PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Robert M Anderson

Publications and source records attributed to Robert M Anderson.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2005

Patient empowerment: reflections on the challenge of fostering the adoption of a new paradigm.

Diabetes is a self-managed illness in which the decisions most affecting the health and well being of patients are made by the patients themselves. Many of these decisions involve routine activities of daily living (e.g., nutrition, physical activity). Effective diabetes care requires patients and health care professionals to collaborate in the development of self-management plans that integrate the clinical expertise of health care professionals with the concerns, priorities and resources of the patient. Collaborative diabetes care requires a new "empowerment" paradigm that involves a fundamental redefinition of roles and relationships of health care professionals and patients. The challenges of fostering the adoption of a new paradigm differ substantially from those associated with the introduction of new technology. Those challenges are discussed in this paper.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗
PubMed2005

Empowerment and self-management after weight loss surgery.

The bariatric surgery health-care professional team are often frustrated and discouraged when patients are unwilling or unable to follow their advice to achieve ideal outcomes after obesity surgery. The acute care model that suffices for other types of surgery is inadequate after a surgery that requires chronic life-long behavioral changes. Practical interventions that facilitate collaborative relationships and foster patient-centered practices are the key to giving up feeling responsible for the choices that patients make, by being responsible to them, and achieving better outcomes.

Attitude to Health↗
PubMed2005

Using focus groups of older African Americans and Latinos with diabetes to modify a self-care empowerment intervention.

OBJECTIVE: To make cultural and age-specific modifications to a self-care empowerment intervention. DESIGN: Focus groups with self-administered surveys. SETTING: Two public health diabetes and geriatrics clinic and two senior centers in and around South Los Angeles. PARTICIPANTS: African Americans and Latinos aged > or = 55 years with diabetes (N=79), and two groups of health educators (N=16). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: After describing the proposed intervention, the focus group facilitators asked participants: 1) whether the community of interest would be interested in the proposed empowerment intervention; 2) why or why not; and 3) how the intervention could be modified to better address the concerns of the study community of interest. All groups were audiotaped, transcribed, and (when appropriate) translated into English. Three independent investigators read all transcripts and completed standardized coding forms for each transcript. In addition, at the end of each focus group, all participants completed a self-administered written survey asking them to rate aspects of the proposed intervention. RESULTS: Older African Americans and Latinos endorsed the intervention but desired an expanded dietary educational component and identified disability as an important missing content area. Participants rejected the use of an audio learning tool and did not believe that matching group-facilitator sociodemographic characteristics was important as long as facilitators demonstrated cultural competency. CONCLUSIONS: These findings illustrate a model of participatory research in which researchers and community members work together to develop an empowerment intervention that will meet community needs and will have greater cultural appropriateness. Modifying the intervention in accordance with these findings should enhance the relevance and impact of the self-care intervention.

Black or African American↗
PubMed2005

Evaluating a problem-based empowerment program for African Americans with diabetes: results of a randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of a problem-based empowerment patient education program specifically tailored for urban African Americans with type 2 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: The study used a randomized controlled trial (RCT) pretest/post-test design with repeated measures. Patients were randomly assigned to either a six-week intervention group or a six-week wait-listed control group. After completing the six sessions, patients were invited to participate in one of two follow-up conditions; attend a monthly support group or receive a monthly phone call from a nurse. Assessment measures included HbA1C, lipids, blood pressure, weight, self-management behavior and psychosocial adaptation. RESULTS: Both control and intervention patients showed a broad array of small-to-modest positive changes during the six-week RCT. These gains were maintained or improved upon during the one-year follow-up period. For patients in the two follow-up conditions, a positive correlation was seen between the number of follow-up contacts and their one-year HbA1C values. CONCLUSIONS: We believe that results of this study can be attributed to volunteer bias, study effects (ie, providing study data on several occasions to patients and their physicians during the one-year study period), and impact of the interventions. However, the study design does not allow us to examine the relative impact of these three factors on the patient improvements seen over the one-year study period.

Black or African American↗
PubMed2003

Changing office practice and health care systems to facilitate diabetes self-management.

Diabetes is a self-managed disease for which patients provide 99% of their own care. For patients to succeed as diabetes self-managers, they need office practices and health care systems that can prepare and support them in their diabetes self-management efforts over the long term. In order to provide effective diabetes education and ongoing support, office practices and health care systems will have to fundamentally redefine the roles of health professionals and patients with diabetes, and redesign practices and systems to allow for effective long-term self-management education and support. Although it is difficult for both people and systems to change, change is essential if we are going to provide self-management support for the majority of patients suffering from this serious chronic disease.

Delivery of Health Care↗
PubMed2003

When do patients and their physicians agree on diabetes treatment goals and strategies, and what difference does it make?

BACKGROUND: For patients with chronic illnesses, it is hypothesized that effective patient-provider collaboration contributes to improved patient self-care by promoting greater agreement on patient-specific treatment goals and strategies. However, this hypothesis has not been tested in actual encounters of patients with their own physicians. OBJECTIVE: To assess the extent to which patients with type 2 diabetes agree with their primary care providers (PCPs) on diabetes treatment goals and strategies, the factors that predict agreement, and whether greater agreement is associated with better patient self-management of diabetes. DESIGN: One hundred twenty-seven pairs of patients and their PCPs in two health systems were surveyed about their top 3 diabetes treatment goals (desired outcomes) and strategies to meet those goals. Using several measures to evaluate agreement, we explored whether patient characteristics, such as education and attitudes toward treatment, and patient-provider interaction styles, such as shared decision making, were associated with greater agreement on treatment goals and strategies. We then examined whether agreement was associated with higher patient assessments of their diabetes care self-efficacy and self-management. RESULTS: Overall, agreement on top treatment goals and strategies was low (all kappa were less than 0.40). In multivariable analyses, however, patients with more education, greater belief in the efficacy of their diabetes treatment, and who shared in treatment decision making with their providers were more likely to agree with their providers on treatment goals or strategies. Similarly, physician reports of having discussed more content areas of diabetes self-care were associated with greater agreement on treatment strategies. In turn, greater agreement on treatment goals and strategies was associated both with higher patient diabetes care self-efficacy and assessments of their diabetes self-management. CONCLUSION: Although patients and their PCPs in general had poor agreement on goals and strategies for managing diabetes, agreement was associated with higher patient self-efficacy and assessments of their diabetes self-management. This supports the hypothesis that enhancing patient-provider agreement on both overall treatment goals and specific strategies to meet these goals may lead to improved patient outcomes.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Faculty development for educational leadership and scholarship.

