PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Rodger L Bick

Publications and source records attributed to Rodger L Bick.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Product individuality of commercially available low-molecular-weight heparins and their generic versions: therapeutic implications.

The currently available brand-name low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) in the United States include dalteparin (Pfizer), enoxaparin (Aventis), and tinzaparin (Pharmion). Other products available, in Europe, include certoparin (Novartis), reviparin (Abbott), nadroparin (GlaxoSmithkline), and parnaparin (Alpha-Wasserman). Each of these LMWHs has a characteristic molecular weight profile and biological activity in terms of an anti-FXa and anti-FIIa potency. The mean molecular weight of these drugs ranges from 4.0 kDa to 7.0 kDa and the anti-FXa:anti-FIIa ratio ranges from 1.5 to 3.5. These agents may also be characterized by the presence of specific chemical end groups such as 2-O-sulfo-4-enepyranosuronic acid at the nonreducing terminus (enoxaparin) or 2,5-anhydro-D-mannose at the reducing terminus (dalteparin). Further, the component oligosaccharide chains exhibit product-specific distribution profiles. It is now widely accepted that individual LMWHs are chemically unique agents and cannot be interchanged therapeutically. Each commercial LMWH has been individually developed for specific clinical indications, which are dose and product dependent. Recently, several generic LMWHs have become available in India (Cutenox and Markaparin) and South America (dilutol, clenox, dripanina), and three companies have filed for regulatory approval of a generic version of enoxaparin in the United States. As the primary aim of a generic drug is to reduce cost without compromising patient care, a generic drug is required to be chemically and biologically equivalent to the pioneer drug. Because LMWHs represent complex natural mucopolysaccharide drugs that have undergone chemical and enzymatic modifications, physicochemical and biological information in addition to molecular weight and anti-FXa:anti-FIIa ratio should be used to determine generic equivalency to the branded drug. We have utilized a previously reported approach to systematically compare three generic versions of enoxaparin obtained from India and Brazil with the branded enoxaparin (Lovenox) available in the United States. Testing included molecular and structural profiling, evaluation in clot-based and amidolytic anti-FXa and anti-FIIa assays, and heparinase-I digestion profiles. While the molecular profiles (4.8 +/- 1.8 kD) and anticoagulant potencies as determined by activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) were comparable for all four agents, the generic products showed variations in the thrombin time (TT) and Heptest assays. Two generic and the branded enoxaparin were readily digested by heparinase-I, losing most of their anticoagulant activity, but one generic product resisted digestion. This may have been due to a unique structural feature in this product. These studies show that, while generic LMWHs may exhibit acceptable molecular weight and anti-FXa profiles, they can exhibit assay-based differences and digestion profiles. Testing in animal models to determine safety, efficacy, and pharmacodynamic parameters may be important to verify equivalence. In order to assure that the generic LMWHs are equivalent to branded LMWHs such that equivalent clinical results are obtained, there is a need to develop clear stepwise guidelines that will establish equivalency in terms of physical, chemical, biochemical, pharmacokinetic, and pharmacodynamic properties for these anticoagulant drugs.

Blood Coagulation Tests↗
PubMed2006

Cancer-associated thrombosis: focus on extended therapy with dalteparin.

The increased risk of thrombosis-related morbidity and mortality in patients with cancer remains, even in the face of anticoagulant therapy. Moreover, recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) complicates the management of cancer and adversely affects quality of life and survival. Until recently, initial therapy with unfractionated heparin or low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) followed by long-term therapy with an oral anticoagulant was the standard of care for the secondary prevention of acute thromboembolism in most patients. However, according to the results of the CLOT trial (Randomized Comparison of Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin Versus Oral Anticoagulant Therapy for the Prevention of Recurrent VTE in Patients With Cancer), extended LMWH therapy with dalteparin represents an alternative to standard oral anticoagulation. In terms of efficacy, the incidence of recurrent VTE in patients receiving dalteparin was half that of those receiving warfarin (27 of 336 patients vs 53 of 336 patients, respectively), for a 52% relative risk reduction. The incidence of major bleeding in this trial was not significantly different in the two arms. Although this LMWH regimen is supported by the latest practice guidelines of the American College of Chest Physicians, the question of whether long-term treatment with LMWH in cancer patients actually affects survival apart from the benefits of thromboprophylaxis remains to be answered.

Anticoagulants↗
PubMed2005

Unfractionated heparin, low molecular weight heparins, and pentasaccharide: basic mechanism of actions, pharmacology, and clinical use.

