Biomedical subjects

Roger Engelmann

Publications and source records attributed to Roger Engelmann.

13 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2007

Usefulness of texture analysis for computerized classification of breast lesions on mammograms.

This work presents the usefulness of texture features in the classification of breast lesions in 5,518 images of regions of interest, which were obtained from the Digital Database for Screening Mammography that included microcalcifications, masses, and normal cases. Sixteen texture features were used, i.e., 13 were based on the spatial gray-level dependence matrix and 3 on the wavelet transform. The nonparametric K-NN classifier was used in the classification stage. The results obtained from receiver operating characteristic analysis indicated that the texture features can be used for separating normal regions and lesions with masses and microcalcifications, yielding the area under the curve (AUC) values of 0.957 and 0.859, respectively. However, the texture features were not very effective for distinguishing between malignant and benign lesions because the AUC was 0.617 for masses and 0.607 for microcalcifications. The study showed that the texture features can be used for the detection of suspicious regions in mammograms.

Breast Neoplasms↗

PubMed2006

Computer-aided diagnosis for the detection and classification of lung cancers on chest radiographs ROC analysis of radiologists' performance.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study is to investigate the effect of a computer-aided diagnostic (CAD) scheme on radiologist performance in the detection of lung cancers on chest radiographs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We combined two independent CAD schemes for the detection and classification of lung nodules into one new CAD scheme by use of a database of 150 chest images, including 108 cases with solitary pulmonary nodules and 42 cases without nodules. For the observer study, we selected 48 chest images, including 24 lung cancers, 12 benign nodules, and 12 cases without nodules, from the database to investigate radiologist performance in the detection of lung cancers. Nine radiologists participated in a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) study in which cases were interpreted first without and then with computer output, which indicated locations of possible lung nodules, together with a five-color scale illustrating the computer-estimated likelihood of malignancy of the detected nodules. RESULTS: Performance of the CAD scheme indicated that sensitivity in detecting lung nodules was 80.6%, with 1.2 false-positive results per image, and sensitivity and specificity for classification of nodules by use of the same database for training and testing the CAD scheme were 87.7% and 66.7%, respectively. Average area under the ROC curve value for detection of lung cancers improved significantly (P = .008) from without (0.724) to with CAD (0.778). CONCLUSION: This type of CAD scheme, which includes two functions, namely detection and classification, can improve radiologist accuracy in the diagnosis of lung cancer.

Clinical Competence↗

PubMed2006

Improving radiologists' recommendations with computer-aided diagnosis for management of small nodules detected by CT.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To evaluate how computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) can improve radiologists' recommendations for management of possible early lung cancers on CT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-eight lung cancers and 28 benign lesions were employed. Each group of 28 lesions was classified into subgroups of two sizes (9 between 6 and 10 mm and 19 between 11 and 20 mm) and three patterns (8 with pure ground glass opacity [GGO], 12 with mixed GGO and 8 solid lesions). Sixteen radiologists participated in the observer study, first without and then with CAD. Radiologists' recommendations, including (1) follow-up in 12 months, (2) in 6 months, (3) in 3 months, or (4) biopsy, were compared at three levels of their malignancy probability ratings (low: 1%-33%; medium: 34%-66%; high: 67%-99%) for 896 observations (56 lesions by the 16 radiologists) in the two size subgroups and three patterns. RESULTS: The number of recommendations changed by radiologists by use of CAD was 163 (18%) among all 896 observations. Among these changed recommendations, the fraction showing a beneficial effect from CAD was 68% (111/163), and the fraction showing a beneficial effect regarding biopsy recommendations was 69% (48/70). With CAD, the radiologists' performance regarding biopsy recommendations was significantly improved for 43 lung cancers (31 changed to biopsy versus 12 changed away from biopsy; P = .003) and was also improved for 27 benign lesions (10 changed to biopsy versus 17 changed away from biopsy; P = .18). Most of the cancers with improved recommendations were solid lesions or mixed GGO and relatively large. CONCLUSION: CAD has the potential to improve the appropriateness of radiologists' recommendations for small malignant and benign lesions on CT scans.

Aged↗

PubMed2006

Temporal subtraction of dual-energy chest radiographs.

