PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

S A Factor

Publications and source records attributed to S A Factor.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2001

Clozapine for the treatment of drug-induced psychosis in Parkinson's disease: results of the 12 week open label extension in the PSYCLOPS trial.

OBJECTIVE: To report the results of the 12-week, prospective, open label extension of the 4-week, multicenter, placebo-controlled, double-blind PSYCLOPS (PSYchosis and CLOzapine in the treatment of Parkinsonism) trial. This extension examined the chronic safety and efficacy of clozapine in the treatment of drug-induced psychosis in Parkinson's disease (PD). BACKGROUND: Psychosis is a serious late complication of PD and may be a harbinger to increased mortality. Clozapine, the first atypical antipsychotic, was shown in several small open label studies to improve psychosis without worsening of motor symptoms. This was recently confirmed in the double-blind PSYCLOPS trial. METHODS: The 53 patients who completed the double-blind portion of PSYCLOPS were evaluated on their original randomized treatment (clozapine or placebo), then had study medication stopped. All were started on clozapine. The patients from both treatment groups were evaluated every 4 weeks over a 12-week period using standardized measures for psychosis and PD. RESULTS: The mean dose of clozapine was 28.78 mg/day. Those originally treated with placebo improved significantly in Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale and clinical global scores for psychosis to the same degree as the group originally randomized to clozapine in the double-blind study. Both groups maintained their response to week 16 (end of the combined double-blind and open label portions). There was no worsening of motor features as measured by the Unified Parkinson's disease rating scale. Eighteen patients were either hospitalized or died during the trial. The most common reasons were pulmonary. CONCLUSIONS: Low-dose clozapine is effective in treating drug-induced psychosis without worsening motor features of PD, and the response is maintained for at least 4 months. Patients with psychosis and PD were previously described as a group with high risk for morbidity and mortality. The high risk continues despite antipsychotic therapy.

Antiparkinson Agents↗
PubMed2000

An extended 5'-tau susceptibility haplotype in progressive supranuclear palsy.

OBJECTIVE: To confirm the association of an extended 5'-tau haplotype on chromosome 17q with the disease phenotype in clinically ascertained individuals with sporadic progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP). BACKGROUND: PSP is a neurodegenerative disease with parkinsonian signs accompanied by vertical supranuclear palsy and tau pathologic features. Previously, we documented the complete segregation of an extended 5'-tau haplotype consisting of four single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) with the disease phenotype in sporadic PSP. This study was conducted in an independent cohort to confirm these results and to improve the statistical power of the data. DESIGN AND METHODS: Direct sequencing and restriction enzyme digests were used to analyze four SNP in tau Exons 1, 4A, and 8. These contiguous SNP were used to reconstruct an extended 5'-tau haplotype in 52 affected and 54 age-matched control individuals. RESULTS: The four SNP formed two homozygous 5'-tau haplotypes (HapA and HapC) or a heterozygous genotype. Fifty-one (98%) patients with PSP had HapA; one (2%) with a later onset was heterozygous; and none had HapC. These PSP haplotype frequencies were different (p < 0.00001) from those of the age-matched control group, in which 18 (33%) people had HapA; 26 (48%) were heterozygous; and 10 (19%) had HapC. The extended 5'-tau haplotype, HapA, had a high sensitivity (98%) and a moderate specificity (67%) as a marker for PSP. CONCLUSIONS: A 5'-tau susceptibility haplotype may be a sensitive marker for sporadic PSP and a genetic defect in, or closely linked to, tau may contribute to the cause of PSP.

Chromosomes, Human, Pair 17↗
PubMed2000

Atypical antipsychotics in the treatment of drug-induced psychosis in Parkinson's disease.

