PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Robin L Brey

Publications and source records attributed to Robin L Brey.

16 recordsLinked to original sources

Both migraine and motion sickness may be due to low brain levels of serotonin.

Scientists believe that low levels of a brain chemical called serotonin may make people susceptible to developing migraine headaches. Many people with migraine also have a problem with motion sickness, but it is not clear why this might be. We know that many drugs to treat motion sickness increase brain levels of serotonin, an important brain chemical. It is possible that low brain levels of serotonin may also be responsible for motion sickness. In this issue of Neurology, Drummond reports on a study that evaluated whether low brain levels of serotonin trigger motion sickness in people with and without migraine. More information about migraine can be found on the next page.

Brain↗

Antiphospholipid antibodies in young adults with stroke.

BACKGROUND: Antiphospholipid antibodies have been associated with a clinical syndrome consisting thrombosis and recurrent, unexplained fetal loss. METHODS: The literature pertaining to stroke associated with antiphospholipid antibodies, with emphasis on stroke in young adults, was reviewed. RESULTS: Antiphospholipid antibodies are an independent risk factor for stroke in young adults in five of six studies. Multiple antiphospholipid specificities or the Lupus Anticoagulant were tested in addition to anticardiolipin antibody in these studies. In the single study that found no increased risk for stroke, only anticardiolipin antibody was tested. Only one of these studies evaluated for risk of recurrent stroke in young adults with antiphospholipid antibodies and found it to be increased. No treatment trials have been conducted in young adults with antiphospholipid antibodies and stroke. In the single treatment trial comparing aspirin and low-INR producing doses of warfarin to prevent recurrent stroke, both were found to be equally effective. CONCLUSIONS: Antiphospholipid antibodies, particularly Lupus Anticoagulant, is an independent risk factor for first and possibly recurrent ischemic stroke in young adults. The best therapeutic strategy for preventing antiphospholipid antibody-associated recurrent stroke is not clear.

Adolescent↗

Soluble adhesion molecule levels, neuropsychiatric lupus and lupus-related damage.

Nervous system dysfunction may occur in as many as 80% of patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematous (SLE) at some point in their disease course. Upregulation of adhesion molecules has been linked to acute SLE-related disease activity and chronic damage. We evaluated the relationship between soluble adhesion molecule levels and neuropsychiatric lupus (NPSLE) manifestations using the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) case definitions to investigate for evidence of a link between upregulation of adhesion molecules and NPSLE manifestations. Sera from the initial study visit of 133 SLE patients enrolled in the San Antonio Lupus Study of Neuropsychiatric Disease (SALUD) and 40 controls were evaluated for soluble adhesion molecule levels (VCAM-1, ICAM-1 and E-selectin) and antiphospholipid antibodies. A subset of 57 SLE patients were evaluated for soluble adhesion molecule levels and antiphospholipid antibodies on two subsequent study visits, as well. NPSLE manifestations at the time of sera ascertainment were recorded using ACR case definitions and SLE-related acute activity and damage were measured. Elevated levels of all three soluble adhesion molecules were seen in SLE patients compared to normal control values. Soluble VCAM-1 levels correlated with measures of current disease activity, NPSLE manifestations and deep venous thrombosis. Persistently positive levels of ICAM-1 and VCAM-1, but not E-selectin were association with increased SLE-related damage. Elevated levels of all soluble adhesion molecule levels correlated with abnormal levels of antiphospholipid antibodies, which are associated with some NPSLE manifestations and have been shown to upregulate adhesion molecule expression.

Adult↗

Antiphospholipid antibodies and subsequent thrombo-occlusive events in patients with ischemic stroke.

CONTEXT: The presence of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) has been associated with vascular occlusive events. However, the role of aPL in predicting ischemic events, particularly recurrent ischemic stroke, is controversial. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of baseline aPL positivity (ie, positivity for anticardiolipin antibodies [aCL], lupus anticoagulant antibodies [LA], or both) on subsequent thrombo-occlusive events, including recurrent stroke. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The Antiphospholipid Antibodies and Stroke Study (APASS), a prospective cohort study within the Warfarin vs Aspirin Recurrent Stroke Study (WARSS), a randomized double-blind trial (N = 2206) conducted at multiple US clinical sites from June 1993 through June 2000 and comparing adjusted-dose warfarin (target international normalized ratio, 1.4-2.8) and aspirin (325 mg/d) for prevention of recurrent stroke or death. APASS participants were 1770 (80%) WARSS participants who consented to enroll in the APASS, with usable baseline blood samples drawn prior to randomization to the WARSS and analyzed for aPL status within 90 days of index stroke by a central independent laboratory. Quality assurance was performed on approximately 10% of samples by a second independent laboratory. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Two-year rate of the composite end point of death from any cause, ischemic stroke, transient ischemic attack, myocardial infarction, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, and other systemic thrombo-occlusive events. The primary analysis assessed the outcome associated with aPL positivity within each WARSS treatment group separately, after risk-factor adjustment (since these aPL-positive vs aPL-negative comparisons were not randomized). RESULTS: Of the 1770 APASS patients, 720 (41%) were classified as aPL-positive and 1050 (59%) as aPL-negative. There was no increased risk of thrombo-occlusive events associated with baseline aPL status in patients treated with either warfarin (relative risk [RR], 0.99; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.75-1.31; P =.94), or aspirin (RR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.70-1.28; P =.71). The overall event rate was 22.2% among aPL-positive and 21.8% among aPL-negative patients. There was no treatment x aPL interaction (P =.91). Patients with baseline positivity for both LA and aCL antibodies tended to have a higher event rate (31.7%) than did patients who tested negative for both antibodies (24.0%) (unadjusted RR, 1.36; 95% CI, 0.97-1.92; P =.07). Classification and regression tree analyses did not identify a specific LA test or aCL isotype or titer that was associated with increased risk of thrombo-occlusive event. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of aPL (either LA or aCL) among patients with ischemic stroke does not predict either increased risk for subsequent vascular occlusive events over 2 years or a differential response to aspirin or warfarin therapy. Routine screening for aPL in patients with ischemic stroke does not appear warranted.

