PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Ron T Gansevoort

Publications and source records attributed to Ron T Gansevoort.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2007

Determinants of insulin resistance in renal transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: Insulin resistance is considered to play an important role in the development of cardiovascular disease, which limits long-term renal transplant survival. Renal transplant recipients are more insulin-resistant compared with healthy controls. It is not known to date which factors relate to this excess insulin resistance. Therefore, we investigated which factors are related to insulin resistance long-term after renal transplantation. METHODS: All renal transplant recipients at our outpatient clinic with a functioning graft for more than one year were invited to participate. We excluded diabetic recipients. Recipient, donor, and transplant characteristics were collected as putative determinants. We used fasting insulin, homeostasis model assessment index, and McAuley's index as valid estimates of insulin resistance. Linear regression models were created to investigate independent determinants of all indexes. RESULTS: A total of 483 recipients (57% male, 50+/-12 years) were analyzed at a median (interquartile range) time of 6.0 (2.6-11.6) years posttransplant. The most consistent determinants across all three indices were body mass index (P<0.001), waist-to-hip ratio (P<0.001), and prednisolone dose (P<0.05). Independent associations were present for total cholesterol (P<0.001), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (P<0.001), creatinine clearance (P<0.05), recipient age (P<0.001), and gender (P< or =0.002). No independent associations were present for transplant-related factors such as acute rejection treatment or cytomegalovirus seropositivity. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that obesity, distribution of obesity, and prednisolone treatment are the predominant determinants of insulin resistance long term after transplantation. Insulin resistance after renal transplantation could be managed favorably by weight and prednisolone dose reduction, which may reduce cardiovascular disease.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Predictors of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor-induced reduction of urinary albumin excretion in nondiabetic patients.

Urinary albumin excretion is a predictor for cardiovascular mortality and morbidity. We investigated which parameters determine baseline urinary albumin excretion in nondiabetic subjects, without renal disease. In addition, we evaluated the parameters that predict the albuminuria-lowering efficacy of an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor. In this substudy of the Prevention of Renal and Vascular Endstage Disease Intervention Trial, 384 microalbuminuric patients were included. Patient and biochemical characteristics were obtained at baseline and after 3 months of double-blinded, randomized treatment (fosinopril 20 mg or placebo). Mean age was 51.1+/-11.5 years, and 65.6% were male. Median urinary albumin excretion was 22.2 mg per 24 hours. At baseline, mean arterial pressure (beta(standardized)=0.161; P=0.006), urinary sodium excretion (beta(standardized)=0.154; P=0.011), and estimated renal function were independently associated with albumin excretion. In these predominantly normotensive to prehypertensive subjects, fosinopril reduced albumin excretion by 18.5% versus a 6.1% increase on placebo after 3 months (P<0.001). Fosinopril use and blood pressure reduction independently predicted the change in urinary albumin excretion. Baseline urinary albumin excretion independently predicted the antialbuminuric effect of fosinopril (beta(standardized)=-0.303; P<0.001). In conclusion, at baseline, sodium intake and blood pressure were positively associated with urinary albumin excretion. Fosinopril reduced albuminuria more than might be expected from its blood pressure-lowering effect alone, and this effect was more outspoken in subjects with higher baseline albumin excretion. Based on our data, we hypothesize that angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition may result in superior cardiovascular protection when compared with other blood pressure-lowering agents in subjects with higher baseline levels of albuminuria.

