Ryan J Krupp | PubMed Health

PubMed2006

Impaction grafting for femoral component revision using a non-polished bead-blasted chrome cobalt stem-average 8 1/2-year follow-up.

Impaction grafting for femoral component revision in patients with significant bone loss has been reported using a tapered polished femoral component that is meant to subside. This study reports our results of femoral component revision using impaction grafting with a bead-blasted chrome cobalt stem designed not to subside. Forty-eight femoral component revisions using impaction grafting were retrospectively reviewed with a minimum 6 1/2-year follow-up. There were 2 failures due to aseptic loosening of the femoral component (4%). There were 22 total complications, and the overall failure rate was 21%. Impaction grafting for femoral component revision using a bead-blasted chrome cobalt stem in patients with a large femoral canal diameter has shown good results with respect to aseptic loosening with minimal subsidence.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

Femoral component revision using an extensively hydroxyapatite-coated stem.

Femoral component revisions with extensively coated stems have shown promising clinical results, although concerns over stress shielding still exist. We retrospectively reviewed 59 patients undergoing femoral component revision with an extensively hydroxyapatite (HA)-coated stem. The average length of follow-up was 3.3 years (range, 2-5 years). The average preoperative Harris Hip Score was 43 points, which improved to 86 points at the latest follow-up (P < .01). The overall mechanical failure rate was 2%. No evidence of stress shielding was seen in 78% of patients. The clinical results of this series using an extensively HA-coated stem are similar to those using an extensively porous-coated stem. Long-term follow-up is required to determine if an extensively HA-coated implant will be superior to an extensively porous-coated implant with regard to stress shielding.

Aged↗

PubMed2003

Optimal entry point for retrograde femoral nailing.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to identify the optimum entry point for retrograde femoral nailing, defined as that point which will provide adequate fracture alignment while minimizing soft-tissue and articular cartilage injury. DESIGN: Cadaveric study. SETTING: Biomechanics laboratory. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Anatomic relationships and fracture reduction. METHODS Eleven cadaveric femori with attached knee joints underwent retrograde femoral nailing with a Synthes femoral nail (Synthes, Paoli, PA, U.S.A.). After placement of the nail, the specimens underwent an osteotomy 3 inches proximal to the articular surface. Multiple entry points were tested to determine fracture alignment and extent of articular cartilage injury. Medial-lateral and anterior-posterior displacements, in addition to any soft-tissue or articular surface trauma, were recorded for these various points of entry. RESULTS: An entry point of 1.2 cm anterior to the femoral origin of the posterior cruciate ligament resulted in the least anterior-posterior displacement of the femoral shaft following fracture. In the coronal plane, an entry point at the midpoint of the intercondylar sulcus was identified as minimizing the displacement following fracture. This ideal position allows for proper seating of the nail within the intercondylar sulcus, resulting in minimal damage to the articular cartilage and posterior cruciate ligament and minimal disruption of the patella femoral joint. CONCLUSION: Retrograde femoral nailing should be used cautiously in select patients, when conventional antegrade nailing cannot be used, due to the unavoidable injury to the knee articular surface associated with this technique. The optimum entry point of 1.2 cm anterior to the femoral posterior cruciate ligament origin and centered in the intercondylar sulcus provides the optimal balance of fracture reduction and knee joint sparing. It may be difficult to target this site with a percutaneous technique and may require direct visualization of the intercondylar sulcus for ideal nail placement.

Anterior Cruciate Ligament↗