PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

S B Hanauer

Publications and source records attributed to S B Hanauer.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Review article: high-dose aminosalicylates to induce and maintain remissions in ulcerative colitis.

Sulfasalazine was the first aminosalicylate to be used for induction and maintenance therapy of ulcerative colitis (UC). Initial trials demonstrated a dose response that was compromised by dose-related intolerance. Recognition that the 5-aminosalicylic acid moiety (5-ASA, mesalazine) is the active ingredient of sulfasalazine has allowed the development of sulpha-free formulations of mesalazine and alternative azo-bond derivatives (olsalazine, balsalazide) that substantially reduce the dose-related (and allergic) consequences of the sulfapyridine moiety of sulfasalazine. Dose-ranging studies of mesalazine formulations for induction of remission have demonstrated increased efficacy of oral mesalazine up to 4-4.8 g/day, particularly in patients with more moderate disease activity. Combination therapy with oral and rectal mesalazine provide additional efficacy for patients with both distal and extensive colitis. The mesalazine formulations have dose-related benefits without dose-related side effects. In contrast, the azo-bond formulations are compromised by secretory diarrhoea at doses providing greater than 2-2.4 g/day of mesalazine. There are less data regarding dose-related benefits of aminosalicylates to maintain remissions in UC greater than 1.6 g/day of mesalazine, although the absence of dose-related side effects allows continuation of the same inductive dose through maintenance treatment without dose-related toxicity.

Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal↗

New lessons: classic treatments, expanding options in ulcerative colitis.

Ulcerative colitis (UC) of moderate severity is a common presentation in gastroenterological practice and a number of treatment options exist to rapidly and effectively induce remission. This review highlights how novel formulations and dosing regimens can ensure treatment success at a greater convenience for the patient with no increased risk of adverse effects. 5-aminosalicyclic acid (5-ASA) is well tolerated with a low incidence of adverse effects, and has a significant role in the management of UC. Different formulations of oral 5-ASA are now available and allow targeted treatment to inflammatory areas of the small bowel and ascending colon. 5-ASA is often initiated at a low dose for patients with mild to moderately active UC and with increasing doses for those who fail or have a poor response. 5-ASA at high doses is increasingly being used as induction therapy for active UC, particularly in patients with recurrent and/or extensive disease. The recent ASCEND studies show that an induction dose of 5-ASA of 4.8 g daily in patients with moderate UC is significantly more effective and resolves symptoms faster compared with a daily dose of 2.4 g. The evidence provided by the ASCEND studies support the rationale for a 'top-down' dosing strategy for UC where more potent therapies are introduced at an earlier stage of moderately severe disease.

Anti-Inflammatory Agents↗

Allopurinol safely and effectively optimizes tioguanine metabolites in inflammatory bowel disease patients not responding to azathioprine and mercaptopurine.

BACKGROUND: Many non-responders to azathioprine or mercaptopurine (6-mercaptopurine) have high normal thiopurine methyltransferase activity and preferentially metabolize mercaptopurine to produce 6-methylmercaptopurine instead of the active 6-tioguanine (6-tioguanine) metabolites. AIM: To describe the use of allopurinol in mercaptopurine/azathioprine non-responders to deliberately shunt metabolism of mercaptopurine towards 6-tioguanine. METHODS: Fifteen thiopurine non-responders whose metabolites demonstrated preferential metabolism towards 6-methylmercaptopurine are described. Subjects were commenced on allopurinol 100 mg po daily and mercaptopurine/azathioprine was reduced to 25-50% of the original dose. Patients were followed clinically and with serial 6-tioguanine and 6-methylmercaptopurine metabolite measurements. RESULTS: After initiating allopurinol, 6-tioguanine levels increased from a mean of 185.73 +/- 17.7 to 385.4 +/- 41.5 pmol/8 x 10(8) red blood cells (P < 0.001), while 6-methylmercaptopurine decreased from a mean of 10 380 +/- 1245 to 1732 +/- 502 pmol/8 x 10(8) RBCs (P < 0.001). Allopurinol led to a decrease in white blood cell from a mean of 8.28 +/- 0.95 to 6.1 +/- 0.82 x 10(8)/L (P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The addition of allopurinol to thiopurine non-responders with preferential shunting to 6-methylmercaptopurine metabolites appears to be an effective means to shift metabolism towards 6-tioguanine.

Allopurinol↗

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of CDP571, a humanized monoclonal antibody to tumour necrosis factor-alpha, in patients with corticosteroid-dependent Crohn's disease.

