PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Rob Leurs

Publications and source records attributed to Rob Leurs.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed2005

Evaluation of histamine H1-, H2-, and H3-receptor ligands at the human histamine H4 receptor: identification of 4-methylhistamine as the first potent and selective H4 receptor agonist.

The histamine H(4) receptor (H(4)R) is involved in the chemotaxis of leukocytes and mast cells to sites of inflammation and is suggested to be a potential drug target for asthma and allergy. So far, selective H(4)R agonists have not been identified. In the present study, we therefore evaluated the human H(4)R (hH(4)R) for its interaction with various known histaminergic ligands. Almost all of the tested H(1)R and H(2)R antagonists, including several important therapeutics, displaced less than 30% of specific [(3)H]histamine binding to the hH(4)R at concentrations up to 10 microM. Most of the tested H(2)R agonists and imidazole-based H(3)R ligands show micromolar-to-nanomolar range hH(4)R affinity, and these ligands exert different intrinsic hH(4)R activities, ranging from full agonists to inverse agonists. Interestingly, we identified 4-methylhistamine as a high-affinity H(4)R ligand (K(i) = 50 nM) that has a >100-fold selectivity for the hH(4)R over the other histamine receptor subtypes. Moreover, 4-methylhistamine potently activated the hH(4)R (pEC(50) = 7.4 +/- 0.1; alpha = 1), and this response was competitively antagonized by the selective H(4)R antagonist JNJ 7777120 [1-[(5-chloro-1H-indol-2-yl)-carbonyl]-4-methylpiperazine] (pA(2) = 7.8). The identification of 4-methylhistamine as a potent H(4)R agonist is of major importance for future studies to unravel the physiological roles of the H(4)R.

Cell Line↗
PubMed2005

N-substituted piperidinyl alkyl imidazoles: discovery of methimepip as a potent and selective histamine H3 receptor agonist.

In this study, we continue our efforts toward the development of potent and highly selective histamine H(3) receptor agonists. We introduced various alkyl or aryl alkyl groups on the piperidine nitrogen of the known H(3)/H(4) agonist immepip and its analogues (1-3a). We observed that N-methyl-substituted immepip (methimepip) exhibits high affinity and agonist activity at the human histamine H(3) receptor (pK(i) = 9.0 and pEC(50) = 9.5) with a 2000-fold selectivity at the human H(3) receptor over the human H(4) receptor and more than a 10000-fold selectivity over the human histamine H(1) and H(2) receptors. Methimepip was also very effective as an H(3) receptor agonist at the guinea pig ileum (pD(2) = 8.26). Moreover, in vivo microdialysis (in rat brain) showed that methimepip reduces the basal level of brain histamine to about 25% after a 5 mg/kg intraperitoneal administration.

Animals↗
PubMed2005

A "locked-on," constitutively active mutant of the adenosine A1 receptor.

We studied the wild-type human adenosine A1 receptor and three mutant receptors, in which the glycine at position 14 had been changed into an alanine, a leucine, or a threonine residue. All receptors were characterized in radioligand binding experiments, the wild-type and the Gly14Thr mutant receptor in greater detail. Both receptors were allosterically modulated by sodium ions and PD81,723 (2-amino-4,5-dimethyl-3-thienyl-[3(trifluoromethyl)-phenyl]methanone), although in a different way. All mutant receptors appeared to be spontaneously or "constitutively" active in a [35S]GTPgammaS binding assay, the first demonstration of the existence of such CAM (constitutively active mutant) receptors for the adenosine A1 receptor. The Gly14Thr mutant receptor was also constitutively active in another functional assay, i.e., the inhibition of forskolin-induced cAMP production in intact cells. Importantly, this mutant displayed a peculiar "locked-on" phenotype, i.e., neither agonist nor inverse agonist was capable of modulating the basal activity in both the GTPgammaS and the cAMP assay, unlike the wild-type and the two other mutant receptors.