Our experience with atypical antipsychotics in patients with PD is that their motor effects are not predictable. The multiple reports concerning clozapine's beneficial effects on tremor, dystonia, nocturnal akathisia, and dyskinesias all underscore this observation. However, the appearance of even minor degrees of parkinsonism in normal volunteers or schizophrenics should suggest that an antipsychotic will not be well-tolerated in patients with PD. The treatment of PD is probably the most stringent test of a drug's freedom from parkinsonian side effects. The data from trials in schizophrenia concerning parkinsonian effects cannot always be confidently interpreted. Virtually all subjects in these trials have been treated with typical neuroleptics until shortly before study entry. Because the parkinsonian side effects of these drugs may persist for several months, patients may still show declining levels of parkinsonism even when placed on a drug that induces it if this effect is milder than that induced by the pre-study neuroleptic. Depending on the pre-study drug used and the duration of the study, distinguishing placebo from a low-potency neuroleptic may be impossible. Furthermore, the standard measure of parkinsonism in psychiatric studies is the Simpson-Angus scale which is heavily weighted toward rigidity and may underscore bradykinesia, gait, and posture abnormalities. The prolactin response to an antipsychotic drug may turn out to be a good predictor of its freedom from parkinsonian side effects. That would fit with the data presented above of clozapine and quetiapine having less parkinsonian effects, olanzapine having more but variable effects and risperidone being poorly tolerated. With the data presented above, comprising a current review of all reports of the use of atypical antipsychotics in PD that we could locate, we can say little with certainty. The only drug with confirmed benefit without worsening parkinsonism is clozapine. Open-label trials involving over 400 patients and two multicenter, placebo-controlled, double-blind trials have demonstrated that it is effective in treating the psychosis. It improves tremor, does not worsen other motor functions to any significant extent, and is safe at low doses. Limited data provide conflicting information on both risperidone and olanzapine. Quetiapine seems to be well-tolerated with some, but definitely less, worsening of PD motor features than risperidone and olanzapine. Based on the current literature, our personal experience, and anecdotal experience of other PD specialists which we solicited, we will venture our own interpretation and recommendations. We think risperidone is poorly tolerated and should be used only as a last resort; that olanzapine is better than risperidone but will, in a majority of patients with PD, worsen motor function. We are optimistic, but not yet convinced, that quetiapine may prove to be as effective and better tolerated than clozapine. It will not require cumbersome monitoring because it does not induce a blood dyscrasia. We therefore recommend that DP be treated in the following manner. First, the anti-PD medications should be simplified and reduced as much as tolerated. We think, in general, side effects multiply more with increasing numbers of drugs than with drug dose, so that patients are more likely to tolerate a higher dose of levodopa than a lower dose of levodopa combined with other adjunctive anti-PD medications. In reducing anti-PD medications, we recommend tapering and stopping, if necessary, the drugs with the highest risk-to-benefit ratio first. Anticholinergics are stopped first, then selegiline, dopamine agonists, amantadine, and finally COMT inhibitors, which have no psychotomimetic action of their own. Finally, levodopa is reduced. Generally, a point is reached at which the anti-PD medications cannot be reduced without jeopardizing motor function. If psychosis persists at this point, then an antipsychotic is added. (ABS

Antiparkinson Agents↗
PubMed2000

Emergency department presentations of patients with Parkinson's disease.

Parkinson's disease (PD) is a chronic progressive neurological disorder characterized by tremor, muscle rigidity, slowness of movement (bradykinesia), and gait instability. In early disease, PD is well managed in an office setting, however, as the disease progresses, a variety of syndromes may result in emergency department visits. The scenarios most likely to require an emergent evaluation are severe motor "off" periods with immobility, involuntary movements (dyskinesia), psychosis, acute confusion, panic disorder, and pain. Other less frequent presentations are also discussed. This article uses illustrative cases to provide a framework to discuss emergency department diagnosis and management issues in caring for these patients.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed1999

