PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Robert Fischer

Publications and source records attributed to Robert Fischer.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Nodular sclerosing Hodgkin disease: new grading predicts prognosis in intermediate and advanced stages.

The prognostic value of histologic classification and single histomorphologic parameters in Hodgkin disease has been widely debated in the literature. Whereas several former studies identified single parameters to be of clinical relevance, some recent reports have doubted the prognostic value of histology using modern treatment. Grading of the largest histologic category of Hodgkin disease, nodular sclerosis (NS), has been controversially discussed concerning clinical relevance. In this study, 965 cases of NS were reviewed to assess 9 histomorphologic parameters. The histologic results were correlated with laboratory and clinical findings and with overall survival and disease-free survival. Based on these results, a new grading of the NS category was established. The new grading, based on the 3 criteria eosinophilia, lymphocyte depletion, and atypia of the Hodgkin/Reed-Sternberg cells, was a significant indicator of prognosis in intermediate and advanced stages. Patients investigated in this study represent an outstanding collection because all of them were enrolled in the prospective multicenter clinical trial of the German Hodgkin Lymphoma Study Group. All of them had been staged uniformly according to the Ann Arbor system and had received stage-adapted modern treatment according to multimodality protocols. A subtle analysis of histology could represent a possible way to identify patients with a significantly better or worse prognosis. This new grading should help to avoid overtreatment to reduce severe therapy-related side effects such as acute toxicity and chronic sequelae such as cardiopulmonary complications and secondary neoplasias.

Adolescent↗

Is your IVF programme good?

Few standards exist today to assess the quality of an IVF centre. Although much focus is placed upon pregnancy rates, emphasis on this outcome alone is inadequate. The purpose of this report is to examine those factors that should be considered in assessing the overall quality of an IVF centre. Current methods to assess quality are reviewed. Many governing bodies throughout the world currently focus solely on pregnancy rates, which can be misguided if factors such as multiple pregnancies, ovarian hyperstimulation, patient satisfaction, and the proper evaluation of laboratory and clinical protocols are not taken into account. Measurements of quality and methods to improve it are critical in all business models, including IVF. We propose an international standard such as the ISO 9001 for IVF centres to properly evaluate and improve the delivery of their care.

Female↗