During the past decade, a large number of new anticoagulant and antithrombotic drugs have been developed. These agents represent a wide variety of substances that are derived using natural sources, biotechnology-based methods, and synthetic approaches. Because of the structural and molecular characteristics, these agents exhibit physicochemical and functional diversities. Thus, each of these classes of drugs controls thrombogenesis by way of distinct mechanisms. The main classes of these new drugs include peptides, peptidomimetics, heparinomimetics, and recombinant proteins. Despite these significant developments, heparin and heparin-derived drugs have continued to play a major role in the management of thrombotic and cardiovascular disorders.

Fondaparinux↗
PubMed2005

Development of generic low molecular weight heparins: a perspective.

It is clear that the introduction of generic versions of low molecular weight heparins (LMWHs) is inevitable; however, it is important that the generic products are manufactured in strict compliance with the manufacturing specification of the branded product. Furthermore, regulatory agencies should require additional data on the chemical biologic, pharmacologic/toxicologic, and dose-response relationship in specific settings. Although there is strong opposition to stop the introduction of these drugs, their development will reduce cost and permit availability to all patients who need them. Some objective guidelines for the proper development of these drugs are needed. Only expert groups and advisory panels to the regulatory bodies can develop these guidelines.

Drug Approval↗
PubMed2005

Recurrent miscarriage syndrome and infertility due to blood coagulation protein/platelet defects: a review and update.

Three-hundred fifty-one women were referred for thrombosis and hemostasis evaluation after suffering recurrent miscarriages. All patients were referred by a high-risk obstetrician or reproductive medicine specialist after anatomic, hormonal or chromosomal defects had been ruled out. These patients were assessed over a three year period. The mean patient age at referral was 34 years and the mean number of miscarriages was 2.9 (2-9). All patients underwent a thorough evaluation for thrombophilia and, when indicated, a hemorrhagic disorder. Of the 351 patients, 29 (8%) had no defect. Of the remaining 322 patients, 7 (2%) had a bleeding disorder: 3 with platelet dysfunction, 1 with Factor XIII deficiency, 3 with von Willebrand's and 3 with Osler-Weber-Rendu. The remainder of the patients had a thrombophilia as follows: 195 (60%) had antiphospholipid syndrome, 64 (20%) had Sticky Platelet Syndrome, 38 (12%) had MTHFR mutation, 23 (7.1%) had PAI-1 polymorphism, 12 (3.7%) had Protein S deficiency, 12 (3.7%) had Factor V Leiden, 3 (1%), had AT deficiency, 3 (1%) had Heparin-Cofactor II deficiency, 3 (1%) had TPA deficiency, and 6 (2%) had Protein C deficiency. There were a total of 364 defects found in the 312 patients harboring thrombophilia; thus, several harbored two and a few harbored three separate defects. All patients with thrombophilia were treated with preconception ASA at 81 mg/day with the immediate post-conception addition of heparin or LMW heparin (Dalteparin). Both ASA and heparin/LMW heparin were used to term. The first 120 patients were treated with unfractionated heparin at 5,000 U every 24 hours, subcutaneously and the last 192 have been treated with Dalteparin at 5,000 U/day subcutaneously. The patients with MTHFR were also treated with folate at 5 mg/day + pyridoxine at 50 mg/day. All patients were carefully monitored with CBC and platelet counts, anti-Xa levels, frequent ultrasounds and physical exams. Only 2 of the thrombophilia patients suffered another miscarriage; all others had a normal term delivery. There were no pregnancy-related thromboses, no delivery complications and no episodes of post-partum thrombosis. The only bleeding consisted of 1-4 cm bruises at injection sites. No episodes of thrombocytopenia (HIT) were noted. In our experience, thrombophilia is a common cause of recurrent miscarriage and all patients with no anatomical, hormonal or chromosomal defect should be evaluated for thrombophilia or a bleeding disorder. The success rate of normal term delivery in these 312 patients was 94% using ASA + heparin or Dalteparin. In addition, side effects of therapy were minimal.

Abortion, Habitual↗
PubMed2004

Thromboprophylaxis in surgical patients.

This review has presented current information regarding thromboprophylaxis in surgery, including pregnancy. Where feasible, references have included current consensus conference recommendations and reliable review articles. Orthopedic surgical thromboprophylaxis has intentionally been deleted, as this topic is well covered in other articles in this issue (EurJ Med Res 9(3), March 2004).

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Differentiation of low-molecular-weight heparins: impact on the future of the management of thrombosis.

