PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

S Bellmunt

Publications and source records attributed to S Bellmunt.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

[Indications for carotid endarterectomy without arteriography. A validation study using eco-Doppler].

INTRODUCTION: The possibility of diagnosing carotid stenosis and carrying out surgery without arteriography has increased with the use of different diagnostic methods. The eco-Doppler has been shown to be a useful method, although it requires previous individualised validation. OBJECTIVE: We aim to validate our Vascular Diagnostic Laboratory in the diagnosis of stenosis of the carotid bifurcation using eco-Doppler as compared with angiography, and the therapeutic indication thus obtained. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We made a prospective study for one year of 62 consecutive patients diagnosed on eco-Doppler as having carotid stenosis of over 70% and subsequent carotid arteriography. The treatment indicated is given, without waiting for the result of the angiography, on clinical evaluation, computerized tomography or cranial magnetic resonance and eco-Doppler, and subsequently on angiography. The degree of correlation of both methods, both for the therapeutic indication and for the degree of stenosis was determined. RESULTS: In five cases there was discrepancy and the therapeutic indication was different. Three of these were related to the diagnosis of carotid occlusion and in the other two cases there were bilateral lesions of over 50% on eco-Doppler, which were classified as minor on angiographic study. In the group with stenosis of over 70% with < 50% contralateral stenosis, eco-Doppler showed sensitivity and specificity of 100%, with a kappa correlation index = 1. CONCLUSION: It is possible to indicate carotid endarterectomy in patients with unilateral stenosis greater than 70% and contralateral stenosis < 50%, based on the eco-Doppler studies done in our Vascular Diagnostic Laboratory.

Aged↗

[Mobile carotid plaque].

INTRODUCTION: In the literature only seven cases have been published describing a mobile carotid plaque, and lack of precise description makes it difficult to differentiate these lesions from mobile thrombotic lesions. The natural history of these lesions is not known and their treatment is controversial, although there is a tendency to choose the type of treatment to be given according to the embologenic potential of the lesion. CLINICAL CASES: We report two cases with mobile carotid plaques. In both cases diagnosis was made on ultrasound Doppler. The first patient had neurological symptoms and a mobile plaque associated with stenosis of over 70%. Surgical treatment was indicated. The second patient had no neurological symptoms. On ultrasound Doppler studies there was a fragment of mobile plaque in the common carotid artery, in the region of the carotid sinus with stenosis of 30 50%. Distal to this zone, in the bulb of the internal carotid artery there was stenosis of >70%. In this case medical treatment was given in view of deterioration in the patient s general state. Both patients improved. CONCLUSIONS: Including our second case, three patients with mobile carotid plaques (neurologically asymptomatic) have now been reported to have made good progress with medical treatment. Until there is more data regarding the natural history of these lesions, they should not be considered to be in themselves sufficient reason for carrying out carotid endarterectomy. The possibility of indicating surgical treatment depends on the degree of carotid stenosis.

Aged↗