PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Ronny Bell

Publications and source records attributed to Ronny Bell.

8 recordsLinked to original sources

Randomized trial of an intervention to improve mammography utilization among a triracial rural population of women.

INTRODUCTION: Mammography is underused by certain groups of women, in particular poor and minority women. We developed a lay health advisor (LHA) intervention based on behavioral theories and tested whether it improved mammography attendance in Robeson County, NC, a rural, low-income, triracial (white, Native American, African American) population. METHODS: A total of 851 women who had not had a mammogram within the past year were randomly assigned to the LHA intervention (n = 433) or to a comparison arm (n = 418) during 1998-2002. Rates of mammography use after 12-14 months (as verified by medical record review) were compared using a chi-square test. Baseline and follow-up (at 12-14 months) surveys were used to obtain information on demographics, risk factors, and barriers, beliefs, and knowledge about mammography. Linear regression, Mantel-Haenszel statistics, and logistic regression were used to compare barriers, beliefs, and knowledge from baseline to follow-up and to identify baseline factors associated with mammography. RESULTS: At follow-up, 42.5% of the women in the LHA group and 27.3% of those in the comparison group had had a mammogram in the previous 12 months (relative risk = 1.56, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.29 to 1.87). Compared with those in the comparison group, women in the LHA group displayed statistically significantly better belief scores (difference = 0.46 points on a 0-10 scale, 95% CI = 0.15 to 0.77) and reduced barriers at follow-up (difference = -0.77 points, 95% CI = -1.02 to -0.53), after adjusting for baseline scores. CONCLUSIONS: LHA interventions can improve mammography utilization. Future studies are needed to assess strategies to disseminate effective LHA interventions to underserved populations.

Adult↗

Cherokee Choices: a diabetes prevention program for American Indians.

In 1999, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) provided Racial and Ethnic Approaches to Community Health 2010 (REACH 2010) funds to the Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians to develop a community-based intervention to improve the health of this rural, mountainous community in North Carolina. During the first year of the Cherokee Choices program, team members conducted formative research, formed coalitions, and developed a culturally appropriate community action plan for the prevention of type 2 diabetes, particularly among children. The Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians has higher rates of obesity and type 2 diabetes than the U.S. and North Carolina general populations. The Cherokee Choices program includes three main components: elementary school mentoring, worksite wellness for adults, and church-based health promotion. A social marketing strategy, including television advertisements and a television documentary series, supports the three components. School policy was altered to allow Cherokee Choices to have class time and after-school time devoted to health promotion activities. School staff have shown an interest in improving their health through attendance at fitness sessions. The credibility of the program has been validated through multiple invitations to participate in school events. Participants in the worksite wellness program have met dietary and physical activity goals, had reductions in body fat, and expressed enthusiasm for the program. A subcoalition has been formed to expand the worksite wellness component and link prevention efforts to health care cost reduction. Participants in the church program have walked more than 31,600 miles collectively.

Adult↗

Racial differences in knowledge, attitudes, and cancer screening practices among a triracial rural population.

BACKGROUND: Low-income, minority, and rural women face a greater burden with regard to cancer-related morbidity and mortality and are usually underrepresented in cancer control research. The Robeson County Outreach, Screening and Education Project sought to increase mammography use among low-income, minority, and rural women age > 40 years. The current article reports on racial disparities and barriers to screening, especially those related to knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors. METHODS: A baseline survey was administered to 897 women age > 40 years who lived in rural Robeson County in North Carolina. The sample consisted of three principal racial groups: whites, African Americans, and Native Americans. Survey comparisons were made among racial groups with respect to knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors regarding breast and cervical carcinoma screening. RESULTS: Overall, Native American and African-American women had lower levels of knowledge, more inaccurate beliefs, and more barriers to screening compared with white women. Among the notable findings were that 43% of the patient population did not mention mammograms and 53% did not mention Pap smears as breast and cervical carcinoma screening tests, respectively; furthermore, compared with white women, significantly fewer African-American and Native American women mentioned these tests (P < 0.001). Sixty-seven percent of all women reported that a physician had never encouraged them to receive a mammogram, although 75% reported having received a regular checkup in the preceding year. CONCLUSIONS: Although all low-income rural women experienced significant barriers to receiving cancer screening tests, these barriers were more common for minority women compared with white women. More research is needed to identify ways to overcome such barriers, especially among Native American women. The results of the current study have important implications with respect to the designing of interventions aimed at improving cancer screening for all women.

Adult↗

Health differences among Lumbee Indians using public and private sources of care.

CONTEXT: Of 2.4 million American Indians, approximately 60% are eligible to receive Indian Health Service (IHS) benefits, leaving many to seek care elsewhere. It is unknown if their quality of care, health behaviors, and health status vary by source of care, as demonstrated for other populations. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether preventive services, health behaviors, and number of health conditions vary as a function of having non-IHS public versus private physicians as sources of usual care. METHODS: 1,177 Lumbee Indians, who are ineligible to receive IHS services, completed a telephone interview that included information on receipt of preventive measures, tobacco use, physical activity, breast self-examination, and medical conditions. Frequencies, chi-squares, t tests, odds ratios, and confidence intervals were used to compare variables by source of care. FINDINGS: 939 respondents (80%) had a private and 210 (18%) a public health clinic physician as their usual source of care; 28 (2%) reported having neither. Logistic regression analyses, restricted to the 1,149 participants who reported either a private or public source of care, revealed no differences in receipt of preventive services or health status by usual source of care. Smokeless tobacco use was less common among persons using private than public providers. CONCLUSIONS: Lumbees whose usual source of care was a public clinic physician did not differ in receipt of preventive services or in health status compared to their counterparts who received care from a private physician. More targeted research into health similarities and differences arising from access to public and private sources of care is warranted.

Adult↗

Public health surveillance of diabetes in the United States.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Division of Diabetes Translation supports a national and state surveillance system that analyzes, interprets, and reports on diabetes risk behaviors, risk factors, care practices, morbidity, and mortality. Data sources include surveys, the U.S. Renal Data System, the Indian Health Service, information on hospital inpatients, birth and death certificates, and special studies to use and to better understand the usefulness of data from managed care, Medicare, and Medicaid for monitoring diabetes. These data are used to define the magnitude and burden of diabetes; monitor changes in burden over time; guide public health planning and policy making, and assess progress toward diabetes objectives, such as those in Healthy People 2010. Challenges facing the diabetes surveillance system are limitations in data sources; the capture of undiagnosed diabetes; tracking key risk factors, such as levels of glycemia and lipids; and surveillance of high- or emerging-risk populations such as racial and ethnic groups, children and youth, and those with prediabetes. Limited resources, competing priorities, and issues of data privacy also challenge surveillance. To overcome these factors, the Division of Diabetes Translation strongly emphasizes partnering with other organizations, such as the Medicare and Medicaid programs, managed care, and other chronic disease programs.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S.↗

Increasing participation of minorities in cancer clinical trials: summary of the "Moving Beyond the Barriers" Conference in North Carolina.

A day-long seminar was held at Wake Forest University School of Medicine to address barriers among ethnic minorities in cancer clinical trials and explore ways that individuals who design and conduct clinical trials could increase minority representation. Speakers addressed implications of under-representation of minorities and identified barriers to minority participation. State-wide focus group results were presented and revealed suspicion of medical research among minorities and the need for bridging to minority communities to improve participation in cancer clinical trials. Working groups assembled and identified barriers specific to trial design, providers, and participants. Attendees were encouraged to devise strategies within their institutions to overcome barriers to minority participation.

Clinical Trials as Topic↗

Patient-centered outcomes of diabetes self-care. Associations with satisfaction and general health in a community clinic setting.

BACKGROUND: Despite the recognition of strategies for diabetes care management, information systems that screen patient diabetes self-care problems are not commonplace, especially among low-income patients. This study examined correlates of three patient-centered outcomes of diabetes self-care (awareness of self-care components, difficulties in diabetes self-care, and adherence to self-care) among low-income diabetic patients. METHODS: Clinical and patient survey data were obtained on 249 participants from 11 primary care community health clinics serving low-income populations in North Carolina in Project IDEAL (Improving Diabetes Education, Access to Care and Living). Measures of patient-centered outcomes of self-care were obtained from the Diabetes Quality Improvement Project (DQIP) Patient-Reported Measures set. RESULTS: A substantial proportion of patients reported difficulty achieving standard self-care treatment goals. The study identified distinct patient characteristics associated with poor self-care outcomes. Increased understanding of self-care components and adherence to them were associated with increased perception of quality of care and, in turn, better general health perceptions in these patients (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: This study identified an unmet need for diabetes self-care knowledge and skills associated with patient outcomes in low-income patients. Routine monitoring of patient-centered self-care outcomes could help improve long-term outcomes of diabetes care in this population.

Community Health Services↗