Albuminuria↗
PubMed2006

Elevated levels of C-reactive protein independently predict accelerated deterioration of graft function in renal transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: Chronic transplant dysfunction is characterized by a gradual decline in renal function with slowly rising serum creatinine. The underlying mechanism is thought to include inflammation and atherosclerosis. C-reactive protein (CRP) is a well-established marker of both inflammation and atherosclerosis. In this prospective study, we investigated whether CRP could be of use as a clinical marker for early identification of renal transplant recipients at increased risk of deterioration of graft function. METHODS: In this prospective study, all participating patients (n = 606) visited the out-patient clinic at least once a year, and serum creatinine was assessed at every visit. Subjects with a follow-up of <1 year (n = 31) were excluded from analysis. RESULTS: A total of 575 patients participated at a median (interquartile range) time of 5.9 (2.6-11.3) years post-transplantation. Median time of follow-up was 3.0 (2.4-3.4) years. Changes in serum creatinine during follow-up were -0.45 (-4.83-4.76) micromol/l/year in 172 subjects with CRP <1.0 mg/l, 1.04 (-3.36-6.12) micromol/l/year in 184 subjects with CRP 1.0-3.0 mg/l and 2.34 (-3.33-9.07) micromol/l/year in 219 subjects with CRP >3.0 mg/l (P < 0.05 for comparison of the three groups). Proteinuria (P = 0.003), CMV IgG titre (P = 0.01), donor age (P = 0.01), CRP concentration (P = 0.02), recipient age (P = 0.02) and recipient gender (P = 0.047) were independently associated with change in serum creatinine during follow-up in a multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Elevated levels of CRP independently predict accelerated deterioration of graft function in renal transplant recipients >1 year post-transplantation. Further prospective studies are required to investigate whether early intervention can prevent deterioration of graft function in subjects with elevated levels of CRP.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Low incidence of nephropathy in surgical ICU patients receiving intravenous contrast: a retrospective analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Various studies have documented a markedly high incidence of contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN). Most of these studies were conducted in patients not in the ICU. In ICU patients intravenous contrast may be withheld for fear of CIN. We investigated the incidence of CIN in ICU patients. DESIGN AND SETTING: Retrospective cohort study in a 12-bed tertiary surgical ICU. PATIENTS: Were evaluated all contrast-enhanced abdominal computed tomography (CT) scans between 1995 and 2003 in patients not on renal replacement therapy (RRT) before the CT. Patients received prophylactic prehydration and, since 2000, acetylcysteine. Low-osmolarity, nonionic contrast was used. CIN was defined as an increase in serum creatinine of more than 44 micromol/l (0.5 mg/dl) within 48 h after contrast administration, with no increase in creatinine of 44 micromol/l during the preceding 2 days. RRT initiated after the CT was also recorded. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: The patient was not on RRT before CT in 486 of 589 cases (16% diabetics). In these 486 cases the median (IQR) creatinine decreased significantly from 88 micromol/l (66-124) on the day of the CT-scan to 84 micromol/l (63-118) 2 days later. Only 7 of the 486 cases (1.4%) fulfilled the criteria of CIN, and in another 17 (3.5%) RRT was started after the CT. Important coexisting causes of renal failure were present in these patients, and in all survivors renal function recovered. CONCLUSIONS: CT with modern contrast is associated with a very low incidence of nephropathy in predominantly nondiabetic surgical ICU patients. Intravenous contrast should only rarely be withheld in these patients.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

The effect of statins on urinary albumin excretion and glomerular filtration rate: results from both a randomized clinical trial and an observational cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Statins improve cardiovascular outcome, but less is known on the renal outcome. We, therefore, studied the relationship between the use of statins and urinary albumin excretion (UAE) and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in two settings: a randomized controlled trial (RCT) and an observational cohort study, in which patients were included to study the impact of an elevated UAE on renal and cardiovascular prognosis. METHODS: We used data from the Prevention of REnal and Vascular ENd-stage Disease Intervention trial (PREVEND-IT) and the PREVEND cohort study. The PREVEND-IT subjects (788 with a UAE 15-300 mg/day) received pravastatin 40 mg/day vs placebo and/or fosinopril 20 mg/day vs placebo in a 2x2 factorial-RCT design. Of the 3440 cohort subjects, 469 used statins during the 4-year follow-up period. Multivariate-regression adjusted for confounding factors and the propensity score was used to estimate the relation between statin use and UAE and GFR. RESULTS: In the RCT, pravastatin did not change UAE or GFR, neither in fosinopril yes/no subgroups. In the observational cohort, statin use was associated with a rise in UAE (+12.1%), compared with statin non-use (+3.6%, P<0.001). This rise was most pronounced in those on statins prior to the first screening [+24.8% (95% CI: 11.9-39.2)], those using statins>3 years [+18.5% (7.3-30.8)] and those with >1 or >2 defined daily doses (+15.7 and +17.3%, respectively). These differences remained significant after adjustment for relevant variables and propensity score. The rise in UAE could not be attributed to a higher dose or a specific statin. GFR fell in 4 years in both statin users and non-users (4.6+/-13.5 and 2.4+/-11.2, respectively). The fall in GFR between groups was not different after adjustment (P=0.11). CONCLUSIONS: We conclude from the RCT data that statins do not lower UAE in subjects selected because of an elevated UAE instead of hyperlipidaemia. In the observational cohort study, the use of statins similarly was not associated with a fall in UAE; UAE instead increased. Statin treatment was not associated with a significant change in GFR in these subjects with only modestly impaired GFR.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Cost-effectiveness of screening for albuminuria with subsequent fosinopril treatment to prevent cardiovascular events: A pharmacoeconomic analysis linked to the prevention of renal and vascular endstage disease (PREVEND) study and the prevention of renal and vascular endstage disease intervention trial (PREVEND IT).

