Biomedical subjects

Rudolf Schiele

Publications and source records attributed to Rudolf Schiele.

11 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Gender differences in acute non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

To assess gender-based differences in presentation and outcome after non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) in clinical practice, this study examined data from the Acute Coronary Syndrome registry, which enrolled 16,817 patients from 2000 through the end of 2002, 6,358 of them with NSTEMIs (34.1% women). Women with NSTEMIs were 7.5 years older, had a history of myocardial infarction and percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass graft less often, and were less likely to have smoked. They more often had a history of systemic hypertension and diabetes mellitus, but this difference was due to their older age. Reperfusion therapy was performed less often in women, which still was significant after adjustment for baseline variables (odds ratio 0.71, 95% confidence interval 0.63 to 0.80). Clopidogrel was given less often in women (43.4% vs 56%). After adjustment for age, gender differences in medical therapy with statins, aspirin, and beta blockers were not significant. Hospital mortality was 1.7 times greater in women. This difference was not significant after adjustment for age (odds ratio 1.07, 95% confidence interval 0.84 to 1.35). Women had greater crude long-term mortality, but after age adjustment, this difference was no longer significant (odds ratio 0.92, 95% confidence interval 0.76 to 1.11). In conclusion, women with NSTEMIs were older than men and thus more often had concomitant diseases but less often had a history of myocardial infarction or coronary artery bypass grafts. They less often received acute percutaneous coronary intervention and less often were treated with clopidogrel. However, there was no difference in age-adjusted mortality in women.

Aged↗

PubMed2006

Highly purified omega-3 fatty acids for secondary prevention of sudden cardiac death after myocardial infarction-aims and methods of the OMEGA-study.

INTRODUCTION: During the last decades a large body of data has been accumulated indicating omega-3 fatty acids to exert beneficial effects on the prognosis of patients with cardiovascular disease. Especially, omega-3 fatty acids are regarded to be effective in reducing the risk of sudden cardiac death after acute myocardial infarction. However, treatment of acute myocardial infarction and secondary prevention considerably have been improved within the past years including early revascularization by PCI, the routine use of beta-blockers, statins and ACE-inhibitors as well as cardiac rehabilitation for improving life style measures. To date, there exists no controlled randomized trial testing the prognostic effect of omega-3 fatty acids after acute myocardial infarction in a double blind regimen under the conditions of modern treatment of myocardial infarction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The present study therefore evaluates the effect of highly purified omega-3 fatty acid ethylesters (omega-3-acid ethyl esters 90=Zodin) on the rate of sudden cardiac death within 1 year after acute myocardial infarction. Secondary endpoints are total mortality, non-fatal cardiovascular events, rhythm abnormalities in holter monitoring and depression score. RESULT AND CONCLUSION: The recruitment-period started in October 2003 and is expected to last until December 2006. The results of the study are therefore expected for the beginning of 2008, when all patients will have completed the 12-months follow up-period.

Death, Sudden, Cardiac↗

PubMed2006

Actual clinical practice of exercise testing in consecutive patients after non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction: results of the acute coronary syndromes registry.

BACKGROUND: Exercise testing has been advocated for risk stratification and determination of therapeutic strategies after acute myocardial infarction. Frequency and therapeutic impact of exercise testing after non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) in actual clinical practice, however, is not known. METHODS AND RESULTS: From the German acute coronary syndrome (ACOS) registry patients with acute NSTEMI (n = 5281) were evaluated: 20.8% of patients (1097/5281) had predischarge exercise testing, and from these tests 33.5% (367/1097) were positive. The strongest predictors for renunciation of predischarge exercise testing were ejection fraction under 40%, age over 70 years and stroke history. In-hospital coronary angiographies or percutaneous coronary interventions were not associated with a lower rate of exercise testing. During 1-year follow-up all-cause mortality was 13.6% in patients without and 5.1% in patients with exercise test respectively (P < 0.0001). In patients with positive exercise test 1-year mortality was 6.5%, in patients with negative exercise test 4.4% (P = 0.13). During follow-up no significant difference was found in the rate of coronary revascularizations between patients either with positive or negative exercise tests. Furthermore, no significant difference was found in the rate of death and revascularizations comparing different groups of exercise capacity. CONCLUSIONS: After NSTEMI in Germany the majority of patients do not get predischarge exercise testing, although this group appears to be of special risk for fatality during follow-up. Furthermore, in actual clinical practice, neither exercise induced signs of ischemia nor exercise capacity have a significant impact on the rate of revascularization procedures during follow-up.

Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary↗

PubMed2005

Early eptifibatide improves TIMI 3 patency before primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute ST elevation myocardial infarction: results of the randomized integrilin in acute myocardial infarction (INTAMI) pilot trial.

