Tuberculous enteritis presenting as small-bowel obstruction.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Aged↗
Biomedical subjects
Rodney J Mason
Publications and source records attributed to Rodney J Mason.
Gastric electrical stimulation: an alternative surgical therapy for patients with gastroparesis.
HYPOTHESIS: Gastric electrical stimulation is an alternative to gastrectomy in patients with refractory gastroparesis. DESIGN: Retrospective case series with a median follow-up of 20 months. SETTINGS: A tertiary care university hospital and a university-affiliated community hospital. PATIENTS: Twenty-nine patients (22 women, 7 men; median age, 39 years; age range, 20-87 years) with debilitating gastroparesis who were referred for gastrectomy from December 10, 2001, through October 1, 2004. Twenty-four patients had type 1 diabetic gastroparesis and 5 patients had idiopathic gastroparesis. INTERVENTIONS: Placement of a gastric stimulator device laparoscopically in 24 patients and by laparotomy in 5 patients. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Morbidity and mortality of the procedure, symptom control, hospital readmissions, need for supplemental nutritional support, body mass index (calculated as weight in kilograms divided by the square of height in meters), and gastric emptying. RESULTS: Follow-up results were available in 27 patients. There was no 30-day mortality or morbidity in 4 patients. The median hospital stay was 3 days. All of the patients tolerated an oral diet at discharge. Symptom control was excellent to good in 19 patients. Nutritional support was discontinued in the 19 patients who were dependent on supplemental feeding before the procedure (P<.001). The median body mass index improved significantly (22.9 preoperatively vs 25.1 postoperatively; P = .006). The median gastric emptying rate (percentage per minute) was measured in 15 of the 27 patients postoperatively and showed significant improvement (0.17% per minute preoperatively vs 0.38% per minute postoperatively; P<.001). Additional procedures were required in 4 patients (owing to poor outcome in 3 patients). CONCLUSIONS: Gastric electrical stimulation ameliorated symptoms, returned patients to normal oral nutritional intake, increased body mass index, improved gastric emptying rates, and is an alternative to gastrectomy in patients with end-stage gastric disease.
Adult↗
Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a prospective randomized double-blind study.
SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: The value of laparoscopy in appendicitis is not established. Studies suffer from multiple limitations. Our aim is to compare the safety and benefits of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in a prospective randomized double blind study. METHODS: Two hundred forty-seven patients were analyzed following either laparoscopic or open appendectomy. A standardized wound dressing was applied blinding both patients and independent data collectors. Surgical technique was standardized among 4 surgeons. The main outcome measures were postoperative complications. Secondary outcome measures included evaluation of pain and activity scores at base line preoperatively and on every postoperative day, as well as resumption of diet and length of stay. Activity scores and quality of life were assessed on short-term follow-up. RESULTS: There was no mortality. The overall complication rate was similar in both groups (18.5% versus 17% in the laparoscopic and open groups respectively), but some early complications in the laparoscopic group required a reoperation. Operating time was significantly longer in the laparoscopic group (80 minutes versus 60 minutes; P = 0.000) while there was no difference in the pain scores and medications, resumption of diet, length of stay, or activity scores. At 2 weeks, there was no difference in the activity or pain scores, but physical health and general scores on the short-form 36 (SF36) quality of life assessment forms were significantly better in the laparoscopic group. Appendectomy for acute or complicated (perforated and gangrenous) appendicitis had similar complication rates, regardless of the technique (P = 0.181). CONCLUSIONS: Unlike other minimally invasive procedures, laparoscopic appendectomy did not offer a significant advantage over open appendectomy in all studied parameters except quality of life scores at 2 weeks. It also took longer to perform. The choice of the procedure should be based on surgeon or patient preference.
Adolescent↗
Barrett's esophagus in females: a comparative analysis of risk factors in females and males.
