PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Roberta Fedele

Publications and source records attributed to Roberta Fedele.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Physicochemically modified silicon as a substrate for protein microarrays.

Reverse phase protein microarrays (RPMA) enable high throughput screening of posttranslational modifications of important signaling proteins within diseased cells. One limitation of protein-based molecular profiling is the lack of a PCR-like intrinsic amplification system for proteins. Enhancement of protein microarray sensitivities is an important goal, especially because many molecular targets within patient tissues are of low abundance. The ideal array substrate will have a high protein-binding affinity and low intrinsic signal. To date, nitrocellulose-coated glass has provided an effective substrate for protein binding in the microarray format when using chromogenic detection systems. As fluorescent systems, such as quantum dots, are explored as potential reporter agents, the intrinsic fluorescent properties of nitrocellulose-coated glass slides limit the ability to image microarrays for extended periods of time where increases in net sensitivity can be attained. Silicon, with low intrinsic autofluorescence, is being explored as a potential microarray surface. Native silicon has low binding potential. Through titrated reactive ion etching (RIE), varying surface areas have been created on silicon in order to enhance protein binding. Further, via chemical modification, reactive groups have been added to the surfaces for comparison of relative protein binding. Using this combinatorial method of surface roughening and surface coating, 3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane (APTES) and mercaptopropyltrimethoxysilane (MPTMS) treatments were shown to transform native silicon into a protein-binding substrate comparable to nitrocellulose.

Adsorption↗

Occupational asthma due to exposure to iroko wood dust.

BACKGROUND: Occupational asthma (OA) from iroko wood has been reported primarily in case reports. OBJECTIVE: To improve understanding of the pathogenesis of OA induced by iroko wood dust. METHODS: Three groups of woodworkers were included in this study: 9 workers who had clinically proven OA from iroko; 10 asymptomatic woodworkers; and 10 woodworkers with asthma. All patients underwent the following tests: a skin test with an iroko aqueous extract, specific IgE determination, and an iroko bronchial provocation test (IBPT). An eosinophil count was determined before and after the IBPT, and a methacholine inhalation test was performed after avoidance of exposure to iroko. Patients were asked to monitor their peak expiratory flow rates during a week at work followed by a week's vacation. RESULTS: In all patients with a personal history predictive of OA from iroko, a reduction of the peak expiratory flow rate and positivity to the IBPT while working with iroko were present. The latter test result showed a dual response, with a decrease in forced expiratory volume in 1 second from 25% to 32% at 10 minutes and a further decrease from 35% to 43% at 8 hours; at 24 hours, the eosinophil count was higher (P = .046). In 4 patients, the intradermal test results with iroko extract were positive, whereas the skin prick test result and the specific IgE determination were negative in all patients. The methacholine test result was also positive. In the control groups, all the test results with iroko extract were negative. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that OA due to iroko wood may be induced by immunologic mechanisms other than IgE-mediated immediate hypersensitivity reactions.

Adult↗

Latex allergy and fruit cross-reaction in subjects who are nonatopic.

Since the first case reported in 1927, latex allergy has attracted the attention of allergists including its capacity to cross-react with fruits. To evaluate the frequency of sensitivity to some fruit allergens shown to cross-react with latex, we evaluated 82 patients (43 men and 39 women, aged between 18 and 45 years) with latex allergy. All patients underwent skin tests with various fruit extracts that potentially cross-react with latex. Only patients with negative prick tests successively underwent prick-by-prick tests with fresh fruits. Thirty-nine of 82 patients (47.5%) were found to have positive skin tests. Prick tests with fruit extracts were positive in 28 patients (kiwi, 21 patients; banana, 17 patients; avocado, 8 patients; and papaya, 3 patients), and the prick-by-prick test had positive results in 11 patients (kiwi, 7 patients; banana, 4 patients; and avocado, 3 patients). In our experience patients with latex allergy are at a high risk of sensitization to some fruits and they often develop allergic reactions, even severe ones, after eating them; for this reason fruit sensitization should be taken into consideration when investigating patients allergic to natural rubber latex.

Adult↗