PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

S Allan Bock

Publications and source records attributed to S Allan Bock.

5 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2003

RBL cells expressing human Fc epsilon RI are a sensitive tool for exploring functional IgE-allergen interactions: studies with sera from peanut-sensitive patients.

Rat basophilic leukemia cells (RBL SX-38) express the alpha, beta, and gamma chains of human Fc epsilon RI. Following sensitization with IgE from a subset of allergic human donors, these cells can be triggered by exposure to anti-IgE or to very low concentrations of specific allergens. We examined 18 sera from patients who were highly sensitive to peanuts by history and had anti-peanut IgE by in vitro testing. The ability of these sera to sensitize the RBL SX-38 cells for degranulation with peanut allergens correlates very well with the absolute amount of anti-peanut IgE (r=0.95; p<0.001). The most effective sera contained at least 50 kU/l of total IgE and at least 15 kU/l of peanut-specific IgE. RBL SX-38 cells sensitized with these sera degranulated optimally upon exposure to anti-IgE (net degranulation of 40+/-8%, means+/-S.D.; n=8) and to a 10(5)-10(6) dilution of crude peanut extract (CPE) (37+/-7% net degranulation; 93+/-13% of that seen with anti-IgE). This assay is quite sensitive. Cells sensitized with selected sera are activated by exposure to a 1:10(7) dilution of the CPE containing picogram amounts of peanut allergens. This assay is also quite specific. Cells sensitized with sera from patients with anti-peanut IgE and no detectable IgE against soybean, walnut or grass pollen did not degranulate following exposure to these latter antigens. The converse was also true; cells sensitized with sera from patients without anti-peanut IgE did not react to peanut. These data demonstrate that RBL cells expressing human Fc epsilon RI form the basis of a useful model system for the detection of allergens and for the study of IgE-allergen interactions.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Diagnostic evaluation.

The diagnosis and management of adverse food reactions is a challenge for pediatricians and other primary care providers. Children of all ages may present with a variety of symptoms that parents have attributed to constituents of the diet. An approach has been devised to aid pediatricians in the evaluation of these children. The process begins with a detailed history. This history may be used to classify the problem into categories of symptoms and possible mechanisms. When common food offenders are suspected of causing symptoms, it is reasonable to obtain in vitro tests that may then be used to decide whether elimination of certain foods is indicated and whether a referral to an allergist is needed. Using this approach, the physician may be able to identify children who are experiencing food-allergic symptoms and aid frustrated families in dealing with problems that have not had apparent solutions. The application of specific testing and the assessment of the results are discussed. Also reviewed are the techniques used by allergists so that pediatricians may help families understand procedures that will be recommended and performed.

Animals↗
PubMed2002

Factors affecting the determination of threshold doses for allergenic foods: how much is too much?

BACKGROUND: Ingestion of small amounts of an offending food can elicit adverse reactions in individuals with IgE-mediated food allergies. The threshold dose for provocation of such reactions is often considered to be zero. However, because of various practical limitations in food production and processing, foods may occasionally contain trace residues of the offending food. Are these very low, residual quantities hazardous to allergic consumers? How much of the offending food is too much? Very little quantitative information exists to allow any risk assessments to be conducted by the food industry. OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine whether the quality and quantity of existing clinical data on threshold doses for commonly allergenic foods were sufficient to allow consensus to be reached on establishment of threshold doses for specific foods. METHODS: In September 1999, 12 clinical allergists and other interested parties were invited to participate in a roundtable conference to share existing data on threshold doses and to discuss clinical approaches that would allow the acquisition of that information. RESULTS: Considerable data were identified in clinical files relating to the threshold doses for peanut, cows' milk, and egg; limited data were available for other foods, such as fish and mustard. CONCLUSIONS: Because these data were often obtained by means of different protocols, the estimation of a threshold dose was very difficult. Development of a standardized protocol for clinical experiments to allow determination of the threshold dose is needed.

Allergens↗
PubMed2002

Update on the clinical features of food-induced anaphylaxis.

Food-induced anaphylaxis has become the leading cause of anaphylactic reactions that occur outside hospital. We introduce the present review with a definition of food-induced anaphylaxis, including its prevalence and proposed etiology. Second, we discuss an entity that is increasingly being recognized: exercise-induced food anaphylaxis, which may be triggered by specific foods or at times where no specific food has been identified. Third, we review current attempts to identify specific food antigens that are responsible for anaphylaxis to well-known triggers (i.e. peanut, as well as more unusual antigens). Fourth, we discuss current treatment options available (i.e. patient education, food avoidance, acute symptom recognition, and early use of self-administered epinephrine). Additionally, we discuss outcome data regarding the morbidity and mortality related to food allergy and anaphylaxis. Finally, information regarding experimental immunomodulatory therapy is presented.

Anaphylaxis↗