Biomedical subjects

Robert H Howland

Publications and source records attributed to Robert H Howland.

21 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

PubMed2003

Group comparisons of DSM-IV subtypes of chronic depression: validity of the distinctions, part 2.

The nosology of chronic depression in Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th ed.; DSM-IV, American Psychiatric Association, 1994) is highly complex and requires clinicians to differentiate among several chronic course subtypes. This study replicates an earlier investigation (J. McCullough et al., 2000; see record 2000-05424-007) that found few differences among Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (3rd ed. rev.; DSM-III-R; American Psychiatric Association, 1987) categories of chronic depression. In the present study, 681 outpatients with chronic major depression, double depression, recurrent major depression without full interepisode recovery, and chronic major depression superimposed on antecedent dysthymia were compared. Few differences were observed on a broad range of demographic, clinical, psychosocial, family history, and treatment response variables. The authors suggest that chronic depression should be viewed as a single, broad condition that can assume a variety of clinical course configurations.

Adult↗

PubMed2003

Effects of sertraline on sleep architecture in patients with depression.

Previous studies indicate that selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), including fluoxetine, fluvoxamine, citalopram and paroxetine, suppress rapid eye movement sleep, and increased nocturnal arousals. There has been no published report of the impact of sertraline on the sleep of depressed patients. This study examines such effects. Forty-seven patients with major depressive disorder, randomized to double-blind treatment with sertraline or placebo, completed sleep studies before and after 12 weeks of pharmacotherapy. Groups were compared using multivariate analyses of covariance and/or analyses of covariance to examine 4 empirically defined sets of sleep measures. Compared to the placebo-treated group, patients who received sertraline experienced an increase in delta wave sleep in the first sleep cycle and prolonged rapid eye movement (REM) sleep latency. Although, sertraline therapy decreased the average number of REM periods (from 3.86 to 2.40), the activity of both REM period 1 and REM period 2 was significantly increased. Aside from an increase in sleep latency, sertraline therapy was not associated with a worsening of measures of sleep continuity. There was also no significant difference between the groups on a measure of subjective sleepiness. These findings are both similar and different from those observed in previous studies of other SSRIs. The increase in delta sleep ratio and consolidation of REM sleep may have some other clinical implications. However, the generalizability of these findings is limited because of a number of reasons. Further studies are needed to examine the effects of SSRIs in acute treatment of depressed patients with severe insomnia, and the relationship of acute changes and relapse prevention of recurrent depression.

Adult↗

PubMed2002

Double-blind switch study of imipramine or sertraline treatment of antidepressant-resistant chronic depression.

BACKGROUND: Although various strategies have been proposed to treat antidepressant nonresponders, little controlled research has been published that examines prospectively the use of switching to an alternate antidepressant. METHODS: This was a multisite study in which outpatients with chronic major depression (with or without concurrent dysthymia), who failed to respond to 12 weeks of double-blind treatment with either sertraline hydrochloride (n = 117) or imipramine hydrochloride (n = 51), were crossed over or switched to 12 additional weeks of double-blind treatment with the alternate medication. Outcome measures included the 24-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression and the Clinical Global Impressions--Severity and Improvement scales. RESULTS: The switch from sertraline to imipramine (mean dosage, 221 mg/d) and from imipramine to sertraline (mean dosage, 163 mg/d) resulted in clinically and statistically significant improvements. The switch to sertraline treatment was associated with fewer adverse effect complaints and significantly less attrition owing to adverse effects. Although sertraline treatment also resulted in significantly higher response rates in the intent-to-treat samples (60% in the sertraline group and 44% in the imipramine group), neither the intent-to-treat remission rates nor the response and remission rates among study completers differed significantly. Moreover, after considering the effect of attrition, there were no significant treatment effects on the more comprehensive generalized estimating equation analyses of the continuous dependent measures. CONCLUSIONS: More than 50% of chronically depressed antidepressant nonresponders benefited from a switch from imipramine to sertraline, or vice versa, despite a high degree of chronicity. As in the initial trial, sertraline was generally better tolerated than imipramine. Switching to a standard antidepressant of a different class is a useful treatment strategy for antidepressant nonresponders and could be considered a standard of comparison for future studies of novel alternate strategies.

Adult↗