PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Rotem Drori

Publications and source records attributed to Rotem Drori.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

Temporally precise cortical firing patterns are associated with distinct action segments.

Despite many reports indicating the existence of precise firing sequences in cortical activity, serious objections have been raised regarding the statistics used to detect them and the relations of these sequences to behavior. We show that in behaving monkeys, pairs of spikes from different neurons tend to prefer certain time delays when measured in relation to a specific behavior. Single-unit activity was recorded from eight microelectrodes inserted into the motor and premotor cortices of two monkeys while they were performing continuous drawinglike hand movements. Repeated scribbling paths, termed drawing components, were extracted by data-mining techniques. The set of the least predictable relations between drawing components and pairs of neurons was determined and represented by one statistic termed the relations score. The chance probability of the relations score was evaluated by teetering the spike times: 1,000 surrogates were generated by randomly teetering the original time of each spike in a small window. In nine of 13 experimental days the precision was better than 12 ms and, in the best case, spike precision reached 0.5 ms.

Animals↗

Neurons of the cerebral cortex exhibit precise interspike timing in correspondence to behavior.

We show that times of spikes can be very precise. In the cerebral cortex, where each nerve cell is affected by thousands of others, it is the common belief that the exact time of a spike is random up to an averaged firing rate over tens of milliseconds. In a brain slice, precise time relations of several neurons have been observed. It remained unclear whether this phenomenon can also be observed in brains of behaving animals. Here we show, in behaving monkeys, that time intervals between spikes, measured in correspondence to a specific behavior, may be controlled to within the milliseconds range.

Action Potentials↗

Partial cross-correlation analysis resolves ambiguity in the encoding of multiple movement features.

A classical question in neuroscience is which features of a stimulus or of an action are represented in brain activity. When several features are interdependent either at a given point in time or at distinct points in time, neural activity related to one feature appears to be correlated with other features. Thus techniques that simultaneously consider multiple features cannot account for delayed interdependencies between features. The result is an ambiguity with respect to the encoded features. Here, we resolve this ambiguity by applying a novel statistical method based on partial cross-correlations. The method yields estimates of linear correlations between neural activity and a given feature that are not affected by linear correlations with other features at multiple time delays. The method also provides a graphical output measured on a scale that allows for comparisons between different features, neurons, and experiments. We use real movement data and neural activity simulated according to a wide range of tuning models to illustrate the method. When applied to real neural activity, the procedure yields results that indicate which of the considered features the neural activity is related to and at what time delays.

Action Potentials↗

Neuronal activity in motor cortical areas reflects the sequential context of movement.

Natural actions can be described as chains of simple elements, whereas individual motion elements are readily concatenated to generate countless movement sequences. Sequence-specific neurons have been described extensively, suggesting that the motor system may implement temporally complex motions by using such neurons to recruit lower-level movement neurons modularly. Here, we set out to investigate whether activity of movement-related neurons is independent of the sequential context of the motion. Two monkeys were trained to perform linear arm movements either individually or as components of double-segment motions. However, comparison of neuronal activity between these conditions is delicate because subtle kinematic variations generally occur within different contexts. We therefore used extensive procedures to identify the contribution of variations in motor execution to differences in neuronal activity. Yet, even after application of these procedures we find that neuronal activity in the motor cortex (PMd and M1) associated with a given motion segment differs between the two contexts. These differences appear during preparation and become even more prominent during motion execution. Interestingly, despite context-related differences on the single-neuron level, the population as a whole still allows a reliable readout of movement direction regardless of the sequential context. Thus the direction of a movement and the sequential context in which it is embedded may be simultaneously and reliably encoded by neurons in the motor cortex.

Action Potentials↗

Dynamical organization of directional tuning in the primate premotor and primary motor cortex.

Although previous studies have shown that activity of neurons in the motor cortex is related to various movement parameters, including the direction of movement, the spatial pattern by which these parameters are represented is still unresolved. The current work was designed to study the pattern of representation of the preferred direction (PD) of hand movement over the cortical surface. By studying pairwise PD differences, and by applying a novel implementation of the circular variance during preparation and movement periods in the context of a center-out task, we demonstrate a nonrandom distribution of PDs over the premotor and motor cortical surface of two monkeys. Our analysis shows that, whereas PDs of units recorded by nonadjacent electrodes are not more similar than expected by chance, PDs of units recorded by adjacent electrodes are. PDs of units recorded by a single electrode display the greatest similarity. Comparison of PD distributions during preparation and movement reveals that PDs of nearby units tend to be more similar during the preparation period. However, even for pairs of units recorded by a single electrode, the mean PD difference is typically large (45 degrees and 75 degrees during preparation and movement, respectively), so that a strictly modular representation of hand movement direction over the cortical surface is not supported by our data.

Animals↗