OBJECTIVE: This study estimated the cost-effectiveness,from the Dutch health care perspective, of screening for albuminuria in the general Dutch population to prevent cardiovascular events (CVEs) with subsequent angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor treatment, using data from the Prevention of REnal and Vascular ENdstage Disease Intervention Trial (PREVEND IT). METHODS: PREVEND IT was a single-center, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial with a 2 x 2 factorial design within the larger observational Prevention of REnal and Vascular ENdstage Disease (PREVEND) study. The PREVEND IT study was conducted to assess the effects of fosinopril 20 mg and pravastatin 40 mg on CVEs in subjects with specific inclusion criteria: urinary albumin excretion (UAE) rate in the range from 15 to 300 mg/d, blood pressure <160/100 mm Hg, and plasma cholesterol level <8.0 mmol/L. Cost-effectiveness estimates for the Dutch population were expressed in euros (2002; 1 euro = US 1.01 dollars) as net costs per life-year gained (LYG) in the baseline and sensitivity (stochastic) analyses. RESULTS: Data were assessed for 864 subjects, with a mean (SD) follow-up of 46 (7) months. CVEs occurred in 45 (5.2%) subjects. Subjects who received fosinopril had a 40% lower incidence of CVEs than subjects in the placebo group (3.9% vs 6.5%, respectively; P = NS). The cost-effectiveness of screening for albumnuria was determined to be euro 16,700/LYG for the study population. Stochastic analysis indicated that the probability of the cost-effectiveness being below the suggested Dutch threshold of euro 20,000/LYG was 59% in the baseline analysis. The probability of cost-effectiveness below euro 20,000/LYG would increase to 91% if only subjects with UAE >50 mg/d were treated with fosinopril. Limiting the screening to subjects aged >50 years and >60 years also improved cost-effectiveness. CONCLUSIONS: The results of our study suggest that screening the general Dutch population for albuminuria and subsequently treating those found positive with fosinopril may be cost-effective compared with no screening and adopting the Dutch health care perspective. However, confirmation from larger multicenter trials is needed.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Update on microalbuminuria as a biomarker in renal and cardiovascular disease.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To discuss recently published papers on the potential use of albuminuria as a predictor of cardiovascular and renal disease. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent studies indicate that screening for microalbuminuria may not only be beneficial for detection and prevention of cardiovascular and renal disease in patients with diabetes, but also in the general population. The best method for this, however, is not yet clear. Findings indicate that it is preferable to assess albumin concentration in fresh urine samples rather than in samples that have been frozen. Furthermore, a new assay for albumin assessment has become available, which detects previously undetectable immuno-unreactive albumin above and beyond immunoreactive albumin detected by classic immunochemical assays. The pros and cons of this assay are considered. SUMMARY: Urinary albumin is a cheap, noninvasive, and easily assessable risk marker, that does not per se require a visit to a physician or health center. As such, it is a promising candidate for screening to identify subjects at high risk of cardiovascular and renal disease, even if albuminuria is not shown to be independent of other risk markers.

Albumins↗
PubMed2006

Prevention of chronic kidney disease: the next step forward!

The incidence of end stage renal disease in patients who have not experienced a classic primary renal disease is dramatically increasing. Chronic kidney disease (CKD) in these patients is due to diabetes, mostly type 2, hypertension and generalised atherosclerosis. As these patients are frequently diagnosed as having renal function impairment only in the late phase, more effort should be undertaken to diagnose them earlier, that is, at a time when renoprotective measures can still be undertaken. For that purpose, measurement of the estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) might be helpful. To properly interpret those measurements, however, we need to be aware of the pros and cons of the use of formulas to estimate the GFR. Most likely, a better way to detect subjects at risk of CKD in the early phase is screening by dipstick proteinuria or preferably by testing for (micro-) albuminuria. Because microalbuminuria not only indicates increased renal but also enhanced cardiovascular risk, the benefits of such screening programmes may have a much greater affect than only preventing renal disease.

