PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Ruth Kalda

Publications and source records attributed to Ruth Kalda.

14 recordsLinked to original sources

Family doctors' problems and motivating factors in management of depression.

BACKGROUND: Depression is a frequent psychiatric disorder, and depressive patient may be more problematic for the family doctors (FD) than a patient suffering from a somatic disease. Treatment of patients with depressive disorders is a relatively new task for Estonian FDs. The aim of our study was to find out the family doctors' attitudes to depression related problems, their readiness, motivating factors and problems in the treatment of depressive patients as well as the existence of relevant knowledge. METHODS: In 2002, altogether 500 FDs in Estonia were invited to take part in a tailor-made questionnaire survey, of which 205 agreed to participate. RESULTS: Of the respondents 185(90%) considered management of depressive patients and their treatment to be the task of FDs. One hundred and eighty FDs (88%) were themselves ready to deal with depressed patients, and 200(98%) of them actually treated such patients. Commitment to the interests of the patients, better cooperation with successfully treated patients, the patients' higher confidence in FDs and disappearance of somatic complaints during the treatment of depression were the motivating factors for FDs. FDs listed several important problems interfering with their work with depressive patients: limited time for one patient, patients' attitudes towards the diagnosis of depression, doctors' difficulties to change the underlying causes of depression, discontinuation of the treatment due to high expenses and length. Although 115(56%) respondents maintained that they had sufficient knowledge for diagnostics and treatment of depression, 181(88%) were of the opinion that they needed additional training. CONCLUSION: FDs are ready to manage patients who might suffer from depression and are motivated by good doctor-patient relationship. However, majority of them feel that they need additional training.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗

Quality improvement in the Estonian health system--assessment of progress using an international tool.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the quality of the Estonian health system with the assessment tool provided by the World Health Organization (WHO). DESIGN: Situation analysis of health care quality using the self-assessment questionnaire proposed by the Council of Europe and WHO Regional Office for Europe as a framework for evaluating national quality activities. SETTING: Estonia. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Four domains for evaluating the national quality activities: policy, organization, methods, and resources. RESULTS: The quality policy of Estonian health care developed in the late 1990s defines the scope of quality and reflects the different viewpoints of stakeholders. Nevertheless, it is not comprehensive enough, activities planned for the involvement of consumers in defining and assessing quality are lacking, and key roles of institutions in quality improvement and incentives for quality are not clearly defined. At present, the responsibilities for quality assurance are distributed among the different stakeholders, but there is no single coordinating structure or mechanism for facilitating or assessing the implementation of the quality activities. Many regulations are established to assure the quality of health services and to protect patients' rights, but the implementation of voluntary mechanisms for quality assurance should be promoted. Access to the sources of information is good, but there is a shortage of unified quality and performance indicators at the national level. CONCLUSION: The results of this study indicated the strengths and shortages of the present organization of quality activities in Estonia and the ways for improvement. Strengthening coordination with explicit quality monitoring was found as a key factor for improvement.

Benchmarking↗

Satisfaction with the access to the health services of the people with chronic conditions in Estonia.

UNLABELLED: After the implementation of the primary health care reform in Estonia, most of chronic conditions are managed by family doctors (FD) in collaboration with specialists. Although the general population has demonstrated the increase in satisfaction with health care after the reform, it has been questioned if people with chronic diseases have been left on a more disadvantaged position in the new system with some restrictions in the access to specialists. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the satisfaction of people with chronic conditions with the access to the health services and compare them to those who did not have a chronic illness. METHOD: In November 2005, a random sample of Estonian residents aged 15-74 were personally interviewed using structured questionnaires (n=1446), 29% of them reported to have a chronic illness. RESULTS: The people with chronic conditions were less satisfied with the access to the health services. They were more satisfied with their family doctors, but less with the health insurance system and they often reported their problems in seeing the specialist. Compared to other respondents, the people with chronic conditions visited their FDs and specialists more often, but no significant differences were found between their waiting times to see the FD or a specialist. CONCLUSION: In Estonia, the people with chronic conditions do not have organisational barriers in their access to the health services. As frequent users of health services, they perceive the shortages of the health system more obviously than the rest of the population and it may reflect their satisfaction with the different aspects of the health system as well as the access to the health services.

