PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

S B Groudine

Publications and source records attributed to S B Groudine.

16 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2001

Speed of recovery and side-effect profile of sevoflurane sedation compared with midazolam.

BACKGROUND: Sedation for surgical procedures performed with regional or local anesthesia has usually been achieved with intravenous medications, whereas the use of volatile anesthetics has been limited. The use of sevoflurane for sedation has been suggested because of its characteristics of nonpungency, rapid induction, and quick elimination. The purpose of this investigation was to assess the quality, recovery, and side effects of sevoflurane sedation compared with midazolam. METHODS: One hundred seventy-three patients undergoing surgery with local or regional anesthesia were enrolled in a multicenter, open-label, randomized investigation comparing sedation with sevoflurane versus midazolam. Sedation level was titrated to an Observer's Assessment of Alertness--Sedation score of 3 (responds slowly to voice). Recovery was assessed objectively by Observer's Assessment of Alertness--Sedation, Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST), and memory scores, and subjectively by visual analog scales. RESULTS: Significantly more patients in the sevoflurane group had to be converted to general anesthesia because of excessive movement (18 sevoflurane and 2 midazolam; P = 0.043). Of remaining patients, 141 were assessable for efficacy and recovery data (93 sevoflurane and 48 midazolam). Sevoflurane and midazolam produced dose-related sedation. Sevoflurane patients had higher DSST and memory scores during recovery. Seventy-six percent (sevoflurane) compared with 35% (midazolam) returned to baseline DSST at 30 min postoperatively (P < 0.05). More frequent excitement-disinhibition was observed with sevoflurane (15 [16%] vs. midazolam; P = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: Sevoflurane for sedation produces faster recovery of cognitive function as measured by DSST and memory scores compared with midazolam. However, sevoflurane for sedation is complicated by a high incidence of intraoperative excitement.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Comparison of renal function following anesthesia with low-flow sevoflurane and isoflurane.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate postoperative renal function after patients were administered sevoflurane under conditions designed to generate high concentrations of compound A. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: A multicenter (11 sites), multinational, open-label, randomized, comparative study of perioperative renal function in patients who have received low-flow (< or = 1 L/min) sevoflurane or isoflurane. PATIENTS: 254 ASA physical status I, II and III patients requiring endotracheal intubation for elective surgery lasting more than 2 hours. INTERVENTIONS: After induction, low-flow anesthesia was initiated at a flow rate < or = 1 L/min. Blood and urine samples were studied to assess postoperative renal function. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Measurements of serum BUN and creatinine, and urine glucose, protein, pH, and specific gravity were used to assess renal function preoperatively and up to 3 days postoperatively. Serum inorganic fluoride ion concentration was measured at preinduction, emergence, and 2, 24 and 72 hours postoperatively. Compound A concentrations were measured at two sites for those patients receiving sevoflurane. Adverse experience data were analyzed. One hundred eighty-eight patients were considered evaluable (98 sevoflurane and 90 isoflurane). Peak serum fluoride concentrations were significantly higher after sevoflurane (40 +/- 16 microM) than after isoflurane (3 +/- 2 microM). Serum creatinine and BUN decreased in both groups postoperatively; glucosuria and proteinuria occurred in 15% to 25% of patients. There were no clinically significant differences in BUN, creatinine, glucosuria, and proteinuria between the low-flow sevoflurane and low-flow isoflurane patients. CONCLUSIONS: There were no statistically significant differences in the renal effects of sevoflurane or isoflurane in surgical patients undergoing low-flow anesthesia for up to 8 hours. Low-flow sevoflurane anesthesia under clinical conditions expected to produce high levels of compound A appears as safe as low-flow isoflurane anesthesia.

Anesthetics, Combined↗
PubMed1999

The use of low-dose heparin is safe in carotid endarterectomy and avoids the use of protamine sulfate.

Controversy exists concerning the appropriate dose of heparin needed during carotid endarterectomy. Use of high-dose heparin (100 U/kg) during carotid endarterectomy may require the use of protamine to minimize perioperative bleeding complications. At the authors' institution the use of 30 U/kg heparin for arterial reconstruction has obviated the need for protamine. A retrospective study of carotid endarterectomies performed was undertaken. Patients undergoing combined procedures with carotid endarterectomy were excluded. A total of 420 carotid endarterectomies were performed in 330 patients. All received 3000 U of heparin or less during carotid endarterectomy. Non-fatal stroke and transient neurological deficits occurred in 0.48% and 1.9%, respectively. Mortality was 0.9%. Wounds were dry in 97%, swollen in 2.5% and bloody in 0.5%. No patient received protamine. Two patients were returned to the operating room for re-exploration because of hematoma. In conclusion, the use of protamine may be safely avoided with 30 U/kg heparin, and give acceptable stroke- and minimal complication rates.

