Managing people at high risk for diabetes.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to Robert E Ratner.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The amylin analogue pramlintide acts in concert with insulin to regulate glucose metabolism. It reduces postprandial hyperglycemia by suppressing postprandial glucagon secretion, regulating gastric emptying, and reducing food intake. In clinical use, pramlintide reduces postprandial glycemic excursions and improves A(1c) without the weight gain and increased risk of hypoglycemia typically seen with intensification of diabetes therapy.
Diabetes incidence is increasing rapidly in the United States. Diabetes increases the risk for cardiovascular disease, the major cause of death in diabetic individuals. The conventional cardiovascular risk factors of hyperlipidemia and hypertension worsen diabetic vascular disease. Treatment targets for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and blood pressure in diabetic individuals are being debated. The SANDS is a randomized, open-label, 3-year trial to examine the effects of aggressive LDL-C (goal <70 mg/dL) and blood pressure (BP) (goal <115/75 mm Hg) reduction versus the standard goals of <100 mg/dL for LDL-C and <130/85 mm Hg for BP. Five hundred forty-nine American-Indian men and women >40 years old with type 2 diabetes were randomized to 1 of 2 groups. Lipids and BP are managed using Food and Drug Administration-approved medications in an algorithmic approach. The presence and progression of atherosclerosis are evaluated by carotid ultrasonography; echocardiography assesses cardiac function. The primary end point is the composite outcome of change in carotid artery intimal medial thickness and fatal/nonfatal cardiovascular events. These outcomes are combined by using a ranked analysis for carotid thickness and assigning a "worst rank" for a cardiovascular event. Secondary end points include carotid plaque score, left ventricular geometry and function, serum C-reactive protein, and safety measures. Unique aspects of the study design and analysis plan involve the use of a composite outcome and changes during the trial of LDL-C treatment goals for participants with baseline or incident cardiovascular disease in the conventional group because of changes in the standard of care. Study results will further understanding of the effects of aggressive risk factor reduction on atherosclerosis burden and cardiac function in diabetic individuals in US populations and will help determine optimal LDL-C and BP treatment goals for diabetic patients.
OBJECTIVE: The Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) lifestyle intervention is a cost-effective strategy to prevent type 2 diabetes, but it is unclear how this intervention could be financed. We explored whether this intervention could be offered in a way that allows return on investment for private health insurers while remaining attractive for consumers, employers, and Medicare. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We used the DPP and other published reports to build a Markov simulation model to estimate the lifetime progression of disease, costs, and quality of life for adults with impaired glucose tolerance. The model assumed a health-payer perspective and compared DPP lifestyle and placebo interventions. Primary outcomes included cumulative incidence of diabetes, direct medical costs, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and cost per QALY gained. RESULTS: Compared with placebo, providing the lifestyle intervention at age 50 years could prevent 37% of new cases of diabetes before age 65, at a cost of $1,288 per QALY gained. A private payer could reimburse $655 (24%) of the $2,715 in total discounted intervention costs during the first 3 intervention years and still recover all of these costs in the form of medical costs avoided. If Medicare paid up to $2,136 in intervention costs over the 15-year period before participants reached age 65, it could recover those costs in the form of future medical costs avoided beginning at age 65. CONCLUSIONS: Cost-sharing strategies to offer the DPP lifestyle intervention for eligible people between ages 50 and 64 could provide financial return on investment for private payers and long-term benefits for Medicare.
OBJECTIVE: Diabetes has been defined as a coronary heart disease (CHD) risk equivalent, and more aggressive treatment goals have been proposed for diabetic patients. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We studied the influence of single and multiple risk factors on the 10-year cumulative incidence of fatal and nonfatal CHD and cardiovascular disease (CVD) in diabetic and nondiabetic men and women, with and without baseline CHD or CVD, in a population (n = 4,549) with a high prevalence of diabetes. RESULTS: In both sexes, diabetes increased the risk for CHD (hazard ratio 1.99 and 2.93 for men and women, respectively). Diabetic men and women had a 10-year cumulative incidence of CHD of 25.9 and 19.1%, respectively, compared with 57.4 and 58.4% for nondiabetic men and women with previous CHD. The pattern was similar when only fatal events were considered. Diabetic individuals with one or two risk factors had a 10-year cumulative incidence of CHD that was only 1.4 times higher than that of nondiabetic individuals (14%). However, the 10-year incidence of CHD in diabetic subjects with multiple risk factors was >40%, and the incidence of fatal CHD was higher in these subjects than in nondiabetic subjects with previous CHD. Data for CVD showed similar patterns, as did separate analyses by sex. CONCLUSIONS: Our results and comparisons with other available data show wide variation in the rate of CHD in diabetes, depending on the population and existing risk factors. Most individuals had a 10-year cumulative incidence >20%, but only those with multiple risk factors had a 10-year cumulative incidence that was equivalent to that of patients with CHD. Until more data are available, it may be prudent to consider targets based on the entire risk factor profile rather than just the presence of diabetes.
