PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

S Busby

Publications and source records attributed to S Busby.

At least 73 records · Page 4Linked to original sources
PubMed1988

Transcription from the Escherichia coli melR promoter is dependent on the cyclic AMP receptor protein.

Expression of the melR gene is required for melibiose-dependent stimulation of transcription initiation at the promoter of the melAB operon. Using the S1 nuclease method we have located the melR transcription start point. Transcription from the melR promoter is dependent on cAMP-CRP: specific nucleotide sequences downstream of bp -59 with respect to the melR transcription start are sufficient for full promoter activity. Nucleotide sequence homologies suggest that the cAMP-CRP binding site is located from bp -52 to -31, in exactly the same position as at the galP1 promoter. Using DNase I footprinting we show that cAMP-CRP and RNA polymerase together bind tightly to the melR promoter sequence, creating a strong footprint from bp -70 to +20. Alone, cAMP-CRP binding is hardly detectable, whereas RNA polymerase alone creates a weak footprint centred around the -10 hexamer sequence. When the melR gene is expressed from a cAMP-CRP-independent promoter, melibiose-dependent transcription from the melAB promoter becomes independent of cAMP-CRP, showing that the melR promoter is the primary site of control by cAMP-CRP in the mel regulon.

Base Sequence↗
PubMed1988

Alterations in the binding site of the cyclic AMP receptor protein at the Escherichia coli galactose operon regulatory region.

Gene manipulation techniques have been used to alter the binding site for the cyclic AMP-cyclic AMP receptor protein complex (cAMP-CRP) at the regulatory region of the Escherichia coli galactose (gal) operon. The effects of these changes on CRP-dependent stimulation of expression from the galP1 promoter in vivo have been measured, and gel binding assays have been used to measure the affinity of cAMP-CRP for the modified sites. Firstly we have deleted progressively longer sequences from upstream of the gal CRP site in order to locate the functional limit of the site. A deletion to -49, removing the first base that corresponds to the consensus sequence for a CRP binding site, is sufficient to reduce CRP binding and block CRP-dependent stimulation of P1. Secondly, we used synthetic oligonucleotides to invert the asymmetric nucleotide sequence at the gal CRP binding site or to make the sequence symmetric. Inversion of the site has little effect on CRP binding, the architecture of open complexes at P1 revealed by DNAase I footprinting, or the stimulation of transcription from P1. Making the site symmetric increases the affinity for CRP by over 50-fold and leads to increased transcription from P1, whilst hardly altering the DNAase I footprint of open complexes. Our results confirm that the strength of binding of CRP depends on the nature of the site and show that it is this that principally accounts for differences in CRP-dependent stimulation of transcription.

Base Sequence↗
PubMed1988

Correlation between the conformation of Escherichia coli -10 hexamer sequences and promoter strength: use of orthophenanthroline cuprous complex as a structural index.

The lac and gal control regions contain two functional overlapping promoters P1 and P2. Point mutations can shift transcription from P1 to P2 and vice versa. We show that the reactivity of DNA fragments towards nucleolytic attack with orthophenanthroline cuprous complex can be used to predict which promoter competes more efficiently for RNA polymerase binding. Furthermore, similar changes in reactivity are observed as closed complexes isomerize to form the final open complexes, provided that the functional start is taken as a reference. We found a correlation between the reactivity pattern of -10 regions in uncomplexed DNA and the rate of open complex formation.

Bacterial Proteins↗
PubMed1988

Functional analysis of different sequence elements in the Escherichia coli galactose operon P2 promoter.

Starting with a DNA fragment containing the galactose operon P2 promoter, we made a series of deletions that progressively replaced DNA sequences upstream of the transcription startpoint and determined their effects on P2 activity. The results show that specific sequences upstream of -32 are not important. Removal of the sequence 5'-CACA-3' from -32 to -28 reduces P2 activity by 50%: longer deletions to -16 further reduce activity but do not remove the information specifying the transcription startpoint. DNA sequences between -32 and -16 at gal P2 assist the isomerization of RNA polymerase from closed to open complexes rather than contributing to the initial binding of RNA polymerase. The activity of gal P2 in the absence of -35 region sequences is dependent on the sequence TG just upstream of the -10 hexamer, TATACT: a mutation at -14 changing the TG sequence to TT totally inactivates P2. However, P2 activity can be restored if the consensus -35 region sequence TTGACA is cloned 17 bp upstream of the -10 hexamer. Thus, for transcription initiation, the -10 hexamer, TATACT, must 'cooperate' with upstream sequences that may be located either around -35 or -14.

