PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Rogelio Jasso-Victoria

Publications and source records attributed to Rogelio Jasso-Victoria.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Cryopreserved tracheal grafts: a review of the literature.

Cryopreserved tracheal grafts have been used in several experimental models of long segment replacement. The clinical application of the procedure has been limited due to the fact that contradictory results have been reported. The purpose of this article is to present a review of the literature on tracheal cryopreservation. Despite the fact that most authors indicate that cryopreserved tracheal allografts retain viability and have a low immunological response, though they continue to function after transplantation with good epithelialization and patency, cryopreservation leads to significant damage to cartilage, the degree of which is based on the freezing-storage methods that affect the function and durability of a graft. The long-term storage of cartilage must therefore be investigated in more detail in basic research models of cartilage viability: the evaluation of chondrocyte apoptosis, and the use of different solutions for tracheal cryopreservation other than RPMI-1640, Dulbecco's modified Eagle's, Eurocollins, and TC-199. Furthermore, problems that involve improving the blood supply to the graft after extensive resection and immunosuppression must be resolved before tracheal cryopreservation can become a clinically established method for tracheal grafts.

Animals↗

[Evaluation of the use of bovine pericardium in non-anatomical lung resections in dogs].

UNLABELLED: In this study we assessed the usefulness, healing, as well as the integration to lung tissue of glutaraldehyde preserved at 0.5% bovine pericardium GPBP and lyophilized (GPBPL), after reinforced resection of lung tissue in dogs by thoracotomy or thoracoscopy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: GPBP and GPBPL were prepared and used to reinforce the suture line of lung resection in 30 mongrel dogs: Group I (n = 6): The GPBP were fixed on the lung with 4-0 polypropylene by thoracotomy. Group II (n = 6): The resection and fixed of the GPBP were performed with an linear stapler by thoracotomy. Group III (n = 6): The resection and fixed of the GPBPL were performed with an linear stapler by thoracotomy. Group IV (n = 6): The resection and fixed of the GPBP strips were performed with a linear stapler by thoracoscopy. Group V: The resection and fixed of the GPBPL strips were performed with a linear stapler by thoracoscopy. Clinico-radiological evaluation was done until euthanasia of all animals at week 8 postop. Progressive insufflation up to 40 cm H2O of airway pressure was done to evaluated resistance of the heal in the suture line reinforced. Macroscopic, and microscopic examination of the GPBP, GPBPL and lung were evaluated. RESULTS: All animals survived the surgical procedure and study time (8 weeks). No airleaks were evident at any time during the study including the insufflation test. Macroscopic examination of the GPBP and GPBPL showed good adaptation to the lung tissue. Microscopically all animals presented good healing with deposition of fibrotic tissue layer on the GPBP and GPBPL. CONCLUSION: GPBP and GPBPL are an adequate materials to reinforce lung staple line, when resection of lung tissue was performed in dogs by thoracotomy or thoracoscopy.

Airway Resistance↗

Usefulness of bovine pericardium as interpositional graft in the surgical repair of nasal septal perforations (experimental study).

A 2.5-cm nasal septal perforation was performed in 18 pigs and repaired as follows: group I (n = 6), septal perforation without treatment; group II (n = 6), surgical repair with interpositional graft of glutaraldehyde-preserved bovine pericardium (GPBP); group III (n = 6), surgical repair with interpositional graft of lyophilized GPBP (LGPBP). The animals were evaluated clinically and radiologically (x-ray and CT scan) 2 days before surgery, daily during the first postoperative week, and weekly during the next 6 months. At the end of the study the animals were euthanized with an overdose of pentobarbital. Macroscopic and microscopic examination of the grafts and nasal septum was performed. All the animals survived the surgical procedure. Five pigs in group I showed persistence of the septal perforation. All the animals in groups II and III showed total closure of the septal perforation, with the presence of fibrotic tissue on the pericardial grafts as well as in the septal cartilage, and overall good healing. In conclusion, GPBP and LGPBP are adequate materials that can be used as interpositional grafts in the surgical closure of septal perforations in pigs

Animals↗

[Lung transplantation].

Lung transplantation (LT) has evolved to become an important alternative in the management of patients with end-stage pulmonary disease and chronic respiratory failure. The beginnings of this technique can be traced back to the experiments of Carrel and Guthrie over a hundred years ago. However, it was not until 1963 when the first clinical experience was performed by Hardy. Clinical success did not arrive until the 1980's thanks to the works of the Toronto Lung Transplant Group. Well established criteria have been described in order to consider a patient as a potential candidate to receive a lung. Several diseases are capable of causing terminal lung damage and in general they can be classified according to their origin as obstructive (COPD, emphysema), restrictive (fibrosis), chronic infectious (cystic fibrosis, bronquiectasis), and vascular (primary pulmonary hypertension). The most frequent diagnosis is COPD. Clinically relevant modes of LT include the implant of one lung (single LT), or both lungs (bilateral sequential LT). Transplantation of the cardiopulmonary block is reserved for special situations and lobar transplantation is still considered experimental. Donor condition is essential to the success of LT. The potential donor patient frequently suffers deterioration in lung function due to edema formation or infection and both complications restrict lung's using for transplantation. Lung preservation is also limited to a short period of time which rarely exceeds 6 hours in spite of specially-designed preservative solutions such as the low potassium dextran. Outcome after LT shows current one-year survival between 65-70% with reduction to 40-45% after five years. Mortality within the first year is usually related to primary graft failure and infection. Long-term survival depends on controlling infectious problems due to immunosuppression as well as the development of bronchilitis obliterans as a manifestation of chronic rejection. LT is a therapeutic modality reserved for selected patients with chronic respiratory failure due to end-stage lung disease.

Actuarial Analysis↗