PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Ronald M Stewart

Publications and source records attributed to Ronald M Stewart.

7 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2003

Appendicitis: selective use of abdominal CT reduces negative appendectomy rate.

BACKGROUND: Recent literature supports the use of CT for all patients with right lower quadrant pain to improve diagnostic accuracy and reduce hospital cost. Our current practice at a large teaching hospital is to use CT only for patients whose diagnosis remains in question after a thorough history, physical examination, and focused laboratory assessment. In consideration of a more liberal use of CT for right lower quadrant pain, we reviewed our experience with selective CT and the effect this has had on our practice, paying particular attention to perforation rate and negative appendectomy rate. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed for all patients who underwent appendectomy in 1995 and 1998. These two patient populations were evaluated for patient demographics, use of CT scan, perforation rate, and incidence of negative appendectomy. RESULTS: Three hundred ninety-four patients underwent appendectomy in 1995 versus 372 in 1998. Gender (64% male in 1995 vs. 60% in 1998), age (mean 24.9 vs. 25.5) and perforation rate (31% in 1995 vs. 29% in 1998) did not change. The use of CT increased in 1998 (12% vs. 34%, p < 0.001) and overall nontherapeutic appendectomy decreased (14% vs. 7%, p < 0.005). This decrease was seen in patients who were operated without CT (13% vs. 7%, p < 0.03) and after CT (19% vs. 6%, p < 0.02). CONCLUSION: Selective use of CT scan in patients presenting with right lower quadrant pain is helpful in reducing the incidence of nontherapeutic appendectomy.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2003

Seven hundred fifty-three consecutive deaths in a level I trauma center: the argument for injury prevention.

BACKGROUND: The past century has seen improvement in trauma care, with a resulting decrease in therapeutically preventable deaths. We hypothesize that further major reduction in injury mortality will be obtained through injury prevention, rather than improvements in therapy. METHODS: Seven hundred fifty-three deaths in an American College of Surgeons-verified, Level I trauma center were reviewed as they occurred. Deaths were classified as therapeutically not preventable, possibly preventable, or preventable. These charts were also reviewed for factors that might have prevented or lessened the severity of the injury. RESULTS: Mean age was 43, mean Glasgow Coma Scale score was 5, mean Revised Trauma Score was 4, mean Injury Severity Score was 41, and mean probability of survival was 0.25 (according to TRISS). Forty-six percent underwent cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the field, 52% died within 12 hours, 74% died within 48 hours, and 86% died within 7 days. Primary causes of death included central nervous system injury in 51%, irreversible shock in 21%, multiple injuries (shock plus central nervous system injury) in 9%, multiple organ failure/sepsis and other causes in 3%, and pulmonary embolus in 0.1%. Seven hundred one (93%) were classified as not preventable with a change in therapy, 32 (4.2%) were classified as potentially preventable with a change in therapy, and 20 were classified as preventable with a change in therapy (2.6%). Forty-six percent had cardiopulmonary resuscitation performed before or immediately on arrival to the hospital. Another 23% had vital signs present on arrival, but had a Glasgow Coma Scale score of <or= 4. Of the 546 unintentionally injured patients, 58% had an identifiable factor that contributed to the presence and/or severity of the injury (intoxication, restraint and helmet use), with 28% of patients having a positive blood alcohol level. Of the 206 patients with intentional injuries, 44% were intoxicated at the time of their death. Commensurate with driving-while-intoxicated prevention program(s), the percentage of intoxicated patients significantly ( p= 0.03) decreased from 45% to 34% over the same 7-year period. CONCLUSION: Dramatically improving therapy (no errors, cure for multiple organ failure, sepsis, and pulmonary embolus) in a modern trauma system would decrease trauma mortality by 13%. In contrast, more than half of all deaths are potentially preventable with preinjury behavioral changes. Injury prevention is critical to reducing deaths in the modern trauma system.

Accidental Falls↗
PubMed2003

Surgeons, intensivists, and the covenant of care: administrative models and values affecting care at the end of life.