Base Sequence↗
PubMed1987

Studies with the Escherichia coli galactose operon regulatory region carrying a point mutation that simultaneously inactivates the two overlapping promoters. Interactions with RNA polymerase and the cyclic AMP receptor protein.

We report in vitro studies of the interactions between purified E. coli RNA polymerase and DNA from the regulatory region of the E. coli galactose operon which carries a point mutation that simultaneously stops transcription initiation at the two normal start points, S1 and S2. In the presence of this point mutation, transcription initiates at a third start point 14/15 bp downstream of S1, showing that inactivation of the two normally active promoters, P1 and P2, unmasks a third weaker promoter, P3. Transcription initiation in the gal operon is normally regulated by the cyclic AMP receptor protein, CRP, that binds to the gal regulatory region and switches transcription from P2 to P1. With the point mutation, CRP binding switches transcription from P3 to P1, although the formation of transcriptionally competent complexes at P1 is very slow. The results are discussed with respect to the mechanism of transcription activation by the CRP factor and the similarities between the regulatory regions of the galactose and lactose operons.

DNA-Directed RNA Polymerases↗
PubMed1987

Binding of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase to a promoter carrying mutations that stop transcription initiation.

The gal P2 promoter can be inactivated by point mutations located in the -10 hexamer sequence or immediately upstream from it. Mutations at either site reduce expression in vivo and prevent the formation, in vitro, of tight complexes with RNA polymerase that give a strong footprint and can initiate transcription. However, with a mutation upstream from the -10 region, RNA polymerase could still make a specific contact with gal promoter DNA as judged by interference with cleavage by restriction enzyme SfaNI at a site within the promoter. In contrast, with a mutation in the -10 hexamer sequence, RNA polymerase could not make this contact and does not interfere with restriction by SfaNI.

Base Sequence↗
PubMed1987

RNA polymerase molecules initiating transcription at tandem promoters can collide and cause premature transcription termination.

Using purified E. coli RNA polymerase we have studied the transcription in vitro of a series of DNA fragments carrying two tandemly arranged promoters, where the corresponding transcription start points were separated by 263, 138, 83 and 78 base pairs. In the case where the transcription start points are 83 base pairs apart, there is an interaction between RNA polymerase molecules transcribing from the two promoters. This interaction results in premature termination of the upstream transcript at a precise site. We propose that this is the result of RNA polymerase transcribing from the upstream promoter bumping into polymerase at the downstream promoter. The interaction between the two polymerase molecules is crucially dependent on the distance between the two promoters.

DNA-Directed RNA Polymerases↗
PubMed1987

RNA polymerase makes important contacts upstream from base pair -49 at the Escherichia coli galactose operon P1 promoter.

A G:C to T:A transversion at bp position -19 in the gal operon promoter region relieves the dependence of galP1 promoter activity on the cAMP-CRP complex. Deletion analysis shows that expression from the promoter is decreased on replacement of the sequence between 49 and 54 bp upstream from the P1 start point. Moreover, protection experiments show that RNA polymerase interacts with this region in open complexes at P1. We propose that this contact is necessary for optimal P1 activity; point mutations in the gal promoter region can alter DNA flexibility and hence the strength of this contact; CRP factor activates P1 transcription by favouring formation of this contact; and the gal repressor blocks P1 activity by binding to this zone.

Base Sequence↗
PubMed1987

Organisation of the regulatory region of the Escherichia coli melibiose operon.

