PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Roy D Crowninshield

Publications and source records attributed to Roy D Crowninshield.

6 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Clinical performance of contemporary tibial polyethylene components.

A postclinical retrieval analysis was performed on 43 polyethylene tibial components of a contemporary total knee arthroplasty system with implantation duration between 12 and 80 months. Components were scored for 8 potential modes of surface wear or damage on the top and back surfaces. Moderate backside wear of 4.1 microm/y was documented by measuring the extent of manufacturer's engraved lettering removal. Neither the topside nor backside score correlated with duration of in vivo function. No component experienced topside or backside delamination, cracking, or significant deformation. The greatest contribution to wear and damage score was pitting and scratching secondary to bone cement debris. The extent of both wear and damage experienced by these components was moderate, in comparison with that previously reported with older implant systems.

Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee↗
PubMed2006

Changing demographics of patients with total joint replacement.

There has been a substantial change in the population demographics of patients who potentially will require total joint replacements. We studied data regarding temporal trends in physical condition, life expectancy, education, and other population demographics of individuals most likely to receive total joint replacements. Changes in this population during the last several decades correlate with temporal changes in the prevalence of joint disease and the incidence of total hip and knee replacements. Compared with several decades ago, patients currently receiving total joint replacements are almost 20% heavier, more physically active, three times more likely to have a high school or college education, and live more than 25% longer. Patients needing total joint replacements are more likely to be female, and twice as likely to receive a total knee replacement than a total hip replacement. Treatment choices and outcome expectations are best determined with accurate knowledge of current surgical science and current patient demographics. Therefore, it is important to realize that today's population most likely to receive total joint replacements is demographically different than in the past.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

The role of proximal femoral support in stress development within hip prostheses.

Bone remodeling commonly associated with implant loosening may require revision total hip replacement when there is substantial proximal femoral bone loss. Additionally, the surgical exposure required to remove primary implants may alter the proximal femur's structure. As a result, in many revision hip situations the proximal femur provides compromised support for the revision femoral component. Stress analyses of the proximal femur with extensively porous-coated prosthetic femoral components show that proximomedial femoral bone loss, ununited femoral osteotomy, and periprosthetic fracture can result in significant elevation of stress within revision prosthetic components. The first principal stress within prosthetic components can, in proximal bone loss conditions, be elevated significantly above a revision prostheses' fatigue strength. Loss of proximomedial bone is predicted to increase stress within a revision component by as much as 82%. An unhealed transverse femoral fracture or osteotomy is predicted to more than double the stress within a revision femoral component. In revision total hip replacement, efforts directed toward the restoration of proximal femoral bone and the use of larger prostheses may contribute to avoiding prostheses fatigue fracture. Similarly, protected weightbearing in patients with ununited femoral osteotomies and periprosthetic fractures may be important to preventing prosthetic fracture.

Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip↗
PubMed2004

Biomechanics of large femoral heads: what they do and don't do.

The stability and durability of total hip reconstruction is dependent on many factors that include the design and anatomic orientation of prosthetic components. An analysis of femoral component head size and acetabular component orientation shows an interdependency of these variables and joint stability. Increased femoral component head size can increase hip stability by increasing the prosthetic impingement-free range of hip motion and by increasing the inferior head displacement required before hip dislocation. Increasing the femoral head size from 22 mm to 40 mm increases the required displacement for dislocation by about 5 mm with the acetabular component at 45 degrees of abduction; however, increasing acetabular component abduction greatly diminishes this stability advantage of larger femoral heads. Vertical acetabular component orientation and femoral component head subluxation are each predicted to more than double the tensile stress with acetabular component polyethylene compared with components at 45 degrees of abduction. With a desirable acetabular component orientation, the use of larger femoral heads may result in improved joint stability and durable use of polyethylene. With high abduction acetabular component orientation, the use of larger femoral heads contributes little to joint stability and contributes to elevated stress within the polyethylene that may result in implant failure.

Acetabulum↗