PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Roy M Soetikno

Publications and source records attributed to Roy M Soetikno.

11 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2003

Keratin mutation in transgenic mice predisposes to Fas but not TNF-induced apoptosis and massive liver injury.

Hepatocytes express keratins 8 and 18 (K8/18) as their only cytoskeletal intermediate filament (IF) proteins, and K8/18 mutations predispose their carriers to liver cirrhosis. Transgenic mice that overexpress mutant human K18 (Arg89-->Cys [R89C]) develop mild chronic hepatitis, hepatocyte fragility, keratin filament disruption, and increased susceptibility to drug-induced liver injury. K18 is a major caspase substrate during apoptosis, and K8- or K18-null mice are significantly predisposed to Fas- and possibly tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-mediated apoptosis in the liver. Here we tested the potential role of the K18 R89C mutation on Fas- or TNF-mediated apoptotic liver injury by injecting Fas antibody (Ab) or TNF-alpha plus actinomycin D into mice that overexpress wild-type (WT) human K18 (with intact filament network, termed TG2 mice) or into K18 R89C mice (with disrupted filament network). K18 R89C mice are significantly more susceptible to Fas-mediated liver injury compared with nontransgenic and TG2 mice. This included differences in lethality, histology, apoptosis, and serum transaminase levels. In contrast, K18 WT and R89C mice manifest similar sensitivity to TNF-induced injury. Both Fas- and TNF-induced apoptosis in liver tissues are associated with caspase-mediated K18 degradation and increased keratin phosphorylation on several but not all sites. In conclusion, transgenic mouse K18 mutation and its consequent keratin filament disruption predispose hepatocytes to Fas- but not TNF-mediated apoptotic injury. This supports the association of keratin mutations with cirrhosis in patients with liver disease and suggests that keratins modulate apoptosis induced by Fas but not TNF.

Actin Cytoskeleton↗
PubMed2003

A phase I/II trial of intratumoral endoscopic ultrasound injection of ONYX-015 with intravenous gemcitabine in unresectable pancreatic carcinoma.

PURPOSE: Localized pancreatic carcinoma is rarely resectable and is resistant to conventional therapies. ONYX-015 (dl1520) is an E1B-55kD gene-deleted replication-selective adenovirus that preferentially replicates in and kills malignant cells. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) has the potential to conveniently and accurately deliver local therapy to the pancreas. Therefore, we undertook a trial of the feasibility, tolerability, and efficacy of EUS injection of ONYX-015 into unresectable pancreatic carcinomas. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Twenty-one patients with locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the pancreas or with metastatic disease, but minimal or absent liver metastases, underwent eight sessions of ONYX-015 delivered by EUS injection into the primary pancreatic tumor over 8 weeks. The final four treatments were given in combination with gemcitabine (i.v., 1,000 mg/m(2)). Patients received 2 x 10(10) (n = 3) or 2 x 10(11) (n = 18) virus particles/treatment. RESULTS: After combination therapy, 2 patients had partial regressions of the injected tumor, 2 had minor responses, 6 had stable disease, and 11 had progressive disease or had to go off study because of treatment toxicity. No clinical pancreatitis occurred despite mild, transient elevations in lipase in a minority of patients. Two patients had sepsis before the institution of prophylactic oral antibiotics. Two patients had duodenal perforations from the rigid endoscope tip. No perforations occurred after the protocol was changed to transgastic injections only. CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates that ONYX-015 injection via EUS into pancreatic carcinomas by the transgastic route with prophylactic antibiotics is feasible and generally well tolerated either alone or in combination with gemcitabine. Transgastric EUS-guided injection is a new and practical method of delivering biological agents to pancreatic tumors.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2002

