PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

S A Kontulainen

Publications and source records attributed to S A Kontulainen.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Accuracy of pQCT for evaluating the aged human radius: an ashing, histomorphometry and failure load investigation.

INTRODUCTION: Quantifying the determinants of bone strength is essential to understanding if or how the structure will fail under load. Determining failure requires knowledge of material and geometric properties. However, characterizing the relative contributions of geometric parameters of bone to overall bone strength has been difficult to date because of limitations in imaging technology. Peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT) uses digital images to derive estimates of bone strength in the peripheral skeleton and is a relatively safe technique to differentiate cortical from trabecular bone and assess bone geometry and density. However, in a compromised osteoporotic bone, thin cortices and low scan resolution can limit accurate analysis. METHODS: Therefore, in this two-part investigation we scanned ten pairs (n=20) of fresh-frozen radial specimens [female, mean (SD) age 79(6) years] using pQCT (XCT 2000) at the 4 and 30% sites of the distal radius. We investigated the accuracy of four different acquisition resolutions (200, 300, 400, 500 microm) and several analysis modes and thresholds. We evaluated (1) the accuracy of the Norland/Stratec XCT 2000 pQCT in assessing low-density bones by comparing pQCT outcomes to ashing and histomorphometry and (2) the association of geometric parameters by pQCT and areal bone mineral density (aBMD) by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) to failure load at the distal radius. RESULTS: Using histomorphometry and ashing as reference standards, we found that pQCT scans varied systematically and underestimated or overestimated total area and mineral content at the radial midshaft depending on the analysis algorithm and selected threshold. Overall, most pQCT analysis modes were accurate. In the mechanical testing studies, bone mineral content and cortical bone content at the midshaft were strongly associated with failure load. The pQCT parameters that best accounted for failure load were total content at the 4% site and cortical thickness at the 30% site and they accounted for up to 81% of the variance. The best DXA predictor of failure load was total density at the distal third site and it explained 75% of the variance. CONCLUSIONS: In summary, analysis mode, resolution and thresholding affected pQCT outputs at the radial midshaft. This study extends our understanding of pQCT analysis and provides important data regarding determinants of bone strength at the distal radius.

Aged↗

Does previous participation in high-impact training result in residual bone gain in growing girls? One year follow-up of a 9-month jumping intervention.

The skeletal response to exercise and training on bone is exceptionally good during the growing years. However, it is not known whether the benefit of training on bone is maintained after the training. This 20-month follow-up study assessed the effect of a 9-month jumping intervention on bone gain and physical performance in 99 girls (mean age 12.5 +/- 1.5 years at the beginning of the study) one year after the end of the intervention. Both bone mineral content (BMC), by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) at the lumbar spine and proximal femur, and physical performance parameters (standing long jump, leg extension strength, and shuttle run tests) were measured at baseline and at 20 months. A multivariate regression analysis was first used to determine the best predictors of the BMC accrual by time. Analysis showed that age at baseline and square of age, changes in height and weight, and pubertal development into Tanner stages 4 and 5 during the follow-up explained the majority of the BMC gain. Then, the effect of participation in the 9-month exercise intervention on BMC accrual and physical performance was analysed adding this variable (participation: yes/no) into the model. The regression analysis showed that the trainees (N = 50) had 4.9 % (95 % CI, 0.9 % to 8.8 %, p = 0.017) greater BMC increase in the lumbar spine than the controls (N = 49). The mean 20-month BMC increase in the lumbar spine was 28 % (SD 19) in the trainees compared to 22 % (12) increase in the controls. In the proximal femur, the trend was similar but the obtained 2 to 3 % higher BMC accrual in the trainees (compared to that in controls) were statistically insignificant. Among the performance variables, using the same model that best predicted the BMC accrual, the only statistically significant between-groups difference, in favour of the trainees, was the improvement in the standing long jump test (6.4 %, 95 % CI, 2.3 % to 10.4 %, p = 0.002). Improvements in the leg extension strength and shuttle run tests showed no between-groups difference. In conclusion, although the greatest proportion of bone mineral accrual in growing girls is attributable to growth, an additional bone gain achieved by jumping training is maintained at the lumbar spine at least a year after the end of the training.

Adaptation, Physiological↗

Examining the developing bone: What do we measure and how do we do it?

The clinical tools available to evaluate bone development in children are often ambiguous, and difficult to interpret. Unfortunately bone densitometry methods (i.e., dual energy X-ray absorptiometry, DXA) which have a relatively straightforward application in adult osteoporosis, are far more difficult to evaluate in the growing skeleton. Even with adequate "adjustment" for bone size or maturity, bone "density" (areal or volumetric) alone often gives an inaccurate assessment of bone strength--especially in children. Ideally, we would like to measure both material and geometric properties of bone to accurately estimate "strength". Mechanically meaningful measures of bone geometry (bone cross-sectional area, cortical thickness) and estimates of bending strength (section modulus, or SSI) are available with non-invasive techniques such as (p)QCT and some DXA software. With new technology it might be possible to also measure bone material properties, which will be especially important in some pediatric disorders. In children, we also need to know something about the loads imposed on a child's bone and consider not only absolute bone strength, but also the strength of bone relative to the physiologic loads. Interpreting bone strength in light of the loads imposed (particularly muscle force) is critical for an accurate diagnosis of the developing bone.

Aging↗