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the proportion of U.S. adults with diabetes who meet American Diabetes Association (ADA) clinical practice recommendations. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Using data from the 1999-2002 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 998 adults aged >/=18 years with self-reported diabetes were identified. The proportion of adults with diabetes meeting ADA recommendations for HbA(1c) (A1C), HDL cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, triglycerides, blood pressure, renal function, nutrient intake, smoking, pneumococcal vaccination, and physical activity was estimated. RESULTS: Among U.S. adults with diabetes in 1999-2002, 49.8% had A1C <7%; 27.4, 36.0, and 65.0% were classified as low risk for HDL cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, and triglycerides, respectively. Nearly 40% met blood pressure recommendations, 66% had normal renal function, and daily nutrient recommendations for protein, saturated fat, unsaturated fat, and fiber were met by 64.0, 48.3, 28.3, and 18.3%, respectively. Although >81% of the sample reported not smoking at the time of the exam, only 38.2% reported ever having had a pneumococcal immunization, and 28.2% reported getting the recommended level of physical activity. Race, age, duration of diabetes, and education affected achievement of ADA recommendations. CONCLUSIONS: Achievement of ADA clinical practice recommendations is far from adequate in U.S. adults with diabetes.
BACKGROUND: The Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) demonstrated that interventions can delay or prevent the development of type 2 diabetes. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the lifetime cost-utility of the DPP interventions. DESIGN: Markov simulation model to estimate progression of disease, costs, and quality of life. DATA SOURCES: The DPP and published reports. TARGET POPULATION: Members of the DPP cohort 25 years of age or older with impaired glucose tolerance. TIME HORIZON: Lifetime. PERSPECTIVES: Health system and societal. INTERVENTIONS: Intensive lifestyle, metformin, and placebo interventions as implemented in the DPP. OUTCOME MEASURES: Cumulative incidence of diabetes, microvascular and neuropathic complications, cardiovascular complications, survival, direct medical and direct nonmedical costs, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and cost per QALY. RESULTS OF BASE-CASE ANALYSIS: Compared with the placebo intervention, the lifestyle and metformin interventions were estimated to delay the development of type 2 diabetes by 11 and 3 years, respectively, and to reduce the absolute incidence of diabetes by 20% and 8%, respectively. The cumulative incidence of microvascular, neuropathic, and cardiovascular complications were reduced and survival was improved by 0.5 and 0.2 years. Compared with the placebo intervention, the cost per QALY was approximately 1100 dollars for the lifestyle intervention and $31 300 for the metformin intervention. From a societal perspective, the interventions cost approximately 8800 dollars and 29,900 dollars per QALY, respectively. From both perspectives, the lifestyle intervention dominated the metformin intervention. RESULTS OF SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS: Cost-effectiveness improved when the interventions were implemented as they might be in routine clinical practice. The lifestyle intervention was cost-effective in all age groups. The metformin intervention did not represent good use of resources for persons older than 65 years of age. LIMITATIONS: Simulation results depend on the accuracy of the underlying assumptions, including participant adherence. CONCLUSIONS: Health policy should promote diabetes prevention in high-risk individuals.