AIMS: Adjunctive therapy with glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors has been shown to reduce ischaemic complications and improve clinical outcome in patients with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute ST elevation myocardial infarction. Little is known about the use of eptifibatide in this setting. METHODS AND RESULTS: One hundred and two patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction <12 h scheduled for primary percutaneous intervention were randomly assigned to early eptifibatide given in the emergency room (early) or optional eptifibatide at the time of PCI (late or no). Primary endpoint was the patency of the infarct vessel before PCI. Patients in the early group received their first eptifibatide bolus, a mean of 45 min before angiography. TIMI 3 patency before PCI was observed in 34% in the early group and 10% in late or no group (P=0.01). The incidence of complete ST resolution 1 h after PCI was 61% in early group and 66% in the late or no group, respectively (P=n.s.). There were no significant differences in the rates of TIMI 3 flow after PCI, death, reinfarction, stroke, and major bleeding complications until day 30. CONCLUSION: In this pilot trial, double bolus eptifibatide given in the emergency room improved TIMI 3 grade flow of the infarct-related coronary artery before PCI. These results should be confirmed in a larger trial and whether this advantage translates into an improvement in clinical outcome should be tested in a trial with primary clinical endpoints.

Adult↗

PubMed2005

Do statins influence the prognostic impact of non-sustained ventricular tachycardia after ST-elevation myocardial infarction?

AIMS: The study evaluates the effect of statin therapy on the prognostic impact of non-sustained ventricular tachycardia (NSVT) occurring after acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). METHODS AND RESULTS: From the German Acute Coronary Syndrome Registry (ACOS), 3137 patients with STEMI and in-hospital Holter monitoring were analysed. Three hundred and forty-six (11.0%) patients had NSVT. When compared with patients with no documented NSVT, patients with NSVT were older, more often had myocardial infarction in their history, diabetes mellitus, and an ejection fraction <40%. Regarding frequency of drug application, medication at discharge did not (beta-blockers, ACE-inhibitors, amiodarone) or only slightly (acetylsalicylic acid, statins, and sotalol) differ between both groups. Multivariable analysis of 1 year mortality, adjusted for age, gender, diabetes, reperfusion therapy, ejection fraction <40%, and beta-blocker therapy showed the following results: In patients without statin treatment and no NSVT, 1 year mortality after STEMI was 9.2%, but increased to 25.0% [odds ratio (OR) 3.02; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.47-6.20], if NSVT were present. In patients on statin treatment and no NSVT, 1 year mortality was only 3.2%, and in the presence of NSVT 1 year mortality was not significantly increased anymore (5.3%; OR 1.03; 95% CI 0.55-1.92). CONCLUSION: After STEMI, only in patients not on statin treatment, the occurrence of NSVT is associated with a significant and marked increase in 1 year mortality.

Aged↗

PubMed2004

Different treatments and outcomes of consecutive patients with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction depending on initial electrocardiographic changes (results of the Acute Coronary Syndromes [ACOS] Registry).

Of 6,302 consecutive patients with acute non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction, 42.8% presented with ST depression, 31.9% showed no significant electrocardiographic changes, and 25.3% presented with T inversion. In comparison with patients with T inversion or no significant electrocardiographic changes, patients with ST depression more often had 3-vessel coronary disease, received less acute therapy despite a strong benefit in a subgroup analysis, and had a worse clinical outcome even after adjustment in a multivariate analysis. Patients with T inversion received a high rate of acute therapy and had a better outcome than did patients without significant electrocardiographic changes and patients with ST depression.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗

PubMed2004

Too little aspirin for secondary prevention after acute myocardial infarction in patients at high risk for cardiovascular events: Results from the MITRA study.

BACKGROUND: A meta-analysis of randomized trials has shown a significant reduction of mortality rate in patients receiving aspirin for secondary prevention after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). However, a significant number of patients do not receive aspirin after AMI. Little is known about why aspirin is withheld or the long-term outcome of these patients today. METHODS: The Maximal Individual Therapy in Acute Myocardial Infarction (MITRA) registry is a multicenter registry of patients with AMI in Germany. RESULTS: Of 4902 patients, 509 (10%) did not receive aspirin at the time of discharge from the hospital. The mean follow-up period for these patients was 17 months. Relative contraindications to aspirin were significantly associated with the withholding of aspirin (in-hospital bleeding: odds ratio [OR], 3.56; 95% CI, 1.86-6.80; history of peptic ulcer: OR, 2.49; 95% CI, 1.62-3.83). Absolute contraindications to aspirin were rare (2.2%). Other medications of proven benefit were also given less often in these patients (beta-blockers: 49.0% vs 61.9%, P <.001; angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors: 65.6% vs 70.2%, P =.06; statins: 12.2% vs 15.1%, P =.10). Patients who were not given aspirin were at high risk for vascular events. They were more likely to have a history of prior AMI (OR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.02-1.79), were in critical clinical condition at admission more often (cardiogenic shock: OR, 1.98; 95% CI, 1.09-3.56; overt heart failure: OR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.05-2.3), and received acute revascularization less often (OR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.05-1.67). The 1-year mortality was 2-times higher in patients who did not receive aspirin than in patients who did receive aspirin (16.5% vs 8.3%, P <.001). A significant association of withheld aspirin at discharge with a higher long-term mortality rate was confirmed with multivariate analysis (OR, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.15-2.29). CONCLUSIONS: Ten percent of patients who sustained an AMI did not receive aspirin at the time of hospital discharge. Most of these patients were at high risk for cardiovascular events. Withheld aspirin was significantly associated with higher mortality rate during follow up.