Increased risk of colorectal neoplasia in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis and ulcerative colitis: a meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Published data on the risk of colorectal neoplasia in patients with ulcerative colitis with and without primary sclerosing cholangitis are conflicting. A meta-analysis was performed to synthesize available publications and to compare the risk of colorectal neoplasia in patients with ulcerative colitis with and without primary sclerosing cholangitis. METHODS: By using MEDLINE and manual search methods, studies were identified that compared the risk of colorectal neoplasia (dysplasia and carcinoma) in patients with ulcerative colitis with and without primary sclerosing cholangitis. In addition, citations were reviewed in relevant articles and proceedings from gastroenterology meetings, and investigators were contacted when data were incomplete. The summary odds ratio (OR) was then calculated for the risk for patients with ulcerative colitis and primary sclerosing cholangitis of having colorectal neoplasia develop compared with that of patients with ulcerative colitis without primary sclerosing cholangitis. RESULTS: Eleven studies met all eligibility criteria for the meta-analysis. Patients with ulcerative colitis and primary sclerosing cholangitis are at increased risk of colorectal dysplasia and carcinoma compared with patients with ulcerative colitis alone; OR 4.79: 95% CI [3.58, 6.41] with the Mantel-Haenszel method, and OR 5.11: 95% CI [3.15, 8.29] with the Der Simonian and Laird method. This increased risk is present even when the risk of colorectal carcinoma alone is considered; OR 4.09: 95% CI [2.89, 5.76] and OR 4.26: 95% CI [2.80, 6.48] by using, respectively, the Mantel-Haenszel and the Der Simonian and Laird methods. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with ulcerative colitis and primary sclerosing cholangitis have a significantly higher risk for the development of colorectal neoplasia than patients with ulcerative colitis but not primary sclerosing cholangitis. More intensive colonoscopic surveillance should be considered for patients with ulcerative colitis and primary sclerosing cholangitis.

Cholangitis, Sclerosing↗
PubMed2002

Risk factors for complications after performance of ERCP.

BACKGROUND: ERCP has become widely available for the diagnosis and treatment of benign and malignant pancreaticobiliary diseases. In this prospective study, the overall complication rate and risk factors for diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP were identified. METHODS: Data were collected prospectively on patient characteristics and endoscopic techniques from 1223 ERCPs performed at a single referral center and entered into a database. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify risk factors for ERCP-associated complications. RESULTS: Of 1223 ERCPs performed, 554 (45.3%) were diagnostic and 667 (54.7%) therapeutic. The overall complication rate was 11.2%. Post-ERCP pancreatitis was the most common (7.2%) and in 93% of cases was self-limiting, requiring only conservative treatment. Bleeding occurred in 10 patients (0.8%) and was related to a therapeutic procedure in all cases. Nine patients had cholangitis develop, most cases being secondary to incomplete drainage. There was one perforation (0.08%). All other complications totaled 1.5%. Variables derived from cannulation technique associated with an increased risk for post-ERCP pancreatitis were precut access papillotomy (20%), multiple cannulation attempts (14.9%), sphincterotome use to achieve cannulation (13.1%), pancreatic duct manipulation (13%), multiple pancreatic injections (12.3%), guidewire use to achieve cannulation (10.2%), and the extent of pancreatic duct opacification (10%). Patient characteristics associated with an increased risk of pancreatitis were sphincter of Oddi dysfunction (21.7%) documented by manometry, previous ERCP-related pancreatitis (19%), and recurrent pancreatitis (16.2%). Pain during the procedure was an important indicator of an increased risk of post-ERCP pancreatitis (27%). Independent risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis were identified as a history of recurrent pancreatitis, previous ERCP-related pancreatitis, multiple cannulation attempts, pancreatic brush cytology, and pain during the procedure. CONCLUSIONS: The most frequent ERCP-related complication was pancreatitis, which was mild in the majority of patients. The frequency of post-ERCP pancreatitis was similar for both diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. Bleeding was rare and mostly associated with sphincterotomy. Other complications such as cholangitis and perforation were rare. Specific patient- and technique-related characteristics that can increase the risk of post-ERCP complications were identified.

Adolescent↗