The regulatory region of the Escherichia coli melibiose operon contains two divergent promoters. One promoter is responsible for the expression of the melR gene, that is essential for melibiose-dependent stimulation of the second promoter. Melibiose-induced transcription from this second promoter initiates at a start point 25 bp upstream from the start codon of the melA gene, encoding an alpha-galactosidase. The nucleotide sequence covering the divergent promoters and the melR gene is reported.

Base Sequence↗
PubMed1986

Transcription initiation at the Escherichia coli galactose operon promoters in the absence of the normal -35 region sequences.

The gal operon regulatory region contains two overlapping promoters, P1 and P2, regulated by cyclic AMP and the cyclic AMP receptor protein (cAMP X CRP). Starting with a mutation that eliminated P1, the promoter that is usually dependent on cAMP X CRP, we constructed a series of deletions that substituted increasing amounts of DNA sequence from upstream of P2, the promoter that usually functions in the absence of cAMP X CRP. Expression from P2 in vivo was halved by deletions that replace the -35 region with unrelated sequences, showing that the -35 sequence participates in promoter function, but is not essential. In vitro studies show that replacement of the -35 sequence increases the time for open complex formation at P2, but does not alter the transcription start point. We examined the effects of the same deletions at the wild type gal promoter region: again, the deletion that replaces the -35 region halves expression in vivo. However, in this case, in the absence of cAMP X CRP, the deletion switches expression from the P2 promoter to P1, the promoter that is usually dependent on cAMP X CRP. Moreover, although the deletion also removes the specific cAMP X CRP binding site, this P1 activity is sharply inhibited in a crp+ background. We argue that this is due to a direct contact between CRP and RNA polymerase bound at the P1 Pribnow box, and we discuss the role of the -35 sequence at these and other promoters.

Base Sequence↗
PubMed1986

Mutations that reduce expression from the P2 promoter of the Escherichia coli galactose operon.

We describe the isolation and characterisation of twelve different mutations that reduce gene expression from the galP2 promoter, starting with a gal regulatory region with a mutation that inactivated galP1, the cAMP-CRP-dependent promoter. Seven of the new mutations reduce the initiation of transcription at P2 whereas the others reduce translation initiation of the first gal operon gene, galE. Two of the mutations affecting translation fall in the galE initiation codon and the Shine-Dalgarno sequence. Mutations that allow the formation of a stem-loop structure in the messenger including this sequence also reduce translation. A deletion of 11 bp, upstream of the Shine-Dalgarno sequence, almost totally prevents translation. Although none of the point mutations that reduced transcription initiation at P2 fall in the -35 region, we repeatedly isolated insertions in this zone. The point mutations all fell around the -10 region: the strongest effects were found with mutations that altered the sequence away from the consensus that has been established for Escherichia coli promoters. The effects of the two strongest P2 mutations were investigated in the absence of the P1 mutation used for their isolation. One mutation, a T:A to C:G transition at -12, inactivates both P2 and P1. In contrast the other, a T:A to G:C transversion at -19, specifically inactivates P2, but leaves P1 partially active even in the absence of cAMP-CRP. The implications of this are discussed in the context of how cAMP-CRP controls the balance between transcription from P2 and P1 at the gal operon regulatory region.

Base Sequence↗
PubMed1985

Point mutations that affect translation initiation in the Escherichia coli gal E gene.

This paper describes the selection and characterization of several mutations in the Escherichia coli galactose operon that affect translation initiation of the galE gene but are located outside of the Shine-Dalgarno sequence and the initiator codon. One mutation lies in the gal promoter region and shifts transcription initiation from the galP1 to the galP2 promoter. This results in a gal messenger that is five nucleotides longer and that is translated threefold more efficiently in vivo. This accords with previous observations from in vitro experiments which showed that the longer gal messenger was better translated (Queen & Rosenberg, 1981). The other mutations that affect galE translation are located in the coding sequence immediately downstream from the initiator codon. In contrast to the promoter mutation, these cause alterations in galE expression only when the gene carries a mutated initiator codon or Shine-Dalgarno sequence and have no effect on the wild-type galE gene. These findings are discussed with respect to our present knowledge of translation initiation mechanisms.