AIM: To evaluate CDP571, a humanized monoclonal antibody to tumour necrosis factor-alpha, for the treatment of corticosteroid-dependent Crohn's disease. METHODS: Patients with corticosteroid-dependent Crohn's disease (use of prednisolone 15-40 mg/day or budesonide 9 mg/day for at least 8 weeks, a previous failed attempt to discontinue corticosteroids within 8 weeks, and Crohn's Disease Activity Index score 150 points or less) were enrolled in a 16-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. The patients received intravenous CDP571 (20 mg/kg at week 0 and 10 mg/kg at week 8) or placebo. Corticosteroid therapy was decreased following a predefined schedule. The primary efficacy end-point was the percentage of patients with corticosteroid-sparing [i.e. no disease flare (Crohn's Disease Activity Index score > or =220 points) and no longer requiring corticosteroid therapy] at week 10. The major secondary efficacy end-point was corticosteroid-sparing at week 16. RESULTS: Seventy-one patients received treatment. Corticosteroid-sparing was achieved by 19 of 39 (48.7%) CDP571 patients and 13 of 42 (40.6%) placebo patients (P = 0.452) at week 10, and by 18 of 39 (46.2%) CDP571 patients and seven of 32 (21.9%) placebo patients (P = 0.032) at week 16. CDP571 therapy was well-tolerated and the incidence of serious adverse events was similar to placebo. CONCLUSIONS: The CDP571 was effective for corticosteroid-sparing at week 16 but not week 10, and was well-tolerated in patients with corticosteroid-dependent Crohn's disease.

Adult↗

Comparative pharmacokinetics of equimolar doses of 5-aminosalicylate administered as oral mesalamine (Asacol) and balsalazide: a randomized, single-dose, crossover study in healthy volunteers.

BACKGROUND: Existing pharmacokinetic data are insufficient to determine whether a delayed-release formulation of mesalamine (Asacol) results in greater systemic exposure to 5-aminosalicylic acid and its major metabolite N-acetyl-5-aminosalicylic acid than a prodrug (balsalazide). AIM: To determine the pharmacokinetic parameters of 5-aminosalicylic acid and N-acetyl-5-aminosalicylic acid from equimolar doses of 5-aminosalicylic acid administered as Asacol and balsalazide. METHODS: Nineteen healthy volunteers completed an open-label, single-dose, randomized, crossover study comparing the pharmacokinetics of 5-aminosalicylic acid and N-acetyl-5-aminosalicylic acid from equimolar doses of 5-aminosalicylic acid (800 mg) administered as Asacol (800 mg) and balsalazide (2250 mg). Plasma and urine samples were analysed for 5-aminosalicylic acid, N-acetyl-5-aminosalicylic acid, and balsalazide (urine only) using high-performance liquid chromatography methods with mass spectrometric detection. Pharmacokinetic parameters assessed for 5-aminosalicylic acid and N-acetyl-5-aminosalicylic acid included: percentage of dose excreted in urine (A(e)%), area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUCt(last)); and maximum plasma concentration (C(max)). RESULTS: The geometric mean total (5-aminosalicylic acid and N-acetyl-5-aminosalicylic acid) urinary excretion values (A(e)%) of Asacol and balsalazide were 19.26 and 19.31% (P = 0.98). The geometric mean A(e)% values of 5-aminosalicylic acid for Asacol and balsalazide were 0.39 and 0.37% (P = 0.78); the geometric mean A(e)% values of N-acetyl-5-aminosalicylic acid for Asacol and balsalazide were 18.78 and 18.83% (P = 0.98). The geometric mean 5-aminosalicylic acid AUC(t(last)) values for Asacol and balsalazide were 3295 and 3449 ng h/mL (P = 0.85); the geometric mean N-acetyl-5-aminosalicylic acid AUC(t(last)) values for Asacol and balsalazide were 15 364 and 16 050 ng h/mL (P = 0.69). The geometric mean 5-5-aminosalicylic acid C(max) values for Asacol and balsalazide were 319 and 348 ng/mL (P = 0.80); the geometric mean N-acetyl-5-aminosalicylic acid C(max) values for Asacol and balsalazide 927 and 1009 ng/mL (P = 0.67). CONCLUSIONS: The systemic absorption of 5-aminosalicylic acid and N-acetyl-5-aminosalicylic acid from Asacol and balsalazide are comparable based upon plasma pharmacokinetic parameters and urinary excretion values.

