PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Robert J Esther

Publications and source records attributed to Robert J Esther.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Follow-up study of long-term survivors of osteosarcoma in the prechemotherapy era.

Osteosarcoma is the most common primary bone sarcoma. Several studies published in the 1960s established that approximately one fifth of patients survive when treated with surgery alone. There is no information, however, about the long-term consequences of osteosarcoma. It is especially relevant to know if these patients are at risk for a second malignancy. We reviewed all clinical records from long-term (defined as more than 10 years) osteosarcoma survivors treated at Mayo Clinic in the prechemotherapeutic era from 1900 to 1960. We re-reviewed histological sections for most cases. Patients or next of kin provided follow-up information during telephone interviews. Rates of second malignancy were compared with expected rates in the population at large. We identified 465 patients treated for osteosarcoma. Of these patients, 83 (17.8%) were long-term survivors, including 19 who were alive up to 65 years after treatment. Of the 7 patients with pulmonary metastases, 3 died. A second malignancy developed in 26 patients, 15 of whom died of the malignancy. Although long-term survivors of osteosarcoma have a higher incidence of a second malignant tumor than a normal population, this increase was not statistically significant. No demographic or histological variables predicted long-term survival.

Age Distribution↗

Hardware removal: indications and expectations.

Although hardware removal is commonly done, it should not be considered a routine procedure. The decision to remove hardware has significant economic implications, including the costs of the procedure as well as possible work time lost for postoperative recovery. The clinical indications for implant removal are not well established. There are few definitive data to guide whether implant removal is appropriate. Implant removal may be challenging and lead to complications, such as neurovascular injury, refracture, or recurrence of deformity. When implants are removed for pain relief alone, the results are unpredictable and depend on both the implant type and its anatomic location. Current literature does not support the routine removal of implants to protect against allergy, carcinogenesis, or metal detection. Surgeons and patients should be aware of appropriate indications and have realistic expectations of the risks and benefits of implant removal.

Device Removal↗

Foot tumors: diagnosis and treatment.

Several large clinical series have demonstrated that benign and malignant tumors occur in the foot and ankle at a much higher rate than previously thought. Vigilance is warranted in investigating any foot mass, including those with an apparently indolent course. Although tumors in the foot tend to produce symptoms relatively early because of the foot's compact structure, many tumors are initially misdiagnosed. Given the comparatively small size of the anatomic compartments in the foot, tumors often present outside the original compartment, making timely diagnosis essential. Major treatment errors can be avoided if physicians consider the potential for malignancy when evaluating all foot masses. A high index of suspicion, an organized approach to diagnosis, and evaluation of and adherence to the basic principles of treatment of musculoskeletal neoplasms increase the likelihood of acceptable results.

Bone Neoplasms↗