PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

S Aronovitch

Publications and source records attributed to S Aronovitch.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Comparison of programs for preventing drug-nutrient interactions in hospitalized patients.

Three programs with different levels of pharmacist intervention designed to prevent drug-nutrient interactions (DNIs) were studied. Six drugs were selected for the study on the basis of their potential for involvement in significant DNIs and the hospital's drug-use profile. During a two-week control phase, the existing pharmacy system, in which no patient-specific information on DNIs is provided, was assessed. During the next four weeks, patients were randomly assigned to intervention 1, placement of a brightly colored label in the medication drawer and on the cover of the nursing medication card flip-chart, or to intervention 2, placement of the labels plus a five-minute structured patient-counseling session. Occurrence of DNIs and nurses' and patients' knowledge of DNIs were assessed. A DNI was defined as potentially altered drug absorption due to inappropriate timing or administration of a drug in relation to food. The occurrence of DNIs decreased significantly under the label system (from 24% to 19%) and under the combined label-counseling system (to 16%). However, the frequency of DNIs did not differ significantly between the two intervention groups. Patients' and nurses' knowledge of DNIs improved as a result of the interventions. The frequency of DNIs decreased when labels were used to alert nurses to proper medication timing.

Adult↗

Investigation of the Knoll Assessment Scale in a tertiary care facility.

The purpose of this study was to assist in assessing the validity and reliability of adaptation of the Knoll Tool, Assessment of Pressure Ulcer Potential. Data were retrospectively collected from charts of a random sample of patients (n = 62) who were admitted to a tertiary care facility. Total risk scores ranged from 0 to 22 with a mean of 8.7 and a standard deviation of 6.37. The alpha for the total assessment tool was .6352 with a standardized item alpha of .5973. Discriminant analysis predicted group membership at 62.9%. Group membership was most accurately predicted in Group 1 (76.9%). Discriminant analysis using a score of 11 predicted only 46.8% of group membership, although Group 1 predicted 88.5% and Group 4 predicted 85.7%. Low predictions may be related to small sample size.

Adolescent↗