Commentary. The impact of shortened training times on the discipline of vascular surgery in the United Kingdom.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to Robert S Rhodes.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
BACKGROUND: Although the scope and patterns of attrition of general surgery residents have been reported, no study has examined the residents who replaced them. The purpose of this study was to assess the quality of replacement residents (RRs). METHODS: A questionnaire asked program directors (PDs) about the prevalence, characteristics, and disposition of RRs in general surgery residency programs from 2001 to 2002. RESULTS: PDs from 169 programs (67%) responded, and 109 (64%) of these programs had RRs. Of 244 RRs (7%), 18 (7%) were postgraduate year (PGY)-1 residents; 64 (26%) were PGY-2 residents; 77 (32%) were PGY-3 residents; 52 (21%) were PGY-4 residents; and 33 (14%) were PGY-5 residents. RRs averaged 1.9 years in their programs. One hundred seventy-five (72%) came from outside the current institution, and 142 had (58%) graduated from U.S. medical schools. PDs judged RRs to be superior (20%), comparable (55%), or inferior (25%) to their peers. Neither internal recruitment nor United States medical school graduation predicted performance. Disposition included promotion and graduation (88%), leaving the program voluntarily (5%), repeating the year (4%), and dismissal (3%). Successful RR performance occurred in 71% of RRs. CONCLUSIONS: Typically, RRs were U.S. medical school graduates, were recruited from outside the institution, and have performed satisfactorily.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
BACKGROUND: This article attempts to quantify the current scope of attrition, identify the reasons why categorical residents are leaving general surgery residency programs voluntarily, and correlate the program directors' and residents' perspectives. STUDY DESIGN: A questionnaire asked the Program Directors of general surgery residency programs how many categorical residents left voluntarily in the 2000-2001 academic year, their postgraduate (PGY) levels, why they left, and where they went. Another questionnaire asked the residents why they entered surgery and why they left. The surveys' responses were compared. RESULTS: A total of 206 programs (81%) responded. One hundred ten programs (53%) reported voluntarily attrition of 167 categorical residents (mean: 0.8 residents per program for all responders and 1.5 residents per program for programs that reported attrition). Seventy-three programs (66%) lost one resident; 23 programs (21%), 2 residents; 9 programs (8%), 3 residents; 4 programs (4%), 4 residents; and 1 program (<1%), 5 residents. Eighty-five PGY-1 residents (51%), 42 PGY-2 residents (25%), 27 PGY-3 residents (16%), and 13 PGY-4 residents (8%) left. The most common reasons for attrition cited by the program directors were personal and work hours/lifestyle in 40% and 35%, respectively. One hundred five residents (63%) entered other fields of medicine; 40 residents transferred to other general surgery programs. Net voluntary attrition, defined as the number of residents who left general surgery voluntarily (127) divided by the resident population at risk, was 3%, indicating that 97% of the residents at risk in the responding programs remained in general surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Most surgery programs that responded were affected by attrition in 2000-2001, with approximately one-third losing more than one resident. Attrition tends to occur early in training. Most residents enter other specialties, primarily for quality-of-life reasons. But many stay in general surgery.
BACKGROUND: Surgical knowledge is the basis of successful clinical problem solving, so is thought to be an important component of overall clinical ability. Continuing medical education (CME) reinforces basic knowledge and provides exposure to new knowledge within a field. Specialty board examination performance measures this knowledge but few studies have investigated a link between such performance and CME activity. This study assessed that link on the American Board of Surgery Recertification Examination. STUDY DESIGN: The study sample comprised 278 randomly chosen applicants for the 2000 examination. Study variables included practice type, career activity, age, gender, other Board certifications, examination attempts, community size, geographic region, nationality, and ethnicity. RESULTS: The study sample was remarkably similar to the total candidate cohort with regard to study variables. Of the 245 sample Diplomates who took the Recertification Examination, 10.2% failed. The Pass group reported 53% more total CME hours and 38% more Category I CME hours than the Fail group. The vast majority of Category I activities were surgical, clinical. Analyzed by quartiles of total CME hours, the failure rate was only 3.4% for the highest quartile but 25.8% for the lowest quartile. For Category I hours, respective failure rates were 4.8% and 19.4%. When further stratified by practice type, the failure rate of those in solo practice was 6% for those in the highest quartile of total CME hours and 37% for those in the lowest quartile. For Category I hours, the respective failure rates were 0% and 31%. CONCLUSIONS: There is a strong relationship between CME activity and performance on the American Board of Surgery Recertification Examination. Low CME activity and practice type appear to be independent risk factors for examination failure. The relationship of these findings to patient care outcomes has important implications.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
BACKGROUND: Patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) pumps are widely used after surgery, but their association with various outcomes is not completely understood. Is PCA pump use related to the incidence of postoperative surgical site infections among patients undergoing open intestinal surgery? MATERIALS AND METHODS: We undertook a comprehensive retrospective chart review of 515 randomly selected patients over age 18 who had major rectal or intestinal surgery (Diagnosis Related Groups [DRGs] 146-149) between January 1994 and March 1997 from eight community or teaching hospitals along the U.S. west coast. Of these patients, 214 used PCA pumps. Outcome measures were in-hospital postoperative surgical site infections, respiratory complications, ileus/abdominal distention, urinary tract infection/urinary retention, and length of stay. RESULTS: Use of a PCA pump was significantly associated with increased in-hospital postoperative surgical site infections (10.7% for PCA, 4.0% for no PCA). The odds ratio for PCA use was about 4.0 after controlling for many variables, including severity of illness at admission, body mass index, preadmission use of corticosteroids, perforated viscus, number of previous abdominal operations, wound classification category, hypothermia, malnutrition on admission, preoperative antibiotic use within 2 h before incision, time from hospital admission to surgery, skin prep to incision time, anesthesia start to incision time, surgical skin to skin time, wound closure type, time from incision closure to the start of PCA, use of drains, blood product use, central line use, line infection, mobility assistance required, hospital, DRG, and surgeon. CONCLUSION: No confounding variables explained the significant association between PCA pump use and in-hospital surgical site infection. These results stand firmly on data that merit additional study to further elucidate possible immunologic effects of PCA pumps.