Temporal subtraction and dual-energy imaging are two enhanced radiography techniques that are receiving increased attention in chest radiography. Temporal subtraction is an image processing technique that facilitates the visualization of pathologic change across serial chest radiographic images acquired from the same patient; dual-energy imaging exploits the differential relative attenuation of x-ray photons exhibited by soft-tissue and bony structures at different x-ray energies to generate a pair of images that accentuate those structures. Although temporal subtraction images provide a powerful mechanism for enhancing visualization of subtle change, misregistration artifacts in these images can mimic or obscure abnormalities. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether dual-energy imaging could improve the quality of temporal subtraction images. Temporal subtraction images were generated from 100 pairs of temporally sequential standard radiographic chest images and from the corresponding 100 pairs of dual-energy, soft-tissue radiographic images. The registration accuracy demonstrated in the resulting temporal subtraction images was evaluated subjectively by two radiologists. The registration accuracy of the soft-tissue-based temporal subtraction images was rated superior to that of the conventional temporal subtraction images. Registration accuracy also was evaluated objectively through an automated method, which achieved an area-under-the-ROC-curve value of 0.92 in the distinction between temporal subtraction images that demonstrated clinically acceptable and clinically unacceptable registration accuracy. By combining dual-energy soft-tissue images with temporal subtraction, misregistration artifacts can be reduced and superior image quality can be obtained.

Automation↗

PubMed2006

Temporal subtraction in chest radiography: automated assessment of registration accuracy.

Radiologists routinely compare multiple chest radiographs acquired from the same patient over time to more completely understand changes in anatomy and pathology. While such comparisons are achieved conventionally through a side-by-side display of images, image registration techniques have been developed to combine information from two separate radiographic images through construction of a "temporal subtraction image." Although temporal subtraction images provide a powerful mechanism for the enhanced visualization of subtle change, errors in the clinical evaluation of these images may arise from misregistration artifacts that can mimic or obscure pathologic change. We have developed a computerized method for the automated assessment of registration accuracy as demonstrated in temporal subtraction images created from radiographic chest image pairs. The registration accuracy of 150 temporal subtraction images constructed from the computed radiography images of 72 patients was rated manually using a five-point scale ranging from "5-excellent" to "1-poor;" ratings of 3, 4, or 5 reflected clinically acceptable subtraction images, and ratings of 1 or 2 reflected clinically unacceptable images. Gray-level histogram-based features and texture measures are computed at multiple spatial scales within a "lung mask" region that encompasses both lungs in the temporal subtraction images. A subset of these features is merged through a linear discriminant classifier. With a leave-one-out-by-patient training/testing paradigm, the automated method attained an A(z) value of 0.92 in distinguishing between temporal subtraction images that demonstrated clinically acceptable and clinically unacceptable registration accuracy. A second linear discriminant classifier yielded an A(z) value of 0.82 based on a feature subset selected from an independent database of digitized film images. These methods are expected to advance the clinical utility of temporal subtraction images for chest radiography.

Algorithms↗

PubMed2006

Computer-aided diagnostic scheme for the detection of lung nodules on chest radiographs: localized search method based on anatomical classification.

We developed an advanced computer-aided diagnostic (CAD) scheme for the detection of various types of lung nodules on chest radiographs intended for implementation in clinical situations. We used 924 digitized chest images (992 noncalcified nodules) which had a 500 x 500 matrix size with a 1024 gray scale. The images were divided randomly into two sets which were used for training and testing of the computerized scheme. In this scheme, the lung field was first segmented by use of a ribcage detection technique, and then a large search area (448 x 448 matrix size) within the chest image was automatically determined by taking into account the locations of a midline and a top edge of the segmented ribcage. In order to detect lung nodule candidates based on a localized search method, we divided the entire search area into 7 x 7 regions of interest (ROIs: 64 x 64 matrix size). In the next step, each ROI was classified anatomically into apical, peripheral, hilar, and diaphragm/heart regions by use of its image features. Identification of lung nodule candidates and extraction of image features were applied for each localized region (128 x 128 matrix size), each having its central part (64 x 64 matrix size) located at a position corresponding to a ROI that was classified anatomically in the previous step. Initial candidates were identified by use of the nodule-enhanced image obtained with the average radial-gradient filtering technique, in which the filter size was varied adaptively depending on the location and the anatomical classification of the ROI. We extracted 57 image features from the original and nodule-enhanced images based on geometric, gray-level, background structure, and edge-gradient features. In addition, 14 image features were obtained from the corresponding locations in the contralateral subtraction image. A total of 71 image features were employed for three sequential artificial neural networks (ANNs) in order to reduce the number of false-positive candidates. All parameters for ANNs, i.e., the number of iterations, slope of sigmoid functions, learning rate, and threshold values for removing the false positives, were determined automatically by use of a bootstrap technique with training cases. We employed four different combinations of training and test image data sets which was selected randomly from the 924 cases. By use of our localized search method based on anatomical classification, the average sensitivity was increased to 92.5% with 59.3 false positives per image at the level of initial detection for four different sets of test cases, whereas our previous technique achieved an 82.8% of sensitivity with 56.8 false positives per image. The computer performance in the final step obtained from four different data sets indicated that the average sensitivity in detecting lung nodules was 70.1% with 5.0 false positives per image for testing cases and 70.4% sensitivity with 4.2 false positives per image for training cases. The advanced CAD scheme involving the localized search method with anatomical classification provided improved detection of pulmonary nodules on chest radiographs for 924 lung nodule cases.

