PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

S Balland

Publications and source records attributed to S Balland.

7 recordsLinked to original sources

Identification of profilin as an IgE-binding component in latex from Hevea brasiliensis: clinical implications.

Considering the high occurrence of profilin as an allergen in many plant species, the assumption was made that profilin might be an allergen in Hevea brasiliensis, a member of the latex producing Euphorbiaceae family. Using IgE-binding inhibition by purified profilins we demonstrated that profilin is an IgE-binding component in the cytosolic fraction of natural latex and, to a lower extent, in the rubber fraction. Thirty-five out of 36 sera containing IgE to ragweed-profilin reacted with profilin from latex, indicating structural homologies between profilins from latex and ragweed. A large percentage (59%) of these sera were found to be positive in CAP latex assay. The preincubation of these sera with purified ragweed profilin greatly inhibited the CAP latex. Because profilin is also present in banana extract, it is likely to be involved in cross-sensitivity to banana and latex. In a group of 19 individuals allergic to latex only two had anti-profilin IgE antibodies. Profilin was barely detectable on glove extract immunoblots, whereas some sera from patients allergic to latex reacted with a 15 kDa allergen which was not profilin. Consequently, IgE antibodies to latex-profilin is a questionable factor for sensitization of occupationally-exposed patients; however, sensitization to profilin should be taken into account when interpreting the results of latex IgE antibody assays.

Allergens↗

[Challenge provocation tests and non-specific bronchial hyperactivity in occupational asthma].

The aim of the study is to determine the interest of realistic challenge (nasal and bronchial) in occupational respiratory symptoms appearing during work. 75 patients were included in the study. The protocol included prick tests, measuring total and specific IgE, spirometry and metacholine test to assess bronchial hyperreactivity (BHR), realistic challenge by rhinomanometry and plethysmography measuring NR (nasal resistance) and RWA (Airway resistance). The test was considered positive if the RWA and/or NR were increased by 100%. 68% of the tests were positives in rhinomanometry and/or plethysmography. There is an BHR in 68% cases of occupational asthma. There is a quite strong correlation between the positivity of the realistic tests and the existence of a non specific BHR.

Asthma↗

[Occupational asthma and rhinitis: challenge tests and nasal hyperactivity: present practice and future perspectives].

Nasal hypersensitivity is defined by an exaggerated response to certain specific stimuli such as a work-related agent, non-specific stimuli (irritant effect), or to allergic or inflammation mediators. The study of nasal hypersensitivity always involves provocation tests with other practical assays. In the occupational context, the provocation test most routinely used are "challenge tests", carried out with suspected substances provided by the patient, and non-specific tests with mediators (histamine and carbachol). Three complementary techniques-rhinomanometry, intranasal expiratory flow, and nasal lavage with cell and mediator studies, aim at three objectives. These are principally diagnostic and physiopathological, but are also possibly therapeutic. The authors describe in detail the technique of passive anterior rhinomanometry, nasal challenge tests and cholinergic challenges leading to a better understanding of non-specific nasal hypersensitivity. Future prospects concern the establishment of dose-response reactivity curves, exploration of the intranasal expiratory flows and research into nasal lavages with the study of cells and mediators released.

Asthma↗

[Occupational asthma and rhinitis: challenge tests and nasal hyperreactivity: current practice and future perspectives].

Nasal hypersensitivity is defined by an exaggerated response to certain specific stimuli such as a work-related agent, non-specific stimuli (irritant effect), or to allergic or inflammation mediators. The study of nasal hypersensitivity always involves provocation tests with other practical assays. In the occupational context, the provocation test most routinely used are "challenge tests", carried out with suspected substances provided by the patient, and non-specific tests with mediators (histamine and carbachol). Three complementary techniques-rhinomanometry, intranasal expiratory flow, and nasal lavage with cell and mediator studies, aim at three objectives. These are principally diagnostic and physiopathological, but are also possibly therapeutic. The authors describe in detail the technique of passive anterior rhinomanometry, nasal challenge tests and cholinergic challenges leading to a better understanding of non-specific nasal hypersensitivity. Future prospects concern the establishment of dose-response reactivity curves, exploration of the intranasal expiratory flows and research into nasal lavages with the study of cells and mediators released.

Asthma↗

[Challenge provocation tests and nonspecific bronchial hyperreactivity in occupational asthma].

The aim of the study is to determine the interest of realistic challenge (nasal and bronchial) in occupational respiratory symptoms appearing during work. 75 patients were included in the study. The protocol included prick tests, measuring total and specific IgE, spirometry and metacholine test to assess bronchial hyperreactivity (BHR), realistic challenge by rhinomanometry and plethysmography measuring NR (nasal resistance) and RWA (Airway resistance). The test was considered positive if the RWA and/or NR were increased by 100%. 68% of the tests were positives in rhinomanometry and/or plethysmography. There is an BHR in 68% cases of occupational asthma. There is a quite strong correlation between the positivity of the realistic tests and the existence of a non specific BHR.

Asthma↗

[Diagnostic value of passive anterior rhinomanometry in everyday allergological practice. 4 years' experience].

Passive anterior rhinomanometry used for nasal provocation tests in respiratory allergology is a very easy test to perform. On the basis of five years' experience, the authors analyse their opinion concerning this technique and review the value of nasal challenge tests in allergic rhinitis. The only real problem is that of the quality of the allergen used, this being the essential factor in terms of correlation with other diagnostic tests (for D.P.: 66.6% between challenge test and skin tests, and 78.5% between challenge test and RAST). Indications are very wide and the results of nasal challenge provide a substantial diagnostic argument when taking therapeutic decisions. However it cannot serve as a substitute for the bronchial challenge test in cases of combined rhinitis and asthma since there are differences in sensitivity and reactivity between the nasal and bronchial mucosae.

Aerosols↗

[Value of realistic exposure tests in the diagnosis of occupational asthma due to exotic woods].

Respiratory pathology related to the increased use of exotic woods has become much more extensive in recent years. The recognition of occupational asthma due to these woods is easy when the history is sufficiently striking. By contrast, the diagnosis may be much more difficult because of frequent inadequacy in classical allergological and immunological tests. This leads to the need for more extensive special investigations. Realistic tests are the most valuable. In the present report, the authors describe the results of such tests in 10 cases of occupational asthma due to exotic woods. They compared history (past, clinical manifestations), results of pulmonary function tests, allergological studies (skin tests and laboratory) and realistic exposure tests. They describe the principles, value, results, limitations and disadvantages.

Adult↗