Adolescent↗

Family doctors' knowledge and self-reported care of type 2 diabetes patients in comparison to the clinical practice guideline: cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: It is widely believed that providing doctors with guidelines will lead to more effective clinical practice and better patient care. However, different studies have shown contradictory results in quality improvement as a result of guideline implementation. The aim of this study was to compare family doctors' knowledge and self-reported care of type 2 diabetes patients with recommendation standards of the clinical practice guideline. METHODS: In April 2003 a survey was conducted among family doctors in Estonia. The structured questionnaire focused on the knowledge and self-reported behavior of doctors regarding the guideline of type 2 diabetes. The demographic and professional data of the respondents was also provided. RESULTS: Of the 354 questionnaires distributed, 163 were returned for a response rate of 46%. Seventy-six percent of the responded doctors stated that they had a copy of the guideline available while 24% reported that they did not. Eighty-three percent of the doctors considered it applicable and 79% reported using it in daily practice. The doctors tended to start treatment with medications and were satisfied with treatment outcomes at higher fasting blood glucose levels than the levels recommended in the guideline. Doctors' self-reported performance of the tests and examinations named in the guideline, which should be performed within a certain time limit, varied from overuse to underuse. Blood pressure, serum creatinine, eye examination and checking patients' ability to manage their diabetes were the best-followed items while glycosylated hemoglobin and weight reduction were the most poorly followed. Doctors' behavior was not related to the fact of whether they had the guideline available, whether they considered it applicable, or whether they actually used it. CONCLUSION: Doctors' knowledge and self-reported behavior in patient follow-up of type 2 diabetes is very variable and is not related to the reported availability or usage of the guideline. Practice guidelines may be a useful source of information but they should not be overestimated.

Blood Glucose↗

Prediction of depression in European general practice attendees: the PREDICT study.

BACKGROUND: Prevention of depression must address multiple risk factors. Estimating overall risk across a range of putative risk factors is fundamental to prevention of depression. However, we lack reliable and valid methods of risk estimation. This protocol paper introduces PREDICT, an international research study to address this risk estimation. METHODS/DESIGN: This is a prospective study in which consecutive general practice attendees in six European countries are recruited and followed up after six and 12 months. Prevalence of depression is assessed at baseline and each follow-up point. Consecutive attendees between April 2003 and September 2004 who were aged 18 to 75 were asked to take part. The possibility of a depressive episode was assessed using the Depression Section of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview. A selection of presumed risk factors was based on our previous work and a systematic review of the literature. It was necessary to evaluate the test-retest reliability of a number of risk factor questions that were developed specifically, or adapted, for the PREDICT study. In a separate reliability study conducted between January and November 2003, consecutive general practice attendees in the six participating European countries completed the risk factor items on two occasions, two weeks apart. The overall response rate at entry to the study was 69%. We exceeded our expected recruitment rate, achieving a total of 10,048 people in all. Reliability coefficients were generally good to excellent. DISCUSSION: Response rate to follow-up in all countries was uniformly high, which suggests that prediction will be based on almost a full cohort. The results of our reliability analysis are encouraging and suggest that data collected during the course of PREDICT will have a satisfactory level of stability. The development of a multi-factor risk score for depression will lay the foundation for future research on risk reduction in primary care. Our data will also provide the necessary evidence base on which to develop and evaluate interventions to reduce the prevalence of depression.

Adolescent↗

Patient evaluation on family doctors' family orientation.

Family orientation is one of basic features of family practice. The purpose of the study was to explore the patients' opinions about family physician involvement in family related issues, and to identify the factors that may influence the patients' opinions. Altogether 514 patients completed a questionnaire. Logistic regression analysis was used to predict the factors which determine patient orientation to talk about family related issues. The results indicate that the patients' health and the family background influence their willingness to talk to family physicians about their family related problems. The findings of the study confirm that special attention should be paid to patients who definitely have family problems because of chronic illness, or an alcohol or drug using family member, or those who are widowed or divorced. Also, the ethnic origin was found to have an impact on patient opinions of family physicians' family involvement.

Adolescent↗

Family doctors' involvement with families in Estonia.

BACKGROUND: Family doctors should care for individuals in the context of their family. Family has a powerful influence on health and illness and family interventions have been shown to improve health outcomes for a variety of health problems. The aim of the study was to investigate the Estonian family doctors' (FD) attitudes to the patients' family-related issues in their work: to explore the degree of FDs involvement in family matters, their preparedness for management of family-related issues and their self-assessment of the ability to manage different family-related problems. METHODS: A random sample (n = 236) of all FDs in Estonia was investigated using a postal questionnaire. Altogether 151 FDs responded to the questionnaire (response rate 64%), while five of them were excluded as they did not actually work as FDs. RESULTS: Of the respondents, 90% thought that in managing the health problems of patients FDs should communicate and cooperate with family members. Although most of the family doctors agreed that modifying of the health damaging risk factors (smoking, alcohol and drug abuse) of their patients and families is their task, one third of them felt that dealing with these problems is ineffective, or perceived themselves as poorly prepared or having too little time for such activities. Of the respondents, 58% (n = 83) were of the opinion that they could modify also relationship problems. CONCLUSIONS: Estonian family doctors are favourably disposed to involvement in family-related problems, however, they need some additional training, especially in the field of relationship management.

Adult↗

Patients' opinions on family doctor accessibility in Estonia.

AIM: To investigate the accessibility of family doctors in Estonia from the patients' point of view. METHODS: Face to face interviews using structured questionnaires were performed. A random sample of the Estonian residents, aged 15-74 years, was studied (n=999). RESULTS: The number of visits provided by family doctors has been continuously increasing since 1998. Out of 999 respondents, 59% visited the family doctor during the previous 12 months. The average number of visits per Estonian resident in one year is 2.48. Out of 999 interviewed persons, 72% said that they had a possibility of contacting their family doctor by phone. The waiting time for an appointment was short in most cases. The family doctor admitted 60% of the respondents on the same day the patients had requested; 22% of the patients were admitted within 1-2 days and 9% of the patients were admitted within 3-4 days. Only 9% of them had to wait more than 5 days. The current home visit fee in Estonia would have affected the decision of the home call of 58% of people. There was a correlation between the acceptability of a visit fee and the people's income. CONCLUSION: The accessibility of family doctors can be considered good in Estonia.

Adolescent↗

Evaluation of primary health care reform in Estonia from patients' perspective: acceptability and satisfaction.

AIM: To analyze the population's view of the primary health care reform five years after the formal implementation of the reform investigating the acceptability of the primary health care system, patients' preferences, and satisfaction with their family doctors. METHODS: Face-to-face interviews using structured questionnaires were preformed with a random sample of the Estonian residents aged 15-74 years (n=999). RESULTS: Out of 999 respondents, 35% prefer to first see their family doctor and if necessary to get a referral or a recommendation to see a specialist. The referral to the specialist by the family doctor is more preferred by older respondents, rural people, by the respondents with a lower level of education and income as well as by people who were more satisfied with their family doctor. The people who were more satisfied with their family doctor found that the whole health care system was functioning better than the previous primary health care system. Out of all the respondents who have had a contact with their family doctor during the last 12 months 87% (n=585) were satisfied with his work. The overall satisfaction with the family doctor depended on 1) perceived competence of the physician (OR=0.624, 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.419-0.933); 2) understanding the patient's problem (OR=0.699, 95%CI=0.496-0.984); 3) punctuality of the physician (OR=1.533, 95%CI=1.075-2.186); and 4) the location of the primary health care center/clinic (OR=0.751, 95%CI=0.574-0.983). CONCLUSION: During the five-year-period most of the Estonian population has accepted the new primary health care system and the satisfaction rate has increased. Family doctors are in the center of the primary health care systems and their professional competence plays a great role in making the system acceptable for the patients.

Adolescent↗

Structure and duration of consultations in Estonian family practice.

OBJECTIVE: To study the influence of age, gender and the nature of the patient's problems on length of time of consultation in the practices of newly trained family doctors in a recently reconstructed health care system. DESIGN: Video-recordings of consultations with consecutive patients in family practice were studied for duration of consultation in relation to age, gender and nature of the problem(s). SETTING: Primary health care. SUBJECTS: 405 consecutive consultations were video-taped in the practices of 27 family doctors. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Length of time of consultation and its segments was analysed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences. The problems were classified according to the ICPC. RESULTS: The average consultation lasted 9.0 min (+/- 4.9). Physical examination was 2.0 min (+/- 1.9) and was performed in 79% of all consultations. Respiratory and circulatory problems were the most common. More than one reason for the encounter was given in one-fourth of cases. Consultation time was longer for older age groups and for patients with psychological problems. CONCLUSION: Video-recording allows consultations to be evaluated directly and is acceptable to patients. The high participation rate of patients in our study can be explained by the individual approach and by the family doctor system. The period of consultation was dependent on patient age and on the number and nature of the problems, but was not influenced by gender.

Adolescent↗