PubMed HealthSearch

Biomedical subjects

Roberto Mendoza-Londono

Publications and source records attributed to Roberto Mendoza-Londono.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

A Phase 3 Trial of Vosoritide in Children with Hypochondroplasia.

BACKGROUND: Hypochondroplasia, a fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 (FGFR3)-related skeletal condition characterized by disproportionate short stature and a spectrum of clinical features, has no available targeted therapies. Vosoritide, a C-type natriuretic peptide analogue approved for the treatment of achondroplasia, is being investigated for hypochondroplasia. METHODS: In this phase 3, multicenter trial, children with hypochondroplasia who were 3 to less than 18 years of age were randomly assigned to receive once-daily subcutaneous injections of vosoritide or placebo for 52 weeks per weight-band dosing regimen. The primary end point was change from baseline in annualized growth velocity at week 52 versus placebo. Confirmatory statistical testing using hierarchical procedures to control for type I error at the one-sided 0.025 significance level (equivalent to the two-sided 0.05 level) was performed for the primary and six key secondary efficacy end points. The safety and side effect profile of vosoritide versus placebo was assessed. RESULTS: A total of 81 participants were randomly assigned to receive vosoritide (n=41) or placebo (n=40). At week 52, the least squares mean (LSM) change from baseline in annualized growth velocity was 1.95 cm/year with vosoritide versus -0.39 cm/year with placebo (LSM difference of 2.33 cm/year; 95% confidence interval, 1.85-2.82 cm/year; two-sided P<0.0001). Most participants in the vosoritide group (87.8%) and the placebo group (72.5%) experienced at least one adverse event (AE). There were no reports of grade 3 or higher AEs, AEs leading to treatment discontinuation, or deaths. CONCLUSIONS: One year of vosoritide treatment significantly increased linear growth in children with hypochondroplasia. (Funded by BioMarin Pharmaceutical; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT06455059.).

Journal Article

A microcosting and cost consequence analysis from a randomized controlled trial comparing genome sequencing with exome sequencing for genetic diagnosis.

PURPOSE: Diagnosing rare diseases is costly. The objectives were to microcost exome (ES) and genome sequencing (GS) trios and estimate the incremental costs of GS per additional diagnosis from an institutional payer perspective. METHODS: Trios (proband plus biological parents) that are referred for sequencing were randomly assigned to ES or GS. Laboratory workflow and sequencing were microcosted. Total and category cost per trio were estimated probabilistically. Effectiveness was expressed as diagnostic yield (rates of diagnostic or partially diagnostic variants detected). Incremental costs and effectiveness were calculated. RESULTS: The mean total cost per trio was CAD 2888.79 (95% CI 2567.72, 3492.72) for ES (n = 329) and 4364.02 (95% CI 3984.94, 5013.67) for GS (n = 324). Reagents accounted for 34% and 61% of total costs for ES and GS, respectively. The incremental cost of GS was 1475.23. The diagnostic yield was 35.9% for ES and 32.7% for GS with a difference of 0.032 (95% CI: -0.041, 0.104, P value .397). CONCLUSION: GS demonstrated higher costs and a similar diagnostic yield to ES but was limited by technical capabilities at the time of the study. The study provides comprehensive costs for the economic evaluation comparing alternative diagnostic pathways and impetus for further evaluating variants uniquely detectable by GS.

Humans