Safety and efficacy of NeuroBloc (botulinum toxin type B) in type A-resistant cervical dystonia.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the safety and efficacy of botulinum toxin type B (BoNT/B) in patients with type A-resistant cervical dystonia (CD). BACKGROUND: Local intramuscular injections of BoNT are an effective therapy for CD. After repeated use, some patients become resistant to therapy. BoNT/B, effective in type A toxin-responsive patients, is proposed as an alternative therapy for type A-resistant patients. METHODS: The authors performed a 16-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of BoNT/B in type A-resistant patients with CD. After resistance to therapy was confirmed with the frontalis-type A test, placebo or 10,000 U BoNT/B was administered in a single session into two to four clinically involved muscles. The Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) was the primary efficacy measurement. TWSTRS-Total, three visual analog scales (Patient Global Assessment of Change, Principal Investigator Global Assessment of Change, Patient Analog Pain Assessment), and adverse events were assessed at baseline and weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16. RESULTS: A total of 77 patients participated (38 placebo, 39 active). Improvements in severity, disability, and pain were documented in the BoNT/B-treated group. TWSTRS-Total scores were improved in the BoNT/B-treated group at weeks 4 (p = 0.0001), 8 (p = 0.0002), and 12 (p = 0.0129). All three visual analog scales demonstrated improvements at week 4 (p < 0.0001, 0.0001, and 0.001). A Kaplan-Meier analysis supported a duration of effect of 12 to 16 weeks in the active group. Dry mouth and dysphagia were self-limited adverse effects, reported more commonly in the BoNT/B group. CONCLUSIONS: Botulinum toxin type B (BoNT/B) (NeuroBloc) is safe and efficacious for the management of patients with type A-resistant cervical dystonia with an estimated duration of treatment effect of 12 to 16 weeks.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Safety and efficacy of NeuroBloc (botulinum toxin type B) in type A-responsive cervical dystonia.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the safety and efficacy of botulinum toxin type B (BoNT/B) in patients with cervical dystonia (CD). BACKGROUND: BoNT/B is a form of chemodenervation therapy for the treatment of patients with CD. METHODS: The authors performed a 16-week, randomized, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of BoNT/B in patients with CD who continue to respond to botulinum toxin type A. Placebo, or 5,000 U or 10,000 U of BoNT/B was administered in two to four muscles involved clinically in CD. The Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS)-Total score at week 4 was the primary efficacy measure. Clinical assessments and adverse events were recorded for treatment day 1 and at weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16. RESULTS: A total of 109 patients were enrolled randomly across all three treatment groups. The mean improvement in the TWSTRS-Total scores in each group at week 4 was 4.3 (placebo), 9.3 (5,000 U), and 11.7 (10,000 U). For the prospectively defined primary contrast (10,000 U versus placebo), highly significant differences were noted for the primary (TWSTRS-Total, baseline to week 4, p = 0.0004) and supportive secondary (Patient Global Assessment, baseline to week 4, p = 0.0001) outcome measures. Improvement in pain, disability, and severity of CD occurred for patients who were treated with BoNT/B when compared with placebo-treated patients. Overall, improvements associated with BoNT/B treatment were greatest for patients who received the 10,000-U dose. The duration of treatment effect for BoNT/B was 12 to 16 weeks for both doses. CONCLUSION: Botulinum toxin type B (NeuroBloc) is safe and efficacious at 5,000 U and 10,000 U for the management of patients with cervical dystonia.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Worsening of motor features of parkinsonism with olanzapine.

Clozapine is the current treatment of choice for drug-induced psychosis (DIP) occurring in Parkinson's disease. However, alternative medications have been sought because of the small but significant risk of agranulocytosis and the need for frequent blood testing. The new "atypical" antipsychotic olanzapine (OLZ) has recently been proposed as a safe and effective option for treating psychosis in this setting. To investigate this, we retrospectively evaluated all 12 of our patients treated with OLZ for DIP. Symptoms of psychosis were improved in nine of 12 patients, but nine of 12 patients also experienced worsening of motor functioning while on OLZ. The worsening was considered dramatic in six of these patients. Overall, there was no significant increase in levodopa doses on OLZ. Only one patient remained on OLZ at the time of the analysis. Nine patients were switched to alternative treatment for DIP. We conclude that although OLZ may improve symptoms of psychosis in parkinsonian patients, it can also worsen motor functioning. In some patients, the degree of motor worsening may be intolerable.

Aged↗
PubMed1999

Dopamine agonists.

Dopamine agonists have been used in the treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD) since the mid 1970s. With the approval of two new agents in 1997, the number available in the United States is up to four; bromocriptine, pergolide, pramipexole, ropinirole. These agents differ in dopamine receptor affinities and chemical structure, which, in turn, may possibly result in differences in efficacy tolerability and safety. Dopamine have historically been used in combination with levodopa in patients with advanced PD, but indicators are now expanding. With is expansion comes increasing controversy. This article reviews dopamine receptor pharmacology and the results of the clinical trials that have used for agonists available in the United States as well as a discussion of three minor agonists.

Apomorphine↗
PubMed1998

Clinical presentation and pharmacological therapy in corticobasal degeneration.