After many decades of relative therapeutic stagnation since the initial discovery of insulin, followed by some modifications on its structure and only having sulfonylureas and biguanides for many years, the last decade has seen a surge in new therapeutic options for the management of diabetes. The results of the United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study and Kumamoto study indicate the need for aggressive glycemic control and the slow inexorable clinical deterioration associated with type 2 diabetes overtime. The propensity for weight gain and hypoglycemia are the two major limitations that subcutaneous insulin and sulfonylureas have been particularly prone to. The newer antidiabetic medications and those on the horizon attempt to address these limitations. GLP-1 agonists and the DPP-IV inhibitors exploit the innate incretin system to improve glycemia while promoting satiety and weight management. Like GLP-1 related compounds, pramlintide offers the potential to address postprandial hyperglucagonemia associated with type 2 diabetes only limited by the multiple injections and gastrointestinal side effects. The glitazars offer the hope ofa new approach to diabetes care addressing not just glycemia, but dyslipidemia and other components of the metabolic syndrome, though the side effect profile remains a major unknown. The INGAP peptide represents the holy grail of diabetes care as it offers the potential of a new paradigm: that of islet regeneration and potential for a cure. But at this stage, with no human data available, it remains highly speculative. Beyond these and other novel agents being developed to meet the challenge of the worldwide epidemic of diabetes, the central place of insulin in diabetes care cannot be forgotten. In view of this the continued efforts of improvement in insulin delivery, kinetics and action have spurred such innovations as the various inhaled insulins and new insulin analogues. There is cause for guarded optimism and excitement about the years ahead. There is reason to expect that despite the growing burden of diabetes worldwide, we will be better equipped to manage it and its comorbidities and prevent its onset and possibly even cure it.
OBJECTIVE: This study evaluates the ability of the incretin mimetic exenatide (exendin-4) to improve glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes failing to achieve glycemic control with maximally effective metformin doses. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A triple-blind, placebo-controlled, 30-week study at 82 U.S. sites was performed with 336 randomized patients. In all, 272 patients completed the study. The intent-to-treat population baseline was 53 +/- 10 years with BMI of 34.2 +/- 5.9 kg/m(2) and HbA(1c) of 8.2 +/- 1.1%. After 4 weeks of placebo, subjects self-administered 5 microg exenatide or placebo subcutaneously twice daily for 4 weeks followed by 5 or 10 microg exenatide, or placebo subcutaneously twice daily for 26 weeks. All subjects continued metformin therapy. RESULTS: At week 30, HbA(1c) changes from baseline +/- SE for each group were -0.78 +/- 0.10% (10 microg), -0.40 +/- 0.11% (5 microg), and +0.08 +/- 0.10% (placebo; intent to treat; adjusted P < 0.002). Of evaluable subjects, 46% (10 microg), 32% (5 microg), and 13% (placebo) achieved HbA(1c) < or =7% (P < 0.01 vs. placebo). Exenatide-treated subjects displayed progressive dose-dependent weight loss (-2.8 +/- 0.5 kg [10 microg], -1.6 +/- 0.4 kg [5 microg]; P < 0.001 vs. placebo). The most frequent adverse events were gastrointestinal in nature and generally mild to moderate. Incidence of mild to moderate hypoglycemia was low and similar across treatment arms, with no severe hypoglycemia. CONCLUSIONS: Exenatide was generally well tolerated and reduced HbA(1c) with no weight gain and no increased incidence of hypoglycemia in patients with type 2 diabetes failing to achieve glycemic control with metformin.
