S B McCusker | PubMed Health

PubMed1981

Perceiving vowels in isolation and in consonantal context.

Recent studies have shown that vowels tend to be identified more accurately in consonantal context than in isolation. This contextual advantage is often explained perceptually, e.g., by assuming that the formant transitions associated with the consonants convey significant vowel information. In two experiments with stylized synthetic speech patterns, we were unable to replicate the contextual advantage. These negative results were probably due to certain unnatural stimulus characteristics. In another experiment we used natural speech stimuli to assess whether nonperceptual factors associated with the identification task contribute to the contextual advantage. Subjects responded to the test items either by (a) circling written CVC syllables, (b) circling written isolated vowels, or (c) vocally mimicking the items (a task that we assume imposes minimal memory load on subjects). Of these response conditions, only the first yielded an advantage for vowels in context, suggesting that the effect depends on two factors: Stimulus-response compatibility and memory load.

Humans↗

PubMed1978

Contrast effects on stop consonant identification.

Changes in the identification of speech sounds following selective adaptation are usually attributed to a reduction in sensitivity of auditory feature detectors. An alternative explanation of these effects is based on the notion of response contrast. In several experiments, subjects identified the initial segment of synthetic consonant-vowel syllables as either the voiced stop [b] or the voiceless stop [ph]. Each test syllable had a value of voice onset time (VOT) that placed it near the English voiced-voiceless boundary. When the test syllables were preceded by a single clear [b] (VOT = -100 msec), subjects tended to identify them as [ph], whereas when they were preceded by an unambiguous [ph] (VOT = 100 msec), the syllables were predominantly labeled [b]. This contrast effect occurred even when the contextual stimuli were velar and the test stimuli were bilabial, which suggests a featural rather than a phonemic basis for the effect. To discount the possibility that these might be instances of single-trial sensory adaptation, we conducted a similar experiment in which the contextual stimuli followed the test items. Reliable contrast effects were still obtained. In view of these results, it appears likely that response contrast accounts for at least some component of the adaptation effects reported in the literature.

Humans↗