Adenosine↗
PubMed2005

Delineation of receptor-ligand interactions at the human histamine H1 receptor by a combined approach of site-directed mutagenesis and computational techniques - or - how to bind the H1 receptor.

Histamine H(1) antagonists or "antihistamines" are one of the most prescribed drug families in Western countries. They exert their effect by binding to the histamine H(1) receptor, a receptor belonging to the class of rhodopsin-like G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). In this review, the binding of ligands to the human histamine H(1) receptor with respect to site-directed mutagenesis studies and molecular modeling techniques is described. The ligands described include agonists (histamine and histaprodifens), a stereoselective partial agonist (lisuride), and selected inverse agonists (mepyramine, acrivastine and triprolidine).

Computational Biology↗
PubMed2005

The role and application of in silico docking in chemical genomics research.

In silico docking techniques are being used to investigate the complementarity at the molecular level of a ligand and a protein target. As such, docking studies can be used to identify the structural features that are important for binding and for in silico screening efforts in which suitable binding partners can be identified. Here we describe a practical approach for setting up docking simulations using different docking programs. We also cover the analysis and rescoring of the obtained docking poses. Possible pitfalls in the docking studies are discussed and hints are provided to resolve commonly occurring problems.

Binding Sites↗
PubMed2005

The histamine H4 receptor as a new therapeutic target for inflammation.

Following the sequencing of the human genome, data-mining efforts have revealed the existence of a new histamine receptor that is expressed at high levels in mast cells and leukocytes. The histamine H(4) receptor has a distinct pharmacological profile and the first compounds that act selectively on the H(4) receptor have been developed. Initial experiments in vivo with H(4) receptor antagonists indicate a role for the H(4) receptor in inflammatory conditions.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed2005

Keynote review: histamine H3 receptor antagonists reach out for the clinic.

Antagonists of the histamine H(1) and H(2) receptors have been successful as blockbuster drugs for treating allergic conditions and gastric ulcers, respectively. As such, histamine receptors have made a significant contribution to establishing G-Protein-coupled receptors as the favored drug targets of the industry. In this light, it can easily be understood that the discovery of a third histamine receptor subtype (H(3)R) in 1983 was greeted with considerable excitement. However, characterization of the H(3)R turned out to be far from trivial. In the past five years, molecular biology approaches have given fresh impetus to the H(3)R research field. As a result, H(3)R ligands are where they were anticipated to be 20 years ago: at the center of attention and on the verge of an anticipated breakthrough as the next generation of histaminergic blockbuster drugs. Here, we assess the status of the H(3)R medicinal chemistry programs of the various players in the field, as far as can be deduced from patent applications and scientific literature.

Animals↗
PubMed2005

The histamine H3 receptor: from gene cloning to H3 receptor drugs.

Since the cloning of the histamine H(3) receptor cDNA in 1999 by Lovenberg and co-workers, this histamine receptor has gained the interest of many pharmaceutical companies as a potential drug target for the treatment of various important disorders, including obesity, attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, Alzheimer's disease, schizophrenia, as well as for myocardial ischaemia, migraine and inflammatory diseases. Here, we discuss relevant information on this target protein and describe the development of various H(3) receptor agonists and antagonists, and their effects in preclinical animal models.

Animals↗
PubMed2005

The human cytomegalovirus-encoded chemokine receptor US28 induces caspase-dependent apoptosis.