Microalbuminuria is a novel atherosclerotic risk factor in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) and predicts future cardiovascular events. Endothelial dysfunction and systemic inflammation have been proposed as common links between microalbuminuria and cardiovascular disease. However, no study has assessed the relation between microalbuminuria and vascular dysfunction as measured by brachial artery reactivity (BAR) in DM. We evaluated 143 patients (85 men; mean age 60.0 +/- 6.7 years) with DM (mean duration 8.2 +/- 7.4 years) enrolled in the Detection of Ischemia in Asymptomatic Diabetics study. Subjects were categorized as those with microalbuminuria (ratio of urinary albumin to creatinine 30 to 299 microg/mg creatinine, n = 28) and those with normoalbuminuria (ratio of urinary albumin to creatinine 0 to 29.9 microg/mg creatinine, n = 115). High-resolution ultrasound BAR testing was used to measure endothelium-dependent and endothelium-independent vasodilations. C-reactive protein was measured as a marker of systemic inflammation. Patients with microalbuminuria and normoalbuminuria had similar baseline characteristics, with the exception that those with microalbuminuria had a longer duration of DM (p = 0.03). Endothelium-dependent vasodilation at 1 minute (p = 0.01) and endothelium-independent vasodilation at 3 minutes (p = 0.007) were significantly less in patients with microalbuminuria. In addition, 96% of patients with microalbuminuria and 76% of those with normoalbuminuria had impaired endothelium-dependent vasodilation (<8%, p = 0.01). Microalbuminuria was an independent predictor of endothelium-dependent vasodilation in the entire cohort (p = 0.045) and after excluding patients on hormone replacement therapy (p = 0.01). Levels of C-reactive protein were significantly higher in patients with microalbuminuria than in those with normoalbuminuria (p = 0.02). We conclude that in DM the presence of microalbuminuria is associated with impaired endothelium-dependent and endothelium-independent vasodilations of the brachial artery and a higher degree of systemic inflammation. In addition, microalbuminuria is an independent predictor of endothelial dysfunction in asymptomatic patients with DM, especially in the absence of hormone replacement therapy.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the prevalence and clinical predictors of silent myocardial ischemia in asymptomatic patients with type 2 diabetes and to test the effectiveness of current American Diabetes Association screening guidelines. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: In the Detection of Ischemia in Asymptomatic Diabetics (DIAD) study, 1,123 patients with type 2 diabetes, aged 50-75 years, with no known or suspected coronary artery disease, were randomly assigned to either stress testing and 5-year clinical follow-up or to follow-up only. The prevalence of ischemia in 522 patients randomized to stress testing was assessed by adenosine technetium-99m sestamibi single-photon emission-computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging. RESULTS: A total of 113 patients (22%) had silent ischemia, including 83 with regional myocardial perfusion abnormalities and 30 with normal perfusion but other abnormalities (i.e., adenosine-induced ST-segment depression, ventricular dilation, or rest ventricular dysfunction). Moderate or large perfusion defects were present in 33 patients. The strongest predictors for abnormal tests were abnormal Valsalva (odds ratio [OR] 5.6), male sex (2.5), and diabetes duration (5.2). Other traditional cardiac risk factors or inflammatory and prothrombotic markers were not predictive. Ischemic adenosine-induced ST-segment depression with normal perfusion (n = 21) was associated with women (OR 3.4). Selecting only patients who met American Diabetes Association guidelines would have failed to identify 41% of patients with silent ischemia. CONCLUSIONS: Silent myocardial ischemia occurs in greater than one in five asymptomatic patients with type 2 diabetes. Traditional and emerging cardiac risk factors were not associated with abnormal stress tests, although cardiac autonomic dysfunction was a strong predictor of ischemia.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Pimagedine inhibits the formation of advanced glycation end products and slows the progression of diabetic complications in experimental models. This study was undertaken to determine if pimagedine ameliorates nephropathy in type 1 (insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus. METHODS: This was a randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled study performed in 690 patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus, nephropathy, and retinopathy. The patients received twice daily dosing with placebo, pimagedine 150 mg, or pimagedine 300 mg for 2-4 years. The primary end point was the time to doubling of serum creatinine; the secondary end points included evaluations of proteinuria, kidney function, and retinopathy. RESULTS: Serum creatinine doubled in 26% (61/236) of the placebo-treated patients and in 20% (91/454) of those who received pimagedine (p = 0.099). The estimated glomerular filtration rate decreased more slowly in the pimagedine-treated patients with a 36-month decrease from baseline of 6.26 ml/min/1.73 m(2) as compared with 9.80 ml/min/1.73 m(2) in the placebo-treated patients (p = 0.05), and pimagedine reduced the 24-hour total urinary proteinuria. (The mean reduction from baseline at month 36 was 732 mg/24 h at the low dose and 329 mg/24 h at the high dose as compared with 35 mg/24 h in the placebo group; p </= 0.001.) Fewer pimagedine-treated patients with baseline and end point evaluations (31/324; 10%) as compared with those receiving placebo (16%; 28/179) experienced a three-step or greater progression of the retinopathy (Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study) score (p = 0.030). Three patients receiving high-dose pimagedine but none receiving low-dose treatment developed glomerulonephritis. CONCLUSIONS: While this study did not demonstrate a statistically significant beneficial effect of pimagedine on the progression of overt nephropathy resulting from type 1 diabetes, it is noteworthy in providing the first clinical proof of the concept that inhibiting advanced glycation end product formation can result in a clinically important attenuation of the serious complications of type 1 diabetes mellitus.
