PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Roger Nelson

Publications and source records attributed to Roger Nelson.

8 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Clinical prediction rules: what are they and what do they tell us?

QUESTION: Clinical prediction rules are research-based tools that quantify the contributions of relevant patient characteristics to provide numeric indices that assist clinicians in making predictions. Clinical prediction rules have been used to describe the likelihood of the presence or absence of a condition, assist in determining patient prognosis, and help the classification of patients for treatment. The recent rapid rise in the use of clinical prediction rules raises questions about the conditions under which they may be used most appropriately. What is the potential role of clinical prediction rules in physiotherapy practice and what are the strategies by which clinicians can determine their appropriate use for a given clinical setting? CONCLUSION: Clinical prediction rules use quantitative methods to build upon the body of literature and expert opinion and can provide quick and inexpensive estimates of probability. Clinical prediction rules can be of great value to assist clinical decision making but should not be used indiscriminately. They are not a replacement for clinical judgment and should complement rather than supplant clinical opinion and intuition. The development of valid clinical prediction rules should be a goal of physiotherapy research. Specific areas in need of attention include deriving and validating clinical prediction rules to screen patients for potentially serious conditions for which current tests lack adequate diagnostic accuracy or have unacceptable cost and risk, and to assist in classification of patients for treatments that are likely to result in substantially different outcomes in heterogeneous groups of patients.

Decision Support Techniques↗
PubMed2006

Reexamining psychokinesis: comment on Bösch, Steinkamp, and Boller (2006).

H. Bösch, F. Steinkamp, and E. Boller's review of the evidence for psychokinesis confirms many of the authors' earlier findings. The authors agree with Bösch et al. that existing studies provide statistical evidence for psychokinesis, that the evidence is generally of high methodological quality, and that effect sizes are distributed heterogeneously. Bösch et al. postulated the heterogeneity is attributable to selective reporting and thus that psychokinesis is "not proven." However, Bösch et al. assumed that effect size is entirely independent of sample size. For these experiments, this assumption is incorrect; it also guarantees heterogeneity. The authors maintain that selective reporting is an implausible explanation for the observed data and hence that these studies provide evidence for a genuine psychokinetic effect.

Cognition↗
PubMed2005

The MedRisk Instrument for Measuring Patient Satisfaction With Physical Therapy Care: a psychometric analysis.

STUDY DESIGN: Psychometric evaluation of a cross-sectional survey. OBJECTIVES: To determine the validity of measures obtained from the MedRisk Instrument for Measuring Patient Satisfaction With Physical Therapy Care (MRPS) to differentiate between patient satisfaction with internal and external factors. BACKGROUND: Self-report measures that sample a variety of items provide clinicians with an array of information that may assist in assessing patient satisfaction. An important measurement characteristic of these instruments is the ability to discriminate between different factors that may influence patient reports of satisfaction with care, ie, discriminant validity. In previous work, exploratory factor analysis suggested that the MRPS questionnaire has a 2-factor structure: "internal," relating to the patient-therapist interaction, and "external," describing nontherapist issues such as admissions and clinic environment. METHODS AND MEASURES: One thousand four hundred forty-nine adult patients completed the MRPS questionnaire upon finishing their course of outpatient physical therapy treatment. Discriminant validity of the 2-factor model was assessed using confirmatory factor analysis. The measures from the 2 factors were then evaluated for reliability by calculating the standard error of measurement (SEM), and for concurrent validity by correlating the mean score of the factors and individual items to global measures of satisfaction. RESULTS: Confirmatory factor analysis supported a good to excellent model fit for the internal factor (7 items) and external factor (3 items). The SEM for the 2 factors was 0.19 and 0.24, indicating a low degree of measurement error. Both factors had high significant correlation with global measures of satisfaction (internal, r = 0.83 and 0.80; external, r = 0.71 and 0.71). All individual items within the 2 factors had significant correlations with global measures ranging from r = 0.33 to 0.80. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings provide evidence of discriminant and concurrent validity of the 2-factor solution for the MRPS questionnaire for the sample that was tested. This 2-factor solution yields measures that are relatively free of error and may discriminate between internal and external factors influencing patient satisfaction. Patients who complete their course of physical therapy report that the professional interaction between the therapist and patient, especially the meaningful exchange of relevant information, is critical for patient satisfaction with care. The generalizability of our data to patients who do not complete their physical therapy care or who are receiving care in other health care environments is unknown.

