Biomedical subjects
Roland Amathieu
Publications and source records attributed to Roland Amathieu.
Prehospital diagnosis of massive ethylene glycol poisoning and use of an early antidote.
We report the case of a patient suspected of voluntary massive poisoning by ethylene glycol. Prehospital diagnosis was established by portable blood analyser and an early antidote with 4 MP treatment initiated in out-of-hospital setting. Use of portable blood analyser in prehospital care should be considered in case of suspected massive poisoning by ethylene glycol.
Survival of severely shocked patients who present with absent radial pulse and unrecordable blood pressure in the pre-hospital phase.
OBJECTIVES: To determine the mortality and clinical features of patients presenting with severe hypotension in the pre-hospital phase of care. DESIGN: A prospective observational study. The medical records of patients attended by a physician-led pre-hospital medical service were examined prospectively. Inclusion criteria were severe shock characterized by a non-palpable radial pulse and unrecordable blood pressure at clinical presentation. All consecutive records between September 2002 and September 2003 were included. SETTING: Seine Saint-Denis, an urban area with a population of 1.5 million located in the northern suburbs of Paris, France. INTERVENTIONS: None. RESULTS: One hundred and thirty one patients met the inclusion criteria. The overall mortality was 50% (66/131). Of the deaths, 20% (13/66) occurred in the pre-hospital phase and 80% (53/66) after arrival in hospital. Clinical features significantly associated with increased mortality were: more than one pre-existing co-morbidity, increased age, high Knaus score, a low Glasgow Coma Score, vasopressor administration, pre-hospital cardiac arrest and hypotension on arrival at hospital. The presence of anaphylactic shock was associated with low mortality. In multivariate analysis, occurrence of cardiac arrest (OR=13.5 [2.8; 64.5]), age (OR=1.03 [1.01; 1.05]) and low Glasgow Coma Scale score value (OR=1.15 [1.05; 1.29]) were independently associated with mortality. CONCLUSION: Patients presenting with profound hypotension in the pre-hospital phase have a high mortality. Patients who recover their blood pressure with interventions before hospital admission and those with anaphylactic shock have a better outcome than other patient sub-groups.
Infraclavicular brachial plexus block versus humeral approach: comparison of anesthetic time and efficacy.
UNLABELLED: Most upper arm regional anesthesia techniques are successful and differences in efficacy should not dictate the choice of technique. In the present study, we compared humeral block (HB) and infraclavicular brachial plexus block (ICB) using anesthetic time (i.e., duration of the procedure + onset time) as the primary outcome measure. The block was successful when a complete sensory block was obtained in the four major nerves of the arm, and the time to complete block was recorded. Patients undergoing orthopedic surgery of the upper limb were included in a prospective randomized study and received ICB (group I, n = 60 patients) or HB (group H, n = 60 patients). Total anesthetic time was 19.5 min (95% confidence interval [CI], 17.4-21.6 min) for ICB and 20.8 min (95% CI, 18.7--22.9 min) for HB (not significant). Time to perform the block was 4.5 min (95% CI, 4-5 min) for ICB and 9.8 min (95% CI, 8.9--10.7 min) for HB (P < 0.05). The onset time was 15 min (95% CI, 13-17 min) for ICB and 11 min (95% CI, 9--13 min) for HB (P < 0.05). The success rate was 92% for ICB and 95% for HB (not significant). One self-limited vascular puncture was made in each group. HB had a faster onset time but ICB using a double-stimulation technique was faster to perform. Anesthetic time was similar with the two techniques. IMPLICATIONS: We have compared infraclavicular brachial plexus block (ICB) with humeral block. Efficacy and anesthetic time were not significantly different, although time to perform the block was shorter with the ICB.