Biomedical subjects

Rozsa Sas

Publications and source records attributed to Rozsa Sas.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2005

RV filling modulates LV function by direct ventricular interaction during mechanical ventilation.

During mechanical ventilation, phasic changes in systemic venous return modulate right ventricular output but may also affect left ventricular function by direct ventricular interaction. In 13 anesthetized, closed-chest, normal dogs, we measured inferior vena cava flow and left and right ventricular dimensions and output during mechanical ventilation, during an inspiratory hold, and (during apnea) vena caval constriction and abdominal compression. During a single ventilation cycle preceded by apnea, positive pressure inspiration decreased caval flow and right ventricular dimension; the transseptal pressure gradient increased, the septum shifted rightward, reflecting an increased left ventricular volume (the anteroposterior diameter did not change); and stroke volume increased. The opposite occurred during expiration. Similarly, the maneuvers that decreased venous return shifted the septum rightward, and left ventricular volume and stroke volume increased. Increased venous return had opposite effects. Changes in left ventricular function caused by changes in venous return alone were similar to those during mechanical ventilation except for minor quantitative differences. We conclude that phasic changes in systemic venous return during mechanical ventilation modulate left ventricular function by direct ventricular interaction.

Abdomen↗

PubMed2005

Ventricular interaction during mechanical ventilation in closed-chest anesthetized dogs.

The cardiac effects of positive pressure ventilation and positive end-expiratory pressure are incompletely understood. External constraint due to increased intrathoracic pressure decreases left ventricular end-diastolic volume; the effects on venous return and ventricular interaction are less clear. Phasic changes in inferior vena caval flow, end-diastolic ventricular dimensions and output were measured in seven anesthetized, ventilated normal dogs. During inspiration, caval flow, right ventricular diameter and output decreased; end-diastolic transseptal pressure gradient, septum-to-left ventricular free wall diameter, left ventricular area (ie, left ventricular volume index) and output increased despite the decreased sum of the septum-to-free wall diameters. The reverse occurred during expiration. Increased positive end-expiratory pressure decreased the left ventricular area, but the end-expiratory right ventricular diameter was unchanged. At given airway pressures, right ventricular diameter was greater at higher positive end-expiratory pressures, suggesting that a leftward septal shift (direct ventricular interaction) added to the effect of external constraint on left ventricular end-diastolic volume. In conclusion, positive pressure ventilation reduced right ventricular end-diastolic volume during inspiration and increased the transseptal pressure gradient, which shifted the septum rightward, increasing left ventricular end-diastolic volume and output. The reverse occurred during expiration. Positive end-expiratory pressure constrained left ventricular filling and decreased left ventricular end-diastolic volume further by a leftward septal shift.

Anesthesia↗

PubMed2004

Atrioventricular nonuniformity of pericardial constraint.

Physiologists and clinicians commonly refer to "pressure" as a measure of the constraining effects of the pericardium; however, "pericardial pressure" is really a local measurement of epicardial radial stress. During diastole, from the bottom of the y descent to the beginning of the a wave, pericardial pressure over the right atrium (P(pRA)) is approximately equal to that over the right ventricle (P(pRV)). However, in systole, during the interval between the bottom of the x descent and the peak of the v wave, these two pericardial pressures appear to be completely decoupled in that P(pRV) decreases, whereas P(pRA) remains constant or increases. This decoupling indicates considerable mechanical independence between the RA and RV during systole. That is, RV systolic emptying lowers P(pRV), but P(pRA) continues to increase, suggesting that the relation of the pericardium to the RA must allow effective constraint, even though the pericardium over the RV is simultaneously slack. In conclusion, we measured the pericardial pressure responsible for the previously reported nonuniformity of pericardial strain. P(pRA) and P(pRV) are closely coupled during diastole, but during systole they become decoupled. Systolic nonuniformity of pericardial constraint may augment the atrioventricular valve-opening pressure gradient in early diastole and, so, affect ventricular filling.

Animals↗

PubMed2003

Opening the pericardium during pulmonary artery constriction improves cardiac function.

During acute pulmonary hypertension, both the pericardium and the right ventricle (RV) constrain left ventricular (LV) filling; therefore, pericardiotomy should improve LV function. LV, RV, and pericardial pressures and RV and LV dimensions and LV stroke volume (SV) were measured in six anesthetized dogs. The pericardium was closed, the chest was left open, and the lungs were held away from the heart. Data were collected at baseline, during pulmonary artery constriction (PAC), and after pericardiotomy with PAC maintained. PAC decreased SV by one-half. RV diameter increased, and septum-to-LV free wall diameter and LV area (our index of LV end-diastolic volume) decreased. Compared with during PAC, pericardiotomy increased LV area and SV increased 35%. LV and RV compliance (pressure-dimension relations) and LV contractility (stroke work-LV area relations) were unchanged. Although series interaction accounts for much of the decreased cardiac output during acute pulmonary hypertension, pericardial constraint and leftward septal shift are also important. Pericardiotomy can improve LV function in the absence of other sources of external constraint to LV filling.

Animals↗

PubMed2002

Evidence for left ventricular constraint during open heart surgery.

BACKGROUND: The degree to which the lungs and other mediastinal structures constrain the heart during cardiac surgery is uncertain. OBJECTIVES: To assess the degree of constraint to left ventricular (LV) filling that is present during cardiac surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Central venous (CVP) and pulmonary capillary wedge pressures (PCWP), and an index of LV end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) - LV area, transesophageal echocardiography - were measured before and after sternotomy, after volume loading, after pericardiotomy, and before and after sternal closure following the clinically indicated procedure in 12 patients undergoing cardiac surgery. PCWP and estimated transmural LVEDP (PCWP-CVP) were plotted against the LV area. RESULTS: In all patients, the difference between PCWP and estimated transmural LVEDP-LV area relations over the full range of LV areas was substantial, indicating the presence of important constraint to filling. Even at small LV areas, when transmural LVEDP approached zero, PCWP was almost always greater than 10 mmHg. Because transmural LVEDP approached zero when areas were smallest, transmural LVEDP-LV area relations were judged to be more plausible than the corresponding PCWP-LV area relations. CONCLUSIONS: Considerable constraint to cardiac filling is effected by the lungs and other mediastinal structures. This constraint must be considered when assessing LV filling pressure - PCWP is not a reliable measure of LV preload in these circumstances.

Aged↗