Viral subversion of apoptosis regulation plays an important role in the outcome of host/virus interactions. Although human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) encodes several immediate early (IE) antiapoptotic proteins (IE1, IE2, vMIA and vICA), no proapoptotic HCMV protein has yet been identified. Here we show that US28, a functional IE HCMV-encoded chemokine receptor, which may be involved in both viral dissemination and immune evasion, constitutively induces apoptosis in several cell types. In contrast, none of nine human cellular chemokine receptors, belonging to three different subfamilies, induced any significant level of apoptosis. US28-induced cell death involves caspase 10 and caspase 8 activation, but does not depend on the engagement of cell-surface death receptors of the tumour necrosis factor receptor/CD95 family. US28 cell-death induction is prevented by coexpression of C-FLIP, a protein that inhibits Fas-associated death domain protein (FADD)-mediated activation of caspase 10 and caspase 8, and by coexpression of the HCMV antiapoptotic protein IE1. The use of US28 mutants indicated that the DRY sequence of its third transmenbrane domain, required for constitutive G-protein signalling, and the US28 intracellular terminal domain required for constitutive US28 endocytosis, are each partially required for cell-death induction. Thus, in HCMV-infected cells, US28 may function either as a chemokine receptor, a phospholipase C activator, or a proapoptotic factor, depending on expression levels of HCMV and/or cellular antiapoptotic proteins.

Apoptosis↗
PubMed2005

The Epstein-Barr virus BILF1 gene encodes a G protein-coupled receptor that inhibits phosphorylation of RNA-dependent protein kinase.

Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection is associated with many lymphoproliferative diseases, such as infectious mononucleosis and Burkitt's lymphoma. Consequently, EBV is one of the most extensively studied herpesviruses. Surprisingly, a putative G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) gene of EBV, BILF1, has hitherto escaped attention, yet BILF1-like genes are conserved among all known lymphocryptovirus species, suggesting that they play a pivotal role in viral infection. To determine the function of EBV BILF1, the activity of this gene and its products was studied. BILF1-specific mRNA was detected in various EBV-positive cell types and found to be expressed predominantly during the immediate early and early phases of infection in vitro. Interestingly, in COS-7 cells transfected with BILF1 expression constructs, a decrease in forskolin-induced CRE-mediated transcription was measured, as well as an increase in NF-kappaB-mediated transcription. In contrast, CRE-mediated transcription was increased in EBV-positive Burkitt's lymphoma cells as well as EBV-positive lymphoblastoid B cells transfected with BILF1, whereas NF-kappaB-mediated transcription levels remained unaffected in these cells. All observed activities were sensitive to treatment with pertussis toxin, indicating that the BILF1-encoded protein mediates these activities by coupling to G proteins of the G(i/o) class. Finally, reduced levels of phosphorylated RNA-dependent antiviral protein kinase were observed in COS-7 and Burkitt's lymphoma cells transfected with BILF1. Neither of the observed effects required a ligand to interact with the BILF1 gene product, suggesting that BILF1 encodes a constitutively active GPCR capable of modulating various intracellular signaling pathways.

Animals↗
PubMed2004

Pharmacological differences between human and guinea pig histamine H1 receptors: Asn84 (2.61) as key residue within an additional binding pocket in the H1 receptor.

We tested several histamine H(1) receptor (H(1)R) and antagonists for their differences in agonists binding affinities between human and guinea pig H(1)Rs transiently expressed in African green monkey kidney (COS-7) cells. Especially, the bivalent agonist histaprodifen-histamine dimer (HP-HA) shows a higher affinity for guinea pig than for human H(1)Rs. Based on the structure of HP-HA, we have further identified VUF 4669 [7-(3-(4-(hydroxydiphenylmethyl)piperidin-1-yl)propoxy)-4-oxochroman-2-carboxylic acid] as a guinea pig-preferring H(1)R antagonist, demonstrating that the concept of species selectivity is not limited to agonists. To delineate the molecular mechanisms behind the observed species selectivity, we have created mutant human H(1)Rs in which amino acids were individually replaced by their guinea pig H(1)R counterparts. Residue Asn(84) (2.61) in transmembrane domain (TM) 2 seemed to act as a selectivity switch in the H(1)R. Molecular modeling and site-directed mutagenesis studies suggest that Asn(84) interacts with the conserved Tyr(458) (7.43) in TM7. Our data provide the first evidence that for some H(1)R ligands, the binding pocket is not only limited to TMs 3, 4, 5, and 6 but also comprises an additional pocket formed by TMs 2 and 7.