Databases, Factual↗

PubMed2005

Computer-aided diagnosis in thoracic CT.

Computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) provides a computerized diagnostic result as a "second opinion" to assist radiologists in the diagnosis of various diseases by use of medical images. CAD has become a practical clinical approach in diagnostic radiology, although, at present, primarily in the area of detection of breast cancer in mammograms. Currently, a large research effort has been devoted to the detection and classification of various lung diseases in thoracic computed tomography (CT) images. We describe in this article the current status of the development of CAD schemes in thoracic CT, including nodule detection, distinction between benign and malignant nodules, and detection, characterization, and differential diagnosis of diffuse lung disease. Observer performance studies indicate that these CAD schemes would be useful in clinical practice by providing radiologists with computer output as a "second opinion."

Humans↗

PubMed2005

Computer-aided detection of peripheral lung cancers missed at CT: ROC analyses without and with localization.

PURPOSE: To retrospectively evaluate whether a difference-image computer-aided detection (CAD) scheme can help radiologists detect peripheral lung cancers missed at low-dose computed tomography (CT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Institutional review board approval and informed patient and observer consent were obtained. Seventeen patients (eight men and nine women; mean age, 60 years) with a missed peripheral lung cancer and 10 control subjects (five men and five women; mean age, 63 years) without cancer at low-dose CT were included in an observer study. Fourteen radiologists were divided into two groups on the basis of different image display formats: Six radiologists (group 1) reviewed CT scans with a multiformat display, and eight radiologists (group 2) reviewed images with a "stacked" cine-mode display. The radiologists, first without and then with the CAD scheme, indicated their confidence level regarding the presence (or absence) of cancer and the most likely position of a lesion on each CT scan. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were calculated without and with localization to evaluate the observers' performance. RESULTS: With the CAD scheme, the average area under the ROC curve improved from 0.763 to 0.854 for all radiologists (P = .002), from 0.757 to 0.862 for group 1 (P = .04), and from 0.768 to 0.848 for group 2 (P = .01). The average sensitivity in the detection of 17 cancers improved from 52% (124 of 238 observations) to 68% (163 of 238 observations) for all radiologists (P < .001), from 49% (50 of 102 observations) to 71% (72 of 102 observations) for group 1 (P = .02), and from 54% (74 of 136 observations) to 67% (91 of 136 observations) for group 2 (P = .006). The localization ROC curve also improved. CONCLUSION: Lung cancers missed at low-dose CT were very difficult to detect, even in an observer study. The use of CAD, however, can improve radiologists' performance in the detection of these subtle cancers.

Aged↗

PubMed2004

Computer-aided diagnosis in chest radiology.

Chest radiography is still a useful examination in various situations, although CT has become a modality of choice as a diagnostic examination in many cases. Current computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) schemes for chest radiographs include nodule detection, interstitial disease detection, temporal subtraction, differential diagnosis of interstitial disease, and distinction between benign and malignant pulmonary nodules. All of these schemes are demonstrated as providing potentially useful tools for radiologists when the output of these schemes is used as a "second opinion." There are some commercially available products for these schemes and more are expected to be available in the near future. The current status of CAD for CT is also discussed briefly in this article.

Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted↗

PubMed2004

Radiologists' performance for differentiating benign from malignant lung nodules on high-resolution CT using computer-estimated likelihood of malignancy.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of our study was to evaluate whether a computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) scheme can assist radiologists in distinguishing small benign from malignant lung nodules on high-resolution CT (HRCT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We developed an automated computerized scheme for determining the likelihood of malignancy of lung nodules on multiple HRCT slices; the likelihood estimate was obtained from various objective features of the nodules using linear discriminant analysis. The data set used in this observer study consisted of 28 primary lung cancers (6-20 mm) and 28 benign nodules. Cancer cases included nodules with pure ground-glass opacity, mixed ground-glass opacity, and solid opacity. Benign nodules were selected by matching their size and pattern to the malignant nodules. Consecutive region-of-interest images for each nodule on HRCT were displayed for interpretation in stacked mode on a cathode ray tube monitor. The images were presented to 16 radiologists-first without and then with the computer output-who were asked to indicate their confidence level regarding the malignancy of a nodule. Performance was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. RESULTS: The area under the ROC curve (Az value) of the CAD scheme alone was 0.831 for distinguishing benign from malignant nodules. The average Az value for radiologists was improved with the aid of the CAD scheme from 0.785 to 0.853 by a statistically significant level (p = 0.016). The radiologists' diagnostic performance with the CAD scheme was more accurate than that of the CAD scheme alone (p < 0.05) and also that of radiologists alone. CONCLUSION: CAD has the potential to improve radiologists' diagnostic accuracy in distinguishing small benign nodules from malignant ones on HRCT.

