PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Robert M Wesley

Publications and source records attributed to Robert M Wesley.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Abnormal uterine bleeding.

Abnormal uterine bleeding is a common presenting symptom in the family practice setting. In women of childbearing age, a methodical history, physical examination, and laboratory evaluation may enable the physician to rule out causes such as pregnancy and pregnancy-related disorders, medications, iatrogenic causes, systemic conditions, and obvious genital tract pathology. Dysfunctional uterine bleeding (anovulatory or ovulatory) is diagnosed by exclusion of these causes. In women of childbearing age who are at high risk for endometrial cancer, the initial evaluation includes endometrial biopsy; saline-infusion sonohysterography or diagnostic hysteroscopy is performed if initial studies are inconclusive or the bleeding continues. Women of childbearing age who are at low risk for endometrial cancer may be assessed initially by transvaginal ultrasonography. Postmenopausal women with abnormal uterine bleeding should be offered dilatation and curettage; if they are poor candidates for general anesthesia or decline dilatation and curettage, they may be offered transvaginal ultrasonography or saline-infusion sonohysterography with directed endometrial biopsy. Medical management of anovulatory dysfunctional uterine bleeding may include oral contraceptive pills or cyclic progestins. Menorrhagia is managed most effectively with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or the levonorgestrel intrauterine contraceptive device. Surgical management may include hysterectomy or less invasive, uterus-sparing procedures.

Adult↗

Research support infrastructure and productivity in U.S. family practice residency programs.

PURPOSE: To examine the associations between 11 research support infrastructural characteristics and measures of research productivity. METHOD: A questionnaire was mailed to 462 directors of non-military family practice residency programs in the United States. A total of 11 research support infrastructural characteristics and six research productivity measures were coded. Initial analyses indicated a skewness in responses given by larger versus smaller programs. Respondents were divided into those from programs with eight or fewer full-time faculty and those from programs with nine or more. Separate analyses were run for each. Logistic regression was employed to determine which research support characteristics would best predict productivity in the top quartile. RESULTS: Of the 461 recipients of deliverable questionnaires, 351 (76.1%) responded. A large proportion of programs reported no research productivity for the preceding 12 months. Separate stepwise logistic regression analyses were run for small and large programs; the ability of the 11 characteristics to predict research-productive programs varied with size. Employment of full-time research professionals was the only characteristic positively associated with research productivity for both groups. For small programs, research productivity was positively associated with the requirement of faculty members to do research. For large programs, it was positively associated with both the presence of fellowship programs and the presence of a specific, written research strategic plan. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated a positive association between several elements of research infrastructure and research productivity but that such infrastructure is inconsistent across programs and seemingly insufficient to develop the necessary research culture and socialization.

Academic Medical Centers↗

Prevalence of community-oriented primary care knowledge, training, and practice.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Recent recommendations requiring resident training in community-oriented primary care (COPC) indicate a continued interest among family medicine educators. This study examines COPC-related aspects of training and practice and whether or not respondents report COPC knowledge. The study also compares residency program and physician responses. METHODS: A total of 400 randomly selected practicing physicians and 470 residency directors were asked about COPC curricular and practice experiences. Physicians were asked if they practice COPC. Programs were asked if they taught COPC. Both were asked if they were knowledgeable about COPC. RESULTS: Response rates for practicing physicians and programs were 58.4% and 71.8%, respectively; 38.8% of programs teach COPC, and 6.7% of physicians reported that they practice COPC. Sixty-seven percent of programs and 19% of physicians reported COPC knowledge. Programs with knowledge of COPC conducted more COPC-related activities than those without such knowledge. This relationship was not seen among practicing physicians. CONCLUSIONS: Aspects of COPC exist in training and in practice environments. Knowledge about COPC is associated with differences in programs' COPC activities but not in the COPC activities of practicing physicians. Programs and physicians differ in COPC implementation in training and practice.

Clinical Competence↗