Aged↗

PubMed2003

Comparison of clinical benefits of clopidogrel therapy in patients with acute coronary syndromes taking atorvastatin versus other statin therapies.

In clinical practice, we found no significant difference between atorvastatin therapy or other statin therapies in the clinical outcomes of patients with acute coronary syndromes receiving clopidogrel therapy. In patients receiving atorvastatin therapy, clopidogrel therapy was associated with a significant decrease in mortality and stroke during univariate analysis and a moderate trend of reduced mortality and stroke without statistical significance in the multivariate analysis.

Acute Disease↗

PubMed2002

Impact of ramipril versus other angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors on outcome of unselected patients with ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction.

We examined the impact of treatment with ramipril versus other angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors on clinical outcome in unselected patients of the prospective multicenter registry Maximal Individual Therapy of Acute Myocardial Infarction PLUS registry (MITRA PLUS). Of 14,608 consecutive patients with ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction, 4.7% received acute therapy with ramipril, 39.0% received other ACE inhibitor therapy, and 56.3% received no ACE inhibitor therapy. In a multivariate analysis, the treatment with ramipril compared with the treatment without ACE inhibitors was associated with a significantly lower hospital mortality and a lower rate of nonfatal major adverse coronary and cerebrovascular events. Compared with other generic ACE inhibitors, ramipril therapy was independently associated with a significantly lower hospital mortality (odds ratio [OR] 0.54, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.32 to 0.90) and a lower rate of nonfatal major adverse coronary and cerebrovascular events (OR 0.65, 95% CI 0.46 to 0.93), but not with a lower rate of heart failure at discharge (OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.50 to 1.27).

Aged↗

PubMed2002

Gender differences in acute myocardial infarction in the era of reperfusion (the MITRA registry).

There is conflicting information about gender differences in presentation, treatment, and outcome after acute ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in the era of thrombolytic therapy and primary percutaneous coronary intervention. From June 1994 to January 1997, we enrolled 6,067 consecutive patients with STEMI admitted to 54 hospitals in southwest Germany in the Maximal Individual TheRapy of Acute myocardial infarction (MITRA), a community-based registry. Women were 9 years older than men, more often had hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and congestive heart failure, and had a history of previous myocardial infarction less often. Women had a longer prehospital delay (45 minutes), had anterior wall infarction more often (odds ratio [OR] 1.21; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.08 to 1.36), and received reperfusion therapy less often (OR 0.83; 95% CI 0.74 to 0.94). The percentage of patients who were eligible for thrombolysis and received no reperfusion was higher in women (OR 1.7; 95% CI 1.56 to 1.89). Women had recurrent angina (OR 1.45; 95% CI 1.23 to 1.71) and congestive heart failure (OR 1.26; 95% CI 1.01 to 1.56) more often. There was a trend toward a higher hospital mortality in women (age-adjusted OR 1.16, 95% CI 0.99 to 1.35; multivariate OR 1.21, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.51), but there was no gender difference in long-term mortality after multivariate analysis (age-adjusted OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.78 to 1.15; multivariate OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.72 to 1.19). Thus, women with STEMI receive reperfusion therapy less often than men. They experience recurrent angina and congestive heart failure more often during their hospital stay. The age-adjusted long-term mortality is not different between men and women, but there is a trend for a higher short-term mortality in women.

Aged↗

PubMed2002

Clinical practice of primary angioplasty for the treatment of acute myocardial infarction in Germany: results from the MITRA and MIR registries.

The pooled data of two German AMI registries: the Maximal Individual Therapy in Acute Myocardial Infarction (MITRA) study and the Myocardial Infarction Registry (MIR) were analysed in order to 1) describe current clinical practice of primary angioplasty in Germany, 2) compare the results of primary angioplasty with those of thrombolysis in the "real world" and 3) define subgroups of patients profiting probably most from primary angioplasty. Between 1994 and 1998, 20,306 AMI patients were included in the registries. At the 271 participating hospitals angioplasty facilities were available at 18.5%. Thrombolysis was still the most frequently used reperfusion therapy at hospitals without (96%) as well as hospitals with such facilities (55%). Transfer of AMI patients for angiography was performed in 3.6% of AMI patients admitted to hospitals without angioplasty facilities. A total of 9906 lytic eligible AMI patients with a pre-hospital delay of no more than 12 hours were treated with either primary angioplasty (n = 1327) or thrombolysis (n = 8579). Univariate analysis of hospital mortality showed a more favourable course for patients treated with primary angioplasty: 6.4% versus 11.3%, OR = 0.54, 95% CI: 0.43-0.67, p < 0.0001. This was confirmed by logistic regression analysis: multivariate OR = 0.58, 95% CI: 0.44-0.77, p < 0.0001. Primary angioplasty was associated with a lower mortality in all subgroups analysed. There was a significant correlation between mortality and the absolute risk reduction (r = 0.82, p < 0.0001) in the different subgroups, which showed an increasing absolute benefit of primary angioplasty compared to thrombolysis with increasing mortality risk.

Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary↗