Although it is difficult to distinguish between the relative effects of insulin resistance and hyperinsulinemia, insulin resistance is clearly associated with significantly increased cardiovascular and cerebrovascular risk. This effect is consistent across the spectrum of worsening glycemic control, from the onset of impaired glucose tolerance to the development of clinical diabetes. It is more difficult to discriminate between the roles of elevated circulating insulin and proinsulin levels; the association between insulin levels and cardiovascular risk is weak. The thiazolidinediones (TZDs) significantly improve insulin sensitivity and exert numerous effects on the vascular bed, including improved endothelial function, decreased vascular inflammation, decreased plasma free fatty acid levels, improved dyslipidemic profiles, and inhibition of vascular smooth muscle proliferation. These findings provide increasing evidence to suggest that the TZDs may have a beneficial effect on atherosclerosis and may reduce the incidence and severity of adverse cardiovascular outcomes. These effects remain to be substantiated by the results of large outcomes studies to evaluate the impact of glycemic control and reversal of insulin resistance on cardiovascular events.
OBJECTIVE: To describe the costs of the Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) interventions to prevent or delay type 2 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We describe the direct medical costs, direct nonmedical costs, and indirect costs of the placebo, metformin, and intensive lifestyle interventions over the 3-year study period of the DPP. Resource use and cost are summarized from the perspective of a large health system and society. Research costs are excluded. RESULTS: The direct medical cost of laboratory tests to identify one subject with impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) was $139. Over 3 years, the direct medical costs of the interventions were $79 per participant in the placebo group, $2,542 in the metformin group, and $2,780 in the lifestyle group. The direct medical costs of care outside the DPP were $272 less per participant in the metformin group and $432 less in the lifestyle group compared with the placebo group. Direct nonmedical costs were $9 less per participant in the metformin group and $1,445 greater in the lifestyle group compared with the placebo group. Indirect costs were $230 greater per participant in the metformin group and $174 less in the lifestyle group compared with the placebo group. From the perspective of a health system, the cost of the metformin intervention relative to the placebo intervention was $2,191 per participant and the cost of the lifestyle intervention was $2,269 per participant over 3 years. From the perspective of society, the cost of the metformin intervention relative to the placebo intervention was $2,412 per participant and the cost of the lifestyle intervention was $3,540 per participant over 3 years. CONCLUSIONS: The metformin and lifestyle interventions are associated with modest incremental costs compared with the placebo intervention. The evaluation of costs relative to health benefits will determine the value of these interventions to health systems and society.
The objective of this study was to assess the effect of mealtime amylin replacement with pramlintide on long-term glycemic and weight control in subjects with type 2 diabetes. This 52-week, randomized, placebo-controlled, multicenter, double-blind, dose-ranging study in 538 insulin-treated subjects with type 2 diabetes compared the efficacy and safety of 30-, 75-, or 150-microg doses of pramlintide, a synthetic analogue of the beta-cell hormone amylin, to placebo when injected subcutaneously three times daily (TID) with major meals. Pramlintide therapy led to a mean reduction in HbA1c of 0.9% and 1.0% from baseline to week 13 in the 75- and 150-microg dose groups, which was significant compared to placebo (p = 0.0004 and p = 0.0002, respectively). In the 150-microg dose group, there was a mean reduction in HbA1c of 0.6% from baseline to week 52 (p = 0.0068 compared to placebo). The greater reduction in HbA1c with pramlintide was achieved without increases in insulin use or severe hypoglycemia, and was accompanied by a significant (p < 0.05) reduction in body weight in all dose groups compared to placebo. Three times the proportion of subjects in the 150-microg pramlintide group compared to the placebo group achieved a concomitant reduction in both HbA1c and body weight from baseline to week 52 (48% versus 16%). The most common adverse event reported with pramlintide treatment was nausea, which was mild to moderate and dissipated early in treatment. The results from this study support the safety and efficacy of pramlintide administered three times a day with major meals, in conjunction with insulin therapy, for improving long-term glycemic and weight control in subjects with type 2 diabetes.
OBJECTIVE: The public is increasingly aware of the importance of HbA(1c) testing, yet the vast majority of patients with diabetes do not know their HbA(1c) status or goal. We set forth to evaluate the impact of a system that provides uniquely formatted and personalized reports of diabetes status and goals on changes in HbA(1c) levels. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 150 patients with diabetes were randomized to receive either standard care or intervention inclusive of a computer-generated 11" x 17" color poster depicting an individual's HbA(1c) status and goals along with personalized steps to aid in goal achievement. All patients enrolled received diabetes education during the 3 months before enrollment. HbA(1c) was performed at baseline and 6 months. RESULTS: At baseline, there were no significant differences between patient groups in terms of age, sex, education level, race, and HbA(1c) or lipid levels. Among patients with baseline HbA(1c) > or =7.0%, there was an 8.6% (0.77% absolute) reduction in HbA(1c) among control subjects compared with a 17.0% (1.69% absolute) decline in the intervention group (P = 0.032). There were no differences between the control and intervention groups with respect to the frequency of patients experiencing any decline in HbA(1c) (63 vs. 69%, P = 0.87); among these patients experiencing a decline, the most substantial reductions were seen with the control group, which had a 13.3% (1.15% absolute) decline compared with the intervention patients, who reduced their HbA(1c) by 24.2% (2.26% absolute reduction; P = 0.0048). At study close, 77% of the patients had their poster displayed on their refrigerator. CONCLUSIONS: This unique and personalized computer-generated intervention resulted in HbA(1c) lowering comparable to that of hypoglycemic agents.
BACKGROUND: Endothelial dysfunction precedes overt atherosclerosis and is present in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) is an effective method of detection of coronary artery disease (CAD); however, the relationship between endothelial function and MPI in asymptomatic patients with T2DM has not been examined. METHODS AND RESULTS: This study used a subset of the population from the Detection of Ischemia in Asymptomatic Diabetics (DIAD) study. Endothelium-dependent vasodilation (EDV) and endothelium-independent vasodilation (EIV) were measured by use of brachial artery ultrasonography in 75 asymptomatic patients with T2DM (56 men; mean age, 58.6 +/- 6.4 years; mean duration of diabetes, 8.4 +/- 7.5 years) who underwent adenosine MPI. Of the patients, 15 (20%) had evidence of relative ischemia (MPI(+)) whereas 60 (80%) had a normal study (MPI(-)). Both EDV (3.5% +/- 3.7% vs 4.5% +/- 6.6%, P = not significant) and EIV (15.1% +/- 7.5% vs 16.8% +/- 8.4%, P = not significant) were similar in the 2 groups. On the basis of a receiver-operator analysis, an EDV response of 8% was selected as a cut point, with a negative predictive value of 93% (13/14 subjects with EDV >or=8% were MPI(-)). CONCLUSIONS: Endothelial function in asymptomatic patients with T2DM is not associated with the presence of relative myocardial ischemia by MPI; however, an EDV of 8% or greater has a high negative predictive value for the exclusion of CAD.
OBJECTIVES: The National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) has enhanced public awareness of the importance of cholesterol in the development of heart disease, yet most patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD) do not know or achieve their low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goals. This randomized, controlled trial was designed to evaluate the impact of a system that provides uniquely formatted laboratory results to patients with CVD on their changes in LDL-C levels. METHODS: Eighty patients with CVD were randomized to receive standard care or the intervention inclusive of a computer-generated, 11''x17'' color poster depicting an individual's LDL-C status and goals along with personalized steps to aid in goal achievement. Cholesterol profiles were obtained at baseline and 6 months after enrollment. Physicians received standard laboratory reports and were blinded to the randomization. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between patient groups in age, education level, race, baseline cholesterol levels, comorbidities, or percentage of patients in each group who met their NCEP goal at baseline. Patients receiving intervention tools had significant reductions in LDL-C from baseline compared with patients in the control group. Intervention patients who did not meet NCEP goals at baseline had the greatest reduction in LDL-C, with a mean change from baseline of -21.5 mg/dL (P<0.001) whereas standard care patients had no significant change in the LDL-C levels (-4.6 mg/dL, P=0.28). At study close, 73% of intervention patients reported that their posters remained displayed on their refrigerator. CONCLUSION: This unique and personalized intervention resulted in the LDL-C lowering benefit among patients with CVD comparable to that of lipid lowering agents.