Administration, Oral↗

Review article: aminosalicylates in inflammatory bowel disease.

Aminosalicylate therapy for ulcerative colitis remains a foundational strategy for the induction and maintenance of remission for mild to moderate disease. Although it seems clear that topical mesalazine (mesalamine) is the most efficacious approach to distal ulcerative colitis, recent trials with orally delivered azo conjugates suggest that there may be an advantage over pH-released mesalazine as a first-line approach to active disease. No such comparisons are available for azo products and the prolonged-release formulation, Pentasa. However, recent meta-analyses have demonstrated that, although there is little difference in systemic exposure between marketed products, luminal concentrations may vary. In maintenance therapy, aminosalicylates remain the standard approach after aminosalicylate-induced remission. A number of gaps remain in the evidence base with regard to the optimal dosing of oral mesalazine as a maintenance agent, whether oral mesalazine can maintain remissions after rectal mesalazine induction, and the dose-response and efficacy of aminosalicylates after steroid- or ciclosporin-induced remissions. Although aminosalicylates have been advocated for several decades in Crohn's disease, a number of controversies have evolved since the original trials with sulfasalazine in active Crohn's disease. The original trials demonstrated benefits for sulfasalazine in colonic involvement, but controlled trial evidence for the role of sulfasalazine as maintenance therapy has not been as firmly established. In addition, although oral mesalazine has been demonstrated in controlled trials to be superior to placebo in mild to moderate disease, it is less efficacious than corticosteroids at inducing remissions. The maintenance benefits of mesalazine appear to be limited to patients 'induced into remission' with mesalazine and in some post-operative settings.

Aminosalicylic Acids↗

Review article: the long-term management of ulcerative colitis.

After the induction of remission, the second priority of therapy for ulcerative colitis is sustained clinical remission, defined as the absence of inflammatory symptoms (diarrhoea, bleeding, rectal urgency) and the maintenance of an intact mucosa, with the absence of ulcers, friability or significant granularity at endoscopy. The 'optimal' maintenance strategy will depend on the therapy needed to induce remission. Thus, the transition from induction to maintenance therapy will be determined by the intensity of acute therapy necessary to induce remission and the duration of therapy required to complete the resolution of clinical symptoms. There are few controlled clinical trials pertaining to maintenance after each induction regimen. However, experience dictates that aminosalicylates are efficacious after aminosalicylate-induced remissions, that steroids should be tapered according to the time required to induce remission, that patients requiring ciclosporin will benefit from the addition of long-term immunomodulation with azathioprine or mercaptopurine, and that many patients with distal colitis who require topical mesalazine (mesalamine) will continue to need topical therapy to maintain remission, albeit at reduced frequency. The expectations for maintenance therapy require patient adherence to the prescribed treatment regimen. Patients require education with regard to the long-term goals of maintenance therapy (e.g. prevention of relapse, reduction of long-term complications of disease activity or risks of acute therapy with steroids), and should be warned against the use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and cautioned about the cessation of smoking, when applicable, due to potential risks of relapse or chronic activity.

Aminosalicylic Acids↗

Repifermin (keratinocyte growth factor-2) for the treatment of active ulcerative colitis: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-escalation trial.

BACKGROUND: Repifermin (keratinocyte growth factor-2) has been shown to reduce inflammation in animal models of colitis. AIM: To evaluate repifermin for the treatment of active ulcerative colitis. METHODS: Eighty-eight patients with active ulcerative colitis were enrolled in a 6-week, double-blind trial. Patients were randomized to receive treatment for five consecutive days with intravenous repifermin at a dose of 1, 5, 10, 25 or 50 microg/kg, or placebo. The primary objective of the study was to evaluate the safety of repifermin. The primary efficacy outcome was clinical remission at week 4, defined as a score of zero on the endoscopic appearance and stool blood components of the Mayo score and a score of zero or unity on the stool frequency and physician's global assessment components. RESULTS: At week 4, the rates of clinical remission in the 1, 5, 10, 25 and 50 microg/kg repifermin groups were 19%, 9%, 0%, 0% and 0%, respectively, and 11% for the placebo group (P = 0.32 for repifermin vs. placebo). The frequencies of commonly occurring adverse events and severe adverse events were similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Intravenous repifermin at a dose of 1-50 microg/kg was very well tolerated, but there was no evidence that repifermin was effective for the treatment of active ulcerative colitis at these doses. An additional study to determine the efficacy of repifermin at doses of > 50 microg/kg or for a longer treatment duration may be warranted, as the maximally tolerated dose was not reached in the present study.

