PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Robert J Baumann

Publications and source records attributed to Robert J Baumann.

11 recordsLinked to original sources

An unusual complication of cancer treatment for acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Childhood cancer is a leading cause of mortality in children less than 15 years of age, accounting for about 10.4 of total childhood deaths [Robinson LL: In: Pizzo PA, Polack DA (eds) Principles and Practice of Pediatric Oncology, 3rd edn. Lippincott--Raven, Philadelphia--NewYork, 1997, pp. 1-10.]. As more aggressive therapeutic regimens have been adopted and ostensibly cured patients are being followed for longer periods of time, it has become increasingly clear that the treatment of cancer can have significant late effects on the growing child, one of the more troublesome of which is the induction of secondary malignancy. We report an 11-year-old child who, as supported by both clinical course and neuroimaging studies, developed an unusual complication eight years after completing therapy for acute lymphoblastic leukemia, gliomatosis cerebri.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗

Stability of salivary concentrations of the newer antiepileptic drugs in the postal system.

Saliva antiepileptic drug (AED) concentrations strongly correlate with serum concentrations. Saliva collection is painless and noninvasive, and untrained personnel can easily be taught the collection process. Remote patients could mail saliva samples to a laboratory for monitoring, and samples could be obtained in the immediate postictal state to provide a "real-time" concentration. The objectives of this study were to assess the stability of saliva lamotrigine (LMT), levetiracetam (LEV), oxcarbazepine (OXC), topiramate (TPM), and zonsiamide (ZNS) concentrations sent through the United States Postal Service (USPS) and to quantify the amount of time needed for patients and the USPS to return samples to clinic. Saliva samples were obtained from patients currently taking 1 of the targeted AEDs. Samples were split into 2 storage vials. One sample was sealed in an addressed envelope, which the patient mailed from home, whereas the other sample was frozen immediately. Postmark date and day returned were collected for mailed samples. Saliva concentrations were determined using HPLC. Wilcoxon rank sum tests were used to compare the immediately-frozen and mailed sample means. Correlations were determined by the Spearman test. Thirty-seven patients were enrolled in the study. The median time between collection and postmark was 1 day (range 0-6 days); and between collection and receipt was 4 days (range 1-160 days). The mean concentrations for mailed and immediately frozen samples were similar for each AED (P > 0.15). Spearman rank order correlations between mailed and immediately frozen aliquots were strong (LMT rs = 1, LEV rs = 1, OXC rs = 0.964, TPM rs = 0.90, and ZNS rs = 1). Saliva samples mailed by patients maintain stability and can be returned in a reasonable length of time. Further studies are needed to assess patient/caretaker capability of obtaining an adequate sample.

Adolescent↗

Physician preference for antiepileptic drug concentration testing.

A four-item questionnaire asked active U.S. members of the Child Neurology Society to value painless antiepileptic drug concentration monitoring, whether members had ordered a saliva level (the best established painless method) in the last year, and whether such levels were available. Value was quantified by time per patient that the physician would willingly expend to arrange for the test. Of 945 questionnaires sent, 544 (58%) were returned. When asked the value of a painless method for children, 286/522 (55%) reported willingness to expend 10 to 30 minutes to arrange the test; 498/522 (95%) would use a painless method if available. When asked the value of an immediate sample at home during a seizure or adverse event, a substantial majority, 370/526 (70%), would make an important donation of their own time to arrange for the sample. Only 5% would not use it. Just 2/544 respondents had obtained a painless (saliva) concentration, and merely 33/544 (6%) perceived such tests as being available. We conclude that child neurologists put a high value on painless antiepileptic monitoring. These data suggest that a painless method of measuring antiepileptic drug concentrations--especially if it could be performed at home--would fulfill an unmet need in the care of children with epilepsy.

Anticonvulsants↗

Feasibility and limitations of oxcarbazepine monitoring using salivary monohydroxycarbamazepine (MHD).

The purpose of this study is to determine the feasibility of using 10-hydroxy-10,11-dihydrocarbazepine (MHD) concentration in saliva as an alternative to serum for the therapeutic monitoring of oxcarbazepine (OXC) treatment. Investigators identified subjects seen in neurology clinics at the University of Kentucky Chandler Medical Center. Patients were eligible if they agreed to participate in this study, were taking oxcarbazepine, and if a serum MHD concentration had been ordered by their physician. Unstimulated saliva specimens (0.25 mL minimum) were collected in the clinic and frozen until analysis. Blood samples were obtained by phlebotomy. Serum specimens were analyzed by a reference laboratory. Saliva MHD concentrations were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography in the Clinical Laboratory at the Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center. Linear regression analysis was used to evaluate correlations. Saliva and blood specimens were collected from 28 epilepsy patients, but usable samples were obtained from only 23. The mean serum MHD concentration was 23.9 +/- 10.0 microg/mL, and the mean saliva concentration was 23.1 +/- 10.1 microg/mL. There was a significant positive correlation between the serum and saliva concentrations: saliva (y) = 0.95 serum (x) + 0.39; r = 0.941; n = 23; P < 0.001). The mean saliva:serum MHD concentration ratio was 0.96 +/- 0.15. The results of the current study indicate that the relationship between freely flowing (unstimulated) saliva and serum concentrations of MHD is sufficient for therapeutic drug monitoring. A limitation of saliva MHD monitoring is that individuals who have difficulty producing small quantities of saliva or who have viscous saliva should generally be avoided for this type of monitoring. It is also recommended to avoid saliva collection within 8 hours after OXC dosing to allow complete absorption and transformation of the parent drug.

