PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

S Bildat

Publications and source records attributed to S Bildat.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

Induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemotherapy and definitive high-dose radiotherapy for patients with locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (stages IIIa/IIIb): a pilot phase I/II trial.

BACKGROUND: Overall prognosis of patients with locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (LAD-NSCLC) is still unfavourable. Different attempts to improve treatment results have been made using combinations of chemotherapy and radiotherapy. The aim of this pilot phase I/II investigation was to test the feasibility and toxicity of a definitive multimodality protocol in patients with irresectable NSCLC stages IIIA (N2) and IIIB. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty LAD-NSCLC patients (stages IIIA/IIIB: 3/27; median age: 54 years, range 34-70; male/female: 17/13) who were consecutively enrolled onto our ongoing neoadjuvant multimodality protocol from October 1996 to February 1999 remained inoperable after induction treatment. Three cycles of cisplatin/etoposide (PE) were followed by hyperfractionated accelerated radiotherapy (HF-RTx: 1.5 Gy bid up to a total dose of 45 Gy in 3 weeks) concurrent with one cycle of PE. Definitive local treatment was completed with a small volume boost of 20 Gy (qd), adding up to a total dose of 65 Gy to the primary. Patients were routinely offered prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI; 30 Gy; 2 Gy qd). RESULTS: Overall toxicity of the definitive CTx/RTx protocol-the main endpoint of this investigation-turned out to be acceptable (oesophagitis grade 3/4: 6/4 patients; pneumonitis grade 3/4: 0/1 patients; no treatment-related deaths). Actuarial survival at 2 years was 31% with a loco-regional control rate of 21%. CONCLUSIONS: This regimen turned out to be feasible with acceptable toxicity and will serve as a reference arm in a planned randomised trial in stage IIIB NSCLC, testing the value of surgery in this setting: preoperative induction CTx/RTx followed by surgery versus definitive CTx/RTx.

Adult↗

Phase ii comparator study of oral versus intravenous topotecan in patients with chemosensitive small-cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: Topotecan, administered intravenously, is active in small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). In this study, the comparability of oral topotecan to IV topotecan was investigated. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with SCLC that had relapsed 90 days or more after cessation of initial chemotherapy were randomized to receive either oral topotecan (Hycamtin) 2.3 mg/m(2)/d x 5 (52 patients) or IV topotecan 1.5 mg/m(2)/d x 5 (54 patients), every 21 days. RESULTS: Response rates in this phase II randomized study were 23% (12/52) in the oral topotecan arm and 15% (8/54) in the IV topotecan arm. All radiological responses were confirmed by an independent radiologist. Median survival was 32 weeks (oral) and 25 weeks (IV). Good symptom control, defined as sustained improvement or no deterioration, was evident in both treatment groups. Topotecan was generally well tolerated, with myelosuppression being the major toxicity. Grade 4 neutropenia occurred in 35.3% of patients on oral topotecan and in 67.3% of patients on IV topotecan, which was statistically significant (P =.001). Fever/infection more than or equal to grade 2 associated with grade 4 neutropenia, together with sepsis, occurred in only 5.1% of courses (oral) and 3.3% of courses (IV). Non-hematological toxicity consisted mainly of vomiting (oral: 36.5% of patients; IV: 31.5% of patients) and nausea (oral: 26.9% of patients; IV: 40.7% of patients). CONCLUSION: This study found oral topotecan to be similar in efficacy to IV topotecan in the treatment of patients with relapsed SCLC, sensitive to first-line chemotherapy, with less grade 4 neutropenia and greater convenience of administration.

Administration, Oral↗

Preoperative treatment strategies in stage III non-small cell lung cancer.

Recent experience has emphasized the need to include systemic chemotherapy in combined-modality management of locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer stage III. If definitive surgery is planned in these situations, preoperative application of drugs-induction chemotherapy-has many advantages in comparison to postoperative delivery. Patients' compliance to treatment, achievable dose intensities of drugs, possible locoregional downstaging, and frequent postoperative problems following complex resections are some of the arguments favouring preoperative chemotherapy. Despite numerous phase-II investigations, little evidence from randomized phase-III trials has been generated. Early inclusion of radiotherapy prior to definitive resection may help to improve preoperative downstaging. Besides available mature phase-II data, phase-III results from ongoing randomized trials are lacking to define the overall value of such a complex approach. Important issues in the future will aim at individualizing these intensive programs according to findings in clinical prognostic factor analyses and to prospectively validate a prognostic risk stratification. Data from translational and molecular research may further help to develop such evidence-based guidelines.

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung↗

Combined modality therapy in NSCLC.

Combined modality treatment has 'come out of age' and increasingly represents standard of care for a rapidly growing number of patients in locally advanced stages of NSCLC. Modern progress of treatment techniques as well as possibilities for supportive interventions will lead to lesser treatment toxicities, better patient's compliance to treatment protocols and combinations of different modalities with a more efficient outcome. This number will further increase, as more and more centres in Europe are setting up the logistics of multidisciplinary treatment groups for patients with lung cancer. Standard of care for most disease stages is currently under investigation in large randomised phase-III trials. Further research in the forthcoming years has to address questions of treatment individualisation (risks, prognosis, need for local control in the individual patient, biological evaluation of tumour aggressiveness, DNA-fingerprinting of tumours, evaluation of MRD-status, treatment in the community). New drugs or treatment principles with different mechanisms of action such as antiangiogenesis factors, signal-transduction inhibitors, immunotherapy, antisense-oligonucleotides or gene(replacement) therapy may stimulate further clinical research. This may eventually define 'new modalities of treatment' thus leading to modern 'second-generation combined-modality protocols' including some of the new principles.

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung↗

Preoperative chemoradiotherapy and surgery for selected non-small cell lung cancer IIIB subgroups: long-term results.

BACKGROUND: Preoperative chemoradiotherapy is feasible for selected patients with non-small cell lung cancer stage IIIb. The aim of this investigation was to analyze long-term results after this multimodality approach and to identify subgroups with improved long-term prognosis. METHODS: From March 1991 to June 1996, 56 patients were entered. Three cycles of cisplatin (P) (60 mg/m2, days 1 + 7) and etoposide (E) (150 mg/m2, days 3 to 5 qd 22) were followed by one cycle of radiotherapy/chemotherapy (RTx/CTx) (45 Gy, 1.5 Gy bid/3 weeks with P 50 mg/m2 days 2 + 9/E 100 mg/m2 days 4 to 6) followed by repeat mediastinoscopy and surgery. RESULTS: There were 46 men and 10 women (age 34 to 69 years, median 55 years; World Health Organization status 0 to 2, median 1). Twenty-eight had T4, and 32 had proven N3, in detail: T4N0/1, 10; T4N2, 14; T3N3, 9; T4N3, 4; and T1/2N3, 19. Thirty-four (61%) were operated on; 27 (48%) were completely (R0) resected. Survival at 5 years is 26% for all, and 43% for R0 patients. Toxicity included two deaths (one septicemia, one anastomosis insufficiency). CONCLUSIONS: This intensive program proved to be highly effective in unfavorable IIIB subgroups with promising long-term survival for T4 tumors as well as N3 disease.

Adult↗