Depression curriculum for students in a primary care internal medicine clerkship.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to S A Haist.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
PURPOSE: To assess the skills of internal medicine-pediatrics (med-peds) residents in evaluating and counseling patients with complex psychosocial problems using a clinical performance exercise (CPE). METHOD: The authors designed a 13-station CPE [nine standardized-patient (SP) stations and four non-SP stations]. Eight of the SP stations focused on counseling or assessing complex psychosocial needs, and three were videotaped and analyzed for specific verbal and nonverbal communication skills. Residents completed a written task for each station and SPs completed a checklist on interviewing and communication skills and a 52-item patient's-satisfaction survey. All first- and third-year residents (n = 25) from two academic years participated. RESULTS: The range of the average scores on the nine SP stations was 43-75%. The residents performed better with common problems (newborn hospital discharge instructions and cardiac risk-factor counseling) than with more complex problems that are less often encountered in the institution (HIV counseling), or problems less often recognized (adult survivor of childhood sexual abuse). As expected, third-year residents scored better than did first-year residents on the written "plan" part of the SP stations and on the non-SP stations. Third-year and first-year residents had similar scores, however, on measures of verbal and nonverbal communication and patient's satisfaction, and for gathering data and providing information. CONCLUSION: This is the first performance-based evaluation of residents in a combined med-peds residency program. The stations addressed more complex clinical skills than those reported for objective structured clinical evaluations of residents.
BACKGROUND: The Council on Graduate Medical Education's (COGME) Fifth Report on Women and Medicine states that "changes in undergraduate and graduate medical education, in addition to continuing medical education, are needed to address adequately the comprehensive health needs of women." Primary care physicians (PCPs) who completed residency training prior to the establishment of new guidelines for women's health education are dependent on continuing medical education (CME) to update their knowledge and skills. METHODS: Primary care physicians attending a university-based CME program in family medicine were surveyed (n = 300) about their need for CME in women's health topics. Responses were analyzed using chi-square analysis and Pearson correlations. Topics of interest were compared with women's health competencies published in 1997 by the American Board of Internal Medicine (ABIM) and in 1997 by the American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP). RESULTS: Of 30 women's health topics listed, 22 were of interest to 50% or more of respondents and 11 were of very high interest (p < .05). Respondents most interested in women's health CME were most likely to believe CME would reduce the number of referrals currently required to evaluate women's breast problems. Topics of interest also align well with ABIM and AAFP competencies in women's health. CME in comprehensive women's health care is therefore of high interest to our respondents and topics of greatest interest are identified. IMPLICATIONS: Areas of interest correlate well with new requirements by ABIM and AAFP and should be targeted by CME programs.
PURPOSE: To see whether fourth-year medical students can teach the physical examination to first-year students as effectively as can faculty preceptors. METHOD: Ninety-three first-year students studying the physical examination were randomly assigned to one of ten fourth-year student preceptors or one of 15 faculty preceptors. Test results and course evaluations were compared by type of preceptor. Fourth-year student preceptors were surveyed regarding their experience. RESULTS: The mean test scores did not differ between the first-year students with fourth-year student preceptors and those with faculty preceptors. The first-year students rated the fourth-year student preceptors higher than they did the faculty preceptors. The fourth-year students rated their experience favorably. CONCLUSION: A select group of fourth-year medical students provides a successful alternative to faculty in the teaching of the physical examination to first-year students.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the impact of an interdisciplinary medicine-surgery clerkship (created to foster generalist education) on students' performances on National Board of Medical Examiners' (NBME) subject examinations. METHOD: Test data for the 226 students who participated in the 16-week combined clerkship and for the 265 students who had completed the traditional clerkships (12 weeks of medicine, 12 weeks of surgery) were compiled and analyzed using t-tests for independent samples. RESULTS: Mean scores on the NBME subject examination in medicine increased significantly after the combined medicine-surgery clerkship (from 433 to 455, p < or = 0.5). Mean scores on the NBME subject examination in surgery were similar to those achieved in the traditional clerkship years. CONCLUSION: Since the medicine and surgery clerkships were combined into a single, interdisciplinary clerkship, students' scores have increased on the medicine NBME subject examination and have remained relatively unchanged on the surgery NBME subject examination, despite a substantial reduction in students' clinical experience in the combined clerkship from the traditional clerkships (16 vs 24 weeks).
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
OBJECTIVE: To determine if fourth-year medical students are as effective as faculty in teaching the physical examination to first-year medical students. DESIGN: Stratified randomization of the first-year students. SETTING: A public medical school. PARTICIPANTS: All 100 first-year medical students in one medical school class were randomly assigned (controlling for gender) to either a faculty or a fourth-year student preceptor for the Physical Examination Module. MAIN RESULTS: The first-year students of faculty preceptors scored no differently on the written examination than the students of the fourth-year medical student preceptors (82.8% vs 80.3%, p = .09) and no differently on a standardized patient practical examination (95.5% vs 95.4%, p = .92). Also, the first-year students rated the two groups of preceptors similarly on an evaluation form, with faculty rated higher on six items and the student preceptors rated higher on six items (all p > .10). The fourth-year student preceptors rated the experience favorably. CONCLUSIONS: Fourth-year medical students were as successful as faculty in teaching first-year medical students the physical examination as measured by first-year student's performances on objective measures and ratings of teaching effectiveness.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
It was hypothesized that internal medicine housestaff who inquire into their hospital patients' social histories would be rated by nurses and attendings as having better interpersonal skills. Thirty-seven internal medicine housestaff were asked to answer a questionnaire regarding the social history of up to three of their hospital patients. The score on these questionnaires was then compared to evaluations by nurses and attendings of housestaffs' interpersonal skills. We found that nurses' evaluations of housestaff interpersonal skills correlated with performance on the social history questionnaire, while attendings' evaluations did not. Social history inquiry by housestaff may be a marker for housestaff humanistic and interpersonal skills.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.