PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Ronald L Koretz

Publications and source records attributed to Ronald L Koretz.

32 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

Is weight reduction an effective therapy for nonalcoholic fatty liver? A systematic review.

PURPOSE: To assess the evidence supporting the efficacy of weight reduction for patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver. METHODS: Potentially relevant studies were identified by a computerized search of databases and a manual search of abstracts from scientific meetings. Studies were included if they reported histology, serum aminotransferase levels, or radiological imaging of the liver in obese adult patients who had undergone weight reduction. Weight reduction regimens included diet, exercise, antiobesity medications, gastric bypass, gastroplasty, or any combination of these interventions. Studies involving jejunoileal or small bowel bypass surgery were excluded. RESULTS: We identified 517 potentially relevant studies, of which 15 met the inclusion criteria: one randomized controlled trial (in abstract form), two nonrandomized controlled trials, nine case series, one retrospective review, and two case reports. Three studies included more than 50 patients, whereas nine studies had 25 or fewer patients. Twelve studies used behavioral, dietary, or pharmacologic therapy for weight reduction, and three studies used surgical interventions. Although all 15 studies demonstrated overall improvement in the measurements of liver outcome after weight reduction, more than half did not report histologic results. CONCLUSION: Despite general acceptance that weight reduction is an effective therapy for nonalcoholic fatty liver, this systematic review found little data to support or refute this recommendation.

Diet↗

Immunonutrition: can you be what you eat?

Some nutrients also influence immunologic responses. Those that have been putatively identified as having such properties include glutamine, omega3 fatty acids, arginine, and ribonucleic acid. Use of these immunonutrients in nutrition support has become known as "immunonutrition." Three of these substances (no data for ribonucleic acid) have been evaluated as individual supplements in randomized controlled trials; for the most part, no clinical efficacy was established. Different combinations of these nutrients have been added to standard enteral nutrition support solutions to create several commercial products. Randomized, controlled trials have suggested that recipients of these commercial immunonutrition formulas had better outcomes than controls receiving standard enteral nutrition. However, a number of design and execution problems with many of those trials exist. Furthermore, we do not have sufficient data to determine if the beneficial effects that have been observed result from a pharmacologic effect of the immunonutrient or to the entire nutrition support regimen. Because an immunonutrient can either upregulate or downregulate the immune response, any effect that is seen may be disease state specific.

Journal Article↗

Immunonutrition: fact, fantasy, and future.

Immunonutrients are molecular compounds that, while being dietary components, also influence immunologic response mechanisms. Substances such as glutamine, w-3 fatty acids, arginine, and/or ribonucleic acid have been added to standard nutritional support solutions, and the use of these formulations is known as "immunonutrition." A number of randomized, controlled trials have demonstrated that recipients of immunonutrition have better outcomes than control subjects receiving standard nutritional support. However, it is possible that standard parenteral or enteral nutrition is actually harmful. We currently lack data from randomized trials showing the efficacy of immunonutrition compared with no nutritional support. Even if such information were forthcoming, these immunonutrients may simply be acting as pharmacologic agents. Finally, because each of these nutritive agents may either up- or downregulate the immune response, the effects may be disease-state specific.

Adjuvants, Immunologic↗

Protein shakes.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Albumins↗

Methods of meta-analysis: an analysis.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To understand the principles of systematic reviewing and meta-analysis, using recent examples from the medical literature to highlight some of these points. RECENT FINDINGS: The word 'meta-analysis' is an intimidating one, and its associated jargon makes it seem incomprehensible. Actually, it is only a mathematical maneuver to add up data in a systematic review; it might be better called 'meta-addition'. The systematic review is a process of using the best available evidence to answer a particular clinical question. Data combination (usually done with meta-analysis) increases the power to see small differences and makes a more precise estimate of a treatment effect. Its major drawback is heterogeneity (the proverbial problem of adding apples and oranges). Systematic reviews have been used by medical societies to create position statements. Such statements have suggested that parenteral nutrition is far less efficacious than previously believed. Systematic reviews in some areas of nutritional support have clarified type II errors. Problems exist, however, in a number of the published meta-analyses of aspects of this therapy. SUMMARY: Especially in an era of resource restraint, we need to become more skilled at interpreting evidence from clinical research.

Clinical Trials as Topic↗