Adult↗

Systematic review: the pharmacokinetic profiles of oral mesalazine formulations and mesalazine pro-drugs used in the management of ulcerative colitis.

AIM: : To quantify through systematic review the pharmacokinetic profiles of the oral delayed release and sustained release mesalazine (5-aminosalicylate, 5ASA) formulations (Asacol, Salofalk, Mesasal, Claversal, Pentasa) and pro-drugs (sulfasalazine, olsalazine, balsalazide) used in the management of ulcerative colitis. METHODS: : Selected articles had: (1) adult healthy volunteers or patients with ulcerative colitis and (2) quantification of pharmacokinetic data to include, at a minimum, urinary excretion of total 5ASA [5ASA plus N-Acetyl-5ASA (N-Ac-5ASA)]. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: : Pharmacokinetic data (Tmax, Cmax, AUC, urinary excretion, faecal excretion) of 5ASA, its major metabolite N-Acetyl-5ASA, total 5ASA, and the parent pro-drug compounds was extracted. MAIN RESULTS: : The summary results for urinary excretion of total 5ASA over 24-96 h in all subjects (either mean or median) were: sulfasalazine mean 11-33% or median 22%; olsalazine mean 14-31% or median 16-27%; balsalazide mean 12-35% or median 20%; Asacol mean 10-35% or median 18-40%; Pentasa mean 15-53% or median 23-34%; Salofalk, Mesasal and Claversal mean 27-56% or median 31-44%. The summary results for faecal excretion of total 5ASA over 24-96 h in all subjects (either mean or median) were: sulfasalazine mean 23-75% or median 38%; olsalazine mean 47-50% or median 17-36%; balsalazide mean 46% or median 22%; Asacol mean 40-64% or median 20-56%; Pentasa mean 12-51% or median 39-59%; Salofalk, Mesasal and Claversal mean 37-44% or median 23-35%. CONCLUSIONS: : The systemic exposure to 5ASA, as measured by urinary excretion of total 5ASA, and the faecal excretion of total 5ASA is comparable for all oral mesalazine formulations and pro-drugs. Thus, selection of a mesalazine therapy for the treatment of ulcerative colitis should be based on other factors such as efficacy, dose-response, toxicity of the parent compound and its metabolites, compliance issues related to dose forms and dosing schedules, and costs.

Administration, Oral↗

Efficacy and safety of oral ridogrel in the treatment of ulcerative colitis: two multicentre, randomized, double-blind studies.

BACKGROUND: Ridogrel at low doses inhibits thromboxane synthase. Oral ridogrel, from 5 mg once daily to 150 mg twice daily, improves the endoscopic appearance of colonic mucosa and clinical manifestations in mild to moderate ulcerative colitis. AIM: One US trial and one international trial were conducted to determine the effect of ridogrel on mild to severe active ulcerative colitis. METHODS: Two 12-week, double-blind, randomized, parallel-group trials were conducted. A US trial compared 0.5 mg, 2.5 mg and 5 mg of ridogrel once daily with placebo. An international trial compared 0.5 mg of ridogrel once daily with 2.5 mg and 5.0 mg of ridogrel once daily and 800 mg of mesalazine (known as mesalamine in the USA) three times daily. The primary efficacy outcome measure was the rate of complete remission. RESULTS: In the US trial, complete remission was achieved in 20.8% of patients in the 0.5 mg ridogrel group, 17.9% in the 2.5 mg ridogrel group, 20.6% in the 5.0 mg ridogrel group and 13.6% in the placebo group. In the international trial, 14.4% of patients in the 0.5 mg ridogrel group, 19.6% in the 2.5 mg ridogrel group, 19.4% in the 5.0 mg ridogrel group and 16.4% in the mesalazine group experienced complete remission. In the international trial, rates of complete remission at the end-point were greater in the 2.5 mg and 5.0 mg ridogrel groups than in the 0.5 mg ridogrel group, but the differences were not statistically significant. In the US trial, rates of complete remission at the end-point were greater in the 2.5 mg and 5.0 mg ridogrel groups than in the placebo group, but the differences were not statistically significant. Approximately 30% of the patients in each group discontinued treatment before the 12-week end-point owing to a lack of therapeutic response. All doses of ridogrel were well tolerated and comparable with placebo or mesalazine in terms of safety. CONCLUSIONS: No significant differences in the primary efficacy outcome measure were found between either the 2.5 mg or the 5.0 mg dose of ridogrel and placebo in the US trial and between either the 2.5 mg or the 5.0 mg dose of ridogrel and the 0.5 mg dose of ridogrel, a surrogate dose for placebo, in the international trial. There was no clear indication in either trial of an effective dose of ridogrel in the treatment of ulcerative colitis.