Base Sequence↗
PubMed1984

On the action of the cyclic AMP-cyclic AMP receptor protein complex at the Escherichia coli lactose and galactose promoter regions.

Using DNase footprinting and transcription assays in vitro we have probed the effect of the cAMP-cAMP receptor protein complex (cAMP-CRP) on the positioning of RNA polymerase and on the location of the transcription start point at the Escherichia coli gal and lac operon regulatory regions. In both cases, RNA polymerase can form two alternative complexes which promote transcription from two different start points, S1 and S2: pre-incubation of promoter DNA with cAMP-CRP results in a shift of the transcription start from S2 to S1 and in an increase in the rate of open complex formation. Moreover, the rate of formation of each heparin-resistant complex parallels the establishment of the corresponding footprint, showing that the stable binding corresponds to open complex formation. We show that, in the case of gal, RNA polymerase, which is bound so as to transcribe from S2, cannot be diverted to S1 by subsequent addition of cAMP-CRP. In contrast, in the case of lac, when cAMP-CRP is added after RNA polymerase, complexes which initiate transcription at S2 are rapidly converted to complexes which initiate at S1. Finally, we present data which suggest that protein-protein interactions are essential for CRP-induced activation at both the lac and gal promoters.

Base Sequence↗
PubMed1984

The selection and characterisation of two novel mutations in the overlapping promoters of the Escherichia coli galactose operon.

Mutations that result in small decreases or increases in expression from the Escherichia coli galactose operon promoter region can be detected by using a plasmid in which the gal promoters were fused to the lac operon. We describe how the level of lac expression was adjusted so that the Lac phenotype of host cells was optimally sensitive to changes in the gal promoter sequence. We have investigated the properties of two new gal promoter mutations both in vivo and in vitro, and have determined their effects on the two overlapping gal promoters, P1 and P2. Although one mutation causes only a small reduction in overall expression in vivo, it completely suppresses transcription initiation at the P1 promoter. However, it also increases expression from the P2 promoter, which compensates for the change at P1. This mutation, a GC to AT transition, falls in a zone just upstream of the P1 Pribnow box, which is essential for P1 activity, whilst improving the homology between the P2 Pribnow box and the consensus sequence. The second mutation causes a small increase in P1 activity. This change, a GC to AT transition at -23, falls in the spacer region between the Pribnow box and the -35 region, a zone containing no known promoter consensus sequences. We suggest that this mutation, which creates a stretch of five AT base pairs, acts by increasing the twist angle of the sequences in the spacer region. We argue that the increase in promoter activity is due to this twist changing the relative orientation of the Pribnow box and -35 regions.

DNA, Bacterial↗
PubMed1983

Deletion mutagenesis of the Escherichia coli galactose operon promoter region.

Using recombinant DNA technology we have created a series of progressively longer deletions both upstream and downstream from the Escherichia coli galactose operon regulatory region. The effects of these lesions on expression of the two overlapping galactose promoters have been quantitated after DNA fragments carrying these deletions were cloned in a plasmid vector, in which the beta-galactosidase gene could be expressed from the truncated galactose regulatory region. The results allow us to determine which sequences are necessary for the activity of the two promoters. Our results show that for the P1 promoter, which is controlled by the cyclic AMP-cyclic AMP receptor protein complex (cAMP-CRP), the sequence necessary for full activity starts 56 base-pairs upstream from the transcription initiation point. In contrast, for the P2 promoter, which functions in the absence of cAMP-CRP, the crucial sequence extends to only 39 base-pairs upstream from the transcription start. Deletions that cut into these sequences cause reductions in promoter strength, although some promoter activity is observed even when the "-35 region" of both P2 and P1 are deleted. Analysis of deletions originating downstream from the regulatory region shows that the elimination of the P1 and P2 Pribnow box sequences leads to loss of promoter activity. However, sequences downstream from the P1 start can be replaced without affecting the activity of either promoter. Finally examination of DNA fragments containing total deletions of both galactose promoters allows us to confirm that the flanking sequences contain no significant promoter activity and that the P1 and P2 promoters are principally responsible for galactose operon expression in vivo.

Base Sequence↗