PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Ronald E Polk

Publications and source records attributed to Ronald E Polk.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

Hospital and community fluoroquinolone use and resistance in Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli in 17 US hospitals.

BACKGROUND: Fluoroquinolones are widely prescribed in hospitals and the community. Previous studies have shown associations between fluoroquinolone use and isolation of fluoroquinolone-resistant Escherichia coli and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). We performed an ecologic-level study to determine whether variability in hospital percentages of fluoroquinolone-resistant E. coli and MRSA were associated with fluoroquinolone use in hospitals and their surrounding communities. METHODS: We measured fluoroquinolone use in 17 US hospitals and their surrounding communities in the year 2000. Data on fluoroquinolone use in hospitals was electronically extracted from billing data. Data on fluoroquinolone use in communities was obtained from IMS health data for all prescriptions filled in pharmacies within a 16-km radius of each hospital. We used hospital antibiograms to determine the percentage of isolates that were fluoroquinolone-resistant E. coli and MRSA, and we performed linear regression to determine the relationship between percentage of resistant isolates and fluoroquinolone use in hospitals and their surrounding communities. RESULTS: There was a significant association between total fluoroquinolone use within hospitals and percentage of S. aureus isolates that were MRSA (r=0.77; P=.0003) and between total fluoroquinolone use in the community and percentage of E. coli isolates that were fluoroquinolone-resistant E. coli (r=0.68; P=.003). Population density within the 16-km radius also correlated with MRSA percentage (r=0.57; P=.015) and fluoroquinolone-resistant E. coli percentage (r=0.85; P=.002), but associations between total fluoroquinolone use and resistance remained significant after adjustment for population density. CONCLUSIONS: In this ecologic analysis, we found associations between fluoroquinolone use in hospitals and methicillin resistance in S. aureus and between fluoroquinolone use in communities and fluoroquinolone resistance in E. coli in hospitals. Antimicrobial use in hospitals and communities may have different relative importance with regard to resistance in different pathogens encountered in hospitals.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗

Predicting hospital rates of fluoroquinolone-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa from fluoroquinolone use in US hospitals and their surrounding communities.

Rates of fluoroquinolone resistance among Pseudomonas aeruginosa in hospitals are increasing, but interhospital variability is great. We sought to determine whether this variability correlated to fluoroquinolone use in hospitals and in the surrounding community. Hospital quinolone use in 1999 (24 hospitals) through 2001 (35 hospitals) was determined from billing records. The number of fluoroquinolone prescriptions within a 10-mile (approximately 16-km) radius of each hospital was determined for 1999 and 2000. Hospital fluoroquinolone use increased from 1999 through 2001, from 137 to 163 defined daily doses (DDD)/1000 patient-days (P=.01). The rate of community fluoroquinolone use also increased, from 2.3 to 2.8 DDD/1000 inhabitant-days (P<.001). Rates of fluoroquinolone-resistant P. aeruginosa increased from 29% in 1999 to 36% in 2001 (P=.003). Both community and hospital fluoroquinolone use were predictive of rates of fluoroquinolone-resistant P. aeruginosa. Levofloxacin was associated with resistance, but ciprofloxacin was not. Most of the variability in resistance rates is explained by volume of fluoroquinolone use, both in the hospital and the surrounding community.

Adolescent↗

Reduction in broad-spectrum antimicrobial use associated with no improvement in hospital antibiogram.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of an antimicrobial management programme on broad-spectrum antimicrobial use and antimicrobial susceptibilities of common nosocomial pathogens at a tertiary-care teaching hospital. METHODS: Review of hospital charts of patients who had been prescribed broad-spectrum antimicrobials 48 h earlier. Recommendations to streamline or discontinue antimicrobials were made based on results of available microbiology data, radiography studies, as well as the working diagnosis at the time of review. The charts were reviewed again on the following day to assess acceptance or rejection of the recommendations. Antimicrobial use, measured as defined daily dose per 1000 patient days (DDD/1000 PD), was determined before and after the antimicrobial management programme was started and was assessed as the mean quarterly use in the six quarters preceding implementation of the programme compared to the most recent six quarters that the programme has been in existence. Antibiotic susceptibilities were obtained from the clinical microbiology laboratory. RESULTS: Compared to the six quarters before the programme, broad-spectrum antibiotic use decreased by 28% (693 DDD/1000 PD to 502 DDD/1000 PD, P = 0.003). Total antifungal agent use decreased by a similar amount, i.e. 28% (144 DDD/1000 PD to 103 DDD/1000 PD, P = 0.02). Total antimicrobial use decreased by 27% (1461 DDD/1000 PD to 1069 DDD/1000 PD, P = 0.0007). Susceptibilities of common nosocomial Gram-negative organisms to commonly prescribed antibiotics did not change significantly over the 3 years of the programme. The rate of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus increased significantly in the non-intensive care areas of the hospital (P = 0.02) and decreased significantly in the intensive care areas of the hospital (P = 0.009) over the 4 year period from 2000 to 2003. CONCLUSION: Implementation of an antibiotic management programme resulted in substantial reductions in both broad-spectrum and total antimicrobial consumption without having a significant impact on antibiotic susceptibilities of common Gram-negative microorganisms within the institution. The changes in MRSA rate in the non-ICU and ICU settings may reflect infection control measures that were in place during the study period.

Anti-Infective Agents↗

Antimicrobial formularies: can they minimize antimicrobial resistance?

The relationship between antimicrobial drug use and resistance rates and the implications for antimicrobial formularies are described. Efforts to restrict antimicrobial drug use to reduce resistance in certain microorganisms have been accompanied by increases in resistance in other microorganisms. Random cycling of a variety of antimicrobial agents to treat infections caused by the same microorganism in different patients within a health care institution has been advocated as a means to reduce antimicrobial resistance. Analysis of actual antimicrobial drug use and resistance data from a network of 40 hospitals revealed wide variability in antimicrobial use. The specific type and volume of antimicrobial agents used appear to play key roles in determining resistance rates. It may be feasible to optimize diversity in antimicrobial drug use and minimize resistance by making judicious changes to the antimicrobial formulary.

Anti-Infective Agents↗