Biomedical subjects

Ryoong-Jin Oh

Publications and source records attributed to Ryoong-Jin Oh.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

High-dose-rate brachytherapy without external beam irradiation for locally advanced prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: High-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) had been used only in combination with external beam irradiation (EBI) until our previously reported first trial of HDR-BT alone without EBI. The purpose of the current report is to evaluate the feasibility, toxicity and efficacy of this regimen, with more patient accrual and longer follow-up. MATERIAL AND METHODS: From 1995 through 2004, 111 patients with localized prostate cancer were treated with HDR-BT without EBI. Fifteen patients were considered as low-risk, 28 as intermediate-risk, and 68 as high-risk. The prescribed dose was 48 Gy/8 fractions/5 days or 54 Gy/9 fractions/5 days. Median follow-up time was 27 months (range 5-119). RESULTS: All the patients completed the treatment regimen. The 3- and 5-year PSA failure-free rates were 83% and 70%, and the local control rates 100% and 97%. The maximum toxicities observed were Grade 3 by CTCAE v3.0 (6 acute, 1 chronic). CONCLUSIONS: HDR-BT without EBI was feasible and its toxicity acceptable. Short-term tumor control was promising, even for locally advanced cases. More patient accrual and longer follow-up are needed to confirm the efficacy of this novel approach.

Aged↗

PubMed2006

Intracavitary brachytherapy for carcinoma of the uterine cervix--comparison of HDR (Ir-192) and MDR (Cs-137).

PURPOSE: To compare the results of high dose rate (HDR) (Ir-192) and medium dose rate (MDR) (Cs-137) intracavitary brachytherapy (ICRT) for carcinoma of the uterine cervix. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between May 1991 and March 2001, a total of 206 patients with Stage I-IVA previously untreated cervical cancer were treated with ICRT combined with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT). HDR was administered to a total of 135 patients: 22 patients in Stage I, 49 in Stage II, 56 in Stage III, and eight in Stage IVA. MDR was administered to a total of 71 patients: six patients in Stage I, 27 in Stage II, 33 in Stage III, and five in Stage IVA. The MDR at point A was 30 Gy/hour for HDR and 1.7 Gy/hour for MDR treatment, and the corresponding median follow-up periods for survivors were 55 and 68 months. RESULTS: For the HDR group, 5-year cause-specific survival rates were 90%, 78%, 53% and 33% for Stages I, II, III, and IVA, respectively. For the MDR group, the corresponding rates were 100%, 76%, 51%, and 40%. In the HDR group, 19 patients (14%) developed Grade 2 or higher late complications, and, in the MDR group, four patients (6%) did. CONCLUSIONS: There was no statistically significant difference in cause-specific survivals between the results of HDR and MDR brachytherapy for cervical cancer. The incidence of late complications tended to be higher for the HDR group than for the MDR group, but did not show a statistically significant difference (p=0.07).

Adult↗

PubMed2006

High-dose-rate brachytherapy combined with long-term hormonal therapy for high-risk prostate cancer: results of a retrospective analysis.

PURPOSE: High-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy combined with hormonal therapy (HTx), without the addition of external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) for high-risk prostate cancer was evaluated retrospectively. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between May 1995 and April 2002, 35 patients with prostate cancer [Stage > or = T2b (UICC 1997) or tumor grading=3 or prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level > or = 20 ng/mL] were treated with HDR brachytherapy combined with HTx. Most patients (74%) had two or more of these factors. All patients received Iridium-192 HDR brachytherapy with a total dose of 54 Gy/9 fractions/5 days (48 Gy/8 fractions/5 days for the first 6 cases) in one implant session. The median neoadjuvant HTx [luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LH-RH) agonist and antiandrogen] period was 7 months. The median adjuvant HTx (ATH) (LH-RH agonist) period was 40 months, and median follow-up was 57 months (range, 23-117 months). RESULTS: The 5-year actuarial biochemical control, local control, and disease-free rates were 62%, 96%, and 76% respectively. No patients experienced local and/or regional relapse without distant progression. The 5-year actuarial cause-specific survival and overall survival rates were 89% and 87%, respectively. The acute and late toxicity were moderate and well tolerated. CONCLUSION: HDR brachytherapy plus long-term HTx is at least as effective as conventional EBRT plus long-term HTx.