Diagnosis, Differential↗

PubMed2003

Effect of high sensitivity in a computerized scheme for detecting extremely subtle solitary pulmonary nodules in chest radiographs: observer performance study.

RATIONALES AND OBJECTIVES: This study investigated the effect of a high sensitivity in computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) for detecting lung nodules in chest radiographs when extremely subtle cases were presented to radiologists. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The chest radiographs used in this study consisted of 36 normal images and 54 abnormals containing solitary lung nodules, of which 25 were extremely subtle and 29 were very subtle. Receiver operating characteristic analysis for detecting lung nodules was performed without and with CAD. The levels of CAD output were simulated with a hypothetical ideal performance of 100% sensitivity, but with three or four false positives per image. Six radiologists participated in an observer study in which cases were interpreted first without and then with the use of CAD. RESULTS: The average A(z) values for radiologists without and with CAD were 0.682 and 0.808, respectively. The performance of radiologists was improved significantly when high sensitivity was used (P = .0003). However, the radiologists were not able to recognize some extremely subtle nodules (5 of 54 nodules by all radiologists), even with the correct CAD output; these nodules were then considered as non-actionable. None of 306 computer-false positives was incorrectly regarded as a nodule by all radiologists, but 63 false positives were incorrectly identified by one or more radiologists. CONCLUSION: The accuracy of radiologists in the detection of some extremely subtle solitary pulmonary nodules can be improved significantly when the sensitivity of a CAD scheme can be made to be at an extremely high level. However, all of the six radiologists failed to identify some nodules (about 10%), even with the correct output of the CAD.

Humans↗

PubMed2003

Computer-aided diagnosis to distinguish benign from malignant solitary pulmonary nodules on radiographs: ROC analysis of radiologists' performance--initial experience.

PURPOSE: To evaluate radiologists' performance for determining a distinction between benign and malignant pulmonary nodules on chest radiographs without and with use of a computer-aided diagnosis scheme. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-three chest radiographs that depicted 31 primary lung cancers and 22 benign nodules were used. The likelihood measure of malignancy for each nodule was determined by using an automated computerized scheme. Sixteen radiologists (nine attending radiologists and seven radiology residents) participated in an observer study in which cases were interpreted first without and then with use of the scheme. The radiologists' performance was evaluated with receiver operating characteristic analysis. RESULTS: The mean area under the best-fit binormal receiver operating characteristic curve plotted in the unit square (Az) values of radiologists who interpreted images without and with the scheme were 0.743 and 0.817, respectively. The performance of radiologists was improved significantly when the scheme was used (P =.002). However, the performance (Az = 0.889) of the computer alone exceeded these results by a substantial margin. The average change in radiologists' confidence level for interpretation without and with the scheme was highly correlated (r = 0.845) with the likelihood measure of malignancy, which was presented as computer output. CONCLUSION: This scheme for computer-aided diagnosis has the potential to improve the accuracy of radiologists' performance in the classification of benign and malignant solitary pulmonary nodules.

Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Computer-aided diagnosis in chest radiography: results of large-scale observer tests at the 1996-2001 RSNA scientific assemblies.

Since 1996, computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) schemes have been presented as interactive demonstrations on computer workstations at each scientific assembly of the Radiological Society of North America. The schemes involved (a) detection of pulmonary nodules, (b) temporal subtraction, (c) detection of interstitial lung disease, (d) differential diagnosis of interstitial lung disease, and (e) distinction between benign and malignant pulmonary nodules on chest radiographs. Large-scale observer tests were carried out to examine how radiologists can benefit from CAD systems. Observer performance was evaluated by analysis of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. The statistical significance of the difference between the areas under the ROC curves without and with CAD was analyzed with the Student t test. In all of the tests, the diagnostic accuracy of the radiologists in total improved significantly when CAD was used. This result provides additional evidence that CAD has the potential to improve the performance of radiologists in their decision-making process in interpreting chest radiographs.

Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted↗