Animals↗
PubMed2004

Fluorescent ligands for the histamine H2 receptor: synthesis and preliminary characterization.

3-[3-(Piperidinomethyl)phenoxy]alkyl, N-cyano-N'-[omega-[3-(1-piperidinylmethyl)phenoxy]alkyl]guanidine and 2-(5-methyl-4-imidazolyl)methyl thioethyl derivatives containing fluorescent functionalities were synthesized and the histamine H2 receptor affinity was evaluated using the H2 antagonist [125I]-aminopotentidine. The compounds exhibited weak to potent H2 receptor affinity with pKi values ranging from <4 to 8.85. The highest H2 receptor affinity was observed for N-cyano-N'-[omega-[3-(1-piperidinylmethyl)phenoxy]alkyl]guanidines substituted with methylanthranilate (13), cyanoindolizine (6) and cyanoisoindole (11) moieties via an ethyl or propyl linker.

Fluorescent Dyes↗
PubMed2004

CC and CX3C chemokines differentially interact with the N terminus of the human cytomegalovirus-encoded US28 receptor.

Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) is the causative agent of life-threatening systemic diseases in immunocompromised patients as well as a risk factor for vascular pathologies, like atherosclerosis, in immunocompetent individuals. HCMV encodes a G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR), referred to as US28, that displays homology to the human chemokine receptor CCR1 and binds several chemokines of the CC family as well as the CX3C chemokine fractalkine with high affinity. Most importantly, following HCMV infection, US28 activates several intracellular pathways, either constitutively or in a chemokine-dependent manner. In this study, our goal was to understand the molecular interactions between chemokines and the HCMV-encoded US28 receptor. To achieve this goal, a double approach has been used, consisting in the analysis of both receptor and ligand mutants. This approach has led us to identify several amino acids located in the N terminus of US28 that differentially contribute to the high affinity binding of CC versus CX3C chemokines. Additionally, our results highlight the importance of secondary modifications occurring at US28, such as sulfation, for ligand recognition. Finally, the effects of chemokine dimerization and interaction with glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) on chemokine binding and activation of US28 were investigated as well using CCL4 as model ligand. In line with the two-state model describing chemokine/receptor interaction, we show that an aromatic residue in the N-loop region of CCL4 promotes tight binding to US28, whereas receptor activation depends on the presence of the N terminus of CCL4, as shown previously for CCR5.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed2004

Synthesis and structure-activity relationships of indole and benzimidazole piperazines as histamine H(4) receptor antagonists.

We describe the structure-activity relationships for a series of ligands structurally related to the recently identified (5-chloro-1H-indol-2-yl)-(4-methyl-piperazin-1-yl)-methanone (1) as histamine H(4) receptor (H(4)R) antagonists. Furthermore, we identified related benzimidazoles as novel lead compounds for the H(4)R. The ligands have been evaluated by radioligand displacement studies and functional assays for their interaction with both the human histamine H(3) and H(4) receptors and exhibit pK(i) values up to 7.5 at the human H(4)R.

Benzimidazoles↗
PubMed2004

Allosteric modulation and constitutive activity of fusion proteins between the adenosine A1 receptor and different 351Cys-mutated Gi alpha-subunits.