Low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) are now universally accepted as drugs of choice for postsurgical prophylaxis and treatment of deep vein thrombosis (DVT). Currently, these agents are also being developed for the treatment of various cardiovascular conditions. Because of manufacturing differences, each of the LMWHs exhibits distinct pharmacologic and biochemical profiles. The specific activity of these agents in anticoagulant assays ranges from 35 to 45 anti-IIa U/mg, whereas the activity in terms of anti-Xa units is designated as 80 to 145 U/mg. These LMWHs are also capable of producing product-specific dose- and time-dependent antithrombotic effects in animal models of thrombosis. Although the ex vivo effects are initially present at dosages that are antithrombotic, these agents have been found to produce sustained antithrombotic effects without any detectable ex vivo anticoagulant actions. In experimental animal models and various clinical trials, these agents also have been found to release tissue factor pathway inhibitor and von Willebrand factor. In addition, LMWHs have been reported to produce fibrinolytic effects. The effect of repeated administration also exhibits product-based augmentation of the antithrombotic and hemorrhagic effects. Several new agents are being investigated as possible substitutes for heparins. These include anti-thrombin, anti-Xa, anti-TF (tissue factor), heparinoids, oral formulations of heparin, activated protein C, and biotechnologically derived serpins. These agents may not have the broad clinical spectrum as that observed with the heparins. More recently, several pharmaceutical companies have produced generic LMWHs.

Blood Coagulation↗
PubMed2004

Generic low-molecular-weight heparins: some practical considerations.

It is now widely accepted that various low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) exhibit specific molecular and structural attributes that are determined by the type of manufacturing process used. For example, enoxaparin, which is prepared by benzylation followed by alkaline hydrolysis of unfractionated heparin (UFH), exhibits a double bond at the nonreducing end and the presence of a unique bicyclic structure namely 1,6 anhydromanno glucose or mannose, or both, at the reducing end. Similarly, the other LMWHs, such as dalteparin, nadroparin, tinzaparin, and parnaparin, exhibit specific structural characteristics that may contribute to their own unique biochemical and pharmacological profiles. These unique features may not exhibit any major influence on the routinely determined anti-Xa and anti-IIa activities. However, these may have an impact on the pharmacokinetics and other biological actions such as the interactions with growth factors, blood components, and vascular cells. This is the reason for the initial caution for the noninterchangeability of the anti-Xa adjusted dosing of the different LMWHs. Although the nonanticoagulant biological effects of these drugs are poorly understood at this time, they are now recognized as contributing significantly to the overall therapeutic effects of these drugs. Because some of these drugs have proved to be effective in the management of cancer-associated thrombosis and exhibit improvements in mortality outcome, these LMWHs may also produce several other effects by modulating inflammatory processes, apoptosis, and other regulatory functions related to cellular functions at different levels. Thus, the interactions of these LMWHs with antithrombin and heparin cofactor II are not the only determinants of their biological actions. Release of tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI), regulation of cytokines, nitric oxide, and eicosanoids contribute to their individuality. Such properties are not only dependent on the oligosaccharide sequence and consensus sites but also depend mainly on microchemical and structural attributes in these drugs. European Pharmacopoeia (EP) and the World Health Organization (WHO) have developed guidelines to characterize these agents in terms of their molecular and biological profile. Regulatory agencies such as the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and European Medicines Agency (EMEA) consider each of these drugs as distinct pharmacological agents. This has prompted the requirement for product-specific clinical data for the approval of their use in various clinical indications. There is a clear concern regarding the development of potential generic versions of branded products and the submissions by generic manufacturers for the regulatory approval of generic interchangeability that refers to the substitution of an apparent chemically identical and bioequivalent versions of the branded LMWHs. Currently, there are no regulatory guidelines or consensus opinions on the acceptance of generic versions of the branded products. Because the LMWHs represent not only a biological entity but also product-specific molecular and structural attributes, the acceptance of a generic version must be based on clearly defined guidelines stipulating minimal molecular and structural, biological, and clinical validation requirements. It is therefore to be stressed that each of the LMWHs is a distinct drug entity that characteristically exhibits a product-based therapeutic spectrum in different thrombotic and nonthrombotic disorders. Thus, until the establishment of valid regulatory guidelines for the generic interchangeability of the commercially available LMWHs is completed, generic substitutes are not recommended.

Anticoagulants↗
PubMed2003

Introduction to thrombosis proficient and cost-effective approaches to thrombosis.

Thrombosis is the most common single cause of death in the United States. More than 2 million people die each year of arterial or venous thrombosis or its consequences, and a similar number experience nonfatal thrombosis-deep vein thrombosis, nonfatal pulmonary embolus, nonfatal cerebrovascular thrombosis, transient cerebral ischemic attacks (40% of patients will have a fatal or nonfatal cerebrovascular thrombosis within 1 year), nonfatal coronary artery thrombosis, retinal vascular thrombosis, and other nonfatal thrombotic episodes. Yet many, if not most, episodes of thrombosis can be prevented by appropriate primary antithrombotic therapy, and most recurrences can be prevented by the appropriate choice of secondary therapy.

Clinical Trials as Topic↗