Administration, Oral↗

A frameshift mutation in NOD2 associated with susceptibility to Crohn's disease.

Crohn's disease is a chronic inflammatory disorder of the gastrointestinal tract, which is thought to result from the effect of environmental factors in a genetically predisposed host. A gene location in the pericentromeric region of chromosome 16, IBD1, that contributes to susceptibility to Crohn's disease has been established through multiple linkage studies, but the specific gene(s) has not been identified. NOD2, a gene that encodes a protein with homology to plant disease resistance gene products is located in the peak region of linkage on chromosome 16 (ref. 7). Here we show, by using the transmission disequilibium test and case-control analysis, that a frameshift mutation caused by a cytosine insertion, 3020insC, which is expected to encode a truncated NOD2 protein, is associated with Crohn's disease. Wild-type NOD2 activates nuclear factor NF-kappaB, making it responsive to bacterial lipopolysaccharides; however, this induction was deficient in mutant NOD2. These results implicate NOD2 in susceptibility to Crohn's disease, and suggest a link between an innate immune response to bacterial components and development of disease.

Adult↗

Efficacy of parenteral methotrexate in refractory Crohn's disease.

BACKGROUND: Methotrexate is steroid-sparing in short-term trials for refractory Crohn's disease. This study assesses the impact of dosing and administration on the long-term utility of methotrexate in Crohn's disease. METHODS: The efficacy and tolerability of methotrexate were assessed in all refractory Crohn's disease patients treated at the University of Chicago from 1 September 1989 to 6 June 1997. RESULTS: Seventy-six patients were identified: 43% male, mean age 35 years, mean Crohn's disease duration 9.5 years. Mean methotrexate duration was 55 weeks; mean dose was 20 mg/week. Drug administration was parenteral (78%), oral (13%), or combination (8%). Improvement occurred in 63% after a mean of 9 weeks, for a mean duration of 65 weeks. Remission occurred in 37% after a mean of 22 weeks, for a mean duration of 59 weeks. Improvement and remission were highest with parenteral therapy, but dose-independent. Parenteral therapy maintained remission in 46%. Improvement (P=0.05) and remission (P=0.01) were more likely for patients under 40. Improvement rates were higher with concurrent steroids (P=0.02) or antibiotics (P=0.01). Side-effects occurred in 46%, resulting in discontinuation in 18%. Prednisone was decreased in 78%, and stopped in 40%. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term therapy with methotrexate in Crohn's disease is safe, effective, steroid-sparing, and most efficacious in younger patients and when given parenterally.

Administration, Oral↗

An engineered human antibody to TNF (CDP571) for active Crohn's disease: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: We evaluated CDP571, a humanized antibody to tumor necrosis factor, for the treatment of active Crohn's disease. METHODS: One hundred sixty-nine patients with moderate-to-severe Crohn's disease were enrolled in a 24-week placebo-controlled trial. Patients were initially randomized to a single dose of 10 or 20 mg/kg CDP571 or placebo to assess dose response. Patients were then retreated with 10 mg/kg CDP571 or placebo every 8 or 12 weeks to assess subsequent dosing intervals. The primary endpoint was clinical response at week 2, defined as a decrease in the Crohn's Disease Activity Index score > or = 70 points. RESULTS: At week 2, clinical response occurred in 45% of CDP571-treated patients compared with 27% of patients in the placebo group (P = 0.023). Patients appeared to benefit from retreatment with CDP571 over 24 weeks, but not all of the results for secondary endpoints were statistically significant. The frequency of severe or serious adverse events was similar among all groups. CONCLUSIONS: CDP571 at an initial dose of 10 or 20 mg/kg is safe and effective for treatment of patients with moderate-to-severe Crohn's disease. Preliminary evidence suggests that retreatment with 10 mg/kg CDP571 at dose intervals of 8 or 12 weeks may also be beneficial, but additional studies are needed.