Aged↗

Management of the neurological manifestations of APS--what do the trials tell us?

PURPOSE: To systematically review evidence from clinical trials about the management of neurological manifestations of Antiphospholipid Syndrome (APS). METHODS: Articles reporting case-control, cohort and prospective studies and treatment trials of primary or secondary stroke prevention in patients with aPL were identified in an OVID literature search from 1966 to 2004, using the keywords: APS, aPL and cerebrovascular disease. Articles were evaluated according to the standard system for assessing medical evidence to answer the following questions: (1) What is the role of aPL and recurrent stroke risk in both primary and secondary APS populations? (2) What is the evidence to support specific treatment strategies for secondary prevention of aPL-associated stroke? (3) What is the evidence to support specific treatment strategies for primary prevention of aPL-associated stroke? CONCLUSIONS: (1) aPL are a risk factor for incident stroke (Grade A, established as useful for the given condition in the specified population). (2) The evidence to support the role of aPL in recurrent stroke is conflicting and, therefore, inconclusive. (3) Warfarin at moderate-intensity doses is equally effective in preventing a recurrent thrombotic event as warfarin at high-intensity doses in patients with APS (Grade A evidence, established as useful for the given condition in the specified population). (4) Warfarin, at moderate-intensity doses is as effective as aspirin (at a dose of 325 mg/day) in preventing recurrent thrombotic events in patients who are aPL-positive at the time of an initial stroke (Grade B evidence, probably useful for the given condition in the given population). (5) Currently there are no data to support the use of any prophylactic therapy in patients with aPL and no clinical manifestations for the purposes of preventing an incident stroke.

Adult↗

Neuropsychiatric involvement in systemic lupus erythematosus.

The correct diagnosis of central and peripheral nervous system manifestations in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) can be challenging because of many SLE-related and non-SLE-related processes that can be present in a patient. The American College of Rheumatology (ACR) has published case definitions for 19 neuropsychiatric SLE (NPSLE) syndromes, with careful attention to important exclusion criteria. These criteria were developed for research purposes but can be helpful to clinicians with a patient who has nervous system dysfunction. This report reviews the data regarding the application of the ACR NPSLE criteria and the influence of ethnicity and disease duration on the development of NPSLE syndromes. Cognitive dysfunction and psychiatric disorders are the two most common manifestations. The work-up and treatment of nervous system syndromes are also discussed.

Angiography↗

Diagnosis and management of patients with neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus (NPSLE).

Neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus (NPSLE) involves a wide range of focal and diffuse central and peripheral nervous system disorders and affects up to 75% of SLE patients. NPSLE can occur any time in the course of SLE, even during periods in which no SLE disease activity is detected, and is likely to be caused by multiple factors, including autoantibody production, microvasculopathy and pro-inflammatory cytokines. Central to the diagnosis of NPSLE is the question of whether the presenting neuropsychiatric symptoms are due to SLE-mediated organ dysfunction, infection, medication side-effects or metabolic abnormalities (e.g. uraemia), or are due to an unrelated condition. The diagnostic inference of NPSLE can be made only after these secondary causes have been excluded. There is no one single diagnostic tool specific to NPSLE, and clinical diagnostic impressions must be based on the combined use of immunoserological testing, functional and/or structural neuroimaging and standardized neurological, rheumatological, psychiatric and neuropsychological assessments. The management of NPSLE includes symptomatic and/or immunosuppressive treatment strategies depending on the specific presenting neuropsychiatric symptoms and whether these occur in the setting of an SLE disease activity flare.

Humans↗

Antiphospholipid antibodies and stroke in young women.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Antiphospholipid antibodies have been associated with ischemic stroke in some but not all studies. METHODS: We performed a population-based case-control study examining antiphospholipid antibodies (anticardiolipin antibodies and lupus anticoagulants) using stored frozen sera and plasma in 160 cases and 340 controls enrolled in the Stroke Prevention in Young Women study. We evaluated for the presence of anticardiolipin antibody (IgG, IgM, and IgA isotypes) by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and for the lupus anticoagulant using several phospholipid-dependent coagulation tests (activated partial thromboplastin time, dilute Russell's viper venom time) with mixing studies. If mixing studies were prolonged, confirmatory tests were performed. RESULTS: A positive anticardiolipin antibody level of any isotype was seen in 43 cases (26.9%) and 62 controls (18.2%) (P=0.03), lupus anticoagulant in 29 cases (20.9%) and 38 controls (12.8%) (P=0.03), and either anticardiolipin antibody or lupus anticoagulant in 61 cases (42.1%) and 86 controls (27.9%) (P=0.003). After adjustment for age, current cigarette smoking, hypertension, diabetes, angina, ethnicity, body mass index, and high-density lipoprotein levels, the relative odds of stroke for women with anticardiolipin antibody immunoreactivity of any isotype or a lupus anticoagulant was 1.87 (95% confidence interval, 1.24 to 2.83; P=0.0027). CONCLUSIONS: The results from this study support the importance of antiphospholipid antibodies as an independent risk factor for stroke in young women.

Adolescent↗