PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

S Brownhill

Publications and source records attributed to S Brownhill.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Gender differences in depression risk and coping factors in a clinical sample.

OBJECTIVE: To examine gender differences in depression risk and coping factors in a clinical sample of patients with a diagnosis of DSM-IV major depression. METHOD: Patients were assessed for substance use and abuse, family history of psychiatric disorder, interpersonal depressogenic factors and lifetime history of anxiety disorders. Trait anxiety, coping styles when depressed, parental bonding, marital features and personality style were also measured. Patients were reassessed at 12-month follow-up. RESULTS: There were few gender differences in experience of depression (either in duration, type or severity prior to treatment) in a group with established episodes of major depression but women reported more emotional arousability when depressed. Women reported higher rates of dysfunctional parenting and childhood sexual abuse, and rated their partners as less caring and as more likely to be a depressogenic stressor. Men were more likely to have a generalized anxiety disorder at assessment, to use recreational drugs prior to presentation. Men were rated as having a more rigid personality style and 'Cluster A' personality traits both at assessment and follow-up. CONCLUSION: There were few gender differences in severity or course of established episodes of major depression. Gender differences were related to levels of arousal, anxiety disorders, and repertoires for dealing with depression, rather than depressive symptoms per se.

Adaptation, Psychological↗

Marital and family functioning: different measures and viewpoints.

BACKGROUND: Dysfunctional relationships have been considered to play an important part in the onset and maintenance of psychiatric disorders, particularly depression. Influential factors appear to be perception of low social support and emotional warmth and/or high levels of criticism and control by the recipient. The IBM was developed for use as a simple self-report measure to rate important components of the relationship between marital partners, described as the constructs of care and control. The aim of this study was to test the validity of the IBM. METHODS: The IBM was compared with data from a structured marital interview based on the Self-Evaluation of Social Support Schedule (SESS). Data were also obtained from a nominated adult offspring witness. Family functioning was assessed using the General Functioning component of the McMaster Family Assessment Device (FAD). The General Health Questionnaire (GHQ) was used to determine levels of psychological morbidity. The witness data for sons and daughters were analysed to gauge gender effects in reporting. RESULTS: The results show that 'care' and 'control' were identifiable constructs discerned by partners and witnesses with 'care' rated more consistently than 'control'. Care between parents was an indicator of the overall quality of the family environment. Care received by the wife from her husband seemed to set the emotional tone for the family. Daughters seemed to be more 'in tune' with perceived care by both parents. Sons were less so, overall, but were more 'in tune' with their fathers' perceived care than with their mothers'. CONCLUSION: Both the IBM, a self-report measure, and the structured marital interview provided consistent information about the quality of marital relationships, particularly perceptions of care. Perceptions of control were less consistently reported, which may suggest that 'control' is a less robust construct. This may suggest that 'control' is a more subjective experience, as the cues are more directed at the partner than other family members.

Adult↗