BACKGROUND: To date, to our knowledge, there is no systematic presentation of treatment outcome in large series of patients clinically diagnosed as having corticobasal degeneration. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical presentation and treatment outcome of patients clinically diagnosed as having corticobasal degeneration. SUBJECTS: We gathered case patients seen in 8 major movement disorder clinics during the last 5 years who were diagnosed as having corticobasal ganglionic degeneration. METHODS: Using a chart review method, we recorded the clinical presentation, medications used, response to medications, and adverse effects. RESULTS: A total of 147 case patients were reviewed, 7 were autopsy proven. Parkinsonian features were present in all, other movement disorders in 89%, and higher cortical dysfunction in 93%. The most common parkinsonian sign was rigidity (92%), followed by bradykinesia (80%), gait disorder (80%), and tremor (55%). Other movement disorders were dystonia in 71% and myoclonus in 55%. Higher cortical dysfunction included dyspraxia (82%), alien limb (42%), cortical sensory loss (33%), and dementia (25%). Ninety-two percent of the case patients received dopaminergic drugs, which resulted in a beneficial effect for 24%. Parkinsonian signs were the elements improving the most and levodopa was the most effective drug. Benzodiazepines, primarily clonazepam, were administered to 47 case patients, which resulted in improvement of myoclonus in 23% and dystonia in 9%. The most frequent disabling adverse effects of drug trials in these case patients were somnolence (n = 24), gastrointestinal complaints (n = 23), confusion (n = 16), dizziness (n =12), hallucinations (n = 5), and dry mouth (n = 5). CONCLUSIONS: Pharmacological intervention was largely ineffective in the management of corticobasal degeneration, and new treatments are needed for ameliorating the symptoms of this syndrome.

Antiparkinson Agents↗
PubMed1998

Clinical comparison of tardive and idiopathic cervical dystonia.

It has been suggested that tardive cervical dystonia may be clinically indistinguishable from the idiopathic form and that the diagnosis rests solely on documenting an exposure to dopamine antagonist medications. To investigate this, we performed a retrospective evaluation of patient records on 102 patients with idiopathic and 20 patients with tardive cervical dystonia seen in our Movement Disorder Clinic over the past 8 years. Several clinical and demographic variables were compared and a number of differences were observed. The presence of extracervical involvement, retrocollis, and spasmodic head movements were individually found to be predictive of tardive cervical dystonia. Torticollis, laterocollis, and trick maneuvers were predictive of idiopathic cervical dystonia. Head tremor (42.2%) and family history of dystonia (9.8%) were present only in the idiopathic group. Cervical muscle hypertrophy was significantly more common in the idiopathic group (100% versus 75%). No difference was found between the two groups in their response to treatment with botulinum toxin A. These results indicate that clinical differences between idiopathic and tardive cervical dystonia exist. These differences may help to distinguish them in the clinical setting, improve diagnostic accuracy, and support the existence of a causal relationship between exposure to dopamine antagonist medications and chronic dystonia.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Acute delirium after withdrawal of amantadine in Parkinson's disease.

We present three patients who, after long-term therapy with amantadine (4 to 18 years), experienced an acute delirium with confusion, disorientation, agitation, and paranoia on withdrawal. These patients had Parkinson's disease for 5 to 29 years; mean age was 73 years. All had a history of varying degrees of dementia and transient hallucinations in the past. Adjustment of other medications was ineffective in improving their condition and no other cause was found. Only with reinstitution of amantadine did the patients return to baseline status (usually within days).

Acute Disease↗
PubMed1997

The emerging role of clozapine in the treatment of movement disorders.

Clozapine, the only commercially available atypical neuroleptic, is approved for the treatment of schizophrenic patients who are unresponsive to or intolerant of typical neuroleptics. It has an unusual pharmacologic profile compared with standard neuroleptics, and it follows that clinical response to this drug is also different. It has shattered the notion that a drug must be capable of inducing or worsening parkinsonism to be a potent antipsychotic. Based on these findings, it is being used increasingly by neurologists for psychiatric and nonpsychiatric problems in patients with movement disorders. The most common use for clozapine among neurologists is in the management of drug-induced psychosis in Parkinson's disease (PD). This problem has been a source of increased morbidity and mortality in PD because of a lack of adequate therapeutic intervention. At this time, because of success in numerous open trials, with improvement of > 80% of patients, clozapine therapy for psychosis in PD is becoming the standard of care. It also appears to be of value in the management of some motor features of PD, including tremors and dyskinesia and possibly even sensory symptoms such as akathisia and pain. The literature also suggests that clozapine may be of potential benefit in hyperkinetic movement disorders including essential tremor, Huntington's disease, and tardive dyskinesia. We review the current data concerning the use of clozapine in patients with these movement disorders and others.

Antiparkinson Agents↗