Albuminuria↗
PubMed2006

Pharmacoeconomics of angiotensin II antagonists in type 2 diabetic patients with nephropathy: implications for decision making.

Angiotensin II receptor antagonists (angiotensin II receptor blockers; ARBs) are a class of antihypertensive drugs that are generally considered comparable to ACE inhibitors in the prevention of heart and kidney failure. However, these two classes of agents do interfere in different stages of the renin-angiotensin system. In patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, advantages for ARBs over conventional (non-ACE inhibitor) therapy on progression from micro- to macroalbuminuria and overt nephropathy and end-stage renal disease have been shown in clinical trials. In patients with type 2 diabetes and end-stage renal disease, the need for dialysis and/or transplantation results in the use of major healthcare resources. This paper reviews the available economic evidence on treatment with ARBs in type 2 diabetic patients with advanced renal disease.Within-trial analytic and Markov model economic evaluations of the RENAAL (Reduction of Endpoint in Non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus with Angiotensin II Antagonist Losartan), IDNT (Irbesartan Diabetic Nephropathy Trial) and IRMA (IRbesartan in type 2 diabetes with MicroAlbuminuria)-2 studies suggest that treatment with ARBs in patients with type 2 diabetes with overt or incipient nephropathy confers health gains and net cost savings compared with conventional (non-ACE inhibitor) therapy. For reimbursement and reference pricing decisions, there is a need for a head-to-head comparison of an ACE inhibitor with ARBs to model all possible costs and effects of ACE inhibitors and ARBs. This will result in a proper pharmacoeconomic outcome, where both types of drugs can be compared for healthcare decisions.

Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers↗
PubMed2005

Diagnostic potential of circulating natriuretic peptides in chronic kidney disease.

BACKGROUND: Measurement of natriuretic peptides, particularly brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) is an established method for the diagnosis of cardiovascular disorders, chiefly left ventricular (LV) dysfunction. The influence of renal function on the diagnostic utility of natriuretic peptides is unclear. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional study of 296 patients with renal disease but no history of cardiac disease using echocardiography to assess LV mass and function. Circulating levels of atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) and BNP were also measured. RESULTS: The incidence of LV hypertrophy increased with progressive renal dysfunction; from 39% in patients with near-normal renal function, to 80% in renal transplant patients. There was a negative correlation between both ANP and BNP, and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) (ANP: r = -0.28, P<0.001; BNP: r = -0.40, P<0.001). Serum ANP and BNP had sensitivity and specificity for LV hypertrophy of 39.9%, 87.4% (ANP) and 61.4%, 67.6% (BNP) respectively. Sensitivity and specificity for LV dysfunction was 77.2%, 32.4% (ANP) and 71.8%, 40.0% (BNP). Significant confounders in determining serum ANP were haemoglobin, beta blockade and albumin, while serum BNP levels were significantly confounded by GFR, albumin, haemoglobin, beta blockade and age. CONCLUSIONS: Across a spectrum of renal dysfunction, GFR is a more important determinant of serum BNP than ventricular function, and several factors are predictors of natriuretic peptide levels. In chronic kidney disease, the use of natriuretic peptides to diagnose LV hypertrophy must be interpreted in light of these other factors. The use of these peptides in renal dysfunction to diagnose LV dysfunction may be of limited value.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Abdominal obesity and smoking are important determinants of C-reactive protein in renal transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: C-reactive protein (CRP) is a predictor of coronary heart disease, total mortality and chronic allograft nephropathy in renal transplant recipients. The determinants of CRP have been investigated in the general population, but not in renal transplant recipients. CRP might reflect metabolic aberrations in association with central obesity and systemic atherosclerosis. However, it may also reflect a low-grade immune-mediated response to the graft. In this study we investigated the factors associated with CRP in a renal transplant population. METHODS: Between August 2001 and July 2003, renal transplant recipients with a functioning graft for more than 1 year (n = 847) were eligible for investigation at their next visit to the outpatient clinic. A total of 606 patients (55% male, aged 51+/-12 years) participated at a median (interquartile range) time of 6.0 (2.6-11.4) years post-transplant. RESULTS: Median CRP concentration was 2.0 (0.80-4.8) mg/l and mean 24 h creatinine clearance was 62+/-22 ml/min. CRP was significantly associated with body mass index, waist circumference and waist-to-hip ratio (P-value < 0.0001). None of the transplant characteristics except creatinine clearance was associated with CRP. In multiple regression analysis, waist circumference, log sICAM-1 concentration, gender, creatinine clearance and current smoking were independently associated with CRP. CONCLUSIONS: In renal transplant recipients waist circumference and smoking are the two most important modifiable independent determinants of CRP. Furthermore, CRP is independently associated with the endothelial function parameter sICAM-1 and, in univariate analyses, associated with multiple cardiovascular risk factors. CRP is not associated with any of the transplant-related factors, except for renal transplant function.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Microalbuminuria and C-reactive protein: similar messengers of cardiovascular risk?