OBJECTIVES: Gastroesophageal reflux symptoms occur with similar frequency in males and females, yet Barrett's esophagus is less common in females. The reason for this disparity is unknown. The aim of this study was to determine the factors related to Barrett's in females. METHODS: The records of 796 patients (462 male, 334 female) evaluated from 1990 to 2000 for symptoms of reflux were retrospectively reviewed. Physiologic abnormalities based on results of endoscopic, motility, pH, and Bilitec testing were identified, and factors related to the presence of Barrett's were determined using univariate and multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Females with reflux symptoms were significantly less likely to have a positive 24-h pH test, a defective lower esophageal sphincter, or a hiatal hernia than males with reflux symptoms. Further, females with reflux on the basis of an abnormal 24-h pH test had significantly less esophageal acid exposure than males with reflux. In contrast, esophageal exposure to refluxed acid and bilirubin was similar in females (n = 50) and males (n = 136) with Barrett's. On multivariable analysis increased esophageal bilirubin exposure was the only significant factor associated with the presence of Barrett's in male and female patients with reflux disease. CONCLUSIONS: Females with reflux symptoms have less esophageal acid exposure on average than males. However, females and males with Barrett's have a similar severity of reflux, and the female gender does not protect against the development of Barrett's in the setting of advanced reflux disease. Esophageal bilirubin exposure is the major risk factor for the presence of Barrett's in patients with reflux disease.
Adult↗
Postprandial acid reflux is reduced by delayed gastric emptying.
The aim of this study was to investigate influence of delayed gastric emptying on postprandial reflux in esophageal pH. Sixty-nine consecutive patients underwent 24 hour (h) esophageal pH monitoring and gastric emptying. In 24 h esophageal pH monitoring, % postprandial reflux pH<4 for 2 h after each meal (% PRT) was extracted from the 24 h pH profile. After solid test meal (1 mCi, Tc99m) was given, gastric emptying was measured with a gamma detector placed transnasally 5 cm below lower esophageal sphincter. % PRT was similar among the 34 normal, 26 delayed and 9 rapid gastric emptying rate patients. Thirty-five with a positive pH study and 34 with a negative had a similar prevalence of gastric emptying disorder. In the positive pH study group, patients with normal gastric emptying had significantly higher % PRT than those with delayed gastric emptying (22.0 vs 12.1%, P<0.05). In the same population, patients with a normal %PRT had a significantly higher prevalence of delayed gastric emptying compared with those with a positive % PRT (6/8 vs 9/27, P<0.05). In patient with abnormal acid exposure but normal % PRT on 24 h esophageal pH monitoring, gastric emptying may be delayed.
Adult↗
Vagal-sparing esophagectomy: a more physiologic alternative.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the function of the vagal nerves and the gastric reservoir after vagal-sparing esophagectomy. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Esophagectomy as currently performed includes division of the vagal nerves and surgical alteration of the stomach, with attendant postoperative dumping, diarrhea, reduced meal capacity, and weight loss. Vagal-sparing esophagectomy has been introduced as a technique for removal of the esophagus while preserving the vagal nerves and gastric reservoir. The procedure is touted as having a low morbidity and is applicable to patients with end-stage benign or early malignant disease. METHODS: A random sample of 15 patients at a median of 20 months after a vagal-sparing esophagectomy was compared to 23 asymptomatic normal subjects; 10 randomly selected patients, 29 months after esophagogastrectomy with colon interposition; and 10 randomly selected patients, 47 months after standard esophagectomy with gastric pull-up. Gastric mucosal acidification was tested with Congo red staining. Vagal secretory function was measured by gastric acid output and pancreatic polypeptide response to sham feeding. Vagal motor function was assessed by a technetium gastric emptying scan and a questionnaire to evaluate dumping and diarrhea. Gastric reservoir function was evaluated by measuring meal capacity and postoperative changes in body mass index. RESULTS: Vagal-sparing esophagectomy preserved the function of the vagi, as evident by an increase in gastric acid output, a rise in serum pancreatic polypeptide following sham feeding, and preservation of normal postoperative gastric emptying in 70% of the patients. After vagal-sparing esophagectomy, patients were free of dumping and diarrhea and were analogous to normal subjects in meal capacity but had a slight reduction in the speed of eating. CONCLUSIONS: Vagal-sparing esophagectomy preserves gastric secretory, motor, and reservoir function. Postoperatively, patients have normal alimentation, bowel regulation, and no weight loss. It is an ideal procedure for patients with end-stage benign disease, Barrett's esophagus with high-grade dysplasia, or esophageal carcinoma limited to the lamina propria.
Adult↗