We studied fusion proteins between the human adenosine A1 receptor and different 351Cys-mutated G(i1) alpha-subunits (A1-Gialpha) with respect to two important concepts in receptor pharmacology, i.e. allosteric modulation and constitutive activity/inverse agonism. The aim of our study was twofold. We first analysed whether such fusion products are still subject to allosteric modulation, and, secondly, we investigated the potential utility of the fusion proteins to study constitutive receptor activity. We determined the pharmacological profile of nine different A1-Gialpha fusion proteins in radioligand binding studies. In addition, we performed [35S]GTPgammaS binding experiments to study receptor and G protein activation of selected A1-Gialpha fusion proteins. Compared to unfused adenosine A1 receptors, the affinity of N6-cyclopentyladenosine (CPA) at wild-type A1-Gialpha fusion proteins (351Cys) increased more than eightfold, while the affinity of 1,3-dipropyl-8-cyclopentylxanthine (DPCPX) did not change significantly. Furthermore, we showed that the allosteric enhancer of agonist binding, PD81,723 (2-amino-4,5-dimethyl-3-thienyl-[3-(trifluoromethyl)-phenyl]methanone), elicited similar effects on ligand binding; i.e. CPA binding to the A1-Gialpha fusion proteins was enhanced, whereas the affinity of DPCPX was hardly affected. Moreover, sodium ions were unable to decrease agonist binding to the majority of the A1-Gialpha fusion proteins, presumably because they exhibit their effect through uncoupling of the R-G complex. From [35S]GTPgammaS binding experiments, we learned that all the A1-Gialpha fusion proteins tested had a higher basal receptor activity than the unfused adenosine A1 receptor, thereby providing improved conditions to observe inverse agonism. Moreover, the maximal CPA-induced stimulation of basal [35S]GTPgammaS binding was increased for the five A1-Gialpha fusion proteins tested, whereas the inhibition induced by 8-cyclopentyltheophylline (CPT) was more pronounced at 351Cys, 351Ile, and 351Val A1-Gialpha fusion proteins. Thus, the maximal receptor (de)activation depended on the amino acid at position 351 of the Gi alpha-subunit. In conclusion, A1-Gialpha fusion proteins, especially with 351Cys and 351Ile, can be used as research tools to investigate inverse agonism, due to their increased readout window in [35S]GTPgammaS binding experiments.

Adenosine↗
PubMed2004

Domain swapping in the human histamine H1 receptor.

G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) represent the largest family of receptors involved in transmembrane signaling. Although these receptors were generally believed to be monomeric entities, accumulating evidence supports the presence of GPCRs in multimeric forms. Here, using immunoprecipitation as well as time-resolved fluorescence resonance energy transfer to assess protein-protein interactions in living cells, we unambiguously demonstrate the occurrence of dimerization of the human histamine H(1) receptor. We also show the presence of domain-swapped H(1) receptor dimers in which there is the reciprocal exchange of transmembrane domain TM domains 6 and 7 between the receptors present in the dimer. Mutation of aspartate(107) in transmembrane (TM) 3 or phenylalanine(432) in TM6 to alanine results in two radioligand-binding-deficient mutant H(1) receptors. Coexpression of H(1)D(107) A and H(1)F(432)A, however, results in a reconstituted radioligand binding site that exhibits a pharmacological profile that corresponds to the wild-type H(1) receptor. Interestingly, the H(1) receptor radioligands [(3)H]mepyramine and [(3)H]-(-)-trans-1-phenyl-3-N,N-dimethylamino-1,2,3,4-tetrahydronaphthalene show differential saturation binding values (B(max)) for wild-type H(1) receptors but not for the radioligand binding site that is formed upon coexpression of H(1) D(107)A and H(1) F(432)A receptors, suggesting the presence of different H(1) receptor populations.

Animals↗
PubMed2004

Identification of 4-(1H-imidazol-4(5)-ylmethyl)pyridine (immethridine) as a novel, potent, and highly selective histamine H(3) receptor agonist.

In this study, the piperidine ring of immepip and its analogues was replaced by a rigid heterocyclic pyridine ring. Many compounds in the series exhibit high affinity and agonist activity at the human histamine H(3) receptor. Particularly, the 4-pyridinyl analogue of immepip (1c, immethridine) is identified as a novel potent and highly selective histamine H(3) receptor agonist (pK(i) = 9.07, pEC(50) = 9.74) with a 300-fold selectivity over the closely related H(4) receptor.

Animals↗