PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Roberto Cubelli

Publications and source records attributed to Roberto Cubelli.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Impairments of trunk movements following left or right hemisphere lesions: dissociation between apraxic errors and postural instability.

Stroke patients present with apraxic or postural deficits involving trunk movements. Praxis and posture control have been associated with the functions of the left and the right hemisphere, respectively. For the first time, in this study the occurrence of apraxic and postural components in trunk movement deficits following right and left hemisphere lesions were investigated in the same participants. Twenty-three patients with left (L/pt), 12 with right (R/pt) hemisphere lesion, and 30 healthy controls were evaluated with a 21-item test assessing the imitation of meaningless, symbolic and reaching movements presented twice on visual or proprioceptive modality. Erroneous, motor responses of the trunk were classified as postural (compensations to overcome stability or asymmetry deficits) or apraxic (execution errors not due to biomechanical constraints). Postural instability reactions were significantly more frequent among the R/pts, whilst apraxic responses were overwhelming within the L/pts. The findings are consistent with the view that the left hemisphere is dominant for praxis and suggest that this dominance be extended to trunk praxis. The results also support the hypothesis that trunk postures are coded in relation to the environment by a representational system. A widespread network, mainly sitting in the right hemisphere, subserves this postural system. The distinction between praxic and postural deficits in executing trunk movements should be kept in mind when evaluating trunk movement difficulties shown by stroke patients, in following up their recovery or when tailoring rehabilitation programmes.

Adult↗

On recognizing proper names: the orthographic cue hypothesis.

Five experiments investigated the recognition of proper names and common nouns using the lexical decision paradigm. In Experiments 1-3 the case of the initial letter of written stimuli was systematically varied. An advantage was consistently found for proper names written with the first letter in capital. Crucially, response times to proper names with the first letter in lowercase and to common nouns irrespective of the case of the first letter did not differ from each other. No difference between proper names and common nouns emerged in Experiment 4 where the stimuli were presented auditorily, and in Experiment 5 where a visual lexical decision task was performed with illegal non-words. The pattern of results shows that the proper name advantage is orthographic in nature and rules out an account in terms of semantic, morphological or other lexical variables. A model is proposed in which information about the case of the first letter is specified in the abstract multidimensional orthographic representation mediating written word recognition.

Adult↗