been trained and certified in a closely supervised program that incorporated quality assurance mechanisms could safely and accurately check unit dose medication cassettes filled by other technicians.

Drug Packaging↗