Adolescent↗

Etanercept for active Crohn's disease: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: We evaluated etanercept, a human soluble tumor necrosis factor receptor: Fc fusion protein, for the treatment of active Crohn's disease. METHODS: Forty-three patients with moderate to severe Crohn's disease were enrolled in an 8-week placebo-controlled trial. Patients were randomized to subcutaneous etanercept 25 mg or placebo twice weekly. The primary outcome measure was clinical response at week 4, defined as a decrease in the baseline Crohn's Disease Activity Index score > or =70 points or a Crohn's Disease Activity Index score <150 points. RESULTS: At week 4, 39% of etanercept-treated patients had clinical response as compared with 45% of placebo-treated patients (P = 0.763). The frequency of common adverse events including headache, new injection site reaction, asthenia, abdominal pain, Crohn's disease-related anemia, and skin disorders was similar in both groups. Likewise, the frequency of severe or serious adverse events was similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Subcutaneous etanercept at a dose of 25 mg twice weekly is safe, but not effective, for the treatment of patients with moderate to severe Crohn's disease. The dose of etanercept administered in this study is that approved for rheumatoid arthritis. Higher doses or more frequent dosing may be required to attain a response in patients with active Crohn's disease.

Adult↗

Infliximab in the treatment of severe, steroid-refractory ulcerative colitis: a pilot study.

We report the experience of 11 patients (of 60 planned patients) enrolled in a double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial of infliximab in patients with severe, active steroid-refractory ulcerative colitis. The study was terminated prematurely because of slow enrollment. Patients having active disease for at least 2 weeks and receiving at least 5 days of intravenous corticosteroids were eligible to receive a single intravenous infusion of infliximab at 5, 10, or 20 mg/kg body weight. The primary endpoint used in this study was treatment failure at 2 weeks after infusion. Treatment failure was defined as 1) unachieved clinical response as defined by a modified Truelove and Witts severity score, 2) increase in corticosteroid dosage, 3) addition of immunosuppressants, 4) colectomy, or 5) death. Safety evaluations included physical examination, clinical chemistry and hematology laboratory tests, and occurrence of adverse experiences. Four of 8 patients (50%) who received infliximab were considered treatment successes at 2 weeks, compared with none of 3 patients who received placebo. Improvement in erythrocyte sedimentation rates and serum concentrations of C-reactive protein and interleukin-6 correlated with the clinical response observed in patients receiving infliximab. Infusion with infliximab produced no significant adverse events. Infliximab was well tolerated and may provide clinical benefit for some patients with steroid-refractory ulcerative colitis.

Adrenal Cortex Hormones↗

Prevalence of nonadherence with maintenance mesalamine in quiescent ulcerative colitis.

OBJECTIVE: There are scant data regarding outpatient adherence in quiescent ulcerative colitis aside from patients enrolled in controlled clinical trials. We conducted a prevalence study to determine the medication adherence rate of maintenance therapy and to identify possible risk factors for nonadherence. METHODS: Outpatients with clinically quiescent ulcerative colitis for >6 months on maintenance mesalamine (Asacol, Procter and Gamble, Cincinnati, OH) were eligible. Patients were interviewed regarding disease history, and demographics were obtained from medical records. Refill information for at least 6 months was obtained from computerized pharmacy records. Adherence was defined as at least 80% consumption of supply dispensed. Using nonadherence as the outcome of interest, stratified analysis and regression modeling were used to identify significant associations. RESULTS: Data were complete for the 94 patients recruited. The overall adherence rate was found to be 40%. The median amount of medication dispensed per patient was 71% (8-130%) of the prescribed regimen. Nonadherent patients were more likely to be male (67% vs 52%, p < 0.05), single (68% vs 53%, p = 0.04), and to have disease limited to the left side of the colon versus pancolitis (83% vs 51%, p < 0.01). Sixty-eight percent of patients who took more than four prescription medications were found to be nonadherent versus only 40% of those patients taking fewer medications (p = 0.05). Age, occupation, a family history of inflammatory bowel disease, length of remission, quality-of-life score, or method of recruitment (telephone interview vs clinical visit) were not associated with nonadherence. Logistic regression identified that a history of more than four prescriptions (odds ratio [OR] 2.5 [1.4-5.7]) and male gender (OR 2.06 [1.17-4.88]) increased the risk of nonadherence. Two statistically significant variables, which were protective against nonadherence, were endoscopy within the past 24 months (OR 0.96 [0.93-0.99]) and being married (OR 0.46 [0.39-0.57]). CONCLUSION: Nonadherence is associated with multiple concomitant medications, male gender, and single status. These patient characteristics may be helpful in targeting those patients at higher risk for nonadherence.

Adult↗