Anticoagulants↗
PubMed1998

Low-dose heparin appears safe and can eliminate protamine use for carotid endarterectomy.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the morbidity associated with carotid endarterectomy (CEA) when low doses of heparin (30 U/kg) are used for anticoagulation. This technique eliminates the need for protamine and its potentially deleterious effects on some patients. DESIGN: A retrospective chart review. SETTING: A large academic medical center. PARTICIPANTS: The records of 420 consecutive CEAs in 337 patients (83 bilateral procedures). INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The amount of heparin used was less than that used in most reported studies. Eighty-two percent of patients received only 2,000 U of heparin for their entire operation (range, 500 to 3,000 U). Complication rates were low. Neurologic complications included a 0.95% incidence of nonfatal stroke and a 2.1% incidence of transient neurologic deficits that resolved in the first day. There was no mortality. The wounds were described in the postoperative period as dry (96%), swollen (3%), or bloody (1%). No patients received protamine. CONCLUSION: The use of 5 to 10,000 U of heparin will provide anticoagulation for more than an hour. In CEA surgery, anticoagulation for this duration is often unnecessary. A smaller dose of heparin (30 U/kg) can provide adequate anticoagulation for this procedure while eliminating the potentially deleterious effects of protamine use. No additional morbidity was attributed to this technique.

Anticoagulants↗
PubMed1998

Intravenous lidocaine speeds the return of bowel function, decreases postoperative pain, and shortens hospital stay in patients undergoing radical retropubic prostatectomy.

UNLABELLED: Postoperative ileus is a concern among surgical patients. Epidural anesthesia and analgesia with local anesthetics can decrease the duration of ileus. Significant systemic absorption of local anesthesia occurs during epidural use. In this study, we examined whether many of the beneficial effects on bowel function seen with epidural lidocaine are also present when the drug is given parenterally. Forty patients undergoing radical retropubic prostatectomy were studied with one half of the patients receiving a lidocaine bolus (1.5 mg/kg) and infusion (3 mg/min, unless weight <70 kg, then 2 mg/min); the other half received a saline infusion. A blind observer recorded the patient's daily pain score, the time the patient first experienced flatulence and had the first bowel movement, and the total use of analgesics. Lidocaine-treated patients first experienced flatulence in a significantly shorter time (P < 0.01) than control patients. Lidocaine patients' hospital stay was also significantly shorter (P < 0.05); on average, they spent 1.1 fewer days in the hospital. I.V. lidocaine initiated before anesthesia and continued 1 h postoperatively significantly sped up the return of bowel function. Lidocaine patients were also more comfortable postoperatively. Many of the bowel function benefits attributed to epidural lidocaine are also present when the drug is administered parenterally. Additionally, the length of hospital stay was reduced in lidocaine-treated patients. IMPLICATIONS: This study prospectively examined whether I.V. lidocaine could affect the return of bowel function after radical prostate surgery. Lidocaine-treated patients had shorter hospital stays, less pain, and faster return of bowel function. In this population, lidocaine infusion can be a useful adjunct in anesthetic management.

Gastrointestinal Motility↗
PubMed1996

Recent problems with paracervical vasopressin: a possible synergistic reaction with nicotine.

Vasopressin is now commonly used to control bleeding during surgery of the cervix. In larger intravenous doses, vasopressin can cause coronary artery vasoconstriction and increase systemic vascular resistance. Nicotine has a similar effect on the coronary circulation. The effects of combining both these drugs has not been studied. We describe a 22-year-old woman who developed severe hypotension and bradycardia after receiving a small dose of paracervical vasopressin. She was using a transdermal nicotine patch at the time of her surgery. We suspect her cardiac problems, and recently reported cardiac events in other women receiving small doses of paracervical vasopressin, could be caused by a synergism of the vasoconstrictive properties of nicotine and vasopressin. Caution is urged when vasopressin is to be administered to patients who smoke or use nicotine transdermal patches.

Administration, Cutaneous↗
PubMed1995

Pressure support ventilation with the laryngeal mask airway: a method to manage severe reactive airway disease postoperatively.

The use of a laryngeal mask airway (LMA) and a bi-level positive airway pressure (BiPAP) machine is described in a post-operative thoracotomy patient with reactive airway disease. The LMA was placed to avoid reintubation of the trachea after a double lumen tube was no longer necessary. Placement in an awakening patient and positive-pressure ventilatory support were well tolerated and did not trigger a bronchospastic response. The patient was able to cough and breathe deeply with the LMA while receiving ventilatory assistance in the post-anaesthesia care unit (PACU). The LMA is a therapeutic option to tracheal reintubation in patients who need postoperative ventilatory support after one-lung anaesthesia.

Aged↗