Cross-Sectional Studies↗
PubMed2005

Longitudinal continuity of care is associated with high patient satisfaction with physical therapy.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Recent literature has suggested that longitudinal continuity (ie, the patient is seen by the same practitioner for the entire course of treatment) may be linked to high degrees of patient satisfaction with medical care. The purpose of this study was to provide preliminary information regarding the association between longitudinal continuity and reports of patient satisfaction with physical therapy outpatient care. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A sample of 1,502 adult subjects completed the MedRisk Instrument for Measuring Patient Satisfaction With Physical Therapy Care at the time of discharge from outpatient physical therapy. Relationships between satisfaction measures and the presence or absence of longitudinal continuity were assessed by use of binary logistic regression. RESULTS: Overall, 36.8% of the subjects reported complete satisfaction on the internal subscale (patient-therapist), and 47.9% of the subjects reported complete satisfaction on the external subscale (patient-support staff). Higher percentages of women (40.2% and 51.1% for internal and external subscales, respectively) than of men (31.9% and 43.3% for internal and external subscales, respectively) were completely satisfied with care. Of subjects who reported complete satisfaction on the internal subscale, 71.2% had longitudinal continuity of care, and 28.8% did not. A similar trend was noted for the external subscale (patient-support staff); 66.8% of subjects who reported complete satisfaction had longitudinal continuity, and 33.2% did not. Odds ratios describing the probability of complete satisfaction with care for subjects who had longitudinal continuity and for those who did not were significant and ranged from 2.7 to 3.5. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Subjects who received their entire course of outpatient physical therapy from only 1 provider were approximately 3 times more likely to report complete satisfaction with care than those who received care from more than 1 provider. These findings suggest that clinicians and managers should make efforts to preserve longitudinal continuity of care as a means of improving patient satisfaction with care.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Alterations in random event measures associated with a healing practice.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether alterations in random events, as measured by a Random event generator (REG), occur in association with a bioenergy healing practice. DESIGN AND SETTING: Two REGs were set up and run in parallel: one in a bioenergy healer's office and another at a local library as a control. Two multiday sets of data were collected in each setting. A third set was collected in which a reduced amount of attention was placed on the REG by the healer. REG excursions were calculated and compared for (1) overall days in the library and bioenergy healer's office, (2) healing and nonhealing phases in the healing office, and (3) overall excursions during high(sets 1 and 2) and low attention (set 3) by the healer. RESULTS: The library REG produced excursions outside the 95% confidence interval (CI) on 35 of 61 days (58%), and the REG in the healing practice 47 of 51 days (92%) (mean difference, 34%; 95% CI, 18% to 49%; chi(2) = 16.3, 1 df, p < 0.0005). In the healer's office, 0.6496 excursions per segment for healing phases and 0.6548 excursions per segment for nonhealing phases were shown (t = -1.3, 6794 df, p = 0.182). A comparison with chance expectation derived from Monte Carlo runs showed significantly less mean excursions per segment (t = -7.8, 36625 df, p < 0.0005) for healing phases and no difference in nonhealing phases (t = -0.16, 6309 df, p = 0.872). There was no significant difference in excursions between the high- and low-attention situations in the healing practice. CONCLUSIONS: In the presence of a healer, an REG produced greater than chance excursions more often than a control REG in a library setting. The healing and nonhealing phases demonstrated inconsistent results. REG deviations were not influenced by the amount of attention directed toward the machine.

Attitude to Health↗
PubMed2002

Patient satisfaction with outpatient physical therapy: instrument validation.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Patient satisfaction with physical therapy is used as an outcome variable. The purpose of this study was to develop and test an instrument used to determine which variables are associated with the satisfaction of patients receiving outpatient physical therapy. SUBJECTS: During the pilot study, 191 patients participated, and 1,868 patients then participated in the main phase of this work. METHODS: Using a survey instrument developed by the authors, subjects responded to global questions concerning overall satisfaction with physical therapy. Content validation of the instrument was investigated using item correlation, principal components analysis, and factor analysis. Reliability was measured using the standard error of measurement. Concurrent validity was investigated by correlating summary scores of the final survey instrument with global measures of satisfaction. RESULTS: Reliability was best for a 10-item questionnaire. Patient satisfaction was most associated with items that reflected a high-quality interaction with the therapist (eg, time, adequate explanations and instructions to patients). Environmental factors such as clinic location, parking, time spent waiting for the therapist, and type of equipment used were not strongly correlated with overall satisfaction with care. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Because the time the therapist spent with patients and the behavior of the therapists are important for patient satisfaction, emphasis on cost-cutting, high patient volume, and the use of "care extenders" may jeopardize satisfaction.

Female↗
PubMed2002

The validity of the GaitRite and the Functional Ambulation Performance scoring system in the analysis of Parkinson gait.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was (1) to determine the validity of the GaitRite System in detecting footfall patterns and selected gait characteristics of person with early stage Parkinson's disease (PD) and (2) to investigate whether the Functional Ambulation Performance (FAP) scoring system is a valid tool to distinguish between selected gait characteristics of patients with early stage Parkinson's disease and similar age of non-impaired individuals. The FAP score is a quantitative means of assessing gait based on specific spatial and temporal gait parameters. PARTICIPANTS: 11 volunteers with idiopathic Parkinson's disease, (mean age = 74.3), and 11 age matched volunteers, (mean age = 70.3), with no history of neurological disorder participated in the study. The non-impaired control group were not matched in age and sex but of similar age and males and females were represented in the control group. METHODS: Temporal and spatial parameters of gait were analyzed for both preferred- speed and fast-speed walking using the computerized GaitRite system. The system integrates specific components of locomotion to provide a single, numerical representation of gait, the Functional Ambulation Performance Score (FAP) score. RESULTS: The most powerful and discriminating variable between Parkinson's and non-impaired groups for both walking speeds was the mean normalized velocity (MNV). Which is velocity divided by leg length. The MNV was 0.83 for PD at preferred walking speed and 1.14 at fast speed, the non-impaired group preferred-speed group walking was 1.33, while fast-speed walking MNV was 1.70. Note the fast walking of PD was slower than the preferred velocity of the non-impaired group. For preferred-speed walking, all gait variables analyzed in the study were different between the two groups beyond the p < 0.05 level of confidence with the single exception of right stance percentage. For fast-speed walking, three of the entered variables did not discriminate between the two groups: the fast walking FAP score, left fast-walking cadence, and right fast-walking single support percentage. CONCLUSION AND DISCUSSION: Our results indicate that persons with Parkinson's disease (PD) attain a significantly lower FAP score when ambulating at their preferred rate and demonstrate shorter step length and a longer step time than the age matched non-impaired group during both preferred and fast velocities of walking. Stance duration and double support duration were increased for the Parkinson's population, whereas single support duration, mean cadence, and heel-to-heel base of support were markedly reduced for both walking speeds. The FAP score was significantly different from the non-impaired control group for preferred-speed walking. These results indicate that the GaitRite system can be useful in detecting footfall patterns and selected time and distance measurements of persons with early stage Parkinson's disease and the FAP score discriminates between the PD population and the non-impaired controls when walking at preferred rate but not at fast walking.

Aged↗