PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Robert Edelman

Publications and source records attributed to Robert Edelman.

24 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed2002

Further evidence for association of hepatitis C infection with parenteral schistosomiasis treatment in Egypt.

BACKGROUND: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection and schistosomiasis are major public health problems in the Nile Delta of Egypt. To control schistosomiasis, mass treatment campaigns using tartar emetic injections were conducted in the 1960s through 1980s. Evidence suggests that inadequately sterilized needles used in these campaigns contributed to the transmission of HCV in the region. To corroborate this evidence, this study evaluates whether HCV infections clustered within houses in which household members had received parenteral treatment for schistosomiasis. METHODS: A serosurvey was conducted in a village in the Nile Delta and residents were questioned about prior treatment for schistosomiasis. Sera were evaluated for the presence of antibodies to HCV. The GEE2 approach was used to test for clustering of HCV infections, where correlation of HCV infections within household members who had been treated for schistosomiasis was the parameter of interest. RESULTS: A history of parenteral treatment for schistosomiasis was observed to cluster within households, OR for clustering: 2.44 (95% CI: 1.47-4.06). Overall, HCV seropositivity was 40% (321/796) and was observed to cluster within households that had members who had received parenteral treatment for schistosomiasis, OR for clustering: 1.76 (95% CI: 1.05-2.95). No such evidence for clustering was found in the remaining households. CONCLUSION: Clustering of HCV infections and receipt of parenteral treatment for schistosomiasis within the same households provides further evidence of an association between the schistosomiasis treatment campaigns and the high HCV seroprevalence rates currently observed in the Nile delta of Egypt.

Egypt↗
PubMed2002

Safety, reactogenicity, and immunogenicity of a tetravalent meningococcal polysaccharide-diphtheria toxoid conjugate vaccine given to healthy adults.

Healthy adults, 18-55 years old, were immunized once with a tetravalent (serogroups A, C, Y, and W-135) meningococcal vaccine conjugated to diphtheria toxoid at 1 of 3 doses and were monitored for safety, reactogenicity, and immunogenicity. No immediate reactions were observed. Only 1 of 89 subjects reported fever; only 1 reported any severe reactogenicity (local pain/soreness, chills, arthralgia, anorexia, and malaise). For each serogroup and in each dose group, the geometric mean serum bactericidal antibody (SBA) titer and immunoglobulin G concentration increased after immunization. In the 4- and 10-microg-dose groups, all subjects had SBA titers >/=8 against serogroups A and C, and 89% and 93% of subjects had SBA titers >/=8 against serogroups Y and W-135, respectively. The A, C, Y, and W-135 Neisseria meningitidis-diphtheria toxoid conjugate vaccine, when given to healthy adults as a single intramuscular injection of 1, 4, or 10 microg/serogroup, is acceptably tolerated and immunogenic and deserves further development.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Clinical responses to undiluted and diluted smallpox vaccine.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the potential to increase the supply of smallpox vaccine (vaccinia virus), we compared the response to vaccination with 10(8.1), 10(7.2), and 10(7.0) plaque-forming units (pfu) of vaccinia virus per milliliter. METHODS: In this randomized, single-blind, prospective study, 680 adults who had not been previously immunized were inoculated intradermally with undiluted vaccine (mean titer, 10(8.1) pfu per milliliter), a 1:5 dilution, or a 1:10 dilution of vaccinia virus with use of a bifurcated needle, and the site was covered with a semipermeable dressing. Subjects were monitored for vesicle formation (an indicator of the success of vaccination) and adverse events for 56 days after immunization. RESULTS: Success rates did not differ significantly among the groups and ranged from 97.1 to 99.1 percent after the first vaccination. Both the undiluted and diluted vaccines were reactogenic. In addition to the formation of pustules, common adverse events included the formation of satellite lesions, regional lymphadenopathy, fever, headache, nausea, muscle aches, fatigue, and chills consistent with the presence of an acute viral illness. Generalized and localized rashes, including two cases of erythema multiforme, were also observed. CONCLUSIONS: When given by a bifurcated needle, vaccinia virus vaccine can be diluted to a titer as low as 10(7.0) pfu per milliliter (approximately 10,000 pfu per dose) and induce local viral replication and vesicle formation in more than 97 percent of persons.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2002

Delayed-type hypersensitivity in volunteers immunized with a synthetic multi-antigen peptide vaccine (PfCS-MAP1NYU) against Plasmodium falciparum sporozoites.

During the testing of the safety and immunogenicity of an adjuvanted, synthetic Plasmodium falciparum CS multiple antigen peptide (MAP) vaccine, we investigated the potential for using cutaneous delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH) reactions as a correlate of immune response. We evaluated 27 of our volunteers for DTH reactions to intradermal inoculation (0.02 ml) of several concentrations of the MAP vaccine and adjuvant control solutions. Induration was measured 2 days after skin tests were applied. Nine of 14 vaccinees (64%) with serum, high-titered anti-MAP antibody developed positive DTH (>or=5mm induration), that first appeared by 29 days after immunization and persisted for at least 3-6 months after 1-2 more immunizations. In contrast, DTH responses were negative in eight of eight vaccinees with no or low antibody titers, and in five of five non-immunized volunteers. Biopsies of positive DTH skin test sites were histologically compatible with a DTH reaction. We conclude that the presence of T cell functional activity reflected by a positive DTH skin test response to the MAP antigen serves as another marker for vaccine immunogenicity.

Adjuvants, Immunologic↗
PubMed2002

The development and use of vaccine adjuvants.

Interest in vaccine adjuvants is intense and growing, because many of the new subunit vaccine candidates lack sufficient immunogenicity to be clinically useful. In this review, I have emphasized modern vaccine adjuvants injected parenterally, or administered orally, intranasally, or transcutaneously with licensed or experimental vaccines in humans. Every adjuvant has a complex and often multi-factorial immunological mechanism, usually poorly understood in vivo. Many determinants of adjuvanticity exist, and each adjuvanted vaccine is unique. Adjuvant safety is critical and can enhance, retard, or stop development of an adjuvanted vaccine. The choice of an adjuvant often depends upon expensive experimental trial and error, upon cost, and upon commercial availability. Extensive regulatory and administrative support is required to conduct clinical trials of adjuvanted vaccines. Finally, comparative adjuvant trials where one antigen is formulated with different adjuvants and administered by a common protocol to animals and humans can accelerate vaccine development.

Adjuvants, Immunologic↗