C-reactive protein (CRP) and urinary albumin excretion are both determinants of cardiovascular risk. The first is closely related to systemic and vascular low-grade inflammation, the latter is considered to be a marker of endothelial dysfunction. Because of these properties, one might presume them to be closely interrelated. In this article, we review the available evidence concerning the relationships of CRP and urinary albumin excretion, with each other and with other cardiovascular risk markers and factors. Should they be considered as dependent or independent risk markers, and which risk markers might be present in the cardiovascular risk estimation formula of the near future? The reasons that this formula might or should include CRP and urinary albumin excretion, rather than diabetes mellitus and the metabolic syndrome, are discussed.

Albuminuria↗
PubMed2005

Mild renal dysfunction is associated with electrocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy.

BACKGROUND: Both renal dysfunction and left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) are signs of end-organ damage, risk markers of cardiovascular (CV) disease and chronic heart failure. In selected populations such as those with diabetes or hypertension, renal dysfunction was found to be related to LVH. We studied the relation between renal dysfunction and LVH in a cross-sectional study in 8592 inhabitants from Groningen, The Netherlands. METHODS: Standard 12-lead electrocardiograms were recorded, and LVH was classified using the Cornell voltage duration product. Renal dysfunction was defined as creatinine clearance <60 mL/min/1.73 m(2) or microalbuminuria (30 to 300 mg/24 h). RESULTS: Electrocardiographic signs of LVH were present in 396 of subjects (5.3%). Subjects with LVH were older and had a more extensive CV risk profile. We found that LVH was more prevalent in subjects with renal dysfunction than in those without (8% v 4%, P < .001). Multivariate regression analysis demonstrated that renal dysfunction was independently related to a 1.47-fold increased risk of the presence of LVH (95% CI = 1.15 to 1.88, P = .009). In addition, both creatinine clearance (OR = 1.56, 95% CI = 1.07 to 2.2, P = .044) and microalbuminuria (OR = 1.37, 95% CI = 1.04 to 1.80, P = .024) were independently associated with the presence of LVH. CONCLUSION: Subjects with mild renal dysfunction have a substantially higher risk of LVH on electrocardiography than those without renal dysfunction.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Screening techniques for detecting chronic kidney disease.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: As patients with impaired kidney function are at increased risk not only for progressive renal function loss, but also for cardiovascular disease, it is of importance to have accurate techniques to screen patients for the presence of an impaired kidney function. RECENT FINDINGS: Glomerular filtration rate can in mass screenings best be evaluated using a formula based upon a serum creatinine measurement and anthropometric parameters. The Cockcroft-Gault and Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formulas are mostly used. Both are easy to use, but have their limitations. Interpreting the results of such glomerular filtration rate estimates requires a good knowledge of these limitations. Urinary albumin excretion can best be measured from 24 h urine collections. As these collections are difficult to perform, however, an early morning spot urine sample for the measurement of urinary albumin concentration can be applied as preselection for screening purposes. SUMMARY: Mass screening for early kidney function impairment, expressed by an impaired glomerular filtration rate or elevated urinary albumin excretion, may help to detect patients at increased cardiac and renal risk. This can best be done using formulas to estimate glomerular filtration rate and by measuring urinary albumin loss.

Albuminuria↗