Aged↗

PubMed2004

An optimization algorithm of dose distribution using attraction-repulsion model (application to low-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy).

PURPOSE: To optimize dose distribution for prostate cancer in low-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy, we have developed a new algorithm named the Attraction-Repulsion Model. The purpose was to find the optimal source configuration. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The Attraction-Repulsion Model is used to optimize the dose distribution by finding the best seed configuration. We arranged grids at intervals of a certain space inside and established target and critical organs as areas of interest. We can make an attribute for grids, and the grids show attraction or repulsion depending on dose delivered from source. Source position is changed by the forces that the grids impose to the sources. A calculation was done repeatedly until the attraction and repulsion forces reached a balance. The optimal configuration was established when the sources reached a stable distribution in time. To evaluate the optimization plan, dose-volume histograms were used. RESULTS: Source configuration can be optimized automatically. The calculation time was approximately 5 min. The V100, V150, V200, and D90 of the target were 95%, 39%, 9%, and 157 Gy, respectively. V150 of the urethra and V80 of the rectum were 2% and 0%, respectively. CONCLUSION: This method can optimize the dose distribution objectively.

Algorithms↗

PubMed2003

Prospective study of HDR (192Ir) versus MDR (137Cs) intracavitary brachytherapy for carcinoma of the uterine cervix.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare the results of high-dose rate (HDR) and medium-dose rate (MDR) intracavitary brachytherapy for carcinoma of the uterine cervix on the basis of a prospective study and to determine the dose rate conversion factor (DRCF) from low-dose rate (LDR) to MDR via HDR, because a DRCF of 0.54 from LDR to HDR has been widely accepted. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between August 1991 and July 1999, 104 patients were entered into this trial to compare results between HDR (n=54) and MDR (n=50). Three patients were excluded from this study, leaving 54 HDR patients and 47 MDR patients eligible. Method and dose of external beam radiotherapy were the same for both groups. For HDR intracavitary brachytherapy, point A dose was adjusted to 32 Gy/4 fractions for stages I and II, to 30 Gy/4 fractions for stage III, and to 22.5 Gy/3 fractions for stage IV. The corresponding values for MDR were 35.6 Gy/4 fractions, 34 Gy/4 fractions, and 25.5 Gy/3 fractions. The average dose rate at point A was 30 Gy/hour (9.0-65.2) for HDR and 1.7 Gy/hour (1.3-2.2) for MDR. We assumed a DRCF of 0.9 from MDR to HDR. RESULTS: The 3-year cause-specific survival rates for HDR were 85%, 83%, 75%, and 0% for stages I, II, III, and IV, respectively. The corresponding figures for MDR were 100%, 82%, 58%, and 40%. Six of the HDR patients (11%) and 2 of the MDR patients (4%) developed Kottmeier's grade 2 or 3 late complications. A DRCF of 0.6 from LDR to MDR could be derived from a DRCF of 0.9 from MDR to HDR and one of 0.54 from LDR to HDR. CONCLUSIONS: There were no statistically significant differences in cause-specific survival and incidence of late complications between HDR and MDR. A DRCF of 0.6 from LDR to MDR could be determined. However, because the results of this trial were preliminary, a further study is needed.

Adult↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Quantitative evaluation of changes in irradiated lung fields after stereotactic irradiation by the Polygon Method.

PURPOSE: To evaluate areas of change in lung after thoracic stereotactic irradiation (STI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We developed a method of evaluation named the Polygon Method, to measure the irradiated lung fields of 12 lung tumors treated by STI. Before treatment, each targeted field was divided into several circular zones of 2 cm in width centered at the tumor on high resolution computed tomography, and the areas of each zone before and after treatment were compared. RESULTS: Six months after treatment, the areas of the zone within 2 cm from the tumor decreased, and the mean ratio of areas after and before STI was 0.849 (range, 0.515 to 1.052, p=0.0254). By contrast, the areas of zones located at 4 to 6, 6 to 8, 8 to 10, and more than 10 cm from the tumor tended to increase, with mean ratios of 1.059, 1.058, 1.089 (p=0.0374), and 1.084, respectively. CONCLUSION: After thoracic STI, volume loss in the lung is limited to the field in close proximity to the tumor, while compensatory expansion of the lung occurs in fields distant from the tumor.

Adenocarcinoma↗