Adolescent↗

Herpes simplex encephalitis and radiotherapy.

The pathogenesis underlying the reactivation of latent herpes simplex virus remains undefined. This article presents the case of a 15-year-old male who developed herpes simplex encephalitis, as proven by a positive cerebrospinal fluid polymerase chain reaction and supported by magnetic resonance imaging findings during radiotherapy for pontine glioma. The temporal relation of radiotherapy to the occurrence of herpes simplex encephalitis suggests that cranial irradiation may play a role in the reactivation of latent herpes simplex virus. This finding suggests that herpes simplex encephalitis should be a part of the differential diagnosis of acute neurologic decline in patients undergoing cranial radiotherapy.

Adolescent↗

Topiramate concentration in saliva: an alternative to serum monitoring.

This study examines the relationship between serum and saliva topiramate concentrations, and attempts to determine if saliva may be a useful alternative to serum for therapeutic monitoring. Saliva and blood specimens were collected from 31 epilepsy patients (mean age 10.5 +/- 6.0 years; range 2.5 years to 24.8 years), and topiramate concentrations were determined by fluorescence polarization immunoassay. One patient's results were omitted because the saliva concentration was below the limit of quantitation of the assay. A strong correlation exists between serum and saliva topiramate concentrations (adjusted r(2) = 0.97, n = 30, P < 0.0001). The mean fraction of saliva to serum concentration is 89.8% +/- 12.1% (range 62.9% to 112.7%). The results of this study support the use of saliva as a viable alternative to serum for monitoring topiramate therapy. Topiramate concentration in saliva: an alternative to serum monitoring.

Adolescent↗

Correlation of levetiracetam concentrations between serum and saliva.

PURPOSE: More than 100 drugs have been evaluated for salivary therapeutic drug monitoring since the 1970s. The most studied drugs are the anticonvulsants phenytoin, phenobarbital, and carbamazepine, demonstrating strong correlations between serum and saliva concentrations. No published data exist for levetiracetam (LEV) to the authors' knowledge. This study's objective is to determine the correlation between LEV serum and saliva concentrations. METHODS: Investigators identified subjects seen in neurology clinics at the University of Kentucky. Patients were eligible if they agreed to participate in this study, were taking LEV for a minimum of 4 weeks, and if a serum LEV concentration had been ordered by their physician. Patients spit a minimum of 0.25 mL into a cup to obtain saliva samples. Blood samples were obtained by phlebotomy. RESULTS: Serum and saliva LEV concentrations were determined via high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) in two separate reference laboratories. Linear regression analysis was used to evaluate correlations. Serum and saliva samples were obtained from 40 patients (22 female, 18 male), ranging from 3 to 57 years of age. The mean +/- SD serum LEV concentration for reference laboratory A was significantly lower (P < 0.0001) than reference laboratory B, 23.6 +/- 13.8 microg/mL and 27.0 +/- 16.9 microg/mL, respectively. The mean +/- SD saliva to serum concentration fraction was also different for the two laboratories, i.e., 41.0% +/- 0.15% for lab A and 36.0% +/- 0.15% for lab B (P = 0.001). The correlation coefficients for the two laboratories were similar, 0.87 and 0.86 (both P < 0.0001) for labs A and B, respectively. CONCLUSION: A significant positive correlation exists between LEV saliva and serum concentrations. The ability to monitor LEV therapy using saliva may provide benefits that include facilitating sample collection and improving the quality of life for persons with epilepsy. Patients with poor venous access, such as children and elderly patients, and persons afraid of needles may particularly benefit from this method.

Adolescent↗

Neurosarcoid presents differently in children than in adults.

BACKGROUND: Neurosarcoid is seldom recognized in children. In the absence of any large pediatric series, it has been assumed that the presenting signs and symptoms are identical in adults and children. OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that childhood neurosarcoid differs in presenting signs and symptoms from neurosarcoid in adults. METHODS: We tabulated the initial neurologic signs and symptoms in all reported cases of childhood sarcoid with evidence of central nervous system involvement. These data then were compared with published studies of adult neurosarcoid. RESULTS: Twenty-nine cases (from the English, French, and German literature) had descriptions of presenting signs and symptoms. Ages were 3 months to 18 years; 48% (14 of 29) presented before 13 years. Seizures were the most common presenting symptom (38%, 11 of 29), and 73% of these children (8 of 11) were <13 years old at presentation. Twenty-one percent (6 of 29) had cranial nerve involvement at presentation, and all were >or=12 years old. Twenty-one percent (6 of 29) had hypothalamic dysfunction. Five children presented with headache, 4 with motor signs, and 3 with papilledema. Twenty-four percent (7 of 29) had mass lesions on imaging. CONCLUSIONS: Children with neurosarcoid present differently than do adults. Children are more likely to have seizures, less likely to have cranial nerve palsies, and perhaps more likely to have a space-occupying lesion. Our analysis of the cases available for review in the published literature suggests that children evolve to an adult pattern as they progress through adolescence.

Central Nervous System Diseases↗

Correlation of lamotrigine concentrations between serum and saliva.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare the relationship between serum and salivary concentrations of lamotrigine in pediatric and adult epilepsy populations. DESIGN: Paired-sample pharmacokinetic study. SETTING: University neurology clinic. PATIENTS: Thirty-seven patients with epilepsy, aged 2-60 years, who were taking lamotrigine and whose physicians had ordered a lamotrigine serum concentration. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Patients spit a minimum of 0.25 ml into a cup to provide saliva samples. Blood samples were obtained by phlebotomy. Serum and salivary lamotrigine concentrations were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography. Linear regression analysis was used to evaluate correlations. Six patients' results were omitted due to the lack of a serum or saliva specimen or clearly erroneous results, leaving 31 patients for analysis. There was a strong correlation between the serum results reported by two reference laboratories (coefficient of correlation [r] = 0.988). The correlations between salivary and serum lamotrigine concentrations were similar for reference laboratory A (r = 0.81) and reference laboratory B (r = 0.84). Saliva:serum concentration ratios ranged from 0.41-1.26 (mean +/- SD 0.62 +/- 0.19) for reference laboratory A and from 0.40-1.19 ((mean +/- SD 0.64 +/- 0.18) for reference laboratory B. CONCLUSION: There is a good correlation between salivary and serum concentrations for lamotrigine. However, there is wide interpatient variability in the saliva:serum ratio. The data suggest that salivary monitoring may play a role in the monitoring of lamotrigine for adult and pediatric patients.

Adolescent↗

Valproate-associated stomatitis.

The purpose of this article is to report a case of severe stomatitis in a patient with pediatric epilepsy taking divalproex sodium. The case was reviewed with detailed oral examinations. This 5-year-old child developed severe stomatitis 18 months after institution of divalproex sodium. Cessation of the medication was associated with resolution of the stomatitis. A review of the pertinent literature is also provided. Stomatitis is a rare but potentially serious adverse effect of divalproex sodium administration.

Anticonvulsants↗

Behavioral treatment of migraine in children and adolescents.

Behavioral interventions, particularly biofeedback and relaxation therapy, have demonstrated their effectiveness in the treatment of both adults and older children with migraine in controlled trials. The physiological basis for their effectiveness is unclear, but data from one trial suggest that levels of plasma beta-endorphin can be altered by relaxation and biofeedback therapies. The data supporting the effectiveness of behavioral therapies are less clear-cut in children than in adults, but that is also true for the data supporting medical treatment. This is due in part to methodological issues, especially the lack of a specific test for migraine, which has hampered research and helped lead to an inappropriate de-emphasis on care for childhood headache. In addition, migraine headaches in children are often briefer and have a higher rate of spontaneous remission than those experienced by adults, making it difficult to separate effective from ineffective treatments. While it is widely believed that stress is a major factor in childhood migraine, well-designed studies have had difficulty developing data to support this viewpoint. Many clinicians utilize 'confident reassurance', reassuring the family that the child is not seriously ill, in the belief that having migraine headaches can be stressful. They also modify behaviors that are believed to trigger migraine headaches, such as poor sleep habits or irregular meal times. Relaxation therapies use techniques such as progressive relaxation, self-hypnosis, and guided imagery. Several studies have found relaxation therapies to be as effective, or more effective, in reducing the frequency of migraine headaches than modest doses of a beta-blockade medication, although one study found relaxation therapy to be no more effective than a control program. Several studies have demonstrated that these therapies can be taught to children in a low cost but effective manner. Biofeedback therapies commonly use an apparatus to demonstrate a physiological effect. Most commonly in pediatrics, children are taught to raise the temperature of one of their fingers. This can be done with or without a thermometer. Several groups have shown that these techniques can be taught to children and that their use is associated with fewer and briefer migraine headaches. People who experience migraines can also experience episodic headaches throughout life. An important consideration is preparing children to deal with future headaches, allowing them to feel in control of their health. Behavioral therapies have the potential to do this, giving the child access to a technique that can be easily resumed without a medical visit or prescription.

Adolescent↗