CONTEXT: End-of-life care remains a challenging and complex activity in critical care units. There is little information concerning the influence of administrative models of care delivery on end-of-life care. OBJECTIVE: To compare and contrast end-of-life care delivery in intensive care units using "semiclosed," "open," and "closed" administrative models. DESIGN: Ethnographic study of three critical care units. SETTING: University hospitals in the United States and New Zealand. SUBJECTS: Approximately 600 physicians, nurses, allied health personnel, patients, family members, and friends. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Ethnographic observations were made at three sites for 75, 3, and 10 wks, respectively. Eighty end-of-life care episodes were observed. The interactions among care personnel and families varied according to the administrative model, depending on whether surgeons or intensivists had primary patient responsibility. This led to differential timing on the shift from "cure" to "comfort," and differential decision-making power for families. CONCLUSIONS: End-of-life care varies according to the administrative model. When surgeons have primary responsibility for the patient, the most important goal is defeating death. When intensivists have sole patient responsibility, scarce resources are considered and quality of life is a significant variable. Discussions about improving the way end-of-life decisions are carried out in intensive care units rarely consider the administrative models and personal, professional, and national values affecting such decisions. To improve care at the end of life, we must critically examine these features.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗
PubMed2003

Surgeons, intensivists, and the covenant of care: administrative models and values affecting care at the end of life--Updated.

CONTEXT: End-of-life care remains a challenging and complex activity in critical care units. There is little information concerning the influence of administrative models of care delivery on end-of-life care. OBJECTIVE: To compare and contrast end-of-life care delivery in intensive care units using "semiclosed," "open," and "closed" administrative models. DESIGN: Ethnographic study of three critical care units. SETTING: University hospitals in the United States and New Zealand. SUBJECTS: Approximately 600 physicians, nurses, allied health personnel, patients, family members, and friends. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Ethnographic observations were made at three sites for 75, 3, and 10 wks, respectively. Eighty end-of-life care episodes were observed. The interactions among care personnel and families varied according to the administrative model, depending on whether surgeons or intensivists had primary patient responsibility. This led to differential timing on the shift from "cure" to "comfort," and differential decision-making power for families. CONCLUSIONS: End-of-life care varies according to the administrative model. When surgeons have primary responsibility for the patient, the most important goal is defeating death. When intensivists have sole patient responsibility, scarce resources are considered and quality of life is a significant variable. Discussions about improving the way end-of-life decisions are carried out in intensive care units rarely consider the administrative models and personal, professional, and national values affecting such decisions. To improve care at the end of life, we must critically examine these features.

Anthropology, Cultural↗
PubMed2002

Improving outcomes following penetrating colon wounds: application of a clinical pathway.

INTRODUCTION: During World War II, failure to treat penetrating colon injuries with diversion could result in court martial. Based on this wartime experience, colostomy for civilian colon wounds became the standard of care for the next 4 decades. Previous work from our institution demonstrated that primary repair was the optimal management for nondestructive colon wounds. Optimal management of destructive wounds requiring resection remains controversial. To address this issue, we performed a study that demonstrated risk factors (pre or intraoperative transfusion requirement of more than 6 units of packed red blood cells, significant comorbid diseases) that were associated with a suture line failure rate of 14%, and of whom 33% died. Based on these outcomes, a clinical pathway for management of destructive colon wounds was developed. The results of the implementation of this pathway are the focus of this report. METHODS: Patients with penetrating colon injury were identified from the registry of a level I trauma center over a 5-year period. Records were reviewed for demographics, injury characteristics, and outcome. Patients with nondestructive injuries underwent primary repair. Patients with destructive wounds but no comorbidities or large transfusion requirement underwent resection and anastomosis, while patients with destructive wounds and significant medical illness or transfusion requirements of more than 6 units/blood received end colostomy. The current patients (CP) were compared to the previous study (PS) to determine the impact of the clinical pathway. Outcomes examined included colon related mortality and morbidity (suture line leak and abscess). RESULTS: Over a 5.5-year period, 231 patients had penetrating colon wounds. 209 survived more 24 hours and comprise the study population. Primary repair was performed on 153 (73%) patients, and 56 patients had destructive injuries (27%). Of these, 40 (71%) had resection and anastomosis and 16 (29%) had diversion. More destructive injuries were managed in the CP group (27% vs. 19%). Abscess rate was lower in the CP group (27% vs. 37%), as was suture line leak rate (7% vs. 14%). Colon related mortality in the CP group was 5% as compared with 12% in the PS group. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical pathway for destructive colon wound management has improved outcomes as measured by anastomotic leak rates and colon related mortality. The data demonstrated the need for colostomy in the face of shock and comorbidities. Institution of this pathway results in colostomy for only 7% of all colon wounds.

Abdominal Abscess↗