PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Robert Legenstein

Publications and source records attributed to Robert Legenstein.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

What can a neuron learn with spike-timing-dependent plasticity?

Spiking neurons are very flexible computational modules, which can implement with different values of their adjustable synaptic parameters an enormous variety of different transformations F from input spike trains to output spike trains. We examine in this letter the question to what extent a spiking neuron with biologically realistic models for dynamic synapses can be taught via spike-timing-dependent plasticity (STDP) to implement a given transformation F. We consider a supervised learning paradigm where during training, the output of the neuron is clamped to the target signal (teacher forcing). The well-known perceptron convergence theorem asserts the convergence of a simple supervised learning algorithm for drastically simplified neuron models (McCulloch-Pitts neurons). We show that in contrast to the perceptron convergence theorem, no theoretical guarantee can be given for the convergence of STDP with teacher forcing that holds for arbitrary input spike patterns. On the other hand, we prove that average case versions of the perceptron convergence theorem hold for STDP in the case of uncorrelated and correlated Poisson input spike trains and simple models for spiking neurons. For a wide class of cross-correlation functions of the input spike trains, the resulting necessary and sufficient condition can be formulated in terms of linear separability, analogously as the well-known condition of learnability by perceptrons. However, the linear separability criterion has to be applied here to the columns of the correlation matrix of the Poisson input. We demonstrate through extensive computer simulations that the theoretically predicted convergence of STDP with teacher forcing also holds for more realistic models for neurons, dynamic synapses, and more general input distributions. In addition, we show through computer simulations that these positive learning results hold not only for the common interpretation of STDP, where STDP changes the weights of synapses, but also for a more realistic interpretation suggested by experimental data where STDP modulates the initial release probability of dynamic synapses.

Action Potentials↗

Indomethacin versus meloxicam for prevention of heterotopic ossification after total hip arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Heterotopic ossification (HO) is a recognized postsurgical complication after total hip arthroplasty. Brooker et al. [6] established a grading system to define the degree of HO. The results of several studies have shown that non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) and radiation therapy reliably reduce the occurrence of severe HO. The exact cause and mechanism of bone formation are not known. The efficacy of indomethacin versus meloxicam for the prevention of heterotopic periarticular ossification and clinical NSAID side-effects after primary, cementless total hip arthroplasty was evaluated. METHODS: Probands underwent cementless total hip replacements at the Orthopaedic Department, Hospital Wiener Neustadt, from January 1997 to January 1998, did not take NSAID up to 4 weeks preoperatively and had no NSAID contraindications. Patients were separated into two groups by different hospitalisation floors. All patients selected for this study suffered from primary or secondary coxarthrosis. Data were collected as a prospective, randomised, parallel group study. Patients were given 50 mg indomethacin 2 times daily ( n=58) vs 7.5 mg meloxicam ( n=58) in a 12-day treatment course. RESULTS: A two-sided Cochran-Armitage trend test showed no statistically significant difference ( p<0.05) for one of the drugs regarding influence on ectopic bone formation according to the grading system of Brooker et al. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates that there is no statistically significant trend that indomethacin or meloxicam protects a hip arthroplasty better from heterotopic bone formation. We prefer indomethacin therapy because it is almost half the price of meloxicam therapy, and we recommend indomethacin in a 12-day treatment course given 50 mg 2 times daily as an effective, inexpensive and easily administered HO prophylaxis.

Aged↗

Input prediction and autonomous movement analysis in recurrent circuits of spiking neurons.

Temporal integration of information and prediction of future sensory inputs are assumed to be important computational tasks of generic cortical microcircuits. It has remained open how cortical microcircuits could possibly achieve this, especially since they consist--in contrast to most neural network models--of neurons and synapses with heterogeneous dynamic responses. It turns out, however, that the diversity of computational units increases the capability of microcircuit models for temporal integration. Furthermore the prediction of future input may be rather easy for such circuits since it suffices to train the readouts from such microcircuits. In this article we show that very simple readouts from a generic recurrently connected circuit of integrate-and-fire neurons with diverse dynamic synapses can be trained in an unsupervised manner to predict movements of different objects, that move within an unlimited number of combinations of speed, angle, and offset over a simulated sensory field. The autonomously trained microcircuit model is also able to compute the direction of motion, which is a computationally difficult problem ('aperture problem') since it requires disambiguation of local sensory readings through the context of other sensory readings at the current and preceding moments. Furthermore the same circuit can be trained simultaneously in a supervised manner to also report the shape and velocity of the moving object. Finally it is shown that the trained neural circuit supports novelty detection and the generation of 'imagined movements'. Altogether the results of this article suggest that it is not necessary to construct specific and biologically unrealistic neural circuit models for specific sensory processing tasks, since 'found' generic cortical microcircuit models in combination with very simple perceptron-like readouts can easily be trained to solve such computational tasks.

Action Potentials↗