Biomedical subjects

Roy D Patterson

Publications and source records attributed to Roy D Patterson.

21 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

PubMed2002

Sustained magnetic fields reveal separate sites for sound level and temporal regularity in human auditory cortex.

Magnetoencephalography was used to investigate the relationship between the sustained magnetic field in auditory cortex and the perception of periodic sounds. The response to regular and irregular click trains was measured at three sound intensities. Two separate sources were isolated adjacent to primary auditory cortex: One, located in lateral Heschl's gyrus, was particularly sensitive to regularity and largely insensitive to sound level. The second, located just posterior to the first in planum temporale, was particularly sensitive to sound level and largely insensitive to regularity. This double dissociation to the same stimuli indicates that the two sources represent separate mechanisms; the first would appear to be involved with pitch perception and the second with loudness. The delay of the offset of the sustained field was found to increase with interclick interval up to 200 ms at least, which suggests that the sustained field offset represents a sophisticated offset-monitoring mechanism rather than simply the cessation of stimulation.

Acoustic Stimulation↗

PubMed2002

The representation of peripheral neural activity in the middle-latency evoked field of primary auditory cortex in humans(1).

Short sweeps with increasing instantaneous frequency (up-chirps) designed to compensate for the propagation delay along the human cochlea enhance the magnitude of wave V of the auditory brainstem responses, while time reversed sweeps (down-chirps) reduce the magnitude of wave V [Dau, T., Wegner, O., Mellert, V., Kollmeier, B., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 107 (2000) 1530-1540]. This effect is due to synchronisation of frequency channels along the basilar membrane and it indicates that cochlear phase delays are preserved up to the input of the inferior colliculus. The present magnetoencephalography study was designed to investigate the influence of peripheral synchronisation on the activation in primary auditory cortex. Spatio-temporal source analysis of middle-latency auditory evoked fields (MAEFs) elicited by clicks and up- and down-chirps showed that up-chirps elicited significantly larger MAEF responses compared to clicks or down-chirps. Both N19m-P30m magnitude and its latency are influenced by peripheral cross-channel phase effects. Furthermore, deconvolution of the empirical source waveforms with spike probability functions simulated with a cochlear model indicated that the source waves for all stimulus conditions could be explained with the same unit-response function, i.e. a far field recorded cortical response of a very small cell assembly along the medio-lateral axis of Heschl's gyrus that receives input from a small number of excitatory fibres. The conclusion is that (i) phase delays between channels in the auditory pathway are preserved up to primary auditory cortex, and (ii) MAEFs can be described by a convolution of a unit-response function with the summary neural activity pattern of the auditory nerve.

Acoustic Stimulation↗

PubMed2002

Asymmetry of masking between complex tones and noise: the role of temporal structure and peripheral compression.

Thresholds for the detection of harmonic complex tones in noise were measured as a function of masker level. The rms level of the masker ranged from 40 to 70 dB SPL in 10-dB steps. The tones had a fundamental frequency (F0) of 62.5 or 250 Hz, and components were added in either cosine or random phase. The complex tones and the noise were bandpass filtered into the same frequency region, from the tenth harmonic up to 5 kHz. In a different condition, the roles of masker and signal were reversed, keeping all other parameters the same; subjects had to detect the noise in the presence of a harmonic tone masker. In both conditions, the masker was either gated synchronously with the 700-ms signal, or it started 400 ms before and stopped 200 ms after the signal. The results showed a large asymmetry in the effectiveness of masking between the tones and noise. Even though signal and masker had the same bandwidth, the noise was a more effective masker than the complex tone. The degree of asymmetry depended on F0, component phase, and the level of the masker. The maximum difference between masked thresholds for tone and noise was about 28 dB; this occurred when the F0 was 62.5 Hz, the components were in cosine phase, and the masker level was 70 dB SPL. In most conditions, the growth-of-masking functions had slopes close to 1 (on a dB versus dB scale). However, for the cosine-phase tone masker with an F0 of 62.5 Hz, a 10-dB increase in masker level led to an increase in masked threshold of the noise of only 3.7 dB, on average. We suggest that the results for this condition are strongly affected by the active mechanism in the cochlea.

Adult↗