The Medical Education Scholars Program (MESP) at the University of Michigan Medical School is designed to develop leaders in medical education. The program's goals are to enable faculty to provide curriculum direction, improved teaching, educational research, and development, and institutional leadership at all levels of medical education. This one-year program uses a variety of educational methods and provides a broad curriculum in educational theory, assessment and evaluation, research design and methods, teaching-skills development, and educational leadership. Faculty are admitted on a competitive basis and one half-day per week of release time is funded as part of the program. Salient outcomes of the program (promotions, educational research and development, curriculum leadership, and educational scholarship) were measured in a pre- and post-program design in which each scholar acted as his or her own control. There were major increases in promotions and educational awards, new educational responsibilities, and new educational programs. A particularly important outcome was the emergence of educational scholarship in the professional portfolios of the program scholars in the form of peer-reviewed presentations and publications and educational grant funding. A cost-outcome analysis indicates that these multi-year outcomes were obtained from a one-time investment of approximately $21,000 per graduating scholar. This evaluation indicates that intensive faculty development programs can have measurable impacts on the careers of the participants and the institutional environment.

Curriculum↗
PubMed2003

Are residents more comfortable than faculty members when addressing sociocultural diversity in medicine?

PURPOSE: Sociocultural medicine is a growing curricular area in medical education. Because faculty members and residents will teach these curricula and model these skills in patient care, it is important to assess their attitudes toward diversity. This study examined faculty members' and residents' attitudes toward sociocultural issues in medicine. METHOD: In November 2000, 198 physicians from the Department of Pediatrics at the University of Michigan Medical School completed a questionnaire on demographics and sociocultural attitudes in medicine while they attended a department-wide retreat on cultural competency. A factor analysis of the sociocultural attitudes measure yielded five dimensions accounting for 70% of the variance. These factors included sexual orientation, diversity in professional functions, discussing race/ethnicity in teaching forums, clinical skills, and alternative medicine. RESULTS: Significant differences were found between faculty members and residents for sexual orientation issues (t = 2.76, p <.01) and alternative medicine (t = 2.84, p <.01), with residents endorsing greater comfort in these areas of patient care. When controlling for demographic/background variables, group differences disappeared. Past exposure to multiculturalism emerged as a significant predictor for both sociocultural attitude dimensions. CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggested while residents felt more comfortable than faculty members did with sexual orientation and alternative medicine issues in medicine, attitudes may have been related more to previous diversity education than to seniority of the physician. Integrating diversity education within departments and across the medical education continuum likely benefits all physicians. In the area of sociocultural medicine, both faculty members and residents can offer perspectives valuable to medical students, colleagues, and the larger medical community.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Personalized follow-up increases return rate at urban eye disease screening clinics for African Americans with diabetes: results of a randomized trial.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of using personalized follow-up, as compared to reminder letters, in increasing return rates at urban eye disease screening clinics for African Americans with diabetes, and to identify factors predictive of the patient's likelihood of returning for annual follow-up exams. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: All patients attending free community-based retinopathy screening clinics who were advised to return in one year for another diabetes eye evaluation (DEE) were randomized to standard or personalized follow-up interventions. Patients in the standard follow-up group received reminder letters a month before it was time to return for their next annual DEE. Patients in the intensive personalized intervention also received the letters, but those patients who did not call for an appointment within 10 days received a phone call from project staff, encouraging them to return for a DEE. RESULTS: One hundred thirty-two African Americans with diabetes were randomized to one of the 2 treatments. The return rate for the intensive, personalized follow-up group was 66%, significantly (P=.001) higher than the 35% return rate for the standard follow-up group. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated the efficacy of personal contact by telephone in improving return rates for annual DEEs in this population of patients. This finding is consistent with one of the key design principles of the project, which was to establish credible personal relationships with community leaders and patients as a means to maximize the utilization of the eye screening clinics.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Conducting community-based, culturally specific, eye disease screening clinics for urban African Americans with diabetes.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the need for, and efficacy of, community-based culturally specific eye disease screening clinics for urban African Americans with diabetes. The study employed a variety of culturally specific methods in the design and performance of 43 community-based eye disease screening clinics in southeastern Michigan. One thousand, thirty-seven subjects were recruited for the study. Of that number, 817 identified themselves as African Americans and are the focus of this report. Of the 817 African-American patients screened, 84 (10%) needed to be examined by an ophthalmologist immediately (< 30 days), and 180 (22%) needed to be examined soon (within 1 to 3 months), while 544 (67%) were advised to return for another exam a year later. The project demonstrated that it was possible to use culturally specific techniques to identify a significant number of urban African Americans with diabetes in need of eye screening and treatment. However, lack of health insurance proved to be the primary barrier to receiving needed treatment. Although the project was successful, it is not a solution to what is essentially a health systems problem, ie, inadequate access